Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 04 Aug 2011
Posts: 51
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

The city of Workney, in raising bus fares from $1.00 to [#permalink] ### Show Tags 20 Aug 2011, 05:37 2 This post was BOOKMARKED 00:00 Difficulty: 35% (medium) Question Stats: 75% (01:51) correct 25% (01:14) wrong based on 165 sessions ### HideShow timer Statistics The city of Workney, in raising bus fares from$1.00 to $1.25, proposed that 18 fare token be sold for$20.00 to alleviate the extra burden of the fare increase on the city's low-income residents. Critics suggested alternatively that 9 fare tokens be sold for $10.00, because a$20.00 outlay would be prohibitive for low-income riders.

The alternative proposal depends on which of the following assumptions?

a) Low-income residents of Workney will continue to ride the buses in the same numbers despite the fare increase

b) Low-income riders would be more likely to take advantage of the savings afforded by the 9-token offer than would other riders.

c) The outlay of $10.00for the purchase of 9 fare tokens would not be prohibitive for low-income bus riders d) The proposed fare increase is needed for the purchase of new buses for the city's bus system e) Buses provide the only means of public transportation in the city of Workney. [Reveal] Spoiler: OA If you have any questions you can ask an expert New! Intern Joined: 11 Apr 2011 Posts: 31 Followers: 0 Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 9 Re: GWD(1) [#permalink] ### Show Tags 20 Aug 2011, 08:04 it should be C.. Senior Manager Joined: 03 Mar 2010 Posts: 440 Schools: Simon '16 (M) Followers: 5 Kudos [?]: 269 [0], given: 22 Re: GWD(1) [#permalink] ### Show Tags 20 Aug 2011, 09:00 C. It is direct negation of conclusion. Btw, what is GWD? _________________ My dad once said to me: Son, nothing succeeds like success. Director Status: Prep started for the n-th time Joined: 29 Aug 2010 Posts: 707 Followers: 6 Kudos [?]: 166 [0], given: 37 Re: GWD(1) [#permalink] ### Show Tags 20 Aug 2011, 09:00 1 This post was BOOKMARKED C is the winner here. Critics suggestion :$10 token for 9 passes would be preferable.
Reason: buying $20 token would be difficult. The suggestion implicitly means$10 token is not prohibitive.
Manager
Joined: 27 Apr 2008
Posts: 190
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 77 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

20 Aug 2011, 11:16
C - the assumption is that $10 is not prohibitive for the low income people. After reading the question, I was looking for an answer that's along the lines of "low income people don't have the cash flow to buy$20 in fares at once" but this answer is not amongst the choices given.
Intern
Joined: 21 Aug 2011
Posts: 26
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

21 Aug 2011, 21:23
Can some one give a detailed explaination, such as: The assumption(1) is, assumption(2) is, or reasoning (1) is, then conclusion...

why each is wrong and why C is right?
Intern
Joined: 21 Aug 2011
Posts: 26
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

21 Aug 2011, 22:06
Why B is not right?
Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Feb 2011
Posts: 263
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 151 [0], given: 9

### Show Tags

21 Aug 2011, 23:40
C

It states $10 token is not prohibitive Manager Status: want to get 720+in GMAT Joined: 13 Mar 2011 Posts: 56 Followers: 1 Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 0 Re: GWD(1) [#permalink] ### Show Tags 24 Aug 2011, 10:00 I think it was an easy one...though E confuses you but you can eliminate it because of extreme language "only"......thus C is the answer _________________ Aim 720+ Intern Joined: 21 Aug 2011 Posts: 26 Followers: 0 Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0 Re: GWD(1) [#permalink] ### Show Tags 24 Aug 2011, 18:05 I was looking for that answer as well, however CR won't give you what you want, it only traps you or makes you wrong. mrblack wrote: C - the assumption is that$10 is not prohibitive for the low income people. After reading the question, I was looking for an answer that's along the lines of "low income people don't have the cash flow to buy $20 in fares at once" but this answer is not amongst the choices given. Manager Joined: 24 Aug 2008 Posts: 230 Location: India WE 1: 3.75 IT WE 2: 1.0 IT Followers: 2 Kudos [?]: 60 [0], given: 5 Re: GWD(1) [#permalink] ### Show Tags 24 Aug 2011, 21:05 Jasonammex wrote: I was looking for that answer as well, however CR won't give you what you want, it only traps you or makes you wrong. mrblack wrote: C - the assumption is that$10 is not prohibitive for the low income people. After reading the question, I was looking for an answer that's along the lines of "low income people don't have the cash flow to buy $20 in fares at once" but this answer is not amongst the choices given. Same here.. Even I was looking for such an answer.. I was stuck between B and C and after answering B, I reliase that 9 token system doesn't offer any saving wrt 18 token system. Thus by POE also, the answer is C. _________________ Cheers, Varun If you like my post, give me KUDOS!! Manager Joined: 15 Nov 2010 Posts: 109 Followers: 4 Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 15 Re: GWD(1) [#permalink] ### Show Tags 10 Sep 2011, 08:53 Jasontuyj2012 wrote: The city of Workney, in raising bus fares from$1.00 to $1.25, proposed that 18 fare token be sold for$20.00 to alleviate the extra burden of the fare increase on the city's low-income residents. Critics suggested alternatively that 9 fare tokens be sold for $10.00, because a$20.00 outlay would be prohibitive for low-income riders.

The alternative proposal depends on which of the following assumptions?

a) Low-income residents of Workney will continue to ride the buses in the same numbers despite the fare increase

b) Low-income riders would be more likely to take advantage of the savings afforded by the 9-token offer than would other riders.

### Show Tags

25 Jul 2016, 17:17
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.