Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 Oct 2014, 03:17

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The decline of manufacturing in a region sets off a chain

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Read the Question in the post below and mark the Correct Answer

  • 53% [30]
  • 14% [8]
  • 12% [7]
  • 8% [5]
  • 10% [6]
Author Message
TAGS:
Expert Post
2 KUDOS received
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 1794
Followers: 1299

Kudos [?]: 3670 [2] , given: 185

The decline of manufacturing in a region sets off a chain [#permalink] New post 27 Jan 2013, 22:44
2
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

86% (02:31) correct 14% (01:43) wrong based on 94 sessions
The decline of manufacturing in a region sets off a chain reaction. Once manufacturing is outsourced, process-engineering expertise can’t be maintained, since it depends on daily interactions with manufacturing. Without process-engineering capabilities, companies find it increasingly difficult to conduct advanced research on next-generation process technologies. Without the ability to develop such new processes, they find they can no longer develop new products.

Which of the following is best supported by the passage?

A. In the long term, an economy with a deteriorating infrastructure for advanced process engineering and with declining manufacturing activity will likely lose its ability to innovate.
B. To develop new products, a company must never cut down on its manufacturing.
C. An increase in the manufacturing activity in a region leads to increase in innovation within the region
D. To develop new products, a company needs to frequently change its processes.
E. An economy that has growing manufacturing capabilities will churn out more new products than other economies.
_________________

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeT9_Wr0DlI&feature=youtu.be

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 1794
Followers: 1299

Kudos [?]: 3670 [1] , given: 185

Re: A 700 level inference question [#permalink] New post 27 Jan 2013, 22:45
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
Hi,

Here is the detailed solution:

The question asks us to find an option statement which is most strongly suggested by the passage. Therefore, the question is very similar to an inference question.

Facts of the case:
• Decline in manufacturing sets off a chain reaction.
• Decline in manufacturing -> Non-maintenance of Process-engineering expertise -> Difficulty in conducting research on next generation process technologies -> Inability to develop new products.

Prethinking:

The passage talks about a sequential cause-effect relationship in the form: A->B->C->D.

In this case, an inference of the form X->Y can be built from the information given, where X can be any event which precedes Y in the above chain reaction.

Analysis of Answer choices:

A. In the long term, an economy with a deteriorating infrastructure for advanced process engineering and with declining manufacturing activity will likely lose its ability to innovate. – Correct choice.We don’t know for sure what a decline in “advanced process engineering” could lead to, since the passage talks about “process engineering” in general. However, a declining manufacturing activity will necessarily lead to inability to develop new products or innovate. Therefore, this statement is supported by the information given in the passage.

B. To develop new products a company must never cut down its manufacturing. –The passage talks about manufacturing in a region, not a company, which may be spread over multiple regions. Thus, this option is incorrect.

C. An increase in the manufacturing activity in a region leads to increase in innovation within the region – While a decrease in manufacturing activity leads to decrease in innovation, we cannot infer what effect an increase in manufacturing activity will have. Thus, incorrect.

D. To develop new products, a company needs to frequently change its processes. – Without the word “frequently”, this option could have been attractive. Note that “frequent” change of processes as a prerequisite to develop new products cannot be inferred from the passage. Thus, incorrect.

E. An economy that has growing manufacturing capabilities will churn out more new products than other economies. – Again, like option D, we cannot infer about the effect of increasing manufacturing activity. Thus, Incorrect.

Hope this helps :)

Thanks,
Chiranjeev
_________________

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeT9_Wr0DlI&feature=youtu.be


Last edited by egmat on 31 Jan 2013, 23:38, edited 1 time in total.
Expert Post
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 2441
Followers: 311

Kudos [?]: 2615 [0], given: 696

Re: A 700 level inference question [#permalink] New post 28 Jan 2013, 01:37
Expert's post
1 KUDOS received
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 23 Oct 2010
Posts: 384
Location: Azerbaijan
Concentration: Finance
Schools: HEC '15 (A)
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V38
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 146 [1] , given: 73

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: A 700 level inference question [#permalink] New post 28 Jan 2013, 10:27
1
This post received
KUDOS
I also vote for A

B- too strong language
C the argument never said that
D didnt like the word frequently. Again , too strong language
E the argument never compared two economies
_________________

Happy are those who dream dreams and are ready to pay the price to make them come true

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 15 Jun 2012
Posts: 8
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [1] , given: 5

Re: A 700 level inference question [#permalink] New post 28 Jan 2013, 12:29
1
This post received
KUDOS
In my opinion, this a conditional logic type question.

