Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 24 Oct 2014, 10:54

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The Daisygen Company genetically engineers flowers which are

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
4 KUDOS received
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 14 Dec 2012
Posts: 838
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.6
Followers: 37

Kudos [?]: 614 [4] , given: 197

GMAT ToolKit User
The Daisygen Company genetically engineers flowers which are [#permalink] New post 18 Aug 2013, 05:32
4
This post received
KUDOS
10
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

20% (02:35) correct 80% (01:34) wrong based on 785 sessions
NOTE:THIS QUESTION IS FROM FREE MOCK AVAILABLE ON GMAT ECONOMIST. DONT ATTEMPT IF YOU ARE PLANNING TO GIVE THAT MOCK.

The Daisygen Company genetically engineers flowers which are then sent to retailers in locations around the world. By splicing a rose with a species of onion they managed to create a flower that looks like the classic, and still very popular, red rose, but that takes much longer to wilt. A longer expiration period presents an important advantage to international flower importers and to individual consumers. Clearly, sales of the Daisygen rose will outnumber those of the original rose species.

Which of the following is an assumption underlying the conclusion?

a)The genes which were spliced into the rose are not also responsible for the onion's tearing effect.
b)Consumers are interested in a flower that will last longer.
c)Plastic flowers have not affected the import and export of natural flowers.
d)Although extremely popular, the original rose was not the highest selling flower species of all.
e)A longer expiration period will allow importers more time for delivery of the Daisygen roses.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

When you want to succeed as bad as you want to breathe ...then you will be successfull....

GIVE VALUE TO OFFICIAL QUESTIONS...



GMAT RCs VOCABULARY LIST: vocabulary-list-for-gmat-reading-comprehension-155228.html
learn AWA writing techniques while watching video : http://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat- ... assessment
: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APt9ITygGss


Last edited by blueseas on 18 Aug 2013, 09:45, edited 1 time in total.
Kaplan GMAT Prep Discount CodesKnewton GMAT Discount CodesVeritas Prep GMAT Discount Codes
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Persevering
Joined: 15 May 2013
Posts: 224
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Leadership
GMAT Date: 08-02-2013
GPA: 3.7
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 34

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The Daisygen Company genetically engineers flowers which are [#permalink] New post 18 Aug 2013, 06:11
b ?

Not e, because longer to wilt does not mean that importers would not have to honor the agreement.
Not d, It is not the highest selling flower, we do not care about this as we are concerned whether the new flower will sell more.
Not c, as irrelevant
Not a, we do not care about the splicing process; we care about the outcome: the flower takes longer to wilt and if the consumers are interested in such a feature.
_________________

--It's one thing to get defeated, but another to accept it.

2 KUDOS received
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 14 Dec 2012
Posts: 838
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.6
Followers: 37

Kudos [?]: 614 [2] , given: 197

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The Daisygen Company genetically engineers flowers which are [#permalink] New post 18 Aug 2013, 10:03
2
This post received
KUDOS
blueseas wrote:
The Daisygen Company genetically engineers flowers which are then sent to retailers in locations around the world. By splicing a rose with a species of onion they managed to create a flower that looks like the classic, and still very popular, red rose, but that takes much longer to wilt. A longer expiration period presents an important advantage to international flower importers and to individual consumers. Clearly, sales of the Daisygen rose will outnumber those of the original rose species.

Which of the following is an assumption underlying the conclusion?

b)Consumers are interested in a flower that will last longer.


option B is wrong because this information is already present in the passage(see highlited portion).

ASSUMPTION is always AN UNSTATED premise.
_________________

When you want to succeed as bad as you want to breathe ...then you will be successfull....

GIVE VALUE TO OFFICIAL QUESTIONS...



GMAT RCs VOCABULARY LIST: vocabulary-list-for-gmat-reading-comprehension-155228.html
learn AWA writing techniques while watching video : http://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat- ... assessment
: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APt9ITygGss

31 KUDOS received
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 15 Jun 2012
Posts: 1120
Location: United States
Followers: 137

Kudos [?]: 1387 [31] , given: 122

Re: The Daisygen Company genetically engineers flowers which are [#permalink] New post 18 Aug 2013, 13:46
31
This post received
KUDOS
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
This question uses a common fallacy "appeal to novelty"

The form is:
X is newer than Y
--OR--
X has new characteristics that are better than those of Y.
Therefore, X is correct, better, or preferable.


