Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 20 Oct 2014, 21:45

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
1 KUDOS received
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 17 May 2007
Posts: 2995
Followers: 57

Kudos [?]: 442 [1] , given: 210

The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use [#permalink] New post 09 May 2008, 00:59
1
This post received
KUDOS
5
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

72% (01:39) correct 28% (00:45) wrong based on 745 sessions
The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use of the word natural to foods that do not contain color or flavor additives, chemical preservatives, or nothing that has been synthesized.

A. or nothing that has been

B. or that has been

C. and nothing that is

D. or anything that has been

E. and anything
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 06 Jan 2008
Posts: 560
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 107 [0], given: 2

Re: SC - Food additves [#permalink] New post 09 May 2008, 05:29
Still thinking..
The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use of the word natural to foods that do not contain
color or flavor additives,
chemical preservatives, or
synthesized stuff...
(D Wins)

Last edited by mymba99 on 09 May 2008, 05:33, edited 1 time in total.
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 1467
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 108 [0], given: 0

Re: SC - Food additves [#permalink] New post 09 May 2008, 05:31
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
bsd_lover wrote:
The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use of the word natural to foods that do not contain color or flavor additives, chemical preservatives, or nothing that has been synthesized.

A. or nothing that has been

B. or that has been

C. and nothing that is

D. or anything that has been

E. and anything


I went with D here.
I believe "or" is correct. If you use "and", the food can be "neutral" if it has one of those three. I don't believe this is the intended meaning.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Apr 2008
Posts: 133
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

Re: SC - Food additves [#permalink] New post 09 May 2008, 12:01
foods that do not contain X, Y, or Z. Eliminates C & E. Between B & D. My pick is B is for concision. I am not sure if D is gramatically incorrect.

bsd_lover wrote:
The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use of the word natural to foods that do not contain color or flavor additives, chemical preservatives, or nothing that has been synthesized.

A. or nothing that has been

B. or that has been

C. and nothing that is

D. or anything that has been

E. and anything
3 KUDOS received
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 14 Oct 2007
Posts: 759
Location: Oxford
Schools: Oxford'10
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 178 [3] , given: 8

Re: SC - Food additves [#permalink] New post 09 May 2008, 12:22
3
This post received
KUDOS
yavasani wrote:
Guys, why is B wrong ?


Hi Yavasani,

B is wrong because "foods" does not agree with "has" in number. we need "have" here.
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 17 May 2007
Posts: 2995
Followers: 57

Kudos [?]: 442 [0], given: 210

Re: SC - Food additves [#permalink] New post 10 May 2008, 00:43
OA is D
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 881
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 158 [0], given: 7

Re: SC - Food additves [#permalink] New post 30 Dec 2008, 04:40
Between D and E, I choose D.
"or" correctly implies "some of potentially many", whereas
"and" implies only absence of listed items make food "natural"
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1634
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 31

Kudos [?]: 277 [0], given: 2

Re: SC - Food additves [#permalink] New post 01 Nov 2009, 09:59
Guys, between B and D, the only difference is anything and nothing.
Why is anything better than nothing??

Thanks.
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit


Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Jun 2010
Posts: 172
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 10

Re: SC - Food additves [#permalink] New post 03 Jan 2011, 09:26
D is parallel -------- X,Y,or Z
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 21 Dec 2010
Posts: 658
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 82 [0], given: 51

Re: SC - Food additves [#permalink] New post 15 May 2011, 07:06
D is quite clear. no other options contend here.
_________________

What is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy.

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Nov 2010
Posts: 109
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 15

Re: SC - Food additves [#permalink] New post 13 Jul 2011, 18:02
bsd_lover wrote:
The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use of the word natural to foods that do not contain color or flavor additives, chemical preservatives, or nothing that has been synthesized.