From my perspective:

The first sentence is an initial statement. Then the conditional logic comes into play:

IF Manufacturing outsourced, then Process engineering can't be maintained
MO--> not PEM

If no PEM--> not next generation process technologies
not PEM--> not NGPT

If not Next Generation Technologies--> Not new products
not NGPT--> not new products

Putting it all together you have, and must follow the arrow.


Manufacturing Outsourcing--> No/difficult Process Engineering-->No Next Generation Process Technologies--->No New Products


A. In the long term, an economy with a deteriorating infrastructure for advanced process engineering and with declining manufacturing activity will likely lose its ability to innovate.
Seems Correct. Difficult Process Engineering is touched upon, and declining manufacturing activity. Both lead to No new products, which can inferred to be "innovation"
B. To develop new products, a company must never cut down on its manufacturing.
If new products for a company, then never lower manufacturing? We don't know this. A company could hypothetically lower it, all we know based on the question is a "region"
C. An increase in the manufacturing activity in a region leads to increase in innovation within the region
This is speculation, we just know about the decline, we don't know about the increase
D. To develop new products, a company needs to frequently change its processes. WE know nothing about changing processes
E. An economy that has growing manufacturing capabilities will churn out more new products than other economies. No. There is nothing alluding toward that in the question.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 27 Jul 2012
Posts: 98
Location: India
GMAT Date: 10-25-2012
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 62

Re: A 700 level inference question [#permalink] New post 28 Jan 2013, 22:27
The decline of manufacturing in a region sets off a chain reaction. Once manufacturing is outsourced, process-engineering expertise can’t be maintained, since it depends on daily interactions with manufacturing. Without process-engineering capabilities, companies find it increasingly difficult to conduct advanced research on next-generation process technologies. Without the ability to develop such new processes, they find they can no longer develop new products.

decline in manufacturing initiates chain reaction
Manufacturing outsourcing -> decline process Eng expertise -> decline adv research new process tech -> new prod dev decline


Which of the following is best supported by the passage?

A. In the long term, an economy with a deteriorating infrastructure for advanced process engineering and with declining manufacturing activity will likely lose its ability to innovate. incorrect- passage does not talks about infrastructure for advanced process engineering
B. To develop new products, a company must never cut down on its manufacturing. correct- pass fact test
C. An increase in the manufacturing activity in a region leads to increase in innovation within the region not necessarily true
D. To develop new products, a company needs to frequently change its processes. not supported by the passage
E. An economy that has growing manufacturing capabilities will churn out more new products than other economies. not supported by the passage
_________________

if my post helped you, let me know by pressing Kudos...

Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Time to apply!
Joined: 24 Aug 2011
Posts: 221
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 600 Q48 V25
GMAT 2: 660 Q50 V29
GMAT 3: 690 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.2
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 166

Re: A 700 level inference question [#permalink] New post 29 Jan 2013, 01:26
I vote for (B).

(A) talks about economy. But in the passage, nothing about economy is discussed in general
_________________

Didn't give up !!! Still Trying!!

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Status: Final Lap
Joined: 25 Oct 2012
Posts: 294
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.54
WE: Project Management (Retail Banking)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 104 [0], given: 85

Re: A 700 level inference question [#permalink] New post 29 Jan 2013, 01:47
egmat wrote:
The decline of manufacturing in a region sets off a chain reaction. Once manufacturing is outsourced, process-engineering expertise can’t be maintained, since it depends on daily interactions with manufacturing. Without process-engineering capabilities, companies find it increasingly difficult to conduct advanced research on next-generation process technologies. Without the ability to develop such new processes, they find they can no longer develop new products.

Which of the following is best supported by the passage?

A. In the long term, an economy with a deteriorating infrastructure for advanced process engineering and with declining manufacturing activity will likely lose its ability to innovate.
B. To develop new products, a company must never cut down on its manufacturing.
C. An increase in the manufacturing activity in a region leads to increase in innovation within the region
D. To develop new products, a company needs to frequently change its processes.
E. An economy that has growing manufacturing capabilities will churn out more new products than other economies.


The conclusion is : Without the ability to develop such new processes, they find they can no longer develop new products.

