NEW HERE? LEARN MORE
closeclose
It is currently 18 Apr 2024, 20:27
Register
GMAT Focus Tests
Decision Tracker
My Rewards
New posts
New comers' posts

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel

The efficiency of microwave ovens in destroying the harmful bacteria

15 posts Go to First Unread Post
Print view
NEW TOPIC
POST REPLY
Question banks

GMAT Question Banks

Downloads
My Bookmarks
Reviews
SORT BY:
Date
Kudos
User avatar
L
nahid78
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2013
Posts: 289
Reviews Badge
The efficiency of microwave ovens in destroying the harmful bacteria [#permalink] New post  Updated on: 22 May 2018, 02:55
3
Kudos
5
Bookmarks
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

25% (medium)

Question Stats:

79% (01:52) correct 21% (02:02) wrong based on 1038 sessions
Hide Show timer Statistics
The efficiency of microwave ovens in destroying the harmful bacteria frequently found in common foods is diminished by the presence of salt in the food being cooked. When heated in a microwave oven, the interior of unsalted food reaches temperatures high enough to kill bacteria that cause food poisoning, but the interior of salted food does not. Scientists theorize that salt effectively blocks the microwaves from heating the interior.

Which one of the following conclusions is most supported by the information above?


(A) The kinds of bacteria that cause food poisoning are more likely to be found on the exterior of food than in the interior of food.

(B) The incidence of serious food poisoning would be significantly reduced if microwave ovens were not used by consumers to cook or reheat food.

(C) The addition of salt to food that has been cooked or reheated in a microwave oven can increase the danger of food poisoning.

(D) The danger of food poisoning can be lessened if salt is not used to prepare foods that are to be cooked in a microwave oven.

(E) Salt is the primary cause of food poisoning resulting from food that is heated in microwave ovens.
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/Login.

_________________
We Shall Overcome... One day...
Signature Read More

Originally posted by nahid78 on 04 May 2017, 00:27.
Last edited by Bunuel on 22 May 2018, 02:55, edited 1 time in total.
Renamed the topic and edited the question.
request expert reply
User avatar
L
abhimahna
Board of Directors
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Status:Emory Goizueta Alum
Posts: 3601
Reviews Badge
Re: The efficiency of microwave ovens in destroying the harmful bacteria [#permalink] New post  04 May 2017, 04:09
3
Kudos
Expert Reply
The argument is saying Adding salt to food diminishes the ability of microwave to kill harmful bacteria.

It then tells the science behind that.

Then, it says Scientists theorize that salt effectively blocks the microwaves from heating the interior.

We need to find the conclusion.

(A) The kinds of bacteria that cause food poisoning are more likely to be found on the exterior of food than in the interior of food. : If they are found on exterior then the whole point would be weakened that it diminishes the ability of microwave to kill harmful bacteria. So, incorrect.

(B) The incidence of serious food poisoning would be significantly reduced if microwave ovens were not used by consumers to cook or reheat food. : Wow, We are talking about Microwave role and they are saying stop using microwave. No relevance.

(C) The addition of salt to food that has been cooked or reheated in a microwave oven can increase the danger of food poisoning. It is saying food has been cooked and then we are adding salt. But ideally we are first adding salt and then cooking it. So, this is a TRAP but a totally incorrect answer.

(D) The danger of food poisoning can be lessened if salt is not used to prepare foods that are to be cooked in a microwave oven. Yes, danger can be lessened if we donot add salt. This is what the whole argument is saying. Hence, Correct

(E) Salt is the primary cause of food poisoning resulting from food that is heated in microwave ovens.: Whether it is primary or secondary, our point is no where related.
_________________

NEWCheck out our new tool - Executive Assessment Tests


My LinkedIn abhimahna. | My GMAT Story: From V21 to V40 | My MBA Journey: My 10 years long MBA Dream
My Secret Hacks: Best way to use GMATClub | Importance of an Error Log!
Verbal Resources: All SC Resources at one place | All CR Resources at one place
GMAT Club Inbuilt Error Log Functionality - View More | Best Reply Functionality on GMAT Club!
New Visa Forum - Ask all your Visa Related Questions - here | Have OPT questions? - Post them here.
Find a bug in the new email templates and get rewarded with 2 weeks of GMATClub Tests for free
Check our new About Us Page here. | Blog: Subscribe to Question of the Day Blog
New! Executive Assessment (EA) Exam - All you need to know!
Signature Read More
User avatar
G
WiziusCareers1
Manager
Manager
Joined: 27 Apr 2009
Status:Not Applying
Posts: 122
Location: India
Schools: HBS '14 (A)
GMAT 1: 730 Q51 V36
Re: The efficiency of microwave ovens in destroying the harmful bacteria [#permalink] New post  04 May 2017, 05:27
The question suggests that the efficiency of the microwave decreases as the quantity of salt increases on the food that is getting heated. Why does that happen? Scientists theorise that salt has the ability to block microwaves from heating the interior of the food.

