Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 15:18 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 15:18

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 26 May 2009
Posts: 161
Own Kudos [?]: 612 [126]
Given Kudos: 13
 Q49  V32 GMAT 2: 700  Q49  V35
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 634
Own Kudos [?]: 3224 [21]
Given Kudos: 6
Send PM
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 4346
Own Kudos [?]: 30782 [18]
Given Kudos: 635
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Send PM
General Discussion
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 2642
Own Kudos [?]: 7775 [7]
Given Kudos: 55
GMAT 2: 780  Q50  V50
Send PM
Re: The commission acknowledged that no amount of money or staff members [#permalink]
5
Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
C is wrong for two reasons. First, we don't want to say "numbers." We can have a large number of people or a small number of people, but it's still just one number. Second, "number(s)" doesn't imply a large amount (it could be any number), so it doesn't fit with the idea of the sentence, which is that even large efforts/expenditures will not achieve what we want. We can fix both problems with C by saying "a large number of staff members."

D isn't saying that the individual staff members are large. It's fine to use an adjective to describe the group, and this interpretation fits logically. If we wanted to say that the staff members themselves were large, we'd need to add language to make our meaning clearer.
Board of Directors
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Status:QA & VA Forum Moderator
Posts: 6072
Own Kudos [?]: 4689 [2]
Given Kudos: 463
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE:Business Development (Commercial Banking)
Send PM
The commission acknowledged that no amount of money or staff members [#permalink]
2
Kudos
generis wrote:
The commission acknowledged that no amount of money or staff members can ensure the safety of people who live in the vicinity of a nuclear plant, but it approved the installation because it believed that all reasonable precautions had been taken.


(A) no amount of money or staff members

(B) neither vast amounts of money nor staff members

(C) neither vast amounts of money nor numbers of staff members

(D) neither vast amounts of money nor a large staff

(E) no matter how large the staff or how vast the amount of money

NOTE: IN YOUR ANSWER, PLEASE STATE THE MEANING OF THE QUESTION IN YOUR OWN WORDS.


The best or excellent answers get kudos, which will be awarded after the answer is revealed.


Meaning : Neither (1) Money Nor (2) staff can ensure the safety of people living in the vicinity of a nuclear plant yet the commission installed the nuclear plant assuming that all necessary safety precautions were taken.

(A) No amount of Money - Wrong usage , changes the meaning.
(B) Staff Members - Wordy
(C) Numbers of staff members - Incorrect Usage and change of meaning.
(E) Wordy and awkward

Correct Answer must be (D) for the highlighted errors in other options, for correct usage of Idiom/PArallelism marker element Neither X Nor Y
Senior SC Moderator
Joined: 22 May 2016
Posts: 5330
Own Kudos [?]: 35486 [6]
Given Kudos: 9464
Send PM
The commission acknowledged that no amount of money or staff members [#permalink]
2
Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
generis wrote:
The commission acknowledged that no amount of money or staff members can ensure the safety of people who live in the vicinity of a nuclear plant, but it approved the installation because it believed that all reasonable precautions had been taken.

(A) no amount of money or staff members
(B) neither vast amounts of money nor staff members
(C) neither vast amounts of money nor numbers of staff members
(D) neither vast amounts of money nor a large staff
(E) no matter how large the staff or how vast the amount of money

OFFICIAL EXPLANATION

• Choice A - incorrect quantifier
-- amount cannot quantify the countable noun staff members
-- amount of ... staff members is incorrect
-- amount should refer to an uncountable noun such as money

• Choice B
-- NOT CLEAR: is vast amounts supposed to describe money only (allowed)

or money and staff members? (Not allowed. Staff members are countable.)

-- Compare B to D. (D) quantifies each element separately and properly. (D) is crystal clear.

• Choice C: not clear.
Is vast supposed to refer to amounts only
OR
to both amounts and numbers?

• Choice D is best
-- In Neither X nor Y, each element is described (modified) separately and properly, creating clarity.
-- the uncountable X element, money, is properly described by vast (an intensifier) and amounts (a proper quantifier for uncountable nouns)
-- the Y element, staff, (everyone who works at a place) is an uncountable noun. "Large" correctly describes staff.

