Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 27 Aug 2016, 08:21

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The Chicago and Calumet Rivers originally flowed into the

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Retired Moderator
Status: Darden Class of 2013
Joined: 28 Jul 2009
Posts: 1838
Schools: University of Virginia
Followers: 21

Kudos [?]: 314 [2] , given: 37

The Chicago and Calumet Rivers originally flowed into the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Jan 2010, 16:04
2
KUDOS
5
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

35% (medium)

Question Stats:

64% (02:02) correct 36% (01:11) wrong based on 486 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The Chicago and Calumet Rivers originally flowed into the St. Lawrence by way of Lake Michigan, but having been redirected by constructing canals so that the water now empties into the Mississippi by way of the Illinois River.

(A) Rivers originally flowed into the St. Lawrence by way of Lake Michigan, but having been redirected by constructing
(B) Rivers had originally flowed into the St. Lawrence by way of Lake Michigan, but they have been redirected by constructing
(C) Rivers, which originally flowed into the St. Lawrence by way of Lake Michigan but have been redirected by the construction of
(D) Rivers, originally flowing into the St. Lawrence by way of Lake Michigan, but having been redirected by the construction of
(E) Rivers, originally flowing into the St. Lawrence by way of Lake Michigan, have been redirected through the construction of
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Last edited by mau5 on 30 Nov 2013, 13:48, edited 1 time in total.
Director
Joined: 25 Aug 2007
Posts: 954
WE 1: 3.5 yrs IT
WE 2: 2.5 yrs Retail chain
Followers: 74

Kudos [?]: 1157 [0], given: 40

Re: Chicago and Calumet Rivers [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Jun 2010, 09:03
I marked B because redirected through looks wrong idiom. Can someone confirm this?
_________________

Tricky Quant problems: http://gmatclub.com/forum/50-tricky-questions-92834.html
Important Grammer Fundamentals: http://gmatclub.com/forum/key-fundamentals-of-grammer-our-crucial-learnings-on-sc-93659.html

Manager
Joined: 18 Oct 2008
Posts: 196
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 11

Re: Chicago and Calumet Rivers [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Jun 2010, 10:27
Even i marked B.

Eliminated E for the same reason as stated above.
Intern
Status: Hardrocker
Joined: 22 Jun 2010
Posts: 39
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GPA: 3.73
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 9

Re: Chicago and Calumet Rivers [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Jun 2010, 12:23
so the answer is not B, i tried.
which one is correct one?
_________________

Good Luck!

Intern
Joined: 28 Mar 2010
Posts: 34
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 32 [2] , given: 0

Re: Chicago and Calumet Rivers [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Jun 2010, 13:51
2
KUDOS
IMO E. Clearly the choices are between B and E. A, C, D are improper sentence constructions in itself.

Now for B, past perfect (had) is not appropriate. There is no past tense later in the sentence to which this event can relate to; instead present perfect (have) is used. So this is incorrect. Possibly "had" could have been correct in case it was written "rivers had originally flowed into ..., but then their course was diverted by..."

That leaves E - which seems to have no flaws.

---------------

Please give Kudos if you like my explanation. Thank you
Director
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 997
Location: Singapore
Followers: 20

Kudos [?]: 692 [0], given: 36

Re: Chicago and Calumet Rivers [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jun 2010, 00:06
Nice question.

The Chicago and Calumet Rivers, [strike]originally flowing into the St. Lawrence by way of Lake Michigan[/strike], have been redirected through the construction of canals so that the water now empties into the Mississippi by way of the Illinois River.

E it is.
_________________

Please press kudos if you like my post.

Manager
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Posts: 171
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 1

Re: Chicago and Calumet Rivers [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jun 2010, 04:21
E is my Take as well.

B Rivers had originally flowed into the St. Lawrence by way of Lake Michigan, but they have been redirected by constructing . Had and constructing are spoiling the show
_________________

R E S P E C T

Finally KISSedGMAT 700 times 450 to 700 An exprience

Manager
Joined: 14 Dec 2010
Posts: 58
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 4

Re: The Chicago and Calumet Rivers originally flowed into the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Jan 2012, 03:47
In B 'by constructing' refers back to the rivers which is not the case...E is better
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 9248
Followers: 804

Kudos [?]: 165 [0], given: 0

Re: The Chicago and Calumet Rivers originally flowed into the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Nov 2013, 09:40
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Senior Manager
Status: Student
Joined: 26 Aug 2013
Posts: 265
Location: France
Concentration: Finance, General Management
Schools: EMLYON FT'16
GMAT 1: 650 Q47 V32
GPA: 3.44
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 401

Re: The Chicago and Calumet Rivers originally flowed into the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Dec 2013, 02:28
Can someone explain this one plz!

