|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 22 May 2007
Posts: 221
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
19
[0], given: 0
|
The city government should invest surplus funds in improving [#permalink]
08 Jul 2008, 05:20
Question Stats:
8% (01:35) correct
91% (01:11) wrong based on 12 sessions
The city government should invest surplus funds in improving the city's transportation network. Most of the network was put in place at a time when the city was much smaller in both area and population. The subway system is outdated and understaffed. The buses rarely run on schedule and their routes are inconvenient. If the city does not make changes soon to the network, it will see many of its prized industries relocate to more convenient cities and, as a result, the city's financial health will be jeopardized.
In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
A)The first is an explanation of a current state of affairs; the second is a prediction based on that state of affairs. B)The first is a statement of fact in opposition to the author's conclusion; the second is that conclusion. C)The first emphasizes an existing problem; the second offers a proposal to solve that problem. D)The first is information the author suggests has been overlooked in the situation at hand; the second describes that situation. E)The first is a justification of an impending problem; the second describes the consequences of that problem.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Nov 2006
Posts: 276
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
18
[0], given: 0
|
IMO it is E
'Most of the network was put in place at a time when the city was much smaller in both area and population.'
This is to justify the fact that the system was better on a smaller population, which is way different than what the situation is today.
'If the city does not make changes soon to the network, it will see many of its prized industries relocate to more convenient cities and, as a result, the city's financial health will be jeopardized.'
If no action is taken, what will happen (a consequence).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 26 Jul 2007
Posts: 541
Schools: Stern, McCombs, Marshall, Wharton
Followers: 4
Kudos [?]:
61
[0], given: 0
|
I agree.
The first boldface is a premise and the second boldface is the conclusion.
That narrows it down to B and E.
B is not correct because the premise is not in opposition to the conclusion. Which leaves E. The premise is the justification of a problem and the conclusion is the consequence of that problem.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 01 Jan 2008
Posts: 513
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
40
[0], given: 0
|
It is E.. Quite straight forward..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 22 May 2007
Posts: 221
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
19
[0], given: 0
|
Not E. The problem is not "impending". It is existing. Moreover "The subway system is outdated and understaffed. The buses rarely run on schedule and their routes are inconvenient" is a justification rather than the boldface
Give it another shot
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Nov 2006
Posts: 276
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
18
[0], given: 0
|
aaron22197 wrote: Not E. The problem is not "impending". It is existing. Moreover "The subway system is outdated and understaffed. The buses rarely run on schedule and their routes are inconvenient" is a justification rather than the boldface
Give it another shot Don't tell me it's A  , cause the bold face is a justification. The first statement is trying to justify why the system is small. Cause they didn't predict how many people will begin to use it. Now that many are using it, it does not function as well as it did in the past.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 22 May 2007
Posts: 221
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
19
[0], given: 0
|
It is A.
I can see the first bold as an explanation and not justification(may be....) . But I thoroughly agree with the second bold face that it is a prediction.
In E, the second boldface cannot be a certain consequence. It is only a potential consequence=prediction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 26 Jul 2007
Posts: 541
Schools: Stern, McCombs, Marshall, Wharton
Followers: 4
Kudos [?]:
61
[0], given: 0
|
Well I could see how it could be A.
The second boldface is definitely the conclusion. So a conclusion could be a prediction. What throws me off is that the in A it says that the first boldface is the current state of affairs.
'Most of the network was put in place at a time when the city was much smaller in both area and population.'
To me saying most of the network was built in the 70's doesn't describe the "current state of affairs" today. We just knok most of it was built in the past. Just because the network was built in the past tells me nothing about the current state of the network today. It could be doing good or bad. The next two sentences to me, describe the current state of affairs.
'The subway system is outdated and understaffed. The buses rarely run on schedule and their routes are inconvenient.'