I think that D is best supported by the conclusion since changing its processes is the same as bringing new processes. Hence, a company needs to frequently change its processes in order to develop new products ..
_________________

KUDOS is the good manner to help the entire community.

"If you don't change your life, your life will change you"

1 KUDOS received
Current Student
avatar
Status: Final Lap Up!!!
Affiliations: NYK Line
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Posts: 1097
Location: India
GMAT 1: 410 Q35 V11
GMAT 2: 530 Q44 V20
GMAT 3: 630 Q45 V31
GPA: 3.84
WE: Engineering (Transportation)
Followers: 31

Kudos [?]: 274 [1] , given: 67

Re: A 700 level inference question [#permalink] New post 30 Jan 2013, 02:08
1
This post received
KUDOS
I think the answer is straight A...

Options d is totally out.
B,c and E all mean the same thing...so we can eliminate all 3 on the basis if one is correcct why not the rest 2.
Only remaining answer is A and IMO its the best answer.

If we want proper reasoning for selecting A ...here it is:-
Manufacturing decline----.> Outsourcing -------> Process eng looses expertises i.e quality -----> No more innovation in r & D--------> No more innovation.....

Read the it in conjunction with A ....
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 25 Dec 2012
Posts: 1
Concentration: Technology, Operations
GPA: 4
WE: Other (Other)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 3

Re: A 700 level inference question [#permalink] New post 30 Jan 2013, 07:57
The answer seems to be A)

For those stating that the economy is not being referred. The para starts with 'declining manufacturing in the region'. Option A) is the statement that covers the all the arguments mentioned in the para.

Good Day !
Expert Post
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 1794
Followers: 1299

Kudos [?]: 3670 [0], given: 185

Re: A 700 level inference question [#permalink] New post 31 Jan 2013, 23:42
Expert's post
Hi All,

Thank you chiming in with your solutions and explanations.

The detailed solution has been posted in the second post of this thread.

Kudos to all who put in the correct answer with correct explanations :)

Thanks,
Chiranjeev
_________________

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeT9_Wr0DlI&feature=youtu.be

Expert Post
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 1794
Followers: 1299

Kudos [?]: 3670 [0], given: 185

Re: A 700 level inference question [#permalink] New post 31 Jan 2013, 23:45
Expert's post
anshunadir wrote:
The decline of manufacturing in a region sets off a chain reaction. Once manufacturing is outsourced, process-engineering expertise can’t be maintained, since it depends on daily interactions with manufacturing. Without process-engineering capabilities, companies find it increasingly difficult to conduct advanced research on next-generation process technologies. Without the ability to develop such new processes, they find they can no longer develop new products.

decline in manufacturing initiates chain reaction
Manufacturing outsourcing -> decline process Eng expertise -> decline adv research new process tech -> new prod dev decline


Which of the following is best supported by the passage?

A. In the long term, an economy with a deteriorating infrastructure for advanced process engineering and with declining manufacturing activity will likely lose its ability to innovate. incorrect- passage does not talks about infrastructure for advanced process engineering
B. To develop new products, a company must never cut down on its manufacturing. correct- pass fact test
C. An increase in the manufacturing activity in a region leads to increase in innovation within the region not necessarily true
D. To develop new products, a company needs to frequently change its processes. not supported by the passage
E. An economy that has growing manufacturing capabilities will churn out more new products than other economies. not supported by the passage


Hi,

Your reasoning is mostly correct. However, option B talks about a company while the passage just talk about "regions". Therefore, B is incorrect.

Also, refer the detailed explanations to see why A is correct.

Happy learning! :)

Thanks.
Chiranjeev
_________________

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeT9_Wr0DlI&feature=youtu.be

Expert Post
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 1794
Followers: 1299

Kudos [?]: 3670 [0], given: 185

Re: A 700 level inference question [#permalink] New post 31 Jan 2013, 23:48
Expert's post
Practicegmat wrote:
I vote for (B).

(A) talks about economy. But in the passage, nothing about economy is discussed in general


Hi,

"Economy" term is very commonly used to refer to regions e.g. You need to have solid infrastructure for an economy to succeed. Here, "economy" refers to a region.