Thx you
_________________

Think outside the box

Current Student
Status: Everyone is a leader. Just stop listening to others.
Joined: 22 Mar 2013
Posts: 993
Location: India
GPA: 3.51
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 159

Kudos [?]: 1259 [2] , given: 226

Re: The Chicago and Calumet Rivers originally flowed into the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Apr 2014, 15:32
2
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
The Chicago and Calumet Rivers originally flowed into the St. Lawrence by way of Lake Michigan, but having been redirected by constructing canals so that the water now empties into the Mississippi by way of the Illinois River.

(A) Rivers originally flowed into the St. Lawrence by way of Lake Michigan, but having been redirected by constructing (-ing modifier is not correct)
(B) Rivers had originally flowed into the St. Lawrence by way of Lake Michigan, but they have been redirected by constructing (past perfect is unnecessary no other past even is mentioned for sequencing )
(C) Rivers, which originally flowed into the St. Lawrence by way of Lake Michigan but have been redirected by the construction of (fragmented sentence first part before but has no verb)
(D) Rivers, originally flowing into the St. Lawrence by way of Lake Michigan, but having been redirected by the construction of (same mistake as A, -ing modifer having bean is 99% wrong)
(E) Rivers, originally flowing into the St. Lawrence by way of Lake Michigan, have been redirected through the construction of (perfect S,ing,verb...)

only E follows correct grammatical construction.
_________________

Piyush K
-----------------------
Our greatest weakness lies in giving up. The most certain way to succeed is to try just one more time. ― Thomas A. Edison
Don't forget to press--> Kudos
My Articles: 1. WOULD: when to use? | 2. All GMATPrep RCs (New)
Tip: Before exam a week earlier don't forget to exhaust all gmatprep problems specially for "sentence correction".

Intern
Joined: 04 May 2013
Posts: 12
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 3 [4] , given: 47

Re: The Chicago and Calumet Rivers originally flowed into the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2014, 08:50
4
KUDOS
HERE IS THE COMPLETE DISSECTION

The Chicago and Calumet Rivers originally flowed into the St. Lawrence by way of Lake Michigan, but having been redirected by constructing canals so that the water now empties into the Mississippi by way of the Illinois River.

(A) Rivers originally flowed into the St. Lawrence by way of Lake Michigan, but having been redirected by constructing.

The use of “having been” is incorrect. We do not expect a “so that” construction after “having been”. “so that” introduces a consequence to an action. “having been” introduces the concept of premise. They do not go well together. Moreover we should expect more informations after “having been”, which makes this answer a fragment.

(B) Rivers had originally flowed into the St. Lawrence by way of Lake Michigan, but they have been redirected by constructing.

The use of “had” is incorrect. If past perfect is used in a sentence make sure that:
1. it is really needed (the two events are related, need a temporal regulation, and the earliest event is preceded by a past perfect verb).
2. The verb expressing the second temporal event is in past tense.

(C) Rivers, which originally flowed into the St. Lawrence by way of Lake Michigan but have been redirected by the construction of.

“comma+which” refers to the item directly preceding “which” -except for cases in which a prepositional phrase is squeezed in, between the modifier's target and the comma preceding the modifier, because it cannot be logically placed elsewhere in the sentence. In this sentence the use of “which” is correct, but this rule is good to recall. What makes this sentence wrong is:
1. The lack of a comma after “Lake Michigan” we already have a subordinator (“which”) we do not want another one in the same sentence.
2. The use of “but” baffles and is incorrect. Because of “But” The entire sentence structure is screwed.

(D) Rivers, originally flowing into the St. Lawrence by way of Lake Michigan, but having been redirected by the construction of

Once agin “having been” fits terribly beside “so that”. “But” bewilders the sentence’s meaning.

