Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!
Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club
Registration gives you:
Tests
Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.
Applicant Stats
View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more
Books/Downloads
Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
The difference between John's and Paul's heights is twice [#permalink]
06 Apr 2012, 11:35
1
This post was BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Difficulty:
75% (hard)
Question Stats:
41% (02:10) correct
59% (00:55) wrong based on 134 sessions
The difference between John's and Paul's heights is twice the difference between John's and Thom's heights. If John is the tallest, what is the average (arithmetic mean) height of the three?
Re: The difference between John's and Paul's heights is twice [#permalink]
06 Apr 2012, 11:47
Expert's post
The difference between John's and Paul's heights is twice the difference between John's and Thom's heights. If John is the tallest, what is the average (arithmetic mean) height of the three?
Re: The difference between John's and Paul's heights is twice [#permalink]
14 Sep 2012, 06:53
Bunuel wrote:
The difference between John's and Paul's heights is twice the difference between John's and Thom's heights. If John is the tallest, what is the average (arithmetic mean) height of the three?
Re: The difference between John's and Paul's heights is twice [#permalink]
14 Sep 2012, 06:59
Expert's post
fameatop wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
The difference between John's and Paul's heights is twice the difference between John's and Thom's heights. If John is the tallest, what is the average (arithmetic mean) height of the three?
Re: The difference between John's and Paul's heights is twice [#permalink]
14 Sep 2012, 07:33
rovshan85 wrote:
The difference between John's and Paul's heights is twice the difference between John's and Thom's heights. If John is the tallest, what is the average (arithmetic mean) height of the three?
(1) Paul is 163 centimeters tall.
(2) Thom is 173 centimeters tall.
If we denote the heights by J, P and T, we can write J = P + 2x and J = T + x for some positive integer x. Then, P + 2x = T + x, or P = T - x. So, the three heights are T - x, T, and T + x. Obviously, their average is T.
We can immediately see that (1) is not sufficient, but (2) is.
Answer B. _________________
PhD in Applied Mathematics Love GMAT Quant questions and running.
Re: The difference between John's and Paul's heights is twice [#permalink]
14 Sep 2012, 07:54
Bunuel wrote:
fameatop wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
The difference between John's and Paul's heights is twice the difference between John's and Thom's heights. If John is the tallest, what is the average (arithmetic mean) height of the three?
(1) Paul is 163 centimeters tall --> P=163. Not sufficient.
(2) Thom is 173 centimeters tall --> directly gives the value of T. Sufficient.
Answer: B.
Hi Bunuel,
I have a doubt in this question. Kindly correct me if i am wrong.
Let the height of John Paul Tom 5x 3x 4x John - Paul = 2(John - Tom) 5x-3x = 2 (5x-4x) LHS = RHS Average height of 3 = 12x/3 = 4x
(1) 3x = 163----> we can find the value of 4x as there is no restriction on the value x can take.---> Sufficient (2) 4x = 173 ----> Sufficient
Answer D
Can you tell me WHY i am wrong wrt OA
Waiting for response.
You cannot arbitrary assume that the heights are 5x, 3x and 4x. Why not 10x, 6x, and 8x?
It doesn't make any difference whether we are taking 5x,3x& 4x or 10x, 6x, and 8x Because average in first case is 4x & in second case is 8x If we are given in first case 3x = 163 & in second case 6x = 163 We want the value of 4x in first case & 8x in second case In Both cases answer will be same which is 163*4/3
Kindly enlighten _________________
If you like my Question/Explanation or the contribution, Kindly appreciate by pressing KUDOS. Kudos always maximizes GMATCLUB worth-Game Theory
If you have any question regarding my post, kindly pm me or else I won't be able to reply
Re: The difference between John's and Paul's heights is twice [#permalink]
14 Sep 2012, 08:46
fameatop wrote:
Hi Bunuel,
I have a doubt in this question. Kindly correct me if i am wrong.