Hope this helps :)

Thanks,
Chiranjeev
_________________

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeT9_Wr0DlI&feature=youtu.be

Expert Post
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 1794
Followers: 1299

Kudos [?]: 3670 [0], given: 185

Re: A 700 level inference question [#permalink] New post 31 Jan 2013, 23:50
Expert's post
Rock750 wrote:
egmat wrote:
The decline of manufacturing in a region sets off a chain reaction. Once manufacturing is outsourced, process-engineering expertise can’t be maintained, since it depends on daily interactions with manufacturing. Without process-engineering capabilities, companies find it increasingly difficult to conduct advanced research on next-generation process technologies. Without the ability to develop such new processes, they find they can no longer develop new products.

Which of the following is best supported by the passage?

A. In the long term, an economy with a deteriorating infrastructure for advanced process engineering and with declining manufacturing activity will likely lose its ability to innovate.
B. To develop new products, a company must never cut down on its manufacturing.
C. An increase in the manufacturing activity in a region leads to increase in innovation within the region
D. To develop new products, a company needs to frequently change its processes.
E. An economy that has growing manufacturing capabilities will churn out more new products than other economies.


The conclusion is : Without the ability to develop such new processes, they find they can no longer develop new products.

I think that D is best supported by the conclusion since changing its processes is the same as bringing new processes. Hence, a company needs to frequently change its processes in order to develop new products ..


Hi,

You got into a trap :wink:

This option could have been a very close option choice without the word "frequently". This word spoils the game :)

Refer to the detailed solution posted above to understand the nuances of this.

Thanks :)
Chiranjeev
_________________

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeT9_Wr0DlI&feature=youtu.be

Expert Post
BSchool Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 27 Aug 2012
Posts: 1117
Followers: 87

Kudos [?]: 565 [0], given: 107

Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: A 700 level inference question [#permalink] New post 08 Sep 2013, 08:07
Expert's post
egmat wrote:
Rock750 wrote:
egmat wrote:
The decline of manufacturing in a region sets off a chain reaction. Once manufacturing is outsourced, process-engineering expertise can’t be maintained, since it depends on daily interactions with manufacturing. Without process-engineering capabilities, companies find it increasingly difficult to conduct advanced research on next-generation process technologies. Without the ability to develop such new processes, they find they can no longer develop new products.

Which of the following is best supported by the passage?

A. In the long term, an economy with a deteriorating infrastructure for advanced process engineering and with declining manufacturing activity will likely lose its ability to innovate.
B. To develop new products, a company must never cut down on its manufacturing.
C. An increase in the manufacturing activity in a region leads to increase in innovation within the region
D. To develop new products, a company needs to frequently change its processes.
E. An economy that has growing manufacturing capabilities will churn out more new products than other economies.


The conclusion is : Without the ability to develop such new processes, they find they can no longer develop new products.

I think that D is best supported by the conclusion since changing its processes is the same as bringing new processes. Hence, a company needs to frequently change its processes in order to develop new products ..


Hi,

You got into a trap :wink:

This option could have been a very close option choice without the word "frequently". This word spoils the game :)

Refer to the detailed solution posted above to understand the nuances of this.

Thanks :)
Chiranjeev


Hi Chiranjeev
Even had the option D not used 'frequently', still it couldn't have been a close contender of A for the same reason you've stated in OE for B - talks about 'company' whereas the argument is all about a region/economy.

Please let me know your thoughts on this.
_________________

UPDATED : e-GMAT SC Resources-Consolidated || ALL RC Resources-Consolidated || ALL SC Resources-Consolidated || UPDATED : AWA compilations-109 Analysis of Argument Essays || NEW !!! GMAC's IR Prep Tool

GMAT Club guide - OG 11-12-13 || Veritas Blog || Manhattan GMAT Blog


KUDOS please, if you like the post or if it helps :-)

Expert Post
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 1794
Followers: 1299

Kudos [?]: 3670 [0], given: 185

Re: A 700 level inference question [#permalink] New post 09 Sep 2013, 03:12
Expert's post
bagdbmba wrote:

Hi Chiranjeev
Even had the option D not used 'frequently', still it couldn't have been a close contender of A for the same reason you've stated in OE for B - talks about 'company' whereas the argument is all about a region/economy.

Please let me know your thoughts on this.


Interesting doubt!

However, the reasoning given in the detailed solution is correct.

Look - if a company is spread out in multiple regions, then it can cut production in one region and maintain production in other regions. In such a case, it will still be able to develop new products (in other regions). So, option B is incorrect.

Let's look at modified version of option D (without the word "frequently"):

D. To develop new products, a company needs to change its processes

Now, this must be true. Why? Because it follows directly from the last line of the passage:

"Without the ability to develop such new processes, they find they can no longer develop new products".

