Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 16 Sep 2014, 01:35

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The city council will certainly vote to approve the new

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1579
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 183 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
The city council will certainly vote to approve the new [#permalink] New post 29 Dec 2008, 02:33
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
The city council will certainly vote to approve the new downtown redevelopment plan, despite the objections of environmentalists. After all, most of the campaign contributions received by members of the city council come from real estate development firms, which stand to benefit from the plan.
Which of the following statements, if true, would most weaken the argument above?
(A) Several members of the city council receive sizable campaign contributions from environmental lobbying groups.
(B) Members of the city council are required to report the size and source of each campaign contribution they receive.
(C) Not every real estate development firm in the city will be able to participate in, and profit from, the new downtown redevelopment plan.
(D) The members of the city council have often voted in ways that are opposed to the interests of their campaign contributors.
(E) Some environmentalists have stated that the new downtown redevelopment plan might be environmentally sound if certain minor modifications are made.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 428
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 14

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR 3: Downtown Redevelopment [#permalink] New post 29 Dec 2008, 03:12
is it C
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Jul 2008
Posts: 100
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

Re: CR 3: Downtown Redevelopment [#permalink] New post 29 Dec 2008, 15:59
Clear D.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Sep 2008
Posts: 106
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Re: CR 3: Downtown Redevelopment [#permalink] New post 29 Dec 2008, 19:13
(C)
_________________

Kick GMAT ass

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1436
Followers: 33

Kudos [?]: 215 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR 3: Downtown Redevelopment [#permalink] New post 31 Jan 2009, 13:50
scthakur wrote:
The city council will certainly vote to approve the new downtown redevelopment plan, despite the objections of environmentalists. After all, most of the campaign contributions received by members of the city council come from real estate development firms, which stand to benefit from the plan.
Which of the following statements, if true, would most weaken the argument above?
(A) Several members of the city council receive sizable campaign contributions from environmental lobbying groups.
(B) Members of the city council are required to report the size and source of each campaign contribution they receive.
(C) Not every real estate development firm in the city will be able to participate in, and profit from, the new downtown redevelopment plan.
(D) The members of the city council have often voted in ways that are opposed to the interests of their campaign contributors.
(E) Some environmentalists have stated that the new downtown redevelopment plan might be environmentally sound if certain minor modifications are made.


D to me.

We need some thing that says CC will not approve new plan

D says contributions do not force votes.

Bingo!
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 26 May 2008
Posts: 432
Schools: Kellogg Class of 2012
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 58 [0], given: 4

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR 3: Downtown Redevelopment [#permalink] New post 31 Jan 2009, 22:15
Another D.

An answer choice that would undermine the reasoning - just because X receives funds from Y, means X will vote for Y - will be true. D says, even though X receives funds from Y doesn't necessarily mean the votes will go to Y

Cheers,
Unplugged
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2008
Posts: 283
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR 3: Downtown Redevelopment [#permalink] New post 01 Feb 2009, 00:20
icandy wrote:
scthakur wrote:
The city council will certainly vote to approve the new downtown redevelopment plan, despite the objections of environmentalists. After all, most of the campaign contributions received by members of the city council come from real estate development firms, which stand to benefit from the plan.
Which of the following statements, if true, would most weaken the argument above?
(A) Several members of the city council receive sizable campaign contributions from environmental lobbying groups.
(B) Members of the city council are required to report the size and source of each campaign contribution they receive.
(C) Not every real estate development firm in the city will be able to participate in, and profit from, the new downtown redevelopment plan.
(D) The members of the city council have often voted in ways that are opposed to the interests of their campaign contributors.
(E) Some environmentalists have stated that the new downtown redevelopment plan might be environmentally sound if certain minor modifications are made.


D to me.

We need some thing that says CC will not approve new plan

D says contributions do not force votes.

Bingo!


Agree with D. C is irrelevant because it makes no difference if some, most, or all receive benefits. If the answer choice stated that none of the real estate development firms in the city will participate and benefit then you can consider C as a potential answer.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1300
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR 3: Downtown Redevelopment [#permalink] New post 01 Feb 2009, 03:10
it shld be D
scthakur wrote:
The city council will certainly vote to approve the new downtown redevelopment plan, despite the objections of environmentalists. After all, most of the campaign contributions received by members of the city council come from real estate development firms, which stand to benefit from the plan.
Which of the following statements, if true, would most weaken the argument above?
(A) Several members of the city council receive sizable campaign contributions from environmental lobbying groups.
(B) Members of the city council are required to report the size and source of each campaign contribution they receive.
(C) Not every real estate development firm in the city will be able to participate in, and profit from, the new downtown redevelopment plan.
(D) The members of the city council have often voted in ways that are opposed to the interests of their campaign contributors.
(E) Some environmentalists have stated that the new downtown redevelopment plan might be environmentally sound if certain minor modifications are made.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 21 Apr 2008
Posts: 497
Schools: Kellogg, MIT, Michigan, Berkeley, Marshall, Mellon
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 13