A. or nothing that has been

B. or that has been -- awkward

C. and nothing that is

D. or anything that has been

E. and anything


Between A and D, anything is the proper usage than nothing. So D.
Retired Moderator
User avatar
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1726
Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Followers: 67

Kudos [?]: 327 [0], given: 109

Re: SC - Food additves [#permalink] New post 14 Jul 2011, 14:54
+1 D

We need "or", not "and". The three items have not to be together. C and E out.
"Nothing" is not logical. The negation is already mentioned in "do not contain". With "nothing", we have a positive statement. (-)(-) = (+)
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Mission GMAT
Joined: 20 Apr 2011
Posts: 96
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 39

Re: SC - Food additves [#permalink] New post 31 Jul 2011, 10:48
Between A and D how does D win?

In short, how does double negative work here?

I can understand that it would be correct if the sentence is

The commission....foods that do not contain color or flavor additives, chemical preservatives, or synthesized materials.

However, how does the not in 'foods that do NOT CONTAIN' act on 'or anything thet has been synthesized"?

'Or anything that has been synthesized' is not 'not contained' in the foods.
_________________

Hope this post helps! :)
Your kudos will let me know.

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Sep 2011
Posts: 206
GMAT 1: Q V
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 5

Re: The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use [#permalink] New post 08 Mar 2012, 08:39
I have chosen the answer D in this case:

A. The use of the word "nothing" is incorrect. It seems to create a double negative, but we are suggesting that we don't want ingredients that have been synthesized, not the reverse.

B. It is confusing to me what the last "that" refers to. Also, if the last "that" refers to foods, then it should be "have been" and not "has been."

C. The use of the word "or" is correct because any of the 3 elements present in food would mean that the food is not natural. By using the word "and" we are saying that all 3 are required before the food is not natural. Also, "nothing" creates a double negative similar to answer choice A.

D. The use of the word "or" is correct in this case and the meaning of this answer choice makes sense.

E. "And" is used incorrectly here.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Mar 2012
Posts: 71
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 20

Re: SC - Food additves [#permalink] New post 21 Sep 2012, 21:15
metallicafan wrote:
+1 D

We need "or", not "and". The three items have not to be together. C and E out.
"Nothing" is not logical. The negation is already mentioned in "do not contain". With "nothing", we have a positive statement. (-)(-) = (+)



Hi,

That helps. One doubt:
Had E option been "or anything synthesized", would E be better than D (= or anything that has been synthesized) for concision?

thanks
Divine
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 12 Jan 2013
Posts: 249
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 47

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use [#permalink] New post 04 Jan 2014, 06:58
bsd_lover wrote:
The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use of the word natural to foods that do not contain color or flavor additives, chemical preservatives, or nothing that has been synthesized.

A. or nothing that has been

B. or that has been

C. and nothing that is

D. or anything that has been

E. and anything


A) incorrectly uses "nothing", which makes the sentence a double negative given that the underline is preceded by "foods that do NOT contain".

B) "or that has been" improperly focuses on synthesized foods, which is not the intended meaning of the author. The intended meaning is that the CONTENTS of food should not be X, Y and Z..

C) Again with the double negative, WRONG

D) "anything" focuses on contents of food and not food in itself. Thus this is better than B (and correct). Also, notice that anything does not create an error with double negatives. CORRECT

E) Uses the word "anything" correctly but, just like B, focuses on foods and NOT contents of foods. Thus, wrong.


Also, (I didn't think of this when I answered, but I do now!) the initial and/or split is paramount; "and" breaks the parallelism of the sentence, "or" upholds it. So right off the bat you should eliminate all options that do not start with "or".

Alternatively, "and" creates an additional unwanted trait of food contents (that are added to the previously stated contents), which is not the intent of the author. The author doesn't mean to say that "foods that do NOT contain perservatives AND anything synthesized", rather "anything synthesized" needs to be its own "entity", thus and is wrong and or is correct.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 23 Feb 2014
Posts: 36
GMAT 1: 560 Q41 V26
GMAT 2: 610 Q46 V28
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 15

Premium Member
Re: The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use [#permalink] New post 20 May 2014, 07:41
I don't see any expert comments here. Request Verbal experts - Please reply.

