Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 Jul 2014, 06:23

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The city's public transportation system should be removed

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Posts: 352
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
The city's public transportation system should be removed [#permalink] New post 30 May 2006, 10:47
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
The city's public transportation system should be removed from the jurisdiction of the municipal government, which finds it politically impossible either to raise fares or to institute cost-saving reductions in service. If public transportation were handled by a private firm, profits would be vigorously pursued, thereby eliminating the necessity for covering operating costs with government funds.
The statements above best support the conclusion that

A the private firms that would handle public transportation would have experience in the transportation industry

B political considerations would not prevent private firms from ensuring that revenues cover operating costs

C private firms would receive government funding if it were needed to cover operating costs

D the public would approve the cost-cutting actions taken by the private firm

E the municipal government would not be resigned to accumulating merely enough income to cover costs
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 14 May 2006
Posts: 1419
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 30 May 2006, 11:09
A (no indication of that in the argument) NO

B (I think this is an assumption, not conclusion, but not sure)

C (the whole argument is about transferring the system to private, so why should government be involved?) NO

D (if the public doesn’t approve the actions of the firm… say they wouldn’t support the rise in fare, then firms are not likely to get profits and cover its operating costs, so argument falls apart using negation)

E (again, nothing about private firms and cutting the costs) NO

Therefore, I am b/w B and D, but leaning towards D since the using assumption-negation technique the argument falls apart…
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 1133
Location: India
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 30 May 2006, 18:36
B............. political considerations would not prevent private firms from ensuring that revenues cover operating costs
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 1741
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 30 May 2006, 20:52
Will go with B.

The conclusion supports the facts mentioned in the statements the goverments cover up the inefficiency by diverting more funds whereas private funds whose utmost importance is profit wil try to maximise revenues to cover the costs.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5097
Location: Singapore
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 131 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 30 May 2006, 21:02
Go with B. The passage appears to suggests that the municipal government has its hands tied with respect to the decision to raise fare or implement cost cutting programs.

With B, it says the private firms will have only one objective --> ensuring that revenus cover operating cost.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 May 2006
Posts: 263
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 31 May 2006, 08:31
i choose B too.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 14 May 2006
Posts: 1419
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 31 May 2006, 09:00
hm... nobody for D? this is an inference question, so does D infer too much or going beyond the scope of the argument?

zoom612, do you have OE?

thanks
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2923
Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 31 May 2006, 09:27
I will go with D.

I feel B is a trap answer. Thats an assumption not the conclusion.

_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Posts: 352
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 31 May 2006, 11:03
The OA is B.
Although i had chosen C,as the last line says...

If public transportation were handled by a private firm, profits would be vigorously pursued, thereby eliminating the necessity for covering operating costs with government funds.


Can someone explain,why not C??
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 10 Nov 2005
Posts: 36
Location: India
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 31 May 2006, 13:53
Cannot be C because C is an inference not a conclusion.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 14 May 2006
Posts: 1419
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 31 May 2006, 14:21
harinder_sandhu wrote:
Cannot be C because C is an inference not a conclusion.


how can you infer that government is going to cover operating costs if it's agenda was to transfer such burden on private firms? I think C is just moving in a completely opposite direction from the argument and not even hinting about conclusion/inference!
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 22 May 2006
Posts: 176
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 01 Jun 2006, 08:44
B is right.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 22 May 2005
Posts: 141
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 02 Jun 2006, 04:12
hey .. b it is ... the political bindings create a barrier and private firms are very much away from the range thus ..political considerations would not bother them much and they wud go with the required hike in fares etc ..

_________________

--I never think of future, it comes soon enough!!

  [#permalink] 02 Jun 2006, 04:12
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Experts publish their posts in the topic The average fare for big city public transportation involvin ronr34 3 23 Nov 2013, 11:02
A city s public transportation board has decided to cut bonzai 7 27 May 2011, 20:09
The city's public transportastion system should be removed puma 5 09 Aug 2008, 09:11
Last year, a certain public transportation system sold an jimmyjamesdonkey 3 15 Apr 2008, 16:42
The city s public transportation system should be removed ritledge 6 18 Oct 2005, 14:30
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The city's public transportation system should be removed

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.