This tells us how the state of the network today.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 661
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
49
[0], given: 7
|
aaron22197 wrote: The city government should invest surplus funds in improving the city's transportation network. Most of the network was put in place at a time when the city was much smaller in both area and population. The subway system is outdated and understaffed. The buses rarely run on schedule and their routes are inconvenient. If the city does not make changes soon to the network, it will see many of its prized industries relocate to more convenient cities and, as a result, the city's financial health will be jeopardized.
In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
A)The first is an explanation of a current state of affairs; the second is a prediction based on that state of affairs. B)The first is a statement of fact in opposition to the author's conclusion; the second is that conclusion. C)The first emphasizes an existing problem; the second offers a proposal to solve that problem. D)The first is information the author suggests has been overlooked in the situation at hand; the second describes that situation. E)The first is a justification of an impending problem; the second describes the consequences of that problem. Answer choice A. an explanation of a current state of affairs: Most of the network was put in place at a time when the city was much smaller in both area and population. the second is a prediction based on that state of affairs: If the city does not make changes soon to thenetwork, it will see many of its prized industries relocate to more convenient cities and, as a result, the city's financial health will be jeopardized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 18 Nov 2009
Posts: 48
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
7
[0], given: 2
|
+1 for A
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 12 Oct 2008
Posts: 562
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
25
[0], given: 2
|
Tough fight between A and E. First I choose E after close look I choose A. I have eliminated E based on second sentence. Second sentence is prediction and not a consequence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Posts: 268
Location: India
Followers: 5
Kudos [?]:
42
[0], given: 25
|
aaron22197 wrote: The city government should invest surplus funds in improving the city's transportation network. Most of the network was put in place at a time when the city was much smaller in both area and population. The subway system is outdated and understaffed. The buses rarely run on schedule and their routes are inconvenient. If the city does not make changes soon to the network, it will see many of its prized industries relocate to more convenient cities and, as a result, the city's financial health will be jeopardized.
In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
A)The first is an explanation of a current state of affairs; the second is a prediction based on that state of affairs. B)The first is a statement of fact in opposition to the author's conclusion; the second is that conclusion. C)The first emphasizes an existing problem; the second offers a proposal to solve that problem. D)The first is information the author suggests has been overlooked in the situation at hand; the second describes that situation. E)The first is a justification of an impending problem; the second describes the consequences of that problem. E is a very tempting answer. The subway system is outdated and understaffed. --> is the impending problem here not the first bold face line. A is the answer.
_________________
Cheers, SD
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Nov 2009
Posts: 314
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
33
[0], given: 20
|
I went with A. But if any expert can help to negate E , that will surely help.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 995
Followers: 12
Kudos [?]:
277
[0], given: 36
|
I will explain why E is wrong. "impending problem" is wrong. It is the current situation. Also focus on the keyword "prediction" in choice A. Its precise. The second boldface is the conclusion of the argument. Hence "prediction" is the right keyword. Argument Claim Point Position Prediction --------> Conclusion Consideration Fact information Justification Supposition Assumption -----> Premise rohitgoel15 wrote: I went with A. But if any expert can help to negate E , that will surely help.
_________________
Please press kudos if you like my post.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 16 Apr 2006
Posts: 282
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
5
[0], given: 2
|
I also fell into trap. I narrowed down between A and E but selected E.
_________________
Trying hard to achieve something unachievable now....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 09 Jun 2011
Posts: 95
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
Same Trap. Chose E.. A is better..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Status: Prep started for the n-th time
Joined: 29 Aug 2010
Posts: 709
Followers: 4
Kudos [?]:
73
[0], given: 37
|
+1 for A.
The second bold face is a classic conditional statement. If X happens + Y will happen. Though the presence of "will" points to a more definite occurence than can/would, it is still just a prediction.
Crick
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Vercules, Legendaddy, noboru, Marcab, metallicafan, rajeevrks27, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, souvik101990, doe007, MacFauz, PTK, carcass, kissthegmat, Narenn
|