Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 24 Sep 2016, 19:36
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The CEO has proposed a new policy requiring that employees

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 20 Nov 2011
Posts: 37
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
GMAT Date: 05-28-2012
GPA: 3.23
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 22 [1] , given: 5

The CEO has proposed a new policy requiring that employees [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Dec 2011, 06:30
1
This post received
KUDOS
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  35% (medium)

Question Stats:

56% (01:35) correct 44% (01:03) wrong based on 176 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The CEO has proposed a new policy requiring that employees should retain all pensions indefinitely or be allowed to cash them in at retirement.

a)that employees should retain all pensions
b)that all pensions be retained by employees
c)the retaining by employees of all pensions
d)employee's retension of all pensions
e)employees to retain all pensions
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 13 Jul 2011
Posts: 151
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 680 Q46 V37
WE: Engineering (Telecommunications)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 42

Re: MR SC problem [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Dec 2011, 07:59
I think the correct answer is B,
as "be retained ... " is parallel to "be allowed.."
can you please post OE ??
BSchool Forum Moderator
User avatar
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 17 Aug 2011
Posts: 913
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
Followers: 71

Kudos [?]: 551 [0], given: 44

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: MR SC problem [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Dec 2011, 10:34
Gavan wrote:
The CEO has proposed a new policy requiring that employees should retain all pensions indefinitely or be allowed to cash them in at retirement.

a)that employees should retain all pensions
b)that all pensions be retained by employees
c)the retaining by employees of all pensions
d)employee's retension of all pensions
e)employees to retain all pensions



Choice B change the meaning and make the pronoun "them" refer wrong antecedent. "all pensions" cannot "be allowed to cash".

Correct choice is E
_________________

Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you :)

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 13 Aug 2010
Posts: 314
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 1

Re: MR SC problem [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Dec 2011, 01:46
+1 for E for ||

to retain || to cash
BSchool Forum Moderator
User avatar
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 17 Aug 2011
Posts: 913
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
Followers: 71

Kudos [?]: 551 [0], given: 44

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: MR SC problem [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Dec 2011, 20:37
prab wrote:
+1 for E for ||

to retain || to cash


Nope, to retain not parallel with to cash. If those two verb are ||, how can you explain with "be". Just see the pronoun "them" in underlined part. "them" in choice B have clearer antecedent "pensions" instead of "employees". If use choice B, the non-underlined part will become "pensions be allowed to cash them (pensions or employees) in at retirements.
_________________

Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you :)

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Oct 2011
Posts: 241
Location: United States
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 720 Q51 V36
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 88 [0], given: 36

Re: MR SC problem [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Dec 2011, 21:09
Gavan wrote:
The CEO has proposed a new policy requiring that employees should retain all pensions indefinitely or be allowed to cash them in at retirement.

a)that employees should retain all pensions
b)that all pensions be retained by employees
c)the retaining by employees of all pensions
d)employee's retension of all pensions
e)employees to retain all pensions


be allowed to cash them -> suggests that employees needs to be the subject
B, C and D out

E is the only option that treats employees to retain and employees be allowed - idiomatic and parallel
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 13 May 2011
Posts: 317
WE 1: IT 1 Yr
WE 2: Supply Chain 5 Yrs
Followers: 21

Kudos [?]: 238 [0], given: 11

Re: MR SC problem [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Dec 2011, 00:22
||. looking for to/be retain. B has wrong pronoun reference. E.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 51
Concentration: Marketing, Economics
GMAT 1: 610 Q47 V27
GRE 1: 304 Q156 V148
GPA: 3.66
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 45

GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: The CEO has proposed a new policy requiring that employees [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Aug 2015, 07:49
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
The CEO has proposed a new policy requiring that employees should retain all pensions indefinitely or be allowed to cash them in at retirement.

a)that employees should retain all pensions
b)that all pensions be retained by employees
c)the retaining by employees of all pensions
d)employee's retension of all pensions
e)employees to retain all pensions

If we split the sentence according to choice E, we get,

1. The CEO has proposed a new policy requiring employees to retain all pensions
2. The CEO has proposed a new policy requiring employees be allowed to cash pensions in at retirement

As I know,
There are two possible constructions after ‘require’. One is ‘someone requires someone else to do something’, the other is the uses in subjunctive.

Split 1: Follows the 1st uses of 'require'
Split 2: Tries to follow the second uses of 'require', but misses subjunctive 'that'. Is it correct?

Correct me if I am wrong.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 24 Nov 2015
Posts: 523
Location: United States (LA)
Concentration: General Management, Marketing
GRE 1: 328 Q167 V161
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 207

Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: The CEO has proposed a new policy requiring that employees [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Aug 2016, 04:48
confused between choices B and E
choice B uses passive voice whereas E uses active voice.
I think that gmat uses active voice whereever possible
correct me if i am wrong
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 04 Aug 2016
Posts: 45
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 32

Re: The CEO has proposed a new policy requiring that employees [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Sep 2016, 06:25
I am not sure I understood the explanation.