(E) Rivers, originally flowing into the St. Lawrence by way of Lake Michigan, have been redirected through the construction of
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 9248
Followers: 804

Kudos [?]: 165 [0], given: 0

Re: The Chicago and Calumet Rivers originally flowed into the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Oct 2015, 05:54
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
VP
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 1332
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 96 [0], given: 768

Re: The Chicago and Calumet Rivers originally flowed into the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Oct 2015, 01:31
amitdesai16 wrote:
IMO E. Clearly the choices are between B and E. A, C, D are improper sentence constructions in itself.

Now for B, past perfect (had) is not appropriate. There is no past tense later in the sentence to which this event can relate to; instead present perfect (have) is used. So this is incorrect. Possibly "had" could have been correct in case it was written "rivers had originally flowed into ..., but then their course was diverted by..."

That leaves E - which seems to have no flaws.

---------------

Please give Kudos if you like my explanation. Thank you

I dont think so.

past perfect can go with present perfect. this case is proved by a sentence in gmatprep" immune to, immune from " and is proved by grammar books. some grammar book say that past perfect can go with past simple and present perfect.

so, B is correct regarding this point .
VP
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 1332
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 96 [0], given: 768

Re: The Chicago and Calumet Rivers originally flowed into the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Oct 2015, 01:52
the only error in B is "constructing canal"

by doing is used to show the method the subject uses to do the action in main clause. there is no reason grammatically to use constructing here.

second, b seem that they have been redirected by canal, not by construction of cannal, which is the intended meaning.
VP
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 1332
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 96 [0], given: 768

Re: The Chicago and Calumet Rivers originally flowed into the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Oct 2015, 01:58
bakfed wrote:
The Chicago and Calumet Rivers originally flowed into the St. Lawrence by way of Lake Michigan, but having been redirected by constructing canals so that the water now empties into the Mississippi by way of the Illinois River.

(A) Rivers originally flowed into the St. Lawrence by way of Lake Michigan, but having been redirected by constructing
(B) Rivers had originally flowed into the St. Lawrence by way of Lake Michigan, but they have been redirected by constructing
(C) Rivers, which originally flowed into the St. Lawrence by way of Lake Michigan but have been redirected by the construction of
(D) Rivers, originally flowing into the St. Lawrence by way of Lake Michigan, but having been redirected by the construction of
(E) Rivers, originally flowing into the St. Lawrence by way of Lake Michigan, have been redirected through the construction of

this is from gmatprep. the oa is e.

however, I do not like this question.

in e, following show an action which happen in the same time frame as redirected. I do not think this is logic

though the main action is in present perfect, happening from a point in the past to present, and following happen at the beginning of this period and we can consider that following is used loggically, I feel hard to see the logicness.

a very hard question.
Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 3561
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Followers: 583

Kudos [?]: 4687 [0], given: 321

Re: The Chicago and Calumet Rivers originally flowed into the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Oct 2015, 02:21
(A) Rivers originally flowed into the St. Lawrence by way of Lake Michigan, but having been redirected by constructing --- There is a fundamental flaw in parallelism in this choice. Two ICs, that are joined by a conjunction such as ‘but' have to be in the same format; here, one is a clause and the other is not complete

(B) Rivers had originally flowed into the St. Lawrence by way of Lake Michigan, but they have been redirected by constructing----- In the hierarchy of tenses, the top is the past perfect, then a past tense and then the present perfect. One cannot jump from past perfect to present perfect without traveling through a past tense. So grammatically wrong

(C) Rivers, which originally flowed into the St. Lawrence by way of Lake Michigan but have been redirected by the construction of -- -- This is a forthright fragment because of the intrusion of relative pronoun ‘which’.

(D) Rivers, originally flowing into the St. Lawrence by way of Lake Michigan, but having been redirected by the construction of --- The first part has no verb - a fragment.

(E) Rivers, originally flowing into the St. Lawrence by way of Lake Michigan, have been redirected through the construction of --- A correct simple sentence with a modifier phrase that modifies the subject of the clause. 2. Is also idiomatically better because of using the preposition ‘through’ to indicate a physical flow of water through the canals -- correct

_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

Re: The Chicago and Calumet Rivers originally flowed into the   [#permalink] 25 Oct 2015, 02:21
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
4 Investigations along the Solo river 1 20 May 2016, 10:42
Original Meaning 3 02 Oct 2015, 10:15
originate from or in 0 19 Apr 2011, 08:25
The Chicago and Calumet Rivers originally flowed into the 6 07 Feb 2009, 10:48
SC :Rhone River 2 19 Jun 2008, 17:09
Display posts from previous: Sort by