The cost of drug research and development is staggering.

D here

All other choices are out of scope or dont make sense to the stimulus

Argument deals withe cost for companies and cost for old folks.

D presents the info to clarify the points.

I go with D. If there are imported drugs (and generic ones) competing for a market share with the ones currently in research and development, then the drug companies will not see a reason to invest in the proram.

I will go with D

I will go with D

The answer is not D gang. Any other guesses? According to the source, this is a V42 level CR, so let`s wait for some more guesses before posting the OA/OE.

E clearly resolves the paradox.

problem1 - drug companies want a ban on generic drugs because they want to recoup their expenses. They are not bothered about the old folks.

problem2 - the old chaps want generics because they cannot afford the drug company drugs as they are expensive.

The solution is E!
As per E, the government pays the research grants for the drug companies. This solves both problem 1 and 2.
Govt grants eases the pressure on drug companeis to recoup their investment. So they wont press for a ban on generics.
As companies wont insist on ban on generics, the old folks are also happy.

ah !! mis-read the question as one that explains the paradox instead of a choice that resolves the paradox..

Yep, Rahul got it!

OA is E.

OE:

Step 1: ID Question Type and Task
A question that contains an apparent contradiction indicates a Paradox Question.

Task: Find the seemingly contradictory issue.

Step 2: Read the Argument and Extract Necessary Information:
The necessary information is the paradox, identify the paradox and pose it to yourself as a question.

Paradox: What would explain why the seniors group cites the high costs of R&D for their position, when the drug companies use the same reason for the opposite position?

Step 3: Formulate an Answer to the Question
Formulate a resolution to the paradox (if possible).

Remember, the best answer provides a connection between the two sides of the paradox without changing or discounting either side.

Step 4: Eliminate Answer Choices:


(A) Eliminate. This exacerbates the paradox by giving reason why the seniors group would want the same thing as the drug companies.

(B) Eliminate. This does not deal with the paradox (which is drug costs, not medical care costs).

(C) Eliminate. This is contradictory to the prompt.

(D) Eliminate. This is irrelevant to the disagreement.

(E) Keep. This would explain why the seniors group cited the same reasons as the drug companies, since they expect the slack from cheaper drugs to be picked up by the federal government.

Step 5: Identify differences in remaining choices

(E) is the only remaining choice and is the correct answer.