The conclusion is true only if:
(1) X is at least as good as Y (retain original advantages)
--OR--
(2) X does not create new weaknesses that Y does not have.


ANALYZE THE STIMULUS:


Fact: By splicing a rose with a species of onion they managed to create a flower that looks like the classic, and still very popular, red rose, but that takes much longer to wilt.
Fact: A longer expiration period presents an important advantage to international flower importers and to individual consumers.
Conclusion: Sales of the Daisygen rose will outnumber those of the original rose species.

Apply the logic above: the new rose is preferable only if:
(1) it remains advantages of the original rose
--OR--
(2) the new rose does not “create” new weaknesses that the original rose does not have.

ANALYZE EACH ANSWER:

a)The genes which were spliced into the rose are not also responsible for the onion's tearing effect.
Correct. To conclude sales of new roses will outnumber those of the original roses, the new roses MUST NOT create disadvantages that the original roses do not have.

b)Consumers are interested in a flower that will last longer.
Wrong. TEMPTING. You will see this kind of trap over and over again in real GMAT test. B is wrong because B is incomplete assumption. The complete B is: Consumers are interested in a flower that does not have new weaknesses and will last longer (new advantage). Thus, B exposes weakness for criticism and is incorrect assumption.

c)Plastic flowers have not affected the import and export of natural flowers.
Wrong. Out of scope. Nothing about “plastic flowers”.

d)Although extremely popular, the original rose was not the highest selling flower species of all.
Wrong. “highest selling” is out of scope.

e)A longer expiration period will allow importers more time for delivery of the Daisygen roses.
Wrong. “more time for delivery” is the fact, not the assumption.

Hope it helps.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMV Chief of Design.

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 13 Jul 2013
Posts: 77
GMAT 1: 570 Q46 V24
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 21

Re: The Daisygen Company genetically engineers flowers which are [#permalink] New post 21 Aug 2013, 01:19
The genes which were spliced into the rose are not also responsible for the onion's tearing effect.

The words not also is confusing me. Why is he using not also here?
1 KUDOS received
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 15 Jun 2012
Posts: 1120
Location: United States
Followers: 137

Kudos [?]: 1387 [1] , given: 122

Re: The Daisygen Company genetically engineers flowers which are [#permalink] New post 21 Aug 2013, 10:29
1
This post received
KUDOS
theGame001 wrote:
The genes which were spliced into the rose are not also responsible for the onion's tearing effect.

The words not also is confusing me. Why is he using not also here?


Hi theGame

"also" means "too" --> A means: The genes which were spliced into the rose are not responsible for the onion's tearing effect TOO.
It means the tearing is the negative effect of onion itself. When the genes were spliced, the company has to make sure the rose will not inherit that negative effect.

Hope it helps.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMV Chief of Design.

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 22 Sep 2012
Posts: 21
GMAT Date: 09-12-2013
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [1] , given: 35

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The Daisygen Company genetically engineers flowers which are [#permalink] New post 22 Aug 2013, 10:40
1
This post received
KUDOS
pqhai wrote:
This question uses a common fallacy "appeal to novelty"

The form is:
X is newer than Y
--OR--
X has new characteristics that are better than those of Y.
Therefore, X is correct, better, or preferable.


The conclusion is true only if:
(1) X is at least as good as Y (retain original advantages)
--OR--
(2) X does not create new weaknesses that Y does not have.


ANALYZE THE STIMULUS:


Fact: By splicing a rose with a species of onion they managed to create a flower that looks like the classic, and still very popular, red rose, but that takes much longer to wilt.
Fact: A longer expiration period presents an important advantage to international flower importers and to individual consumers.
Conclusion: Sales of the Daisygen rose will outnumber those of the original rose species.