Let the height of John Paul Tom 5x 3x 4x John - Paul = 2(John - Tom) 5x-3x = 2 (5x-4x) LHS = RHS Average height of 3 = 12x/3 = 4x
(1) 3x = 163----> we can find the value of 4x as there is no restriction on the value x can take.---> Sufficient (2) 4x = 173 ----> Sufficient
Answer D
Can you tell me WHY i am wrong wrt OA
Waiting for response.[/quote]
You cannot arbitrary assume that the heights are 5x, 3x and 4x. Why not 10x, 6x, and 8x?[/quote]
It doesn't make any difference whether we are taking 5x,3x& 4x or 10x, 6x, and 8x Because average in first case is 4x & in second case is 8x If we are given in first case 3x = 163 & in second case 6x = 163 We want the value of 4x in first case & 8x in second case In Both cases answer will be same which is 163*4/3
Re: The difference between John's and Paul's heights is twice [#permalink]
14 Sep 2012, 09:19
EvaJager wrote:
fameatop wrote:
You cannot arbitrary assume that the heights are 5x, 3x and 4x. Why not 10x, 6x, and 8x?
It doesn't make any difference whether we are taking 5x,3x& 4x or 10x, 6x, and 8x Because average in first case is 4x & in second case is 8x If we are given in first case 3x = 163 & in second case 6x = 163 We want the value of 4x in first case & 8x in second case In Both cases answer will be same which is 163*4/3
Kindly enlighten[/quote]
All you can assume is that the three heights are T - x, T, and T + x for some positive x, where T is Thom's height. See my previous post: the-difference-between-john-s-and-paul-s-heights-is-twice-130320.html#p1121568 Take the three heights 163, 173, and 183. 183 - 163 = 20 = 2(183 - 173) Is 163/3 = 173/4 = 183/5? No![/quote]
If you go by my method using option (1), the three heights will be 271.66, 163, 217.3 & the differences in height is 108.66, 54.33 which satisfies the original statement.
I could be wrong Had the question stated that the heights are integer values, but nothing of such sort is mentioned. Why i am wrong?
Waiting 4 reply _________________
If you like my Question/Explanation or the contribution, Kindly appreciate by pressing KUDOS. Kudos always maximizes GMATCLUB worth-Game Theory
If you have any question regarding my post, kindly pm me or else I won't be able to reply
Re: The difference between John's and Paul's heights is twice [#permalink]
14 Sep 2012, 09:35
fameatop wrote:
EvaJager wrote:
fameatop wrote:
You cannot arbitrary assume that the heights are 5x, 3x and 4x. Why not 10x, 6x, and 8x?
It doesn't make any difference whether we are taking 5x,3x& 4x or 10x, 6x, and 8x Because average in first case is 4x & in second case is 8x If we are given in first case 3x = 163 & in second case 6x = 163 We want the value of 4x in first case & 8x in second case In Both cases answer will be same which is 163*4/3
Kindly enlighten
All you can assume is that the three heights are T - x, T, and T + x for some positive x, where T is Thom's height. See my previous post: the-difference-between-john-s-and-paul-s-heights-is-twice-130320.html#p1121568 Take the three heights 163, 173, and 183. 183 - 163 = 20 = 2(183 - 173) Is 163/3 = 173/4 = 183/5? No![/quote]
If you go by my method using option (1), the three heights will be 271.66, 163, 217.3 & the differences in height is 108.66, 54.33 which satisfies the original statement.
I could be wrong Had the question stated that the heights are integer values, but nothing of such sort is mentioned. Why i am wrong?
Waiting 4 reply[/quote]
It is a DS question. Also the triplet 163, 173, 183 satisfies the requirements. So, how can (1) be sufficient? _________________
PhD in Applied Mathematics Love GMAT Quant questions and running.
Re: The difference between John's and Paul's heights is twice [#permalink]
22 Mar 2013, 06:38
fameatop wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
The difference between John's and Paul's heights is twice the difference between John's and Thom's heights. If John is the tallest, what is the average (arithmetic mean) height of the three?
As I’m halfway through my second year now, graduation is now rapidly approaching. I’ve neglected this blog in the last year, mainly because I felt I didn’...
Hilary Term has only started and we can feel the heat already. The two weeks have been packed with activities and submissions, giving a peek into what will follow...
Ninety-five percent of the Full-Time Class of 2015 received an offer by three months post-graduation, as reported today by Kellogg’s Career Management Center(CMC). Kellogg also saw an increase...