Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 20 Oct 2016, 18:11

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The CEO has proposed a new policy requiring that employees

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 20 Nov 2011
Posts: 37
GMAT Date: 05-28-2012
GPA: 3.23
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 25 [1] , given: 5

The CEO has proposed a new policy requiring that employees [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Dec 2011, 06:30
1
KUDOS
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

35% (medium)

Question Stats:

57% (01:35) correct 43% (01:03) wrong based on 178 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The CEO has proposed a new policy requiring that employees should retain all pensions indefinitely or be allowed to cash them in at retirement.

a)that employees should retain all pensions
b)that all pensions be retained by employees
c)the retaining by employees of all pensions
d)employee's retension of all pensions
e)employees to retain all pensions
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Manager
Joined: 13 Jul 2011
Posts: 151
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 680 Q46 V37
WE: Engineering (Telecommunications)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 42

### Show Tags

12 Dec 2011, 07:59
I think the correct answer is B,
as "be retained ... " is parallel to "be allowed.."
can you please post OE ??
BSchool Forum Moderator
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 17 Aug 2011
Posts: 913
Location: Viet Nam
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
Followers: 71

Kudos [?]: 565 [0], given: 44

### Show Tags

12 Dec 2011, 10:34
Gavan wrote:
The CEO has proposed a new policy requiring that employees should retain all pensions indefinitely or be allowed to cash them in at retirement.

a)that employees should retain all pensions
b)that all pensions be retained by employees
c)the retaining by employees of all pensions
d)employee's retension of all pensions
e)employees to retain all pensions

Choice B change the meaning and make the pronoun "them" refer wrong antecedent. "all pensions" cannot "be allowed to cash".

Correct choice is E
_________________

Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Aug 2010
Posts: 314
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

13 Dec 2011, 01:46
+1 for E for ||

to retain || to cash
BSchool Forum Moderator
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 17 Aug 2011
Posts: 913
Location: Viet Nam
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
Followers: 71

Kudos [?]: 565 [0], given: 44

### Show Tags

27 Dec 2011, 20:37
prab wrote:
+1 for E for ||

to retain || to cash

Nope, to retain not parallel with to cash. If those two verb are ||, how can you explain with "be". Just see the pronoun "them" in underlined part. "them" in choice B have clearer antecedent "pensions" instead of "employees". If use choice B, the non-underlined part will become "pensions be allowed to cash them (pensions or employees) in at retirements.
_________________

Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

Manager
Joined: 17 Oct 2011
Posts: 241
Location: United States
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 720 Q51 V36
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 89 [0], given: 36

### Show Tags

27 Dec 2011, 21:09
Gavan wrote:
The CEO has proposed a new policy requiring that employees should retain all pensions indefinitely or be allowed to cash them in at retirement.

a)that employees should retain all pensions
b)that all pensions be retained by employees
c)the retaining by employees of all pensions
d)employee's retension of all pensions
e)employees to retain all pensions

be allowed to cash them -> suggests that employees needs to be the subject
B, C and D out

E is the only option that treats employees to retain and employees be allowed - idiomatic and parallel
Senior Manager
Joined: 13 May 2011
Posts: 317
WE 1: IT 1 Yr
WE 2: Supply Chain 5 Yrs
Followers: 21

Kudos [?]: 242 [0], given: 11

### Show Tags

28 Dec 2011, 00:22
||. looking for to/be retain. B has wrong pronoun reference. E.
Manager
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 55
Concentration: Marketing, Economics
GMAT 1: 610 Q47 V27
GRE 1: 304 Q156 V148
GPA: 3.66
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 45

Re: The CEO has proposed a new policy requiring that employees [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Aug 2015, 07:49
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
The CEO has proposed a new policy requiring that employees should retain all pensions indefinitely or be allowed to cash them in at retirement.

a)that employees should retain all pensions
b)that all pensions be retained by employees
c)the retaining by employees of all pensions
d)employee's retension of all pensions
e)employees to retain all pensions

If we split the sentence according to choice E, we get,

1. The CEO has proposed a new policy requiring employees to retain all pensions
2. The CEO has proposed a new policy requiring employees be allowed to cash pensions in at retirement

As I know,
There are two possible constructions after ‘require’. One is ‘someone requires someone else to do something’, the other is the uses in subjunctive.

Split 1: Follows the 1st uses of 'require'
Split 2: Tries to follow the second uses of 'require', but misses subjunctive 'that'. Is it correct?

Correct me if I am wrong.
_________________

If you like this post, don’t miss to give Kudos.
Giving kudos is a way of saying thanks
.

Hasan Mahmud

Director
Joined: 24 Nov 2015
Posts: 545
Location: United States (LA)
Concentration: General Management, Marketing
GRE 1: 328 Q167 V161
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 215

Re: The CEO has proposed a new policy requiring that employees [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Aug 2016, 04:48
confused between choices B and E
choice B uses passive voice whereas E uses active voice.
I think that gmat uses active voice whereever possible
correct me if i am wrong
Chat Moderator
Joined: 04 Aug 2016
Posts: 98
GPA: 4
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 55

Re: The CEO has proposed a new policy requiring that employees [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Sep 2016, 06:25
I am not sure I understood the explanation.