Apply the logic above: the new rose is preferable only if:
(1) it remains advantages of the original rose
--OR--
(2) the new rose does not “create” new weaknesses that the original rose does not have.

ANALYZE EACH ANSWER:

a)The genes which were spliced into the rose are not also responsible for the onion's tearing effect.
Correct. To conclude sales of new roses will outnumber those of the original roses, the new roses MUST NOT create disadvantages that the original roses do not have.

b)Consumers are interested in a flower that will last longer.
Wrong. TEMPTING. You will see this kind of trap over and over again in real GMAT test. B is wrong because B is incomplete assumption. The complete B is: Consumers are interested in a flower that does not have new weaknesses and will last longer (new advantage). Thus, B exposes weakness for criticism and is incorrect assumption.

c)Plastic flowers have not affected the import and export of natural flowers.
Wrong. Out of scope. Nothing about “plastic flowers”.

d)Although extremely popular, the original rose was not the highest selling flower species of all.
Wrong. “highest selling” is out of scope.

e)A longer expiration period will allow importers more time for delivery of the Daisygen roses.
Wrong. “more time for delivery” is the fact, not the assumption.

Hope it helps.


This was really an eye-opener for me. (+1 Already).
_________________

If KUDOS then gmatclub Test series.
YEAH!!

1 KUDOS received
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 15 Jun 2012
Posts: 1120
Location: United States
Followers: 137

Kudos [?]: 1387 [1] , given: 122

Re: The Daisygen Company genetically engineers flowers which are [#permalink] New post 22 Aug 2013, 10:56
1
This post received
KUDOS
SmokedRing wrote:
pqhai wrote:
This question uses a common fallacy "appeal to novelty"

The form is:
X is newer than Y
--OR--
X has new characteristics that are better than those of Y.
Therefore, X is correct, better, or preferable.


The conclusion is true only if:
(1) X is at least as good as Y (retain original advantages)
--OR--
(2) X does not create new weaknesses that Y does not have.


ANALYZE THE STIMULUS:


Fact: By splicing a rose with a species of onion they managed to create a flower that looks like the classic, and still very popular, red rose, but that takes much longer to wilt.
Fact: A longer expiration period presents an important advantage to international flower importers and to individual consumers.
Conclusion: Sales of the Daisygen rose will outnumber those of the original rose species.

Apply the logic above: the new rose is preferable only if:
(1) it remains advantages of the original rose
--OR--
(2) the new rose does not “create” new weaknesses that the original rose does not have.

ANALYZE EACH ANSWER:

a)The genes which were spliced into the rose are not also responsible for the onion's tearing effect.
Correct. To conclude sales of new roses will outnumber those of the original roses, the new roses MUST NOT create disadvantages that the original roses do not have.

b)Consumers are interested in a flower that will last longer.
Wrong. TEMPTING. You will see this kind of trap over and over again in real GMAT test. B is wrong because B is incomplete assumption. The complete B is: Consumers are interested in a flower that does not have new weaknesses and will last longer (new advantage). Thus, B exposes weakness for criticism and is incorrect assumption.

c)Plastic flowers have not affected the import and export of natural flowers.
Wrong. Out of scope. Nothing about “plastic flowers”.

d)Although extremely popular, the original rose was not the highest selling flower species of all.
Wrong. “highest selling” is out of scope.

e)A longer expiration period will allow importers more time for delivery of the Daisygen roses.
Wrong. “more time for delivery” is the fact, not the assumption.

Hope it helps.


This was really an eye-opener for me. (+1 Already).


Hi SmokedRing
Welcome to gmatclub. Hope you find good materials for your Gmat journey. :)
Cheer!
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMV Chief of Design.

Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 22 Sep 2012
Posts: 21
GMAT Date: 09-12-2013
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 35

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The Daisygen Company genetically engineers flowers which are [#permalink] New post 22 Aug 2013, 11:25
pqhai wrote:
SmokedRing wrote:
pqhai wrote:
This question uses a common fallacy "appeal to novelty"

The form is:
X is newer than Y
--OR--
X has new characteristics that are better than those of Y.
Therefore, X is correct, better, or preferable.


