|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Manager
Status: Target MBA
Joined: 20 Jul 2010
Posts: 213
Location: Singapore
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
4
[0], given: 12
|
Re: Energy to move uphill [#permalink]
27 Sep 2011, 08:54
Thanks @gmatbull - Great explanation.
_________________
Thanks and Regards, GM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 98
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 3
|
Re: Energy to move uphill [#permalink]
01 Nov 2011, 23:57
Easy C
|
|
|
|
|
|
Verbal GMAT Forum Moderator
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 17 Aug 2011
Posts: 787
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: International Business, Finance
GPA: 3.07
Followers: 18
Kudos [?]:
83
[0], given: 35
|
Re: The energy an animal must expend to move uphill is [#permalink]
16 Dec 2011, 02:08
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 07 Aug 2011
Posts: 186
Location: United States
Concentration: Technology, International Business
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V37
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
20
[0], given: 6
|
Re: The energy an animal must expend to move uphill is [#permalink]
26 Dec 2011, 11:51
Its C
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Oct 2011
Posts: 283
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
13
[0], given: 110
|
Re: The energy an animal must expend to move uphill is [#permalink]
06 Jan 2012, 08:33
Quite tricky. The ratio seemed to throw off track at first but it was the only answer that made sense. C is the answer.
_________________
Consider KUDOS if you feel the effort's worth it
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1746
Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Followers: 49
Kudos [?]:
150
[0], given: 108
|
Re: The energy an animal must expend to move uphill is [#permalink]
06 Jan 2012, 14:18
+1 C
_________________
"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."
My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html
Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 17 Jul 2011
Posts: 93
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 1
|
Re: The energy an animal must expend to move uphill is [#permalink]
07 Jan 2012, 22:07
c
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Jun 2010
Posts: 400
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 680 Q50 V32
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
38
[0], given: 13
|
Re: The energy an animal must expend to move uphill is [#permalink]
03 May 2012, 05:48
(A) The amount of energy needed to move uphill is no greater for large animals that it is for small animals. WRONG. Because the author agrees energies are different for different sizes. (B) Small animals can move more rapidly than large animals can. WRONG. This is the Premise so can't be the assumption. (C) The ratio of surface area to body weight is smaller in large animals than it is in small animals. CORRECT (D) There is little variation in the ratio of energy output to body weight among animals. WRONG. There is a lot of variation for larger animals ratio is higher and smaller animals ratio is smaller. (E) The amount of energy needed to run at a given speed is proportional to the surface area of the running animal. WRONG. Speeds are irrelevant to the argument. We are discussing only energies needed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 02 Jan 2011
Posts: 201
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
22
[0], given: 22
|
Re: The energy an animal must expend to move uphill is [#permalink]
14 May 2012, 23:53
The energy an animal must expend to move uphill is proportional to its body weight, whereas the animal’s energy output available to perform this task is proportional to its surface area. This is the reason that small animals, like squirrel, can run up a tree trunk almost as fast as they can move on level ground, whereas large animals tend to slow down when they are moving uphill.
Which one of the following is an assumption on which the explanation above depends?
(A) The amount of energy needed to move uphill is no greater for large animals that it is for small animals. - Negating the information already provided in the Premise (B) Small animals can move more rapidly than large animals can. - Provided in the premise already (C) The ratio of surface area to body weight is smaller in large animals than it is in small animals. - This provides the most appropriate assumption - Correct (D) There is little variation in the ratio of energy output to body weight among animals. - If this is assumed, then both large and small animals should be able to move fast. Does not justify to be an assumption. (E) The amount of energy needed to run at a given speed is proportional to the surface area of the running animal. - Irrelevant information
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 28 May 2011
Posts: 200
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, International Business
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38
GPA: 3.6
WE: Project Management (Computer Software)
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
28
[0], given: 7
|
Re: The energy an animal must expend to move uphill is [#permalink]
19 May 2012, 04:13
I guess C is the straight choice...
_________________
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://gmatclub.com/forum/a-guide-to-the-official-guide-13-for-gmat-review-134210.html -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 07 May 2012
Posts: 9
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
Re: The energy an animal must expend to move uphill is [#permalink]
06 Jun 2012, 09:11
small animals ==> large surface area but less weight==> climb faster Large animals ==> smaller surface area but more weight ==> slower answer C.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 02 Jan 2011
Posts: 201
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
22
[0], given: 22
|
Re: The energy an animal must expend to move uphill is [#permalink]
06 Jun 2012, 22:03
Energy expended (E) to move uphill is proportional to Body weight. ie W Hence more W results in greater E
Energy output (OE) available is proportional to surface area ie A Hence more A results in greater OE
(A) The amount of energy needed to move uphill is no greater for large animals that it is for small animals. - If this is the case, then both large and small animals should be able to move uphill with same efficiency - Incorrect. (B) Small animals can move more rapidly than large animals can. - Already mentioned in the argument - Incorrect (C) The ratio of surface area to body weight is smaller in large animals than it is in small animals. - This provides the proper link why small animals are more efficient at moving compared to large animals - Correct (D) There is little variation in the ratio of energy output to body weight among animals. - Should have equal efficiency among all animals - Incorrect (E) The amount of energy needed to run at a given speed is proportional to the surface area of the running animal. - Irrelevant in the present context - Incorrect
|
|
|
|
|
|
Verbal GMAT Forum Moderator
Status: Preparing for the another shot...!
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 1337
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GMAT 1: 720 Q V
GPA: 3.75
Followers: 69
Kudos [?]:
326
[0], given: 53
|
Re: The energy an animal must expend to move uphill is [#permalink]
19 Aug 2012, 12:12
Though my reply is a bit late, still I shall not suffice just by solving and not by sharing. ENERGY EXPENDED~ WEIGHT OF THE ANIMAL ENERGY OUTPUT ~ SURFACE AREA OF THE ANIMAL CLEARLY SURFACE AREA ~ WEIGHT, let surface area be denoted by A and weight be W. The more is A/W, the more is the energy output/energy expended. If an option states that the ratio of surface area to body weight is smaller in large animals than it is in small animals, then for sure the ratio of energy output/energy expended is much less than that of smaller animals. Hence c is the clear winner.
_________________
Prepositional Phrases Clarified|Elimination of BEING| Absolute Phrases Clarified Rules For Posting
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Status: Final Lap Up!!!
Affiliations: NYK Line
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Posts: 981
Location: India
GMAT 1: 410 Q35 V11 GMAT 2: 530 Q44 V20 GMAT 3: 630 Q45 V31
GPA: 3.2
WE: Engineering (Transportation)
Followers: 15
Kudos [?]:
105
[0], given: 58
|
Re: The energy an animal must expend to move uphill is [#permalink]
03 Oct 2012, 00:10
There are two possible assumption to this one is straight fwd that there is a limitation on the max energy output as energy output is proportional to size. Hence when the slow down it means that they reached there is max. but unfortunately its not mentioned in the options another is a mathmetical approach
Energy to move uphill proportional to Body wt...................1 Energy output Proprtional to Surface area..........................2
Divide 1 and 2
energy to move uphill Body wt ------------------------- = K* ----------------- energy output Surface area
This clearly justifies the option C As Energy decreses in animals with body wt the other side of eqn should aslo decrease to maintain the proportionality
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: The energy an animal must expend to move uphill is
[#permalink]
03 Oct 2012, 00:10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Vercules, Legendaddy, noboru, Marcab, metallicafan, rajeevrks27, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, souvik101990, doe007, MacFauz, PTK, carcass, kissthegmat, Narenn
|