|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 949
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
6
[1] , given: 0
|
The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of [#permalink]
 09 Dec 2005, 16:39
1
This post received
KUDOS
Question Stats:
42% (01:40) correct
57% (01:03) wrong based on 0 sessions
The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of medical experiments were established to ensure that patients must be warned of potential risks and an independent panel would evaluate the experiment before it was conducted.
A) must be warned of potential risks and an independent panel would
B) must be warned of potential risks and that an independent panel
C) are warned about potential risks and that an independent panel
D) will be warned about potential risks and an independent panel would
E) would be warned of potential risks and that an independent panel would
Last edited by joemama142000 on 09 Dec 2005, 18:01, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 22 Aug 2005
Posts: 1133
Location: CA
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
9
[0], given: 0
|
E.
would is required to indicate future, unseen, effects of federal rules.
C is incorect: tense not consistent. "it was conducted" in non-underlined portion indicates past tense.
_________________
Whether you think you can or think you can't. You're right! - Henry Ford (1863 - 1947)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 949
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
6
[0], given: 0
|
If the sentence were modified would this be correct?
The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of medical experiments are established to ensure that patients must be warned of potential risks and an independent panel evaluate the experiment before it was conducted.
also what about this sentence?
The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of medical experiments are established to ensure that patients will be warned of potential risks and an independent panel will evaluate the experiment before it was conducted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Posts: 1913
Followers: 7
Kudos [?]:
55
[0], given: 0
|
Re: SC federal rules [#permalink]
09 Dec 2005, 19:58
joemama142000 wrote: The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of medical experiments were established to ensure that patients must be warned of potential risks and an independent panel would evaluate the experiment before it was conducted.
A) must be warned of potential risks and an independent panel would
B) must be warned of potential risks and that an independent panel
C) are warned about potential risks and that an independent panel
D) will be warned about potential risks and an independent panel would
E) would be warned of potential risks and that an independent panel would
E for parallel structure and parallel tenses and correct idiom "be warned of"
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 949
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
6
[0], given: 0
|
oa is E
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 04 Jul 2005
Posts: 107
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
Re: SC federal rules [#permalink]
11 Dec 2005, 09:30
E,//lism would be warned of and would evaluate
I thought warn about is a correct idiom but now I know that I was wrong
thanks guys for posting this question
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5289
Followers: 17
Kudos [?]:
91
[0], given: 0
|
Late, but E for the consistent use of the modal would.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 13 Jul 2010
Posts: 173
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
11
[0], given: 7
|
Re: SC federal rules [#permalink]
15 Nov 2010, 18:42
Yurik79 wrote: joemama142000 wrote: The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of medical experiments were established to ensure that patients must be warned of potential risks and an independent panel would evaluate the experiment before it was conducted.
A) must be warned of potential risks and an independent panel would
B) must be warned of potential risks and that an independent panel
C) are warned about potential risks and that an independent panel
D) will be warned about potential risks and an independent panel would
E) would be warned of potential risks and that an independent panel would I vote for D D would not be correct as it is missing the "that" to be parallel with to ensure "that" patients...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 31 Jul 2010
Posts: 34
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
9
[0], given: 1
|
Re: SC federal rules [#permalink]
15 Nov 2010, 22:06
E for parallel construction (that.. that..) and subjunctive usgae ( were - would )
_________________
Kudos Never costs your Pocket ! Give when u feel it worthy 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 04 May 2009
Posts: 71
Location: Astoria, NYC
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
6
[0], given: 1
|
Re: SC federal rules [#permalink]
16 Nov 2010, 08:19
I picked E not even for parrallelism but for the usage of: would be warned of.....rather than warned about...
We usually would get warned of danger rather than about
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 16 Jul 2010
Posts: 163
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
9
[0], given: 0
|
Re: SC federal rules [#permalink]
16 Nov 2010, 21:50
anish319 wrote: I picked E not even for parrallelism but for the usage of: would be warned of.....rather than warned about...
We usually would get warned of danger rather than about I think your point is valid. Can somebody explain?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 23 Jun 2010
Posts: 40
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
7
[1] , given: 5
|
Re: SC federal rules [#permalink]
27 Feb 2011, 15:01
1
This post received
KUDOS
I originally picked E for ||ism. But after reaching MGMAT SC and a couple of OG examples where words like 'rule' and 'laws' are associated with MUST instead of COULD/SHOULD/WOULD (since laws are mandatory and words like would/should/could imply one has a choice in obeying the law...) , I decided to go with B because that is the only option that has MUST in the beginning and removes WOULD from the second half. It didn't make sense to me but I went by the rules in MGMAT and OG. Turns out there are exceptions to the rule  How to avoid this trap?
_________________
-DK
---------------------------------------------------------
If you like what you read then give a Kudos! 
Diagnostic Test: 620
The past is a guidepost, not a hitching post.
---------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 21 Dec 2010
Posts: 657
Followers: 9
Kudos [?]:
58
[0], given: 51
|
Re: SC federal rules [#permalink]
28 Feb 2011, 11:58
warned of and warned about ? warned about is wrong usage .
_________________
What is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Status: GMAT Learner
Joined: 14 Jul 2010
Posts: 672
Followers: 21
Kudos [?]:
108
[1] , given: 31
|
Re: The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of [#permalink]
29 Jan 2012, 02:05
1
This post received
KUDOS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of
[#permalink]
29 Jan 2012, 02:05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, Marcab, Narenn, GetThisDone
|
close