The conclusion is true only if:
(1) X is at least as good as Y (retain original advantages)
--OR--
(2) X does not create new weaknesses that Y does not have.


ANALYZE THE STIMULUS:


Fact: By splicing a rose with a species of onion they managed to create a flower that looks like the classic, and still very popular, red rose, but that takes much longer to wilt.
Fact: A longer expiration period presents an important advantage to international flower importers and to individual consumers.
Conclusion: Sales of the Daisygen rose will outnumber those of the original rose species.

Apply the logic above: the new rose is preferable only if:
(1) it remains advantages of the original rose
--OR--
(2) the new rose does not “create” new weaknesses that the original rose does not have.

ANALYZE EACH ANSWER:

a)The genes which were spliced into the rose are not also responsible for the onion's tearing effect.
Correct. To conclude sales of new roses will outnumber those of the original roses, the new roses MUST NOT create disadvantages that the original roses do not have.

b)Consumers are interested in a flower that will last longer.
Wrong. TEMPTING. You will see this kind of trap over and over again in real GMAT test. B is wrong because B is incomplete assumption. The complete B is: Consumers are interested in a flower that does not have new weaknesses and will last longer (new advantage). Thus, B exposes weakness for criticism and is incorrect assumption.

c)Plastic flowers have not affected the import and export of natural flowers.
Wrong. Out of scope. Nothing about “plastic flowers”.

d)Although extremely popular, the original rose was not the highest selling flower species of all.
Wrong. “highest selling” is out of scope.

e)A longer expiration period will allow importers more time for delivery of the Daisygen roses.
Wrong. “more time for delivery” is the fact, not the assumption.

Hope it helps.


This was really an eye-opener for me. (+1 Already).


Hi SmokedRing
Welcome to gmatclub. Hope you find good materials for your Gmat journey. :)
Cheer!



Thanks pqhai.... Em havin a gud time here.
Though em a little ...but its better late den never.
_________________

If KUDOS then gmatclub Test series.
YEAH!!

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 03 Dec 2012
Posts: 367
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 291

Re: The Daisygen Company genetically engineers flowers which are [#permalink] New post 15 Oct 2013, 00:51
Solved it in 1.17 secs. I am so happy : ). Hope I can perform similarly on the day of the exam. #relentlesshardworker
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 29 Apr 2013
Posts: 101
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT Date: 11-06-2013
WE: Programming (Telecommunications)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 77 [0], given: 53

Re: The Daisygen Company genetically engineers flowers which are [#permalink] New post 28 Oct 2013, 07:29
pqhai wrote:
This question uses a common fallacy "appeal to novelty"

The form is:
X is newer than Y
--OR--
X has new characteristics that are better than those of Y.
Therefore, X is correct, better, or preferable.


The conclusion is true only if:
(1) X is at least as good as Y (retain original advantages)
--OR--
(2) X does not create new weaknesses that Y does not have.


ANALYZE THE STIMULUS:


Fact: By splicing a rose with a species of onion they managed to create a flower that looks like the classic, and still very popular, red rose, but that takes much longer to wilt.
Fact: A longer expiration period presents an important advantage to international flower importers and to individual consumers.
Conclusion: Sales of the Daisygen rose will outnumber those of the original rose species.

Apply the logic above: the new rose is preferable only if:
(1) it remains advantages of the original rose
--OR--
(2) the new rose does not “create” new weaknesses that the original rose does not have.

ANALYZE EACH ANSWER:

a)The genes which were spliced into the rose are not also responsible for the onion's tearing effect.
Correct. To conclude sales of new roses will outnumber those of the original roses, the new roses MUST NOT create disadvantages that the original roses do not have.

b)Consumers are interested in a flower that will last longer.
Wrong. TEMPTING. You will see this kind of trap over and over again in real GMAT test. B is wrong because B is incomplete assumption. The complete B is: Consumers are interested in a flower that does not have new weaknesses and will last longer (new advantage). Thus, B exposes weakness for criticism and is incorrect assumption.

c)Plastic flowers have not affected the import and export of natural flowers.
Wrong. Out of scope. Nothing about “plastic flowers”.

d)Although extremely popular, the original rose was not the highest selling flower species of all.
Wrong. “highest selling” is out of scope.

e)A longer expiration period will allow importers more time for delivery of the Daisygen roses.
Wrong. “more time for delivery” is the fact, not the assumption.

