Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 18:13 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 18:13

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 548
Own Kudos [?]: 4447 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Taiwan
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Jan 2005
Posts: 54
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Toronto, Canada
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 01 Jan 2005
Posts: 76
Own Kudos [?]: 8 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: NJ
Send PM
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 899
Own Kudos [?]: 373 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: NewJersey USA
Send PM
Re: The city has proposed a number of water treatment and [#permalink]
I was breaking my head over this question. It is not as easy as it sounds.

I believe I have a convincing answer.

A. the cost of which raises water bills high enough so that

enough so that is redundant

B. at a cost raising water bills so high that

- looks OK, but the participle phrase raising water bills could modify the noun cost or the subject projects. It is not very clear here. However the restrictive clause using that would avoid the ambiguity.

C. at a cost which raises water bills high enough so

This is idiomatic error. Usage is so + that

D. whose cost will raise water bills so high that

Whose clearly refers to the projects here. It also has the corect idiomatic usage

E. whose cost will raise water bills high enough so that

This has the redundancy problem.
avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 971
Own Kudos [?]: 769 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: The city has proposed a number of water treatment and [#permalink]
If a thread is posted within a week I think it'll benefit everybody is all discussions can be grouped into the same thread rather than spreading out into several threads. :)



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Sentence Correction (EA only) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
GMAT Club Bot
Re: The city has proposed a number of water treatment and [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6920 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
Current Student
278 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne