Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 27 Oct 2016, 00:36

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2013, 03:31
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

38% (01:49) correct 62% (01:01) wrong based on 107 sessions

The Dancing Doll line sold slightly more than $3.5 million worth of toys last year, 40% mroe than the Teeny Tiny Trucks line did and newarly 3 times as much as the Basic Blocks line's sales. A. the Teeny Tiny Trucks line did and newarly 3 times as much as the Basic Blocks line's sales B. the Teeny Tiny Trucks did and nearly 3 times what the Basic Blocks' sales were C. the Teeny Tiny Trucks line sold and nearly 3 times as much as Basic Blocks' sales. D. the Teeny Tiny Trucks line and nearly 3 times more than Basic Blocks' sales E. the Teeny Tiny Trucks line and nearly 3 times more than the Basic Blocks line Can someone please explain the difference between 3 times as much as and 3 times more than?? [Reveal] Spoiler: OA VP Status: Far, far away! Joined: 02 Sep 2012 Posts: 1123 Location: Italy Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship GPA: 3.8 Followers: 177 Kudos [?]: 1868 [1] , given: 219 Re: The Dancing Doll line sold slightly more than [#permalink] ### Show Tags 05 Apr 2013, 04:34 1 This post received KUDOS The Dancing Doll line sold slightly more than$3.5 million worth of toys last year, 40% more than the Teeny Tiny Trucks line did and newarly 3 times as much as the Basic Blocks line's sales.

A. the Teeny Tiny Trucks line did and newarly 3 times as much as the Basic Blocks line's sales
B. the Teeny Tiny Trucks did and nearly 3 times what the Basic Blocks' sales were
C. the Teeny Tiny Trucks line sold and nearly 3 times as much as Basic Blocks' sales.
D. the Teeny Tiny Trucks line and nearly 3 times more than Basic Blocks' sales
E. the Teeny Tiny Trucks line and nearly 3 times more than the Basic Blocks line

To answer te question correctly, IMO, the point in not "the difference between 3 times as much as and 3 times more than".
We have to mantain the parallelism in the structure. The subject is the Dancing Doll line, and it must be compared to other "lines"; the passage says "40% more than" and we have to mantain that structure using "3 times more than" (and not 3 times as much for example) . Only E keeps these conditions intact. IMO E
_________________

It is beyond a doubt that all our knowledge that begins with experience.

Kant , Critique of Pure Reason

Tips and tricks: Inequalities , Mixture | Review: MGMAT workshop
Strategy: SmartGMAT v1.0 | Questions: Verbal challenge SC I-II- CR New SC set out !! , My Quant

Rules for Posting in the Verbal Forum - Rules for Posting in the Quant Forum[/size][/color][/b]

Manager
Status: struggling with GMAT
Joined: 06 Dec 2012
Posts: 227
Concentration: Accounting
GMAT Date: 04-06-2013
GPA: 3.65
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 314 [1] , given: 46

Re: The Dancing Doll line sold slightly more than $3.5 million [#permalink] ### Show Tags 20 Apr 2013, 07:13 1 This post received KUDOS In kaplan the explanation is............ The word than preceding the underlined portion of the sentence tells us that the underlined portion is a comparison.Items compared must be parallel to each other,both as items and grammatically.Here,the money the Dancing Doll(DD) line received from sales is compared to that received by the Teeny Tiny Trucks)TT and Basic Blocks (BB)lines,so all three quantities should be started the same way. Only the mane of the toy line and the amount should change from item to item,and the verb sold does not need to be repeated for each item. (A)includes did with the TT sales but no verb with the BB sales,these forms are not parallel (B)is not parallel because it uses did with TT sales and were with BB sales (C)includes sold withTT sales,but no additional verb with BB,so it can also be eliminated (D)uses Basic Blocks sales,which is not parallel to Dancing Dolls line and Tenny Tine line (E)eliminates the verbs and make the comparison more parallel by using more than for one item and nearly three times as much as for other.Its the correct answer. Give kudos if you find my post helpful Senior Manager Joined: 19 Apr 2011 Posts: 289 Schools: Booth,NUS,St.Gallon Followers: 5 Kudos [?]: 252 [0], given: 51 Re: The Dancing Doll line sold slightly more than [#permalink] ### Show Tags 05 Apr 2013, 05:02 Hi I think it is not about the maintaining the structure . When multiplication factor (like 3 times ) is used then it cannot be more than. Please make sure the OA is right and it is from a valid source. _________________ +1 if you like my explanation .Thanks Retired Moderator Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying Joined: 19 Feb 2007 Posts: 3610 Location: India WE: Education (Education) Followers: 653 Kudos [?]: 5096 [0], given: 321 Re: The Dancing Doll line sold slightly more than [#permalink] ### Show Tags 05 Apr 2013, 10:30 Three times as much as means three times x, where x is the trait of the first item or in other words 300 per cent Three times more than means, 1x+3x, summing up to 4x or 400 percent. Of course this is not what the text wants to assert. Its focus is on whether 40% more than is parallel to three times as much as. IMO, 40% more than is logically as parallel to as three times as much as. While the former is called comparative degree, the latter is called positive degree. Between logic and structure parallelism, logic is more paramount (at least in this context). This is my gut feeling. _________________ “Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb. 9884544509 Re: The Dancing Doll line sold slightly more than [#permalink] 05 Apr 2013, 10:30 Similar topics Replies Last post Similar Topics: The Dancing Doll line sold slightly more than$3.5 million 0 23 Aug 2013, 03:17
The Dancing Doll line sold slightly more than $3.5 million 9 29 Apr 2010, 10:14 The dancing doll line sold slightly more than$3.5 million 6 27 Jan 2010, 08:10
5 The Dancing Doll line sold slightly more than $3.5 million 50 31 Oct 2007, 04:45 6 The city will lose more than one million dollars in 6 02 Mar 2008, 13:19 Display posts from previous: Sort by # The Dancing Doll line sold slightly more than$3.5 million

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.