Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 21 May 2013, 05:11
Customize  |  Hide

The doctrine applies in Canada ,where there is a federal law

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
CEO
CEO
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 3550
Followers: 55

Kudos [?]: 626 [0], given: 781

The doctrine applies in Canada ,where there is a federal law [#permalink] New post 01 Dec 2003, 11:45
00:00

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 100% (00:25) wrong based on 0 sessions
The doctrine applies in Canada ,where there is a federal law and a provincial law that are each valid and consistent.

a. is a federal law and a provincial law that are each valid and
b.are a federal law and a provincial law that are each valid and
c.are a federal law and a provincial law both of which are each valid and
d. is a federal law and a provincial law both of which are each valid and
e.are a federal law and a provincial law that are each valid or


this one totally got me !

Again subject verb agreement

the following explanation was provided


We should use the plural verb in the following construction:

"There ARE" + singular/plural noun 1 + "and" + singular/plural noun 2


But in the following case the form of the verb "be" will correspond to the

from of the nearest noun:

"There IS/ARE" + singular/plural noun 1 + "or" no matter what noun 2



is this correct?

thanks
praetorian
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Feb 2003
Posts: 1683
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 02 Dec 2003, 06:29
I narrow to B and C and choose B because it is shorter.

You question is interesting. Only AND form a plural subject; others (OR, PLUS, AS WELL AS, and so on) do not.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 12 Oct 2003
Posts: 289
Location: sydney
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 02 Dec 2003, 06:33
its B. but where u get it from? such qs don't appear in gmat. i guess....
_________________

When u r about to make ends meet, someone moves the ends.

SVP
SVP
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 1982
Location: India
Followers: 129

Kudos [?]: 667 [0], given: 170

GMAT Tests User
Re: SC : Doctrine.. [#permalink] New post 22 Dec 2010, 08:35
A noun becomes a compound noun when it combines with another noun using the conjunction ‘and’ and is plural in number per se.

For example: There is a brother and a sister in this class, is wrong because, a sister and a brother put together becomes a compound and plural noun entailing a plural verb. The correct version is ‘There are a sister and a brother in this class.’ Hence You can dump A and D.
B is the correct one; here ‘that’ is the subject of the subordinate clause; ‘that’ stands for both the laws and the word ‘each’ indicates that the laws individually and jointly are valid and consistent.

C is wrong because of using the unidiomatic ‘both of which are each’. Each is an unnecessary intrusion

E is wrong becos of saying that the laws are each valid ‘or’ consistent. Valid ‘or’ consistent distorts the intended meaning of the original passage.
_________________

” I truly believe in online learning, I have been a student in both an Ivy League school (brick and mortar) and in an online setting and I have learned 1,000 times more in an online setting. You do not have anyone there lecturing you and then you do the work, online you are made to do it all yourself. Amazing how different the results are. - Heather(a student)”

Alicia Helle, an online student at the UW, "Obtaining my degree online has been a blessing. With two small children, I am able to work when it is convenient for my family and me. I have nothing but positive comments and experiences from my time at UW-Stout.”

Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Preparing for GMAT - March 2011
Joined: 21 May 2010
Posts: 150
Location: London
Schools: INSEAD, RSM, HEC, St. Gallen, IF, IESE
WE 1: Finance 6 years
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: SC : Doctrine.. [#permalink] New post 23 Dec 2010, 09:02
it becomes plural verb as two nouns are combined using the conjunction '‘and’' .
_________________

In The World Full Of Duplicates,, I Am The Only Masterpiece..
Girl Power
beat-the-beast-with-non-native-speaker-108349.html

Intern
Intern
Joined: 22 Oct 2010
Posts: 5
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: SC : Doctrine.. [#permalink] New post 23 Dec 2010, 09:43
[quote="Praetorian"]The doctrine applies in Canada ,where there is a federal law and a provincial law that are each valid and consistent.

a. is a federal law and a provincial law that are each valid and
b.are a federal law and a provincial law that are each valid and
c.are a federal law and a provincial law both of which are each valid and
d. is a federal law and a provincial law both of which are each valid and
e.are a federal law and a provincial law that are each valid or

IMO, B is the answer
Re: SC : Doctrine..   [#permalink] 23 Dec 2010, 09:43
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts The doctrine applies in Canada ,where there is a federal law Praetorian 5 13 Dec 2003, 03:19
New posts Case A ---> The doctrine applies in Canada, where there taklu 0 21 Nov 2004, 18:15
New posts 1 SC - federal law maulikmajithia 7 15 Jun 2008, 19:03
New posts 1 The doctrine applies in Canada ,where there is a federal law reply2spg 8 08 Feb 2009, 10:37
New posts 2 The policy applies in some states, where there is a federal Arvars 2 24 Nov 2012, 06:33
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The doctrine applies in Canada ,where there is a federal law

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.