Hope it helps.


Do you have any similar questions like this, so that we can test how this concept works for other questions as well?
_________________

Do not forget to hit the Kudos button on your left if you find my post helpful 8-)

Collection of some good questions on Number System

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Status: GMAT_Hound
Joined: 04 Jun 2013
Posts: 339
Location: India
Concentration: Statistics, International Business
Schools: Fuqua, ISB '15
GMAT Date: 12-02-2013
GPA: 3.32
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 46

Kudos [?]: 168 [1] , given: 39

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: The Daisygen Company genetically engineers flowers which are [#permalink] New post 28 Oct 2013, 10:26
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
@ TirthankarP
First of all may i kindly point a small mistake in the request you made, without sounding rude? it should be "similar question such as this" .
Yes there are lot many question similar to this. In OG 12 , in the diagnostic section there is a question , which talks about a bee/wasp that runs to hunt its prey and pauses to take rest bla bla ... that is quite similar to this 1.
Hope that helps. and once again excuse me for pointing out the typo
_________________

Regards,

S

Consider +1 KUDOS if you find this post useful

Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 29 Apr 2013
Posts: 101
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT Date: 11-06-2013
WE: Programming (Telecommunications)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 77 [0], given: 53

Re: The Daisygen Company genetically engineers flowers which are [#permalink] New post 28 Oct 2013, 10:49
Hey WaterFlowsUp !

Thanks for pointing out my mistake. I really appreciate :)
Many of us usually make such mistakes in "spoken English". But this "like v/s such as" is one of those things that I always take care of while solving SC questions :P
_________________

Do not forget to hit the Kudos button on your left if you find my post helpful 8-)

Collection of some good questions on Number System

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 20 Jul 2013
Posts: 13
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 308

Re: The Daisygen Company genetically engineers flowers which are [#permalink] New post 05 Dec 2013, 04:48
I don't agree to the OA. Let us say the new rose has the genes of the onion which are responsible for the tearing effect of onion. The newrose would not have any disadvantages until someone cuts the rose, right?
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 17 May 2012
Posts: 4
Schools: HBS '16, Insead '14
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 2

Re: The Daisygen Company genetically engineers flowers which are [#permalink] New post 26 Dec 2013, 15:25
Clear A.. Defender assumption question...
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Apr 2012
Posts: 465
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 58

CAT Tests
Re: The Daisygen Company genetically engineers flowers which are [#permalink] New post 05 Aug 2014, 06:38
pqhai wrote:
This question uses a common fallacy "appeal to novelty"

The form is:
X is newer than Y
--OR--
X has new characteristics that are better than those of Y.
Therefore, X is correct, better, or preferable.


The conclusion is true only if:
(1) X is at least as good as Y (retain original advantages)
--OR--
(2) X does not create new weaknesses that Y does not have.


ANALYZE THE STIMULUS:


Fact: By splicing a rose with a species of onion they managed to create a flower that looks like the classic, and still very popular, red rose, but that takes much longer to wilt.
Fact: A longer expiration period presents an important advantage to international flower importers and to individual consumers.
Conclusion: Sales of the Daisygen rose will outnumber those of the original rose species.

Apply the logic above: the new rose is preferable only if:
(1) it remains advantages of the original rose
--OR--
(2) the new rose does not “create” new weaknesses that the original rose does not have.

