Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 Oct 2014, 08:45

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The Department of Homeland Security has proposed new federal

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Jun 2006
Posts: 343
Location: Washington DC
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

The Department of Homeland Security has proposed new federal [#permalink] New post 23 Dec 2006, 18:08
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  65% (hard)

Question Stats:

55% (02:19) correct 45% (01:37) wrong based on 269 sessions
The Department of Homeland Security has proposed new federal requirements for driver’s licenses that would allow them to be used as part of a national identification system. Using licenses for purposes not directly related to operating a motor vehicle is un-American because it would require U.S. citizens to carry the equivalent of “papers.” Such a requirement would allow the government to restrict their movements and activities in the manner of totalitarian regimes. In time, this could make other limits on freedom acceptable.

The author assumes which of the following?

(A) The next presidential election will be dishonest, as has happened in eastern European countries.
(B) The government will soon start curtailing the activities of those it considers “dissidents.”
(C) Blanket restrictions on law-abiding individuals are contrary to the traditions of American culture and law.
(D) The majority of Americans are not willing to give up their right to travel and move about without identification.
(E) Americans should resist all government regulation of their lives.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Oct 2006
Posts: 76
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [1] , given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 01 Jan 2007, 05:13
1
This post received
KUDOS
My take is C... byPOE

A. Not a Choice as OUt of scope.
B is ruled out!
C. SO SO...Doesn't appear to be a clearcut assumption
D.Argument doesn't talk abt the right to travel although there is a reference of driver's license. rule it out!
E. Rule it out straight away...as it is generalization against all the govt regs.

As A,B,D,E are not the choices, C is the answer by POE. c appears to be an inference rather than an assumption...
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 03 Dec 2006
Posts: 77
Location: London
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 01 Jan 2007, 06:53
appuvar wrote:
Quote:
D.Argument doesn't talk abt the right to travel although there is a reference of driver's license. rule it out!


but D includes movements other than travel
D) The majority of Americans are not willing to give up their right to travel and move about without identification.

and the argument talks about movements:
would allow the government to restrict their movements and activities

Therefore, even if the answer is C, your reasoning is not clear to me.
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 1136
Location: Bangalore
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 10 Jan 2007, 19:59
Give me D!
Conclusion:Using licenses for purposes not directly related to operating a motor vehicle is a restriction of freedom.

Why?

Because majority of Americans are not willing to give up their right to travel and move about without identification.

If they WERE willing to give up this right, it wouldn't be a restriction of freedom would it?

C talks about law-abiding citizens. The argument does not say anything about law-abiding citizens. All it mentions is 'American citizens'.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Jan 2007
Posts: 67
Location: D.C.
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 11 Jan 2007, 03:25
khaos wrote:
appuvar wrote:
Quote:
D.Argument doesn't talk abt the right to travel although there is a reference of driver's license. rule it out!


but D includes movements other than travel
D) The majority of Americans are not willing to give up their right to travel and move about without identification.

and the argument talks about movements:
would allow the government to restrict their movements and activities

Therefore, even if the answer is C, your reasoning is not clear to me.


It's between C and D for me. I thought about this... when we negate this assumption it feels like D is the better answer.

Negate D - "The majority of Americans ARE willing to give up the right to travel without identification."

This proves false the whole argument the author is trying to makes,

I pick D.
1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 877
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 15 [1] , given: 0

The Department of Homeland Security has proposed new federal [#permalink] New post 17 Aug 2007, 20:54
1
This post received
KUDOS
The Department of Homeland Security has proposed new federal requirements for driver’s licenses that would allow them to be used as part of a national identification system. Using licenses for purposes not directly related to operating a motor vehicle is un-American because it would require U.S. citizens to carry the equivalent of “papers.” Such a requirement would allow the government to restrict their movements and activities in the manner of totalitarian regimes. In time, this could make other limits on freedom acceptable.

The author assumes which of the following?

A. The next presidential election will be dishonest, as has happened in
eastern European countries.
B. The government will soon start curtailing the activities of those it
considers “dissidents.”
C. Blanket restrictions on law-abiding individuals are contrary to the
traditions of American culture and law.
D. The majority of Americans are not willing to give up their right to
travel and move about without identification.
E. Americans should resist all government regulation of their lives.

My question is which of these sentences is the main conclusion??
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 09 Jul 2007
Posts: 1111
Location: London
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - Homeland Security [#permalink] New post 18 Aug 2007, 02:19
vineetgupta wrote:
The Department of Homeland Security has proposed new federal requirements for driver’s licenses that would allow them to be used as part of a national identification system. Using licenses for purposes not directly related to operating a motor vehicle is un-American because it would require U.S. citizens to carry the equivalent of “papers.” Such a requirement would allow the government to restrict their movements and activities in the manner of totalitarian regimes. In time, this could make other limits on freedom acceptable.

The author assumes which of the following?

A. The next presidential election will be dishonest, as has happened in
eastern European countries.
B. The government will soon start curtailing the activities of those it
considers “dissidents.”
C. Blanket restrictions on law-abiding individuals are contrary to the
traditions of American culture and law.
D. The majority of Americans are not willing to give up their right to
travel and move about without identification.
E. Americans should resist all government regulation of their lives.

My question is which of these sentences is the main conclusion??


I could not find a conclusion in the passage, any eagle eye guys might help.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 18 Aug 2007
Posts: 75
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 18 Aug 2007, 02:37
I would go with C.

C. Blanket restrictions on law-abiding individuals are contrary to the
traditions of American culture and law.

Though i am not totally confident on the essence of the passage, the other choices seems to be vague.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 244
Location: Singapore
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - Homeland Security [#permalink] New post 18 Aug 2007, 04:45
vineetgupta wrote:
The Department of Homeland Security has proposed new federal requirements for driver’s licenses that would allow them to be used as part of a national identification system. Using licenses for purposes not directly related to operating a motor vehicle is un-American because it would require U.S. citizens to carry the equivalent of “papers.” Such a requirement would allow the government to restrict their movements and activities in the manner of totalitarian regimes. In time, this could make other limits on freedom acceptable.

The author assumes which of the following?

A. The next presidential election will be dishonest, as has happened in
eastern European countries.
B. The government will soon start curtailing the activities of those it
considers “dissidents.”
C. Blanket restrictions on law-abiding individuals are contrary to the
traditions of American culture and law.
D. The majority of Americans are not willing to give up their right to
travel and move about without identification.
E. Americans should resist all government regulation of their lives.

My question is which of these sentences is the main conclusion??


A, B is out because it is out of context.

D contradicts the passage."In time, this could make other limits on freedom acceptable".

E is too extreme.

That leaves us with C.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2006
Posts: 97
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - Homeland Security [#permalink] New post 18 Aug 2007, 06:51
I think the answer is D.

Author initially says that government's changes would require people ( who don't have the new license ) to carry equivalent of papers (these are the papers that could help to identify the citizen). So author assumes that citizens may not be willing to carry these papers and if they are forced to carry, they might just stay away from certain activities thus restricting their freedom. Hence I think the answer is D.

What is the OA?
_________________

http://gmatstuff.blogspot.com

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 20 Dec 2004
Posts: 181
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 18 Aug 2007, 07:24
I would go with C. The conclusions is

Using licenses for purposes not directly related to operating a motor vehicle is un-American because it would require U.S. citizens to carry the equivalent of “papers.”
_________________

Regards

Subhen

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 20 Jun 2005
Posts: 151
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 19 Aug 2007, 16:24
I bet on C.

D is out because I do not like the future tense. The author has already assumed something here.
Current Student
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 3403
Location: New York City
Schools: Wharton'11 HBS'12
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 164 [0], given: 2

 [#permalink] New post 19 Aug 2007, 16:58
OK i came down to C and D..

assumption tend to be more general..somehow reading the passage, it appears the assumption is that blanket restrictions on law-abiding individuals are contrary to the
traditions of American culture and law

C it is..
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 877
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 20 Aug 2007, 11:13
The OA is C...but my question is :
Which of the italicized sentences is the main conclusion??
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jun 2007
Posts: 385
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 20 Aug 2007, 12:20
The main conclusion is In time, this could make other limits on freedom acceptable. I feel the OA is wrong and it has to be D. C does not even fit into an inference leave alone being an assumption
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Sep 2006
Posts: 281
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 20 Aug 2007, 22:51
Nope the main conclusion is

"Using licenses for purposes not directly related to operating a motor vehicle is un-American" because .....