Could someone please post the OE?
Verbal Expert
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 1566
Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
Followers: 242

Kudos [?]: 976 [0], given: 19

Re: The CEO has proposed a new policy requiring that employees [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Sep 2016, 09:19
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
warriorguy wrote:
I am not sure I understood the explanation.

Could someone please post the OE?

In command subjunctive mood, the verb in it's raw form is to be used. Command subjunctive is used for certain "bossy" verbs such as "demand", "require" etc.

I demand that you go there... right
I demand that you should go there... wrong

A: Because of wrong usage of command subjunctive (as described above), A is wrong.

B: Option B uses command subjunctive correctly (though in passive voice) - However the requirement is from employees, not from pensions. Therefore "employees" should be the subject of the clause in subjunctive mood.

C: Use of gerund with "requiring" is awkward. The requirement is from employees, not from retaining.

D: The requirement is from employees, not from retention.
Chat Moderator
Joined: 04 Aug 2016
Posts: 98
GPA: 4
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 55

Re: The CEO has proposed a new policy requiring that employees [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Sep 2016, 10:49
sayantanc2k wrote:
warriorguy wrote:
I am not sure I understood the explanation.

Could someone please post the OE?

In command subjunctive mood, the verb in it's raw form is to be used. Command subjunctive is used for certain "bossy" verbs such as "demand", "require" etc.

I demand that you go there... right
I demand that you should go there... wrong

A: Because of wrong usage of command subjunctive (as described above), A is wrong.

B: Option B uses command subjunctive correctly (though in passive voice) - However the requirement is from employees, not from pensions. Therefore "employees" should be the subject of the clause in subjunctive mood.

C: Use of gerund with "requiring" is awkward. The requirement is from employees, not from retaining.

D: The requirement is from employees, not from retention.

Now that I think about the options - its clear to be - the form is bossy verb + that + subject + Command Sub:

Subject should be employees and not pension -

As usual, thanks sayantanc2k
Intern
Joined: 02 Mar 2015
Posts: 5
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 1

Re: The CEO has proposed a new policy requiring that employees [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Sep 2016, 16:57
warriorguy wrote:
sayantanc2k wrote:
warriorguy wrote:
I am not sure I understood the explanation.

Could someone please post the OE?

In command subjunctive mood, the verb in it's raw form is to be used. Command subjunctive is used for certain "bossy" verbs such as "demand", "require" etc.

I demand that you go there... right
I demand that you should go there... wrong

A: Because of wrong usage of command subjunctive (as described above), A is wrong.

B: Option B uses command subjunctive correctly (though in passive voice) - However the requirement is from employees, not from pensions. Therefore "employees" should be the subject of the clause in subjunctive mood.

C: Use of gerund with "requiring" is awkward. The requirement is from employees, not from retaining.

D: The requirement is from employees, not from retention.

Now that I think about the options - its clear to be - the form is bossy verb + that + subject + Command Sub:

Subject should be employees and not pension -

As usual, thanks sayantanc2k

I have the same doubt, why ''that' is missing in the correct answer?
Chat Moderator
Joined: 04 Aug 2016
Posts: 98
GPA: 4
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 55

Re: The CEO has proposed a new policy requiring that employees [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Sep 2016, 01:13
DML88 wrote:

I have the same doubt, why ''that' is missing in the correct answer?

Hi DML88,

Require can take either of the two forms - infinitive (to) and command subjunctive form: IF you observe option e then the form is "to" form.

a)that employees should retain all pensions
b)that all pensions be retained by employees
c)the retaining by employees of all pensions
d)employee's retension of all pensions
e)employees to retain all pensions

Other verbs which can infinitive and command subjunctive are : ask, intend, beg, order, urge.

I hope that helps.
Intern
Joined: 02 Mar 2015
Posts: 5
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 1

Re: The CEO has proposed a new policy requiring that employees [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Sep 2016, 04:46
warriorguy wrote:
DML88 wrote:

I have the same doubt, why ''that' is missing in the correct answer?

Hi DML88,

Require can take either of the two forms - infinitive (to) and command subjunctive form: IF you observe option e then the form is "to" form.

a)that employees should retain all pensions
b)that all pensions be retained by employees
c)the retaining by employees of all pensions
d)employee's retension of all pensions
e)employees to retain all pensions

Other verbs which can infinitive and command subjunctive are : ask, intend, beg, order, urge.

I hope that helps.

Thank you! It is clear now and also make more sense in the question. Answer (E) keeps the meaning.
Re: The CEO has proposed a new policy requiring that employees   [#permalink] 04 Sep 2016, 04:46
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
9 Management is considering a policy requiring employees prov 5 11 Jun 2014, 20:05
15 Management is considering a policy requiring employees provi 17 26 Aug 2013, 12:43
2 Senator Lasker has proposed legislation requiring that 9 20 Aug 2008, 05:46
2 Senator Lasker has proposed legislation requiring that 1 16 Mar 2008, 03:46
1 Senator Lasker has proposed legislation requiring that 9 15 Jul 2007, 12:32
Display posts from previous: Sort by