Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 Oct 2014, 06:24

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The candy manufacturer's claim that employee

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Feb 2011
Posts: 80
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: CR candy manufacturer [#permalink] New post 25 Aug 2011, 10:01
B is the answer
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Aug 2011
Posts: 143
Location: United States
Concentration: Economics, Finance
GMAT Date: 10-16-2013
GPA: 3
WE: Analyst (Computer Software)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 434

Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: CR candy manufacturer [#permalink] New post 25 Aug 2011, 10:16
B is the right answer.
Option A actually strengthens the passage.
Options C,D and E are irrelevant in the context.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Oct 2010
Posts: 274
Location: India
GMAT 1: 560 Q36 V31
GPA: 3
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 27

Re: CR candy manufacturer [#permalink] New post 03 Sep 2011, 08:47
The answer is B since the answer mentions "non-employees"
_________________

petrifiedbutstanding

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Nov 2010
Posts: 109
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 15

Re: CR candy manufacturer [#permalink] New post 08 Sep 2011, 17:43
joemama142000 wrote:
The candy manufacturer's claim that employee "theft" costs the company thousands of dollars a year in potential sales is greatly overstated. Most of the candy eaten on the job and not paid for is eaten one piece at a time, by workers who would not be willing to buy an entire box of it anyway.

Which of the following if true, most weakens the argument above?

(A) The workers eat only defective candies that could not be sold
(B) Candy eaten by employees represents lost potential sales to non-employees
(C) A few workers account for most of the candy that is eaten but not paid for.
(D) Most of the candies eaten by employees are consumed during the holiday season, when production outputs are at their highest
(E) The amount of candy eaten by employees is only a small fraction of the candy sold by the company


B. It explains why the conclusion is not overstated.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 01 Jun 2011
Posts: 176
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 6

Re: CR candy manufacturer [#permalink] New post 10 Sep 2011, 01:17
IMO B
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Prepping for the last time....
Joined: 28 May 2010
Posts: 200
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GPA: 3.2
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 21

Re: CR candy manufacturer [#permalink] New post 10 Sep 2011, 06:40
Good question mate.. B is ans.
_________________

Two great challenges: 1. Guts to Fail and 2. Fear to Succeed

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 Jun 2011
Posts: 190
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 21

Re: CR candy manufacturer [#permalink] New post 10 Sep 2011, 08:56
yup... definately B.. good question.. but 4 easily discardable answers made the cr easy overall
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Jul 2011
Posts: 154
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 680 Q46 V37
WE: Engineering (Telecommunications)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 42

Re: CR candy manufacturer [#permalink] New post 19 Oct 2011, 21:13
B for me :)
took me 63 seconds !
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 98
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 3

Re: The candy manufacturer's claim that employee [#permalink] New post 13 Nov 2011, 21:08
B
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 01 Jan 2011
Posts: 78
Schools: INSEAD,IIMA,IIMB
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 2

Re: The candy manufacturer's claim that employee [#permalink] New post 19 Nov 2011, 22:34
B
_________________

_________________________
Try and you will succeed !

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 28 Nov 2011
Posts: 305
Followers: 308

Kudos [?]: 487 [1] , given: 2

CAT Tests
Re: The candy manufacturer's claim that employee [#permalink] New post 23 Aug 2012, 10:21
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
The candy manufacturer's claim that employee "theft" costs the company thousands of dollars a year in potential sales is greatly overstated. Most of the candy eaten on the job and not paid for is eaten one piece at a time, by workers who would not be willing to buy an entire box of it anyway.

Which of the following if true, most weakens the argument above?

(A) The workers eat only defective candies that could not be sold

If the workers eat only those candies that wouldn't be sold, then the argument is strengthened. After all, the company doesn't stand to make any profit from candies it would have thrown away.

(B) Candy eaten by employees represents lost potential sales to non-employees

The argument says that the idea it is losing money to candy-gobbling employees is overstated. Well, if all of the candy eaten by employees represents lost sales, then the case isn't overstated. The company is losing money to this "theft." Therefore (B) weakens the argument.

(C) A few workers account for most of the candy that is eaten but not paid for.

Doesn't really address whether the claim is overstated.

(D) Most of the candies eaten by employees are consumed during the holiday season, when production outputs are at their highest

Well imagine that most of this candy is defective, i.e., it would not have sold anyways. Regardless of what season it is, the argument would not be weakened.

(E) The amount of candy eaten by employees is only a small fraction of the candy sold by the company

This seems to match up with the part of the argument that says the claim is overstated.
_________________

Christopher Lele
Magoosh Test Prep


Image

Image

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 01 Jul 2013
Posts: 10
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 20

Re: The candy manufacturer's claim that employee [#permalink] New post 27 Aug 2013, 07:51
Answer should be B.. since it showing potential sales lost to the company..
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 Jan 2013
Posts: 107
Concentration: Technology, Other
Schools: Haas
GMAT Date: 01-14-2015
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 22

GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: The candy manufacturer's claim that employee [#permalink] New post 27 Aug 2013, 09:42
Conclusion : Candy Manufacturers claim of losses through theft exceeds potential sales is false .
Premise : Candy eaten would not lead to potential sales because
Candy eaten on the job and not paid for, is eaten one piece at a time by workers who would not buy the whole box.

