The commission acknowledged that no amount of money or staff : GMAT Sentence Correction (SC)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 19 Jan 2017, 13:55

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The commission acknowledged that no amount of money or staff

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 11 Nov 2006
Posts: 144
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

The commission acknowledged that no amount of money or staff [#permalink]

Show Tags

11 Apr 2007, 04:32
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The commission acknowledged that [u]no amount of money or staff members[/u] can ensure the safety of people who live in the vicinity of a nuclear plant, but it approved the installation because it believed that all reasonable precautions had been taken.
(A) no amount of money or staff members
(B) neither vast amounts of money nor staff members
(C) neither vast amounts of money nor numbers of staff members
(D) neither vast amounts of money nor a large staff
(E) no matter how large the staff or how vast the amount of money

~Good explanations are welcome!
If you have any questions
New!
Director
Joined: 13 Dec 2006
Posts: 518
Location: Indonesia
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 208 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

11 Apr 2007, 05:13
I will go with D for parallelism and conciseness

regards,

Amardeep
Manager
Joined: 27 Feb 2007
Posts: 68
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 1

Re: SC - Vast amounts of money [#permalink]

Show Tags

11 Apr 2007, 05:48
(A) no amount of money or staff members
Here, the word amount is common for money and staff members. You can't use "amount" for people.
(B) neither vast amounts of money nor staff members
Staff members are not quantified here. So not parallel with "vast amounts of money".
(C) neither vast amounts of money nor numbers of staff members
Again, staff members are not quantified here. So not parallel with "vast amounts of money".
(D) neither vast amounts of money nor a large staff
It should be the correct option.
(E) no matter how large the staff or how vast the amount of money
Though there is parallelism in this part, the rest of the sentence does not go with it.

I too vote for D.

Last edited by rakesh.id on 11 Apr 2007, 06:33, edited 2 times in total.
Manager
Joined: 27 Feb 2007
Posts: 68
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 1

Show Tags

11 Apr 2007, 05:57
By the way, is there a way to edit your posts?

Last edited by rakesh.id on 11 Apr 2007, 06:34, edited 1 time in total.
Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Sep 2006
Posts: 281
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

11 Apr 2007, 06:16
D for conciseness and parallelism

Yes you can edit your post, click on the button beside "quote" on your post
_________________

AimHigher

Senior Manager
Joined: 27 Mar 2007
Posts: 329
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

11 Apr 2007, 07:21
(A) amount only for noncountable > staff members is countable
(B) same mistake, 'staff members' lacks 'number of'
(C) numbers of is unidiomatic, it must be a number of members or the number of members
(E) makes no sense, because it introduces a contrast that is not given in the sentence.
(D) is the right answer, because amounts of money nor a large staff does not violate the rule of non- and countable.

Best regards & cheers!
Senior Manager
Joined: 27 Mar 2007
Posts: 329
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

11 Apr 2007, 07:22
(A) amount only for noncountable > staff members is countable
(B) same mistake, 'staff members' lacks 'number of'
(C) numbers of is unidiomatic, it must be a number of members or the number of members
(E) makes no sense, because it introduces a contrast that is not given in the sentence.
(D) is the right answer, because amounts of money nor a large staff does not violate the rule of non- and countable.

Best regards & cheers!
VP
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 1367
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 612 [0], given: 10

Re: SC - Vast amounts of money [#permalink]

Show Tags

12 Apr 2007, 17:01
querio wrote:
The commission acknowledged that no amount of money or staff members can ensure the safety of people who live in the vicinity of a nuclear plant, but it approved the installation because it believed that all reasonable precautions had been taken.
(A) no amount of money or staff members
(B) neither vast amounts of money nor staff members
(C) neither vast amounts of money nor numbers of staff members
(D) neither vast amounts of money nor a large staff
(E) no matter how large the staff or how vast the amount of money

~Good explanations are welcome!

which of the following is correct usage?Pls explain.
1.No X or Y
2.No X and Y
3.No X and No Y
3.No X or No Y
Re: SC - Vast amounts of money   [#permalink] 12 Apr 2007, 17:01
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 Acknowledging the volunteers’ giving of a great deal 2 01 Feb 2015, 03:46
3 Outsourcing is widely acknowledged as one of the best 7 04 Jun 2010, 02:07
4 The commission acknowledged that no amount of money or staff 19 10 Jun 2009, 22:58
Since John Locke acknowledged authorship of his political 2 17 Jan 2009, 13:55
Since John Locke acknowledged authorship of his political 3 09 Jan 2008, 07:40
Display posts from previous: Sort by