•Choice E - no noun that works
(E) cannot fit grammatically into the sentence because it supplies no noun
that can function as a subject for the verb can.
COMMENTS


We have only one answer, and hence our winner is
Abhishek009 :)
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Status:Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Posts: 2101
Own Kudos [?]: 8808 [0]
Given Kudos: 171
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Send PM
The commission acknowledged that no amount of money or staff members [#permalink]
generis wrote:
generis wrote:
The commission acknowledged that no amount of money or staff members can ensure the safety of people who live in the vicinity of a nuclear plant, but it approved the installation because it believed that all reasonable precautions had been taken.

(A) no amount of money or staff members
(B) neither vast amounts of money nor staff members
(C) neither vast amounts of money nor numbers of staff members
(D) neither vast amounts of money nor a large staff
(E) no matter how large the staff or how vast the amount of money

OFFICIAL EXPLANATION

• In choice A, amount of . . . staff members is incorrect;
amount properly refers to an undifferentiated mass, as in the case of money
That is, amount should refer to something such as money. Amount cannot refer to countable staff members.

• Choice B does not make clear whether vast amounts is supposed to describe money only
or money and staff members
Note that B has a very subtle modifier issue.
IF (B) had said "neither staff members nor vast amounts of money," then (B) would have been fine.
In that case, the meaning would be slightly different from that in (D), but not wrong.
The meaning would be "neither the existing capabilities of staff members nor vast amounts of money" can ensure safety.


• In choice C it is not certain whether vast modifies amounts only
or amounts and numbers
Just as in (B), answer (C) contains a subtle modifier issue.

• Choice D is best

•Choice E cannot fit grammatically into the original sentence because it supplies no noun
that can function as a subject for the verb can.
COMMENTS

This official explanation is very good. My comments are for emphasis or to make ideas explicit.

We have only one answer, and hence our winner is
Abhishek009 :)


I narrowed it down to B and D and ended up choosing B.

B. The commission acknowledged that neither vast amounts of money nor staff members can ensure the safety of people who live in the vicinity of a nuclear plant, but it approved the installation because it believed that all reasonable precautions had been taken. --- OE is Choice B does not make clear whether vast amounts is supposed to describe money only or money and staff members

But since we have a Neither X nor Y structure, I don't think vast amounts can modify staff members (Although logically it might make sense to convey a large number of staff members ...). The same logic will hold true in case of Either X or Y.

Whereas, we can argue that vast amounts modifies both money and staff members if we had X or Y structure as the following-

The commission acknowledged that vast amounts of money or staff members -- here we can say vast amounts modifies money and staff members. (Though I think using "amount" for staff is incorrect.)

Such modifications can lead to illogical meaning as in (few options)- https://gmatclub.com/forum/the-herbicid ... l#p2174424

AjiteshArun , GMATNinja , MagooshExpert , GMATGuruNY , VeritasKarishma , VeritasPrepBrian , MartyMurray , daagh , DmitryFarber, RonPurewal , DmitryFarber , ccooley other experts - please enlighten
Manager
Manager
Joined: 27 Dec 2016
Posts: 241
Own Kudos [?]: 238 [0]
Given Kudos: 1103
Send PM
Re: The commission acknowledged that no amount of money or staff members [#permalink]
Hello GMATNinjaTwo &GMATNinja,

Though I answered this question correctly, I still have a question regarding option C and D. I eliminated option C because it could say "neither vast amounts of money nor numbers of staff members" or "neither vast amounts of money nor vast amounts of numbers of staff members". Can we say option D is similar to option C as well? In other words, can we say option D could be saying "neither vast amounts of money nor a large staff" or "neither vast amounts of money nor a vast amounts of large staff"? If so, wouldn't option D be incorrect?

Would greatly appreciate it if you could please shed some light on this!
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 5179
Own Kudos [?]: 4653 [4]
Given Kudos: 629
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1:
715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Send PM
Re: The commission acknowledged that no amount of money or staff members [#permalink]
3
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Skywalker18 wrote:
I narrowed it down to B and D and ended up choosing B.

B. The commission acknowledged that neither vast amounts of money nor staff members can ensure the safety of people who live in the vicinity of a nuclear plant, but it approved the installation because it believed that all reasonable precautions had been taken. --- OE is Choice B does not make clear whether vast amounts is supposed to describe money only or money and staff members

But since we have a Neither X nor Y structure, I don't think vast amounts can modify staff members (Although logically it might make sense to convey a large number of staff members ...). The same logic will hold true in case of Either X or Y.