What does "they" refer to? "they" refers to "companies".

So, companies cannot develop new products without new processes.

This is what option D says.

Does it help?

Thanks,
Chiranjeev
_________________

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeT9_Wr0DlI&feature=youtu.be

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 05 Jun 2012
Posts: 40
GMAT 1: 480 Q48 V9
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 46

Re: The decline of manufacturing in a region sets off a chain [#permalink] New post 09 Sep 2013, 09:53
Hi,
Just one help. I have seen lots of CR answers get rejected due to use of strong word , such as here it is frequently.As i was sure of A but selected D.So can any one please en light me how we will catch strong word trick in CR.
Thank you
Expert Post
BSchool Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 27 Aug 2012
Posts: 1117
Followers: 87

Kudos [?]: 565 [0], given: 107

Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: A 700 level inference question [#permalink] New post 10 Sep 2013, 02:01
Expert's post
egmat wrote:
bagdbmba wrote:

Hi Chiranjeev
Even had the option D not used 'frequently', still it couldn't have been a close contender of A for the same reason you've stated in OE for B - talks about 'company' whereas the argument is all about a region/economy.

Please let me know your thoughts on this.


Interesting doubt!

However, the reasoning given in the detailed solution is correct.

Look - if a company is spread out in multiple regions, then it can cut production in one region and maintain production in other regions. In such a case, it will still be able to develop new products (in other regions). So, option B is incorrect.

Let's look at modified version of option D (without the word "frequently"):

D. To develop new products, a company needs to change its processes

Now, this must be true. Why? Because it follows directly from the last line of the passage:

"Without the ability to develop such new processes, they find they can no longer develop new products".

What does "they" refer to? "they" refers to "companies".

So, companies cannot develop new products without new processes.

This is what option D says.

Does it help?

Thanks,
Chiranjeev


Hi Chiranjeev,
Got your point...! Thanks..

So,basically the word 'frequently' throws D out of the game here. Isn't it something similar concept I was trying to make in your another question http://gmatclub.com/forum/inference-vs-assumption-146758.html#p1265147 regrading the scope of the argument...?

Anything too narrow or too broad in the context of the scope of the argument should be eliminated...! Let me know please whether this analogy is proper?
_________________

UPDATED : e-GMAT SC Resources-Consolidated || ALL RC Resources-Consolidated || ALL SC Resources-Consolidated || UPDATED : AWA compilations-109 Analysis of Argument Essays || NEW !!! GMAC's IR Prep Tool

GMAT Club guide - OG 11-12-13 || Veritas Blog || Manhattan GMAT Blog


KUDOS please, if you like the post or if it helps :-)

Expert Post
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 1794
Followers: 1299

Kudos [?]: 3670 [0], given: 185

Re: A 700 level inference question [#permalink] New post 10 Sep 2013, 20:55
Expert's post
bagdbmba wrote:
Hi Chiranjeev,
Got your point...! Thanks..

So,basically the word 'frequently' throws D out of the game here. Isn't it something similar concept I was trying to make in your another question http://gmatclub.com/forum/inference-vs-assumption-146758.html#p1265147 regrading the scope of the argument...?

Anything too narrow or too broad in the context of the scope of the argument should be eliminated...! Let me know please whether this analogy is proper?


I don't think the word "frequently" here makes option D either too narrow or too broad here.

-Chiranjeev
_________________

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeT9_Wr0DlI&feature=youtu.be

Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 23 Jul 2010
Posts: 488
Followers: 43

Kudos [?]: 441 [0], given: 249

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: The decline of manufacturing in a region sets off a chain [#permalink] New post 08 Nov 2013, 04:45
Re: The decline of manufacturing in a region sets off a chain   [#permalink] 08 Nov 2013, 04:45
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Experts publish their posts in the topic ACME’s manufacturing costs for sets of horseshoes include mikemcgarry 5 25 Sep 2013, 09:55
3 Experts publish their posts in the topic ACME’s manufacturing costs for sets of horseshoes mikemcgarry 3 14 Feb 2013, 11:19
Declined Promotion dr0xlunltd 10 19 Oct 2011, 19:31
2 Manufacturers issue cents-off coupons to get consumers to varunmaheshwari 4 04 Sep 2011, 05:48
1 Chain of Modifiers Raths 4 19 Oct 2010, 02:39
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The decline of manufacturing in a region sets off a chain

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.