(A) The kinds of bacteria that cause food poisoning are more likely to be found on the exterior of food than in the interior of food.
If the bacteria is on the exterior of the food, how does salt create a problem??
(B) The incidence of serious food poisoning would be significantly reduced if microwave ovens were not used by consumers to cook or reheat food.
Not using microwave oven cannot be the conclusion as the argument is about microwaves.
(C) The addition of salt to food that has been cooked or reheated in a microwave oven can increase the danger of food poisoning.
Salt increases the danger of food poisoning?? No. As such the passage is based on the salt on food that is getting heated.
(D) The danger of food poisoning can be lessened if salt is not used to prepare foods that are to be cooked in a microwave oven.
Yes. This is what the passage suggests.
(E) Salt is the primary cause of food poisoning resulting from food that is heated in microwave ovens.
The argument is not about the primary cause or secondary cause. Irrelevant.
User avatar
P
chesstitans
VP
VP
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1031
Location: United States
Schools: Stanford '19 Carroll '19 LBS '19
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The efficiency of microwave ovens in destroying the harmful bacteria [#permalink] New post  01 Jul 2017, 03:58
C is a great trap.
There is only one premise and one conclusion in the passage even though there are 3 sentences. The first two are the main premise.
User avatar
S
sach24x7
Manager
Manager
Joined: 15 Aug 2014
Status:Don't Give Up!
Posts: 77
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, General Management
Schools: INSEAD Jan '20 HEC Jan20 Intake IE IIMA PGPX"20 IIMB EPGP"20
GMAT Date: 04-25-2015
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
Re: The efficiency of microwave ovens in destroying the harmful bacteria [#permalink] New post  01 Jul 2017, 06:10
Guys. Can somebody clearly explain about E?

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
P
chesstitans
VP
VP
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1031
Location: United States
Schools: Stanford '19 Carroll '19 LBS '19
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The efficiency of microwave ovens in destroying the harmful bacteria [#permalink] New post  01 Jul 2017, 16:28
sach24x7 wrote:
Guys. Can somebody clearly explain about E?

Posted from my mobile device


E is obviously wrong, salt does not cause any food poisoning, and the last half of E is also wrong
User avatar
B
Firdaus
Intern
Intern
Joined: 22 Jul 2014
Status:Self Redemption
Affiliations: Open
Posts: 10
Umar: Firdaus
GPA: 3.45
Reviews Badge
Re: The efficiency of microwave ovens in destroying the harmful bacteria [#permalink] New post  02 Jul 2017, 02:31
1
Kudos
Main conclusion of Argument is : Efficiency of M/wave to kill bacteria that causes food poisoning....presence of salt in food.

Scientists theory that salt blocks heatwaves is a derived statement from the premise : when heated in a microwave oven....salted food doesnot.

Inference: from statements,
Salt - blocks microwaves that heat the interior of food that contains bacteria ---> that causes food poisoning.
hence,
If there is less salt o rno salt used to cook food then microwaves will heat interior of food and kill bacteria. In this way danger of food poisoning can be reduced. Notice that D is along the lines of main pt of the author.
User avatar
L
arvind910619
Director
Director
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Status:Learning
Posts: 877
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
Reviews Badge
Re: The efficiency of microwave ovens in destroying the harmful bacteria [#permalink] New post  08 Jul 2017, 04:33
Fell for C it is a trap .
If we prepared food already and we are heating why would anybody add more salt to already cooked food.
D on the other hand talks about the food yet to be prepared
avatar
jessicarahman
Intern
Intern
Joined: 14 Jan 2018
Posts: 1
Re: The efficiency of microwave ovens in destroying the harmful bacteria [#permalink] New post  15 Jan 2018, 00:09
Hi