Could someone please post the OE?
Expert Post
Verbal Expert
User avatar
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 1391
Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
Followers: 210

Kudos [?]: 827 [0], given: 19

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: The CEO has proposed a new policy requiring that employees [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Sep 2016, 09:19
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
warriorguy wrote:
I am not sure I understood the explanation.

Could someone please post the OE?


In command subjunctive mood, the verb in it's raw form is to be used. Command subjunctive is used for certain "bossy" verbs such as "demand", "require" etc.

I demand that you go there... right
I demand that you should go there... wrong

A: Because of wrong usage of command subjunctive (as described above), A is wrong.

B: Option B uses command subjunctive correctly (though in passive voice) - However the requirement is from employees, not from pensions. Therefore "employees" should be the subject of the clause in subjunctive mood.

C: Use of gerund with "requiring" is awkward. The requirement is from employees, not from retaining.

D: The requirement is from employees, not from retention.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 04 Aug 2016
Posts: 45
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 32

Re: The CEO has proposed a new policy requiring that employees [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Sep 2016, 10:49
sayantanc2k wrote:
warriorguy wrote:
I am not sure I understood the explanation.

Could someone please post the OE?


In command subjunctive mood, the verb in it's raw form is to be used. Command subjunctive is used for certain "bossy" verbs such as "demand", "require" etc.

I demand that you go there... right
I demand that you should go there... wrong

A: Because of wrong usage of command subjunctive (as described above), A is wrong.

B: Option B uses command subjunctive correctly (though in passive voice) - However the requirement is from employees, not from pensions. Therefore "employees" should be the subject of the clause in subjunctive mood.

C: Use of gerund with "requiring" is awkward. The requirement is from employees, not from retaining.

D: The requirement is from employees, not from retention.








Now that I think about the options - its clear to be - the form is bossy verb + that + subject + Command Sub:

Subject should be employees and not pension -


As usual, thanks sayantanc2k
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 02 Mar 2015
Posts: 5
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 1

Re: The CEO has proposed a new policy requiring that employees [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Sep 2016, 16:57
warriorguy wrote:
sayantanc2k wrote:
warriorguy wrote:
I am not sure I understood the explanation.

Could someone please post the OE?


In command subjunctive mood, the verb in it's raw form is to be used. Command subjunctive is used for certain "bossy" verbs such as "demand", "require" etc.

I demand that you go there... right
I demand that you should go there... wrong

A: Because of wrong usage of command subjunctive (as described above), A is wrong.

B: Option B uses command subjunctive correctly (though in passive voice) - However the requirement is from employees, not from pensions. Therefore "employees" should be the subject of the clause in subjunctive mood.

C: Use of gerund with "requiring" is awkward. The requirement is from employees, not from retaining.

D: The requirement is from employees, not from retention.








Now that I think about the options - its clear to be - the form is bossy verb + that + subject + Command Sub:

Subject should be employees and not pension -


As usual, thanks sayantanc2k



I have the same doubt, why ''that' is missing in the correct answer?
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 04 Aug 2016
Posts: 45
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 32

Re: The CEO has proposed a new policy requiring that employees [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Sep 2016, 01:13
DML88 wrote:

I have the same doubt, why ''that' is missing in the correct answer?











Hi DML88,

Require can take either of the two forms - infinitive (to) and command subjunctive form: IF you observe option e then the form is "to" form.

a)that employees should retain all pensions
b)that all pensions be retained by employees
c)the retaining by employees of all pensions
d)employee's retension of all pensions
e)employees to retain all pensions

Other verbs which can infinitive and command subjunctive are : ask, intend, beg, order, urge.

I hope that helps.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 02 Mar 2015
Posts: 5
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 1

Re: The CEO has proposed a new policy requiring that employees [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Sep 2016, 04:46
warriorguy wrote:
DML88 wrote:

I have the same doubt, why ''that' is missing in the correct answer?











Hi DML88,

Require can take either of the two forms - infinitive (to) and command subjunctive form: IF you observe option e then the form is "to" form.

a)that employees should retain all pensions
b)that all pensions be retained by employees
c)the retaining by employees of all pensions
d)employee's retension of all pensions
e)employees to retain all pensions

Other verbs which can infinitive and command subjunctive are : ask, intend, beg, order, urge.

I hope that helps.


Thank you! It is clear now and also make more sense in the question. Answer (E) keeps the meaning.
Re: The CEO has proposed a new policy requiring that employees   [#permalink] 04 Sep 2016, 04:46
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
9 Management is considering a policy requiring employees prov bschool17 5 11 Jun 2014, 20:05
15 Experts publish their posts in the topic Management is considering a policy requiring employees provi blueseas 17 26 Aug 2013, 12:43
2 Senator Lasker has proposed legislation requiring that vksunder 9 20 Aug 2008, 05:46
2 Senator Lasker has proposed legislation requiring that aMante 1 16 Mar 2008, 03:46
1 Senator Lasker has proposed legislation requiring that bmwhype2 9 15 Jul 2007, 12:32
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The CEO has proposed a new policy requiring that employees

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.