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR 3: Downtown Redevelopment [#permalink] New post 01 Feb 2009, 13:26
Hi mates,

IMO D

Quote:
The city council will certainly vote to approve the new downtown redevelopment plan, despite the objections of environmentalists. After all, most of the campaign contributions received by members of the city council come from real estate development firms, which stand to benefit from the plan.
Which of the following statements, if true, would most weaken the argument above?
(A) Several members of the city council receive sizable campaign contributions from environmental lobbying groups.
(B) Members of the city council are required to report the size and source of each campaign contribution they receive.
(C) Not every real estate development firm in the city will be able to participate in, and profit from, the new downtown redevelopment plan.
(D) The members of the city council have often voted in ways that are opposed to the interests of their campaign contributors.
(E) Some environmentalists have stated that the new downtown redevelopment plan might be environmentally sound if certain minor modifications are made.


B, C and E out: they don't have nothing to do with the argument

Between A and D... well, it took me a while to decide between them. I think the point is the word "several" in A, which can mean majority or not

OA and Source?

Cheers
_________________

mates, please visit my profile and leave comments
johnlewis1980-s-profile-feedback-is-more-than-welcome-80538.html

I'm not linked to GMAT questions anymore, so, if you need something, please PM me

I'm already focused on my application package :)

My experience in my second attempt
http://gmatclub.com/forum/p544312#p544312
My experience in my third attempt
630-q-47-v-28-engineer-non-native-speaker-my-experience-78215.html#p588275

Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 29 Jan 2009
Posts: 13
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Re: CR 3: Downtown Redevelopment [#permalink] New post 01 Feb 2009, 14:03
D :P .

Whats the OA?
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 17 Dec 2008
Posts: 179
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 0

Re: CR 3: Downtown Redevelopment [#permalink] New post 01 Feb 2009, 18:33
The city council will certainly vote to approve the new downtown redevelopment plan, despite the objections of environmentalists. After all, most of the campaign contributions received by members of the city council come from real estate development firms, which stand to benefit from the plan.
Which of the following statements, if true, would most weaken the argument above?
(A) Several members of the city council receive sizable campaign contributions from environmental lobbying groups.
(B) Members of the city council are required to report the size and source of each campaign contribution they receive.
(C) Not every real estate development firm in the city will be able to participate in, and profit from, the new downtown redevelopment plan.

(D)The members of the city council have often voted in ways that are opposed to the interests of their campaign contributors.
(E) Some environmentalists have stated that the new downtown redevelopment plan might be environmentally sound if certain minor modifications are made.

Among A and D, D is definitely stronger since it definitely breaks the main reasoning of the argument. A is not strong enough, so what if env lobbyists also give money...most still come from real estate.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 May 2008
Posts: 204
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR 3: Downtown Redevelopment [#permalink] New post 01 Feb 2009, 19:37
Another D

conclusion "city council will certainly vote to approve the new downtown redevelopment plan"

premise: campaign contributions received by members of the city council come from real estate development firms, which stand to benefit from the plan


D - if taken as premise will weaken the conclusion.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 10 Jan 2009
Posts: 105
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 2

Re: CR 3: Downtown Redevelopment [#permalink] New post 01 Feb 2009, 20:28
Another D.

(A) Several members of the city council receive sizable campaign contributions from environmental lobbying groups.

For A we need to assume that favor of the city council is proportional to the contributions.
A is out because of this.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 26 May 2008
Posts: 432
Schools: Kellogg Class of 2012
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 58 [0], given: 4

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR 3: Downtown Redevelopment [#permalink] New post 01 Feb 2009, 21:16
Can we have the OA?

Cheers,
Unplugged
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 25 Oct 2006
Posts: 652
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 190 [0], given: 6

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR 3: Downtown Redevelopment [#permalink] New post 02 Feb 2009, 00:00
Yeah D stands clear.
_________________

If You're Not Living On The Edge, You're Taking Up Too Much Space

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1579
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 183 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR 3: Downtown Redevelopment [#permalink] New post 02 Feb 2009, 00:13
OA is D.
Re: CR 3: Downtown Redevelopment   [#permalink] 02 Feb 2009, 00:13
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 The city council will certainly vote to approve the new noboru 3 26 Jul 2009, 05:26
The city council will certainly vote to approve the new gmatter08 3 24 May 2008, 12:11
2 The city council will certainly vote to approve the new marcodonzelli 4 30 Jan 2008, 05:36
The city council will certainly vote to approve the new Riuscita 6 06 Apr 2006, 11:47
The city council will certainly vote to approve the new ywilfred 13 10 Sep 2005, 04:59
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The city council will certainly vote to approve the new

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.