The last line is the secondary conclusion

So C should be it
_________________

AimHigher

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 28 Jun 2007
Posts: 463
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 20 Aug 2007, 23:36
vineetgupta wrote:
The OA is C...but my question is :
Which of the italicized sentences is the main conclusion??


I think both are conclusions. But I would go with the first one as the main one, because the second seems to be derived from the first .
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 09 Aug 2006
Posts: 529
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - Homeland Security [#permalink] New post 22 Aug 2007, 07:48
vineetgupta wrote:
The Department of Homeland Security has proposed new federal requirements for driver’s licenses that would allow them to be used as part of a national identification system. Using licenses for purposes not directly related to operating a motor vehicle is un-American because it would require U.S. citizens to carry the equivalent of “papers.” Such a requirement would allow the government to restrict their movements and activities in the manner of totalitarian regimes. In time, this could make other limits on freedom acceptable.

The author assumes which of the following?

A. The next presidential election will be dishonest, as has happened in
eastern European countries.
B. The government will soon start curtailing the activities of those it
considers “dissidents.”
C. Blanket restrictions on law-abiding individuals are contrary to the
traditions of American culture and law.
D. The majority of Americans are not willing to give up their right to
travel and move about without identification.
E. Americans should resist all government regulation of their lives.

My question is which of these sentences is the main conclusion??


The conclusion is that given the new travel requirement, Govt wants to act in totalitarian way by first restricting movements which eventually will lead to more limits on freedom.

As per the question asked ,
A - No talk of president election in the stem - Eliminate.
B- No mention of any dissidents in the stem - Eliminate.
C- No sign of blanket restriction. On the contrary it seems the restrictions are phased - Eliminate.
D- Yes..
E - This is a suggestion for further action not an assumption.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 877
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 22 Aug 2007, 10:37
AimHigher wrote:
Nope the main conclusion is

"Using licenses for purposes not directly related to operating a motor vehicle is un-American" because .....

The last line is the secondary conclusion

So C should be it


If the second conclusion id derived from the first,then shouldn't the second one be the main conclusion??
Expert Post
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 3573
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Other
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Followers: 367

Kudos [?]: 1852 [0], given: 359

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
The Department of Homeland Security has proposed new federal [#permalink] New post 04 Jun 2008, 01:09
Expert's post
The Department of Homeland Security has proposed new federal requirements for driver’s licenses that would allow them to be used as part of a national identification system. Using licenses for purposes not directly related to operating a motor vehicle is un-American because it would require U.S. citizens to carry the equivalent of “papers.” Such a requirement would allow the government to restrict their movements and activities in the manner of totalitarian regimes. In time, this could make other limits on freedom acceptable.

The author assumes which of the following?

A) The next presidential election will be dishonest, as has happened in eastern European countries.
B) The government will soon start curtailing the activities of those it considers “dissidents.”
C) Blanket restrictions on law-abiding individuals are contrary to the traditions of American culture and law.
D) The majority of Americans are not willing to give up their right to travel and move about without identification.
E)Americans should resist all government regulation of their lives.

My question is how it is close to real GMAT
_________________

HOT! GMAT TOOLKIT 2 (iOS) / GMAT TOOLKIT (Android) - The OFFICIAL GMAT CLUB PREP APP, a must-have app especially if you aim at 700+ | PrepGame

The Department of Homeland Security has proposed new federal   [#permalink] 04 Jun 2008, 01:09
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 Following a $200,000 grant from the Department of Homeland goodyear2013 4 07 Apr 2014, 09:01
The Department of Homeland Security has proposed new federal mun23 0 01 Mar 2013, 20:03
The Department of Homeland Security has proposed new federal Orange08 0 20 Jul 2012, 12:59
Experts publish their posts in the topic The Department of Homeland Security has proposed new federal walker 0 04 Jun 2008, 08:14
The Department of Homeland Security has proposed new federal vineetgupta 0 19 Feb 2013, 10:29
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The Department of Homeland Security has proposed new federal

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page    1   2   3    Next  [ 41 posts ] 



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.