ANALYZE EACH ANSWER:

a)The genes which were spliced into the rose are not also responsible for the onion's tearing effect.
Correct. To conclude sales of new roses will outnumber those of the original roses, the new roses MUST NOT create disadvantages that the original roses do not have.

b)Consumers are interested in a flower that will last longer.
Wrong. TEMPTING. You will see this kind of trap over and over again in real GMAT test. B is wrong because B is incomplete assumption. The complete B is: Consumers are interested in a flower that does not have new weaknesses and will last longer (new advantage). Thus, B exposes weakness for criticism and is incorrect assumption.

c)Plastic flowers have not affected the import and export of natural flowers.
Wrong. Out of scope. Nothing about “plastic flowers”.

d)Although extremely popular, the original rose was not the highest selling flower species of all.
Wrong. “highest selling” is out of scope.

e)A longer expiration period will allow importers more time for delivery of the Daisygen roses.
Wrong. “more time for delivery” is the fact, not the assumption.

Hope it helps.

Hi,
As I agree with the concept of : "X does not create new weaknesses that Y does not have." , it's not stated anywhere in the stem....
What if the new roses had longer stems or less seeds or something like that?
It would not affect the end consumer but might present a problem for growers... But would that change the question?
I chose B and still don't know why it's wrong, and don't see why A is right....
Can someone elaborate a little more?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Apr 2014
Posts: 291
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 46

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The Daisygen Company genetically engineers flowers which are [#permalink] New post 05 Aug 2014, 21:47
pqhai wrote:
This question uses a common fallacy "appeal to novelty"

The form is:
X is newer than Y
--OR--
X has new characteristics that are better than those of Y.
Therefore, X is correct, better, or preferable.


The conclusion is true only if:
(1) X is at least as good as Y (retain original advantages)
--OR--
(2) X does not create new weaknesses that Y does not have.


ANALYZE THE STIMULUS:


Fact: By splicing a rose with a species of onion they managed to create a flower that looks like the classic, and still very popular, red rose, but that takes much longer to wilt.
Fact: A longer expiration period presents an important advantage to international flower importers and to individual consumers.
Conclusion: Sales of the Daisygen rose will outnumber those of the original rose species.

Apply the logic above: the new rose is preferable only if:
(1) it remains advantages of the original rose
--OR--
(2) the new rose does not “create” new weaknesses that the original rose does not have.

ANALYZE EACH ANSWER:

a)The genes which were spliced into the rose are not also responsible for the onion's tearing effect.
Correct. To conclude sales of new roses will outnumber those of the original roses, the new roses MUST NOT create disadvantages that the original roses do not have.

b)Consumers are interested in a flower that will last longer.
Wrong. TEMPTING. You will see this kind of trap over and over again in real GMAT test. B is wrong because B is incomplete assumption. The complete B is: Consumers are interested in a flower that does not have new weaknesses and will last longer (new advantage). Thus, B exposes weakness for criticism and is incorrect assumption.

c)Plastic flowers have not affected the import and export of natural flowers.
Wrong. Out of scope. Nothing about “plastic flowers”.

d)Although extremely popular, the original rose was not the highest selling flower species of all.
Wrong. “highest selling” is out of scope.

e)A longer expiration period will allow importers more time for delivery of the Daisygen roses.
Wrong. “more time for delivery” is the fact, not the assumption.

Hope it helps.


For B , in addition to the logic expounded by you , I think one major flaw is that if customers start buying longer lasting flowers , they will not buy that frequently. So the sales will not be increasing that much.

However I am having difficulty applying the negation rule over here. If I negate B , i.e Consumers are NOT interested in a flower that will last longer. , isn't the conclusion broken down
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 18 Oct 2013
Posts: 51
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Strategy
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 9

GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: The Daisygen Company genetically engineers flowers which are [#permalink] New post 05 Aug 2014, 23:38
pqhai wrote:

b)Consumers are interested in a flower that will last longer.
Wrong. TEMPTING. You will see this kind of trap over and over again in real GMAT test. B is wrong because B is incomplete assumption. The complete B is: Consumers are interested in a flower that does not have new weaknesses and will last longer (new advantage). Thus, B exposes weakness for criticism and is incorrect assumption.


Hi pghai,

I am still confused between option A and option B. It says that the consumer are interested in a flower that will last longer. If we negate the statement - Consumers are not interested in a flower that will last longer. This breaks the conclusion. However, option A seems more convincing to me. I am looking for a reason to eliminate Choice B. Can you please explain?


