The companies that are the prime purchasers of computer : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 18 Jan 2017, 23:48

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The companies that are the prime purchasers of computer

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 13 Dec 2009
Posts: 129
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 281 [1] , given: 10

The companies that are the prime purchasers of computer [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Apr 2010, 11:07
1
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

47% (02:48) correct 53% (01:57) wrong based on 227 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The companies that are the prime purchasers of computer software will not buy a software package if the costs of training staff to use it are high, and we know that it is expensive to teach people a software package that demands the memorization of unfamiliar commands. As a result, to be successful, commercial computer software cannot require users to memorize unfamiliar commands.

The conclusion above follows logically if which one of the following is assumed?

(A) If more prime purchasers of computer software buy a software product, that product will successful.
(B) Commercial computers software that does not require users to memorize unfamiliar commands is no more expensive than software that does.
(C) Commercial computer software will not be successful unless prime purchasers buy it.
(D) If the initial cost of computer software is high, but the cost of training users is low, prime purchases will still buy that software.
(E) The more difficult it is to learn how to use a piece of software, the more expensive it is to teach a person to use that software.

[Reveal] Spoiler:
OA C

i know the OA and I have explanation also, but explanation is not convincing, so please explain your reasoning. thank you.
If you have any questions
New!
Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Jul 2009
Posts: 297
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

18 Apr 2010, 11:54
sandeep25398 wrote:
The companies that are the prime purchasers of computer software will not buy a software package if the costs of training staff to use it are high, and we know that it is expensive to teach people a software package that demands the memorization of unfamiliar commands. As a result, to be successful, commercial computer software cannot require users to memorize unfamiliar commands.

The conclusion above follows logically if which one of the following is assumed?

(A) If more prime purchasers of computer software buy a software product, that product will successful.
(B) Commercial computers software that does not require users to memorize unfamiliar commands is no more expensive than software that does.
(C) Commercial computer software will not be successful unless prime purchasers buy it.
(D) If the initial cost of computer software is high, but the cost of training users is low, prime purchases will still buy that software.
(E) The more difficult it is to learn how to use a piece of software, the more expensive it is to teach a person to use that software.

[Reveal] Spoiler:
OA C

i know the OA and I have explanation also, but explanation is not convincing, so please explain your reasoning. thank you.

Let me try..!!

Premise1 : The companies that are the prime purchasers of computer software will not buy a software package if the costs of training staff to use it are high
Premise2: expensive to teach people a software package that demands the memorization of unfamiliar commands

Required Conclusion: To be successful, commercial computer software cannot require users to memorize unfamiliar commands.

We have to establish a relation between.. prime purchasers >>> buying >>> software with low memorization requirement >>> Software successful.

And this an assumption question...

For me only A and C stand close..

Negate both of them and you will see, option C destroys the argument ..

if you negate option A, you get : If NOT more prime purchasers of computer
software buy a software product, that product will successful...A software can be successful, even if its very expensive and only few people cant afford it..!!! The argument doesn't fall apart.
Manager
Joined: 13 Dec 2009
Posts: 129
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 281 [0], given: 10

### Show Tags

18 Apr 2010, 20:42
nverma wrote:
Let me try..!!

Premise1 : The companies that are the prime purchasers of computer software will not buy a software package if the costs of training staff to use it are high
Premise2: expensive to teach people a software package that demands the memorization of unfamiliar commands

Required Conclusion: To be successful, commercial computer software cannot require users to memorize unfamiliar commands.

We have to establish a relation between.. prime purchasers >>> buying >>> software with low memorization requirement >>> Software successful.

And this an assumption question...

For me only A and C stand close..

