Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 20 Aug 2014, 09:09

Flash Sale:

The Economist GMAT Tutor - 15% Off All Courses


Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The candy manufacturer's claim that employee

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
3 KUDOS received
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 941
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 25 [3] , given: 0

GMAT Tests User
The candy manufacturer's claim that employee [#permalink] New post 23 Apr 2006, 02:39
3
This post received
KUDOS
7
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  35% (medium)

Question Stats:

58% (02:14) correct 42% (01:11) wrong based on 1101 sessions
The candy manufacturer's claim that employee "theft" costs the company thousands of dollars a year in potential sales is greatly overstated. Most of the candy eaten on the job and not paid for is eaten one piece at a time, by workers who would not be willing to buy an entire box of it anyway.

Which of the following if true, most weakens the argument above?

(A) The workers eat only defective candies that could not be sold
(B) Candy eaten by employees represents lost potential sales to non-employees
(C) A few workers account for most of the candy that is eaten but not paid for.
(D) Most of the candies eaten by employees are consumed during the holiday season, when production outputs are at their highest
(E) The amount of candy eaten by employees is only a small fraction of the candy sold by the company
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 29 Apr 2003
Posts: 1408
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 23 Apr 2006, 04:18
B...
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 941
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR candy manufacturer [#permalink] New post 23 Apr 2006, 12:06
joemama142000 wrote:
The candy manufacturer's claim that employee "theft" costs the company thousands of dollars a year in potential sales is greatly overstated. Most of the candy eaten on the job and not paid for is eaten one piece at a time, by workers who would not be willing to buy an entire box of it anyway.

Which of the following if true, most weakens the argument above?

A) The workers eat only defective candies that could not be sold

B) Candy eaten by employees represents lost potential sales to non-employees

C) A few workers account for most of the candy that is eaten but not paid for.

D) Most of the candies eaten by employees are consumed during the holiday season, when production outputs are at their highest

E) The amount of candy eaten by employees is only a small fraction of the candy sold by the company


Theft is overstated because employees that eat the candy included in theft wouldnt buy the candy anyways.
OA is B. If the candy eaten by employees could have been sold. then theft is not overstated.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 29 Dec 2005
Posts: 1351
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR candy manufacturer [#permalink] New post 23 Apr 2006, 21:28
joemama142000 wrote:
The candy manufacturer's claim that employee "theft" costs the company thousands of dollars a year in potential sales is greatly overstated. Most of the candy eaten on the job and not paid for is eaten one piece at a time, by workers who would not be willing to buy an entire box of it anyway.

Which of the following if true, most weakens the argument above?

A) The workers eat only defective candies that could not be sold
B) Candy eaten by employees represents lost potential sales to non-employees
C) A few workers account for most of the candy that is eaten but not paid for.
D) Most of the candies eaten by employees are consumed during the holiday season, when production outputs are at their highest
E) The amount of candy eaten by employees is only a small fraction of the candy sold by the company


its a good question.

B too....
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 06 Jun 2004
Posts: 1062
Location: CA
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 23 Apr 2006, 23:25
Good question, B for me too
_________________

Don't be afraid to take a flying leap of faith.. If you risk nothing, than you gain nothing...

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 02 Jun 2010
Posts: 29
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 4

GMAT ToolKit User GMAT Tests User
Re: CR candy manufacturer [#permalink] New post 20 Aug 2010, 10:20
joemama142000 wrote:
The candy manufacturer's claim that employee "theft" costs the company thousands of dollars a year in potential sales is greatly overstated. Most of the candy eaten on the job and not paid for is eaten one piece at a time, by workers who would not be willing to buy an entire box of it anyway.

Which of the following if true, most weakens the argument above?

(A) The workers eat only defective candies that could not be sold
(B) Candy eaten by employees represents lost potential sales to non-employees
(C) A few workers account for most of the candy that is eaten but not paid for.
(D) Most of the candies eaten by employees are consumed during the holiday season, when production outputs are at their highest
(E) The amount of candy eaten by employees is only a small fraction of the candy sold by the company


Only (B) explains a good reason why candies eaten by employees could affect potential sales and hence undermining the argument.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 29 Jul 2010
Posts: 46
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 1

Re: CR candy manufacturer [#permalink] New post 20 Aug 2010, 10:28
its a clear B
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Posts: 41
Schools: Haas, HBS, UNC, Duke, Kellogg, etc
WE 1: Investment Banking Domain, Functionally-Technology
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 2

Re: CR candy manufacturer [#permalink] New post 20 Aug 2010, 11:32
yep clear B...
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 Aug 2010
Posts: 158
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 15

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR candy manufacturer [#permalink] New post 20 Aug 2010, 16:03
my answer is B
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 10 Jun 2010
Posts: 20
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: CR candy manufacturer [#permalink] New post 22 Aug 2010, 07:03
B is for me.