D is correct answer - I get it. It sounds right too. Not awkward ...etc.
But meaning and grammar based analysis - I was only able to remove B. What about other choices - What are the incorrect?
4 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 18 May 2014
Posts: 30
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 21 [4] , given: 2

Re: The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use [#permalink] New post 20 May 2014, 10:26
4
This post received
KUDOS
vingmat001 wrote:
I don't see any expert comments here. Request Verbal experts - Please reply.

D is correct answer - I get it. It sounds right too. Not awkward ...etc.
But meaning and grammar based analysis - I was only able to remove B. What about other choices - What are the incorrect?





Hi vingmat001,

Why wait for the experts when we can solve it on our own. :-D

Let’s first understand the structure and meaning of the sentence.


The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use of the word ‘natural’ to foods
o that do not contain
 color or flavor additives, (item-1)
 chemical preservatives (item-2)
 or nothing that has been synthesized. (item-3)


MEANING

• So, the sentence tells us that a certain commission has restricted the advertisers to use the word ‘natural’ for some specific type of foods.
o These are the foods that do not contain
1. Color or flavor additives
2. Chemical preservatives
3. Or anything that has been synthesized

Now, let’s move on to the options:


OPTION A

The given sentence has only one error. It says that the natural foods do not contain nothing that has been synthesized. The double negative (do not contain and nothing) invert the intended meaning of the sentence. So, this is incorrect.

1. People should not eat nothing that has high level of cholesterol.

2. People should not eat anything that has high level of cholesterol.


Which one of the above is correct? The second one. First one has double negatives that distort the meaning.


OPTION B

This option changes the sentence structure by removing ‘nothing’.

The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use of the word ‘natural’ to foods
o that do not contain
 color or flavor additives,
 chemical preservatives
o or that has been synthesized.


1. Now, the third item of the list is not parallel to the other two. In fact there is no third item in the list. There is no connector to connect the two items of the list ‘color or flavor additives’ and ‘chemical preservatives’.

2. This option makes the two clauses starting with ‘that’ parallel to each other. Now, the meaning becomes that natural foods are the ones that have been synthesized. This is illogical since synthesized foods can’t be natural.


OPTION C

1. This option has the same error as option A has. (nothing)

2. It also replaces the connector ‘or’ with ‘and’. This changes the meaning of the original sentence. Initially it meant that natural foods are the foods that do not have any of the three items listed in the list.

Now, it means that natural foods are the foods that don’t have all the listed items in them i.e. a food that contains one or two of the listed items can be a natural food.


OPTION D

This option corrects the only error from the original sentence.


OPTION E

This option has the same error as error no. 2 in option C.



Hope this helps! :)
Manyu
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 23 Feb 2014
Posts: 36
GMAT 1: 560 Q41 V26
GMAT 2: 610 Q46 V28
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 15

Premium Member
Re: The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use [#permalink] New post 28 May 2014, 11:07
Thanks Manyu!


Also found awesome e-GMAT explanation!

markers-in-parallelism-139076.html
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 18 Jul 2014
Posts: 2
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 1

Re: The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use [#permalink] New post 01 Aug 2014, 20:17
buffdaddy wrote:
yavasani wrote:
Guys, why is B wrong ?


Hi Yavasani,

B is wrong because "foods" does not agree with "has" in number. we need "have" here.

i think this explanation is incorrect. " has been synthesized"modifies foods, so this use distorts the meaning.
Re: The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use   [#permalink] 01 Aug 2014, 20:17
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use pzazz12 2 22 Oct 2010, 04:58
The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use oraluzal@yahoo.com 2 09 Feb 2007, 05:59
The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use joemama142000 5 16 Feb 2006, 16:37
The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use Arsene_Wenger 4 06 Jun 2005, 07:55
The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use mckenna 3 11 Mar 2005, 19:36
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 23 posts ] 



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.