Negate both of them and you will see, option C destroys the argument ..

if you negate option A, you get : If NOT more prime purchasers of computer
software buy a software product, that product will successful...A software can be successful, even if its very expensive and only few people cant afford it..!!! The argument doesn't fall apart.

thanks for reply, i was closing between option B and C, since stem says cost of training will be more if training is required this means overall cost of the software will increase.. and in option B says that assumption is the software which does not require to memorize is no more expansive than one which does. any though on this point of view..
thanks
Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Jul 2009
Posts: 297
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

18 Apr 2010, 23:43
einstein10 wrote:
nverma wrote:
Let me try..!!

Premise1 : The companies that are the prime purchasers of computer software will not buy a software package if the costs of training staff to use it are high
Premise2: expensive to teach people a software package that demands the memorization of unfamiliar commands

Required Conclusion: To be successful, commercial computer software cannot require users to memorize unfamiliar commands.

We have to establish a relation between.. prime purchasers >>> buying >>> software with low memorization requirement >>> Software successful.

And this an assumption question...

For me only A and C stand close..

Negate both of them and you will see, option C destroys the argument ..

if you negate option A, you get : If NOT more prime purchasers of computer
software buy a software product, that product will successful...A software can be successful, even if its very expensive and only few people cant afford it..!!! The argument doesn't fall apart.

thanks for reply, i was closing between option B and C, since stem says cost of training will be more if training is required this means overall cost of the software will increase.. and in option B says that assumption is the software which does not require to memorize is no more expansive than one which does. any though on this point of view..
thanks

I agree with what u are saying regarding B.
But, as u are mentioning, Question is overall costs..

And if we negate B, we get " Commercial computers software that does not require users to memorize unfamiliar commands is no (remove no) more expensive than software that does." >>> we might get the software (with memorization) on the same price of software (withOUT memorization). But it still doesn't destroy the argument.. which is looking for an assumption to link.. prime purchasers >>> buying >>> software with low memorization requirement>>> NO TRAINING >>> Software successful
SVP
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1558
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 575 [0], given: 6

### Show Tags

20 Apr 2010, 19:01
how did you negate C and find out that the conclusion falls apart. Can someone please shed more light on this.
Intern
Joined: 04 Apr 2010
Posts: 9
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

20 Apr 2010, 21:40
(A) If more prime purchasers of computer software buy a software product, that product will be successful.//Sure but this statement is open ended as other attributes may also make the software successful.
(B) Commercial computers software that does not require users to memorize unfamiliar commands is no more expensive than software that does.// Software cost is not an issue. Training cost is. So discard.
(C) Commercial computer software will not be successful unless prime purchasers buy it.//This is correct because it directly implies that software is definitely good to go since prime purchasers are buying it. It also narrows the scope of argument by sticking to argument only. Unlike (A)
(D) If the initial cost of computer software is high, but the cost of training users is low, prime purchases will still buy that software. //This is not completely relevant to the argument as cost of software is not an issue. HR training cost is.
(E) The more difficult it is to learn how to use a piece of software, the more expensive it is to teach a person to use that software. // This is simply reiterating what is already mentioned so discard.
Intern
Joined: 21 Feb 2010
Posts: 33
Location: Ukraine
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [1] , given: 9

### Show Tags

22 Apr 2010, 09:10
1
KUDOS
the keyword is successful, so u need to find the answer with some information which tells you in which way the product can be successful.
here we have 2 answers - A and C, and then my intsight helps me
Director
Joined: 21 Dec 2010
Posts: 649
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 219 [0], given: 51

### Show Tags

07 May 2011, 05:50
it still doesn't destroy the argument.. which is looking for an assumption to link.. prime purchasers >>> buying >>> software with low memorization requirement>>> NO TRAINING >>> Software successful

i agree with the reasons to reject A and B .they dont destroy the argument . moreover , C focuses on the exact wording of the conclusion.
_________________

What is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy.

VP
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1353
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 240 [0], given: 10

### Show Tags

11 May 2011, 00:44
Tipped over on this one.
_________________

Visit -- http://www.sustainable-sphere.com/
Promote Green Business,Sustainable Living and Green Earth !!

Manager
Status: Prepping for the last time....
Joined: 28 May 2010
Posts: 200
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GPA: 3.2
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 21

### Show Tags

16 Sep 2011, 04:40
(C) Commercial computer software will not be successful unless prime purchasers buy it.

Negating C implies that 'some' commercial comp. software will be successful when prime purchasers 'don't' buy it.