Only B could make "theft" in potential sales not overstated.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 28 Feb 2010
Posts: 176
WE 1: 3 (Mining Operations)
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 33

Re: CR candy manufacturer [#permalink] New post 24 Aug 2010, 00:35
"Overstated" is the cue here !!!!
_________________

Regards,
Invincible...:)
"The way to succeed is to double your error rate."
"Most people who succeed in the face of seemingly impossible conditions are people who simply don't know how to quit."

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 03 Jun 2010
Posts: 108
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Re: CR candy manufacturer [#permalink] New post 25 Aug 2010, 09:33
B
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 May 2010
Posts: 443
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 112

Re: CR candy manufacturer [#permalink] New post 25 Aug 2010, 21:02
b ---no surprises
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 May 2010
Posts: 203
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 3

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR candy manufacturer [#permalink] New post 25 Aug 2010, 21:17
It's B and the Q is pretty straight forward.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Sep 2008
Posts: 154
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR candy manufacturer [#permalink] New post 16 Oct 2010, 10:48
i choose d
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 19 Jul 2010
Posts: 11
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 3

Re: CR candy manufacturer [#permalink] New post 18 Oct 2010, 18:45
The conclusion is that the manufacturer claims about the theft is overstated right ?

and the question is about which weakens the argument.

so IMO it is A, if the employees are eating the defective candies which cannot be sold then it is not a loss for the company
and the manufacturer is definitely over stating about the losses.

If A is true wouldn't it weaken the argument.

Correct me if i am wrong..
1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Status: Can't give up
Joined: 20 Dec 2009
Posts: 321
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 26 [1] , given: 35

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR candy manufacturer [#permalink] New post 09 Nov 2010, 13:38
1
This post received
KUDOS
(B) Candy eaten by employees represents lost potential sales to non-employees.

The candies eaten basically are NOT SOLD by the company. therefore eating them really does not cost to the company.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Jul 2010
Posts: 97
Location: Sweden
Concentration: Finance, International Business
Schools: Stockholm School of Economics (MSc Finance) - Class of 2014
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V40
GPA: 4
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 6

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR candy manufacturer [#permalink] New post 25 Aug 2011, 05:38
B strengthens
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Sep 2008
Posts: 154
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR candy manufacturer [#permalink] New post 25 Aug 2011, 06:33
clearly b
7 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Jul 2011
Posts: 100
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Schools: Duke '15
GPA: 3.9
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 51 [7] , given: 4

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR candy manufacturer [#permalink] New post 25 Aug 2011, 07:58
7
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Weaken the argument:
Workers eating candy -> Doesn't cost company sales.

(A) The workers eat only defective candies that could not be sold
Actually strengthens the argument
(B) Candy eaten by employees represents lost potential sales to non-employees
Directly tell us that eaten candy can be sold to others. Correct
(C) A few workers account for most of the candy that is eaten but not paid for.
Has no effect on the argument as we don't care which employee eats how much
(D) Most of the candies eaten by employees are consumed during the holiday season, when production outputs are at their highest
Tells us about production not how sales are effected.
(E) The amount of candy eaten by employees is only a small fraction of the candy sold by the company
Tells us nothing about lost sales.

Answer is B
_________________

Show Thanks to fellow members with Kudos its shows your appreciation and its free

Re: CR candy manufacturer   [#permalink] 25 Aug 2011, 07:58
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
A candy manufacturer decreases the weight of a candy bar by tekno9000 2 18 Aug 2008, 19:43
The candy manufacturer's claim that employee "theft* perfectstranger 13 22 Jul 2008, 11:59
A computer manufacturer claims that a perfectly square inwosu 6 26 Sep 2007, 14:15
The manufacturer of DTF claims its product reduces facial wlee76 5 03 Dec 2005, 15:51
The candy manufacturers claim that employee "theft" costs andy_gr8 9 10 Nov 2005, 18:24
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The candy manufacturer's claim that employee

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 40 posts ] 



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.