Assumption : Potential customers ( non employees) wont buy single candy , they would only purchase boxes !!

Weaken the Assumption saying : Potential customers will buy single candy ... is rephrased by B
"Candy eaten by employees represents lost potential sales to non-employees"

Hope this helps !!
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Persevering
Joined: 15 May 2013
Posts: 224
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Leadership
GMAT Date: 08-02-2013
GPA: 3.7
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 34

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The candy manufacturer's claim that employee [#permalink] New post 28 Aug 2013, 03:42
Straight B, if you can pre-think this one.

the argument says that the candies are eaten by workers who would not be willing to buy it, but this could hurt sales as non employees could obviously buy those that are being consumed by workers.
_________________

--It's one thing to get defeated, but another to accept it.

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Posts: 2
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [1] , given: 2

Re: The candy manufacturer's claim that employee [#permalink] New post 05 Sep 2013, 02:45
1
This post received
KUDOS
:) IMO B is the correct answer.
That was easy, it took me 50 secs.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 30 Apr 2011
Posts: 49
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 29

Re: The candy manufacturer's claim that employee [#permalink] New post 15 Oct 2013, 17:44
B for sure, no doubt :)
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 19 Jul 2013
Posts: 5
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 5

Re: The candy manufacturer's claim that employee [#permalink] New post 30 Mar 2014, 01:22
I would go for B since directly weakens the argument by stating that those eaten candies might have increased the profits.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 02 Mar 2013
Posts: 3
GPA: 3.64
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 10

Re: The candy manufacturer's claim that employee [#permalink] New post 30 Mar 2014, 21:03
joemama142000 wrote:
The candy manufacturer's claim that employee "theft" costs the company thousands of dollars a year in potential sales is greatly overstated. Most of the candy eaten on the job and not paid for is eaten one piece at a time, by workers who would not be willing to buy an entire box of it anyway.

Which of the following if true, most weakens the argument above?

(A) The workers eat only defective candies that could not be sold
(B) Candy eaten by employees represents lost potential sales to non-employees
(C) A few workers account for most of the candy that is eaten but not paid for.
(D) Most of the candies eaten by employees are consumed during the holiday season, when production outputs are at their highest
(E) The amount of candy eaten by employees is only a small fraction of the candy sold by the company


Can you pls explain why the answer is not A?
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 15 Nov 2011
Posts: 5
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 14

Re: The candy manufacturer's claim that employee [#permalink] New post 30 Jun 2014, 15:49
joemama142000 wrote:
The candy manufacturer's claim that employee "theft" costs the company thousands of dollars a year in potential sales is greatly overstated. Most of the candy eaten on the job and not paid for is eaten one piece at a time, by workers who would not be willing to buy an entire box of it anyway.



-Emp. theft = lost revenue
-piece by piece consumption (slow)
C: losses are greatly overstated

Which of the following if true, most weakens the argument above?

(A) The workers eat only defective candies that could not be sold --- strengthens; if workers are eating the damaged inventory there wouldn't be losses.
(B) Candy eaten by employees represents lost potential sales to non-employees --- weakens; if employees eat candy that could be sold then there are losses b/c revenue is being lost as the quantities for sale are suppressed. Best so far!
(C) A few workers account for most of the candy that is eaten but not paid for. --- passage makes note of slow pace at which candy is eaten. Therefore, even if "select" employees are responsible for all of the damage they're not eating at a fast enough pace. Neither here nor there
(D) Most of the candies eaten by employees are consumed during the holiday season, when production outputs are at their highest. --- at busy season less inventory = greater losses. Strengthen!
(E) The amount of candy eaten by employees is only a small fraction of the candy sold by the company. --- despite being a small portion it could still be a large portion of potential sales. Irrelevant.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 May 2014
Posts: 63
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 31

Re: The candy manufacturer's claim that employee [#permalink] New post 10 Aug 2014, 22:32
How does A strengthen? Please explain. I believe A weakens
Re: The candy manufacturer's claim that employee   [#permalink] 10 Aug 2014, 22:32
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
A candy manufacturer decreases the weight of a candy bar by tekno9000 2 18 Aug 2008, 19:43
The candy manufacturer's claim that employee "theft* perfectstranger 13 22 Jul 2008, 11:59
A computer manufacturer claims that a perfectly square inwosu 6 26 Sep 2007, 14:15
The manufacturer of DTF claims its product reduces facial wlee76 5 03 Dec 2005, 15:51
The candy manufacturers claim that employee "theft" costs andy_gr8 9 10 Nov 2005, 18:24
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The candy manufacturer's claim that employee

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 40 posts ] 



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.