This weakens the conclusion as it mentions that only making software less complex will make software successful..
_________________

Two great challenges: 1. Guts to Fail and 2. Fear to Succeed

Manager
Joined: 09 Jun 2011
Posts: 145
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

16 Sep 2011, 09:35
raghavakumar85 wrote:
(C) Commercial computer software will not be successful unless prime purchasers buy it.

Negating C implies that 'some' commercial comp. software will be successful when prime purchasers 'don't' buy it.

This weakens the conclusion as it mentions that only making software less complex will make software successful..

"This weakens the conclusion as it mentions that only making software less complex will make software successful" Did not understand relation of making it less complex or complex with success here..

Mainly the argument is relating success of the software with prime purchasers and not with complexity..

Correct me if i am wrong...
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 May 2011
Posts: 372
Location: US
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 95 [0], given: 46

### Show Tags

16 Sep 2011, 10:32
I'll go with B but not sure how OA is C.

Can someone explain why B is wrong?
_________________

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What you do TODAY is important because you're exchanging a day of your life for it!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Senior Manager
Status: MBAing!!!!
Joined: 24 Jun 2011
Posts: 311
Location: United States (FL)
Concentration: Finance, Real Estate
GPA: 3.65
WE: Project Management (Real Estate)
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 56

### Show Tags

16 Sep 2011, 12:58
I picked E. If you negate E the argument falls apart.
Math Forum Moderator
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 2021
Followers: 161

Kudos [?]: 1704 [1] , given: 376

### Show Tags

16 Sep 2011, 13:36
1
KUDOS
einstein10 wrote:
The companies that are the prime purchasers of computer software will not buy a software package if the costs of training staff to use it are high, and we know that it is expensive to teach people a software package that demands the memorization of unfamiliar commands. As a result, to be successful, commercial computer software cannot require users to memorize unfamiliar commands.

The conclusion above follows logically if which one of the following is assumed?

(A) If more prime purchasers of computer software buy a software product, that product will successful.
(B) Commercial computers software that does not require users to memorize unfamiliar commands is no more expensive than software that does.
(C) Commercial computer software will not be successful unless prime purchasers buy it.
(D) If the initial cost of computer software is high, but the cost of training users is low, prime purchases will still buy that software.
(E) The more difficult it is to learn how to use a piece of software, the more expensive it is to teach a person to use that software.

Very little is gained from refuting OA's from OG, GPrep, LSAT.

OA is indeed "C", and it is correct. We just have to justify how?

Premise:
Prime purchasers won't BUY a software that requires expensive training.
Expensive training is required for teaching UNFAMILIAR commands of a software.

Conclusion:
To be SUCCESSFUL, our software must not require users to learn unfamiliar command.

A proper conclusion would have been:
To make prime purchasers buy our software or at least consider buying, we must not require the users of the software to learn unfamiliar command.

Why?
Because, that will make sure that the training is not expensive. If the training is not expensive, companies will consider buying.

So far just BUYING is concerned, the conclusion holds good. However, the conclusion takes a leap ahead. It says, "TO BE SUCCESSFUL". Note: "To be successful" IS NOT NECESSARILY analogous to "to sell the products to prime purchasers", yet the conclusion mistakenly associated the selling with the success.

C says just that:
(C) Commercial computer software will not be successful unless prime purchasers buy it.

(B) Commercial computers software that does not require users to memorize unfamiliar commands is no more expensive than software that does.
Even if we take this into consideration, it will not justify the success. Moreover, we know the cost of the software is not the issue; at least, not according to the passage. It is the training cost/unfamiliar command that matters.

(E) The more difficult it is to learn how to use a piece of software, the more expensive it is to teach a person to use that software.
Using a software is vaguely/remotely related to difficulty associated with learning unfamiliar command. This is out of scope.