Thanks for your help!!!

-Anuj
_________________

Preparing for the next shot!!!

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: PLAY HARD OR GO HOME
Joined: 25 Feb 2014
Posts: 138
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT Date: 11-08-2014
GPA: 3.1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 49 [1] , given: 323

GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: The Daisygen Company genetically engineers flowers which are [#permalink] New post 11 Aug 2014, 22:36
1
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
anujag24 wrote:
pqhai wrote:

b)Consumers are interested in a flower that will last longer.
Wrong. TEMPTING. You will see this kind of trap over and over again in real GMAT test. B is wrong because B is incomplete assumption. The complete B is: Consumers are interested in a flower that does not have new weaknesses and will last longer (new advantage). Thus, B exposes weakness for criticism and is incorrect assumption.


Hi pghai,

I am still confused between option A and option B. It says that the consumer are interested in a flower that will last longer. If we negate the statement - Consumers are not interested in a flower that will last longer. This breaks the conclusion. However, option A seems more convincing to me. I am looking for a reason to eliminate Choice B. Can you please explain?


Thanks for your help!!!

-Anuj

Hii Anuj,
let me try to exlpain..
Although people are interested in flowers that last long,we are more interested in whether the sale will be greater than natural flowers..even if people are interested,we have no idea whether they will go ahead and purchase them..what if the conversion process was costly and it cost 10 times more than natural flowers,and what if the rose smells like an onion,or what if tearing effect persists in new flower ?So,though people are interested in long lasting flowers,the factors such as cost,smell,tearing effect will keep them away from purchasing the new flower and this will affect our CONCLUSION...



Hope that helps..please consider KUDOS,if my post helped :)
_________________

THE WORD IMPOSSIBLE ITSELF SAYS : I-M-POSSIBLE...SO,DREAM THE IMPOSSIBLE-AND DO THE INCREDIBLE

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 18 Oct 2013
Posts: 51
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Strategy
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 9

GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: The Daisygen Company genetically engineers flowers which are [#permalink] New post 12 Aug 2014, 11:39
vards wrote:
anujag24 wrote:
pqhai wrote:

b)Consumers are interested in a flower that will last longer.
Wrong. TEMPTING. You will see this kind of trap over and over again in real GMAT test. B is wrong because B is incomplete assumption. The complete B is: Consumers are interested in a flower that does not have new weaknesses and will last longer (new advantage). Thus, B exposes weakness for criticism and is incorrect assumption.


Hi pghai,

I am still confused between option A and option B. It says that the consumer are interested in a flower that will last longer. If we negate the statement - Consumers are not interested in a flower that will last longer. This breaks the conclusion. However, option A seems more convincing to me. I am looking for a reason to eliminate Choice B. Can you please explain?


Thanks for your help!!!

-Anuj

Hii Anuj,
let me try to exlpain..
Although people are interested in flowers that last long,we are more interested in whether the sale will be greater than natural flowers..even if people are interested,we have no idea whether they will go ahead and purchase them..what if the conversion process was costly and it cost 10 times more than natural flowers,and what if the rose smells like an onion,or what if tearing effect persists in new flower ?So,though people are interested in long lasting flowers,the factors such as cost,smell,tearing effect will keep them away from purchasing the new flower and this will affect our CONCLUSION...



Hope that helps..please consider KUDOS,if my post helped :)



This really helps!!! Kudos for you. :)
_________________

Preparing for the next shot!!!

Re: The Daisygen Company genetically engineers flowers which are   [#permalink] 12 Aug 2014, 11:39
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
SC Genetically engineered plant mahesh004 5 03 Oct 2006, 07:35
2 Using the techniques employed by genetic engineering, a new Riuscita 6 02 Apr 2006, 18:11
Simply because they are genetically engineered does not make christoph 7 18 Oct 2005, 09:24
A new genetically engineered papaya was produced not by seed Pauline 7 23 Jul 2005, 02:04
Plant scientists have been able to genetically engineer pb_india 28 18 May 2005, 09:01
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The Daisygen Company genetically engineers flowers which are

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 21 posts ] 



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.