Would you please more clear why D)" The danger of food poisoning can be lessened if salt is not used to prepare foods that are to be cooked in a microwave oven."
is the best?
I think C is a great trap.
There is only one premise and one conclusion in the passage even though there are 3 sentences.
Thanks
avatar
B
deveshj21
Manager
Manager
Joined: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 81
Schools: Desautels '23 (S)
GMAT 1: 600 Q43 V30
GMAT 2: 690 Q49 V35
The efficiency of microwave ovens in destroying the harmful bacteria [#permalink] New post  24 Jan 2020, 11:10
nightblade354 iamsiddharthkapoor
How should one approach such questions?
Should one Prethink or should jump directly to POE.
I tried to prethink but couldn't come up with anything.
User avatar
L
nightblade354
Current Student
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Status:He came. He saw. He conquered. -- Going to Business School -- Corruptus in Extremis
Posts: 1733
Location: United States (MA)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Schools: Darden '25 (M)
The efficiency of microwave ovens in destroying the harmful bacteria [#permalink] New post  24 Jan 2020, 11:20
Expert Reply
deveshj21, having a handle on the question is incredibly important. It is not a requirement to prethink, per se, but you must know what the argument is saying. Prethinking is where you begin to see the assumptions being made and can attack/strengthen those areas. This will come with practice. For now, focus on your basics of learning premises/conclusion and understanding the argument. From there, see holes where they are and then attack the answer choices.
_________________
My CR Guide: Here
My RC Guide: Here
My Legendary Debrief: Here
Daagh's AWA Responses. Go: Here
Want to know your Business School chances? Go: Here
Want to be a moderator? We may want you to be one! See how: Here
Signature Read More
avatar
B
deveshj21
Manager
Manager
Joined: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 81
Schools: Desautels '23 (S)
GMAT 1: 600 Q43 V30
GMAT 2: 690 Q49 V35
The efficiency of microwave ovens in destroying the harmful bacteria [#permalink] New post  24 Jan 2020, 11:35
nightblade354 wrote:
deveshj21, having a handle on the question is incredibly important. It is not a requirement to prethink, per se, but you must know what the argument is saying. Prethinking is where you begin to see the assumptions being made and can attack/strengthen those areas. This will come with practice. For now, focus on your basics of learning premises/conclusion and understanding the argument. From there, see holes where they are and then attack the answer choices.

nightblade354
Thanks a ton for always helping me out.
I totally agree to what you have said, and consistently practice the same.
The prethinking part has started to come naturally to me by way of argument analysis, I read the question(para) discern whether it is an argument of a set of facts, then if I have discerned that the question is an argument I decide whether it is properly supported by the premises, and so on. All the credit goes to your CR guide.
But i feel that sometimes i think too much,as i did in this question.
User avatar
P
Kritisood
Director
Director
Joined: 21 Feb 2017
Posts: 521
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V39
Reviews Badge
Re: The efficiency of microwave ovens in destroying the harmful bacteria [#permalink] New post  25 Jan 2020, 23:47
chesstitans wrote:
sach24x7 wrote:
Guys. Can somebody clearly explain about E?

Posted from my mobile device


E is obviously wrong, salt does not cause any food poisoning, and the last half of E is also wrong


(E) Salt is the primary cause of food poisoning resulting from food that is heated in microwave ovens. Too extreme. We cannot conclude this basis the argument.
User avatar
P
Kritisood
Director
Director
Joined: 21 Feb 2017
Posts: 521
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V39
Reviews Badge
Re: The efficiency of microwave ovens in destroying the harmful bacteria [#permalink] New post  25 Jan 2020, 23:50
jessicarahman wrote:
Hi

Would you please more clear why D)" The danger of food poisoning can be lessened if salt is not used to prepare foods that are to be cooked in a microwave oven."
is the best?
I think C is a great trap.
There is only one premise and one conclusion in the passage even though there are 3 sentences.
Thanks


(D) The danger of food poisoning can be lessened if salt is not used to prepare foods that are to be cooked in a microwave oven.

The best option after POE. Acc to the argument, salt acts as a barrier for heat to reach the interior and kill bacteria. Hence, we may conclude that the danger of food poisoning (due to the presence of bacteria) would lessen if salt isn't used in the foods that are to be cooked in a microwave oven.
User avatar
VerbalBot
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17201
Re: The efficiency of microwave ovens in destroying the harmful bacteria [#permalink] New post  25 Nov 2023, 02:48
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
GMAT Books | GMAT Club Tests | Best Prices on GMAT Courses | GMAT Mobile App | Math Resources | Verbal Resources
Signature Read More
GMAT Club Bot
gmatclubot
Re: The efficiency of microwave ovens in destroying the harmful bacteria [#permalink]
25 Nov 2023, 02:48
NEW TOPIC
POST REPLY
Downloads
My Bookmarks
Reviews
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6904 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
239 posts
mysterymanrog
CR Forum Moderator
828 posts

cron

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne
Main navigation
GMAT Resources
Partners
MBA Resources
www.gmac.com|www.mba.com | | GMAT Club Rules | Terms and Conditions