Ans: "C"
_________________
Manager
Joined: 01 Jun 2011
Posts: 176
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 6

### Show Tags

18 Sep 2011, 01:24
t is one logical reasoning questions :
Software will be baught if the training costs are less.
Training cost are more if commands are unfamiliar.
thus
if language dosen't use unfamiliar it will be successful.

Only missing link is how do u define success....thus assumptions is that more the software is baught more successful it is.
Manager
Status: Bell the GMAT!!!
Affiliations: Aidha
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 183
Location: Singapore
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 680 Q46 V37
GMAT 2: 620 Q49 V27
GMAT 3: 700 Q49 V36
WE: Other (Other)
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 43

### Show Tags

21 Sep 2011, 00:31
I was confused between B and C and finally picked B. But after reading the explanations, I get it. Good question!
_________________

If my post did a dance in your mind, send me the steps through kudos :)

Senior Manager
Status: Do and Die!!
Joined: 15 Sep 2010
Posts: 326
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 432 [1] , given: 193

### Show Tags

22 Sep 2011, 09:43
1
KUDOS
Nice Explanation by Fluke

i went for B:
_________________

I'm the Dumbest of All !!

Manager
Status: Retaking next month
Affiliations: None
Joined: 05 Mar 2011
Posts: 229
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V27
GPA: 3.01
WE: Sales (Manufacturing)
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 113 [0], given: 42

### Show Tags

24 Sep 2011, 01:14
Gr8 Explanation @ Fluke. Just hope i can atleast make out some logic in the answer choices when pressed for time in the real exam.
Math Forum Moderator
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 2021
Followers: 161

Kudos [?]: 1704 [0], given: 376

### Show Tags

24 Sep 2011, 01:22
GMATPASSION wrote:
Gr8 Explanation @ Fluke. Just hope i can atleast make out some logic in the answer choices when pressed for time in the real exam.

Amen!!!
_________________
Manager
Joined: 20 Jul 2011
Posts: 152
GMAT Date: 10-21-2011
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 15

### Show Tags

24 Sep 2011, 19:51
einstein10 wrote:
The companies that are the prime purchasers of computer software will not buy a software package if the costs of training staff to use it are high, and we know that it is expensive to teach people a software package that demands the memorization of unfamiliar commands. As a result, to be successful, commercial computer software cannot require users to memorize unfamiliar commands.

The conclusion above follows logically if which one of the following is assumed?

(A) If more prime purchasers of computer software buy a software product, that product will successful.
(B) Commercial computers software that does not require users to memorize unfamiliar commands is no more expensive than software that does.
(C) Commercial computer software will not be successful unless prime purchasers buy it.
(D) If the initial cost of computer software is high, but the cost of training users is low, prime purchases will still buy that software.
(E) The more difficult it is to learn how to use a piece of software, the more expensive it is to teach a person to use that software.

[Reveal] Spoiler:
OA C

i know the OA and I have explanation also, but explanation is not convincing, so please explain your reasoning. thank you.

Conclusion: to be successful, software must not require user to memorise unfamiliar commands
Premise: Softwares that require memorisation of unfamiliar commands --> high training costs involved for prime purchasers --> prime purchasers will not buy software
Assumption: if prime purchasers will not buy software, the software will not be successful.
_________________

"The best day of your life is the one on which you decide your life is your own. No apologies or excuses. No one to lean on, rely on, or blame. The gift is yours - it is an amazing journey - and you alone are responsible for the quality of it. This is the day your life really begins." - Bob Moawab

Re: assumption argument   [#permalink] 24 Sep 2011, 19:51

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 25 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
7 Companies are rapidly adopting computer technology 11 22 Nov 2013, 22:10
1 Most employees in the computer industry move from company to 4 11 Apr 2011, 17:42
17 Most employees in the computer industry move from company to 13 03 Oct 2009, 21:11
2 Most employees in the computer industry move from company to 9 05 Mar 2008, 15:27
Most employees in the computer industry move from company to 13 07 Jun 2007, 06:42
Display posts from previous: Sort by