Whereas, we can argue that vast amounts modifies both money and staff members if we had X or Y structure as the following-

The commission acknowledged that vast amounts of money or staff members -- here we can say vast amounts modifies money and staff members. (Though I think using "amount" for staff is incorrect.)

Such modifications can lead to illogical meaning as in (few options)- https://gmatclub.com/forum/the-herbicid ... l#p2174424
You're right about both vast amounts of staff members and the meaning call. That is, we can use neither (a) vast amounts with staff members (countable) nor (b) staff members alone, without anything to indicate the number of staff members (meaning call).

The commission acknowledged that staff members cannot ensure the safety of people who live in the vicinity of a nuclear plant.

This version does nothing to communicate the idea (somewhat crudely put here) that just as lots of money is not enough, lots of staff members are insufficient (the intended meaning of the sentence).
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 5179
Own Kudos [?]: 4653 [2]
Given Kudos: 629
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1:
715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Send PM
Re: The commission acknowledged that no amount of money or staff members [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
csaluja wrote:
Hello GMATNinjaTwo &GMATNinja,

Though I answered this question correctly, I still have a question regarding option C and D. I eliminated option C because it could say "neither vast amounts of money nor numbers of staff members" or "neither vast amounts of money nor vast amounts of numbers of staff members". Can we say option D is similar to option C as well? In other words, can we say option D could be saying "neither vast amounts of money nor a large staff" or "neither vast amounts of money nor a vast amounts of large staff"? If so, wouldn't option D be incorrect?

Would greatly appreciate it if you could please shed some light on this!
We should not "distribute" from inside the neither... nor. That is, we should read option C (the portion after nor) as:

The commission acknowledged that numbers of staff members cannot ensure the safety of people...
Intern
Intern
Joined: 02 Jun 2020
Posts: 37
Own Kudos [?]: 18 [1]
Given Kudos: 169
Location: India
Send PM
Re: The commission acknowledged that no amount of money or staff members [#permalink]
AjiteshArun wrote:
Skywalker18 wrote:
I narrowed it down to B and D and ended up choosing B.

B. The commission acknowledged that neither vast amounts of money nor staff members can ensure the safety of people who live in the vicinity of a nuclear plant, but it approved the installation because it believed that all reasonable precautions had been taken. --- OE is Choice B does not make clear whether vast amounts is supposed to describe money only or money and staff members

But since we have a Neither X nor Y structure, I don't think vast amounts can modify staff members (Although logically it might make sense to convey a large number of staff members ...). The same logic will hold true in case of Either X or Y.

Whereas, we can argue that vast amounts modifies both money and staff members if we had X or Y structure as the following-

The commission acknowledged that vast amounts of money or staff members -- here we can say vast amounts modifies money and staff members. (Though I think using "amount" for staff is incorrect.)

Such modifications can lead to illogical meaning as in (few options)- https://gmatclub.com/forum/the-herbicid ... l#p2174424
You're right about both vast amounts of staff members and the meaning call. That is, we can use neither (a) vast amounts with staff members (countable) nor (b) staff members alone, without anything to indicate the number of staff members (meaning call).

The commission acknowledged that staff members cannot ensure the safety of people who live in the vicinity of a nuclear plant.

This version does nothing to communicate the idea (somewhat crudely put here) that just as lots of money is not enough, lots of staff members are insufficient (the intended meaning of the sentence).


So it means B is rejected on the basis of intended meaning only. or we can say on the basis of comparision. vast amount of money shall be compared to a quantity showing the number of staff members.

Regards,
Gaurav
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 5179
Own Kudos [?]: 4653 [1]
Given Kudos: 629
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1:
715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Send PM
Re: The commission acknowledged that no amount of money or staff members [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
Gauravvinod92 wrote:
So it means B is rejected on the basis of intended meaning only. or we can say on the basis of comparision. vast amount of money shall be compared to a quantity showing the number of staff members.

Regards,
Gaurav
Hi Gauravvinod92,

That's a good point. I think the way I'd look at it is that meaning is usually very important, and we often choose structures that help us get the intended meaning across.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 12 Jul 2020
Posts: 82
Own Kudos [?]: 11 [0]
Given Kudos: 109
Location: United Kingdom
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V34
Send PM
Re: The commission acknowledged that no amount of money or staff members [#permalink]
For E, imo "no matter" is an idiom that links two clauses, here the structure is grammatically wrong, so it is not even about style/awkwardness.
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Posts: 5123
Own Kudos [?]: 4683 [1]
Given Kudos: 38
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Send PM
Re: The commission acknowledged that no amount of money or staff members [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
faat99 wrote:
For E, imo "no matter" is an idiom that links two clauses, here the structure is grammatically wrong, so it is not even about style/awkwardness.


Hello faat99,

We hope this finds you well.

We are writing to provide a bit of clarity on your last post.

There is no rule that "no matter" can only link clauses. For example, "No matter the danger, I will go skydiving."

The primary error in Option E is that the sentence formed by it - "no matter how large the staff or how vast the amount of money can ensure the safety of people who live in the vicinity of a nuclear plant" - leads to an incoherent meaning, as it has no subject.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
Manager
Manager
Joined: 15 Nov 2020
Posts: 99
Own Kudos [?]: 13 [1]
Given Kudos: 1614
Send PM
Re: The commission acknowledged that no amount of money or staff members [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Hi,

How is the use of amounts correct here for an uncountable noun- money? Please explain.

Thanks
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 5179
Own Kudos [?]: 4653 [1]
Given Kudos: 629
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1:
715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Send PM
Re: The commission acknowledged that no amount of money or staff members [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
ankitapugalia wrote:
Hi,

How is the use of amounts correct here for an uncountable noun- money? Please explain.

Thanks

Hi ankitapugalia,

It's okay to use amount with uncountable nouns. If we see amount with a count noun, that'd be unexpected. For example, amount of money (uncountable) is fine, but amount of chairs (count) is not.
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Posts: 5123
Own Kudos [?]: 4683 [2]
Given Kudos: 38
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Send PM
Re: The commission acknowledged that no amount of money or staff members [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
ankitapugalia wrote:
Hi,

How is the use of amounts correct here for an uncountable noun- money? Please explain.

Thanks


Hello ankitapugalia,

We hope this finds you well.

To answer your query, in this case, "amounts" is itself a countable noun used to refer to "money"; it is the same as using the countable noun "gallons" to refer to the uncountable noun "water"; in such usages, the countable noun represents a discreet quantity of the uncountable noun.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Status:Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Posts: 3480
Own Kudos [?]: 5136 [0]
Given Kudos: 1431
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Send PM
Re: The commission acknowledged that no amount of money or staff members [#permalink]
Expert Reply
ankitapugalia wrote:
Hi,

How is the use of amounts correct here for an uncountable noun- money? Please explain.

Thanks

Hi ankitapugalia.

"Amount" is used with uncountable nouns. So, in this case, the sentence is mentioning multiple "amounts" of the uncountable "money."
Manager
Manager
Joined: 06 Apr 2023
Posts: 92
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 283
Location: India
Send PM
Re: The commission acknowledged that no amount of money or staff members [#permalink]
seekmba wrote:
good question as it is very easy to overlook the errors and pick the incorrect option.

The commission acknowledged that no amount of money or staff members can ensure the safety of people who live in the vicinity of a nuclear plant, but it approved the installation because it believed that all reasonable precautions had been taken.

(A) no amount of money [singular] or staff members [plural] - incorrect
(B) neither vast amounts of money [singular] nor staff members [plural] - incorrect
(C) neither vast amounts of money [singular] nor numbers of staff members - 'numbers of' is always wrong
(D) neither vast amounts of money [singular] nor a large staff [singular] - CORRECT
(E) no matter how large the staff or how vast the amount of money - awkward



I disagree, in option (D) vast amounts is plural.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 06 Apr 2023
Posts: 92
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 283
Location: India
Send PM
Re: The commission acknowledged that no amount of money or staff members [#permalink]
MartyTargetTestPrep wrote:
ankitapugalia wrote:
Hi,

How is the use of amounts correct here for an uncountable noun- money? Please explain.

Thanks

Hi ankitapugalia.

"Amount" is used with uncountable nouns. So, in this case, the sentence is mentioning multiple "amounts" of the uncountable "money."



Hi Marty, in option D

neither vast amounts of money nor a large staff

Vast amounts is plural while a large staff is singular so what should we treat the subject singular or plural?
GMAT Club Bot
Re: The commission acknowledged that no amount of money or staff members [#permalink]
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6920 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne