Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!
Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club
Registration gives you:
Tests
Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.
Applicant Stats
View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more
Books/Downloads
Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
The figure above shows a streetlight that consists of a [#permalink]
21 Feb 2012, 02:01
7
This post was BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Difficulty:
85% (hard)
Question Stats:
35% (02:15) correct
65% (00:57) wrong based on 173 sessions
The figure above shows a streetlight that consists of a glass sphere, with center O, placed on top of a vertical pole that is 4 meters high. What is the height QR of the streetlight?
(1) The radius of the pole is 6 centimeters.
(2) The radius OQ of the sphere is 24 centimeters.
The figure above shows a streetlight that consists of a glass sphere, with center O, placed on top of a vertical pole that is 4 meters high. What is the height QR of the streetlight?
(1) The radius of the pole is 6 centimeters.
(2) The radius OQ of the sphere is 24 centimeters.
There is absolutely no need to actually calculate the height QR. Just notice that the height of a pole (given) and the radius of the pole completely defines (fixes) it. The same way the radius of a sphere completely defines (fixes) it. So, only if we have defined (fixed) pole and defined (fixed) sphere we can be able to say how much below the top of the pole the sphere goes, and we'll be able to calculate QR.
Both statements together provide us with the info needed: the radius of the pole and the radius of the sphere. Hence when taken together statements are sufficient.
Answer: C.
P.S. When dealing with DS problems try to avoid calculations as much as possible. Remember DS problems do not ask you to solve, but rather to determine if you are ABLE to solve and in many cases you can determine that a statement is sufficient without working out all of the math.
The figure above shows a streetlight that consists of a glass sphere, with center O, placed on top of a vertical pole that is 4 meters high. What is the height QR of the streetlight?
(1) The radius of the pole is 6 centimeters.
(2) The radius OQ of the sphere is 24 centimeters.
There is absolutely no need to actually calculate the height QR. Just notice that the height of a pole (given) and the radius of the pole completely defines (fixes) it. The same way the radius of a sphere completely defines (fixes) it. So, only if we have defined (fixed) pole and defined (fixed) sphere we can be able to say how much below the top of the pole the sphere goes, and we'll be able to calculate QR.
Both statements together provide us with the info needed: the radius of the pole and the radius of the sphere. Hence when taken together statements are sufficient.
Answer: C.
P.S. When dealing with DS problems try to avoid calculations as much as possible. Remember DS problems do not ask you to solve, but rather to determine if you are ABLE to solve and in many cases you can determine that a statement is sufficient without working out all of the math.
Hope it's clear.
Hi Bunuel,
I'm slightly confused with why do we need the radius of the pole ?
If the sphere sits on the pole its one point would touch the pole, hence the height of street lamp would be pole height + sphere diameter
Thus B should be sufficient correct?
Thanks in advance _________________
Giving +1 kudos is a better way of saying 'Thank You'.
The figure above shows a streetlight that consists of a glass sphere, with center O, placed on top of a vertical pole that is 4 meters high. What is the height QR of the streetlight?
(1) The radius of the pole is 6 centimeters.
(2) The radius OQ of the sphere is 24 centimeters.
There is absolutely no need to actually calculate the height QR. Just notice that the height of a pole (given) and the radius of the pole completely defines (fixes) it. The same way the radius of a sphere completely defines (fixes) it. So, only if we have defined (fixed) pole and defined (fixed) sphere we can be able to say how much below the top of the pole the sphere goes, and we'll be able to calculate QR.
Both statements together provide us with the info needed: the radius of the pole and the radius of the sphere. Hence when taken together statements are sufficient.
Answer: C.
P.S. When dealing with DS problems try to avoid calculations as much as possible. Remember DS problems do not ask you to solve, but rather to determine if you are ABLE to solve and in many cases you can determine that a statement is sufficient without working out all of the math.
Hope it's clear.
Hi Bunuel,
I'm slightly confused with why do we need the radius of the pole ?
If the sphere sits on the pole its one point would touch the pole, hence the height of street lamp would be pole height + sphere diameter
Thus B should be sufficient correct?
Thanks in advance
No, it does't "sit" on the pole it's placed IN the circular top of the pole (notice that the sphere is slightly below the top of the pole). Now, consider extreme case when the radius of the pole is more than the radius of the sphere, in that case the sphere will just fall into it.
Re: The figure above shows a streetlight that consists of a [#permalink]
21 Feb 2012, 22:39
Hi Bunuel,
Thanks for your reply but I have this question, may be its even silly but in your reply you assumed the pole to be hollow i.e a steel pipe but the question says pole i.e solid pole like a vaulting pole hence the chance of the sphere going into the pole is nil.
I dont know how the GMAT defines such terms cause both possibilities exist _________________
Giving +1 kudos is a better way of saying 'Thank You'.
Re: The figure above shows a streetlight that consists of a [#permalink]
21 Feb 2012, 22:42
Expert's post
boomtangboy wrote:
Hi Bunuel,
Thanks for your reply but I have this question, may be its even silly but in your reply you assumed the pole to be hollow i.e a steel pipe but the question says pole i.e solid pole like a vaulting pole hence the chance of the sphere going into the pole is nil.
I dont know how the GMAT defines such terms cause both possibilities exist
Notice that the sphere is slightly below the top of the pole. _________________
Re: The figure above shows a streetlight that consists of a [#permalink]
24 Feb 2012, 02:32
I was also confused the part that boomtangboy mentioned above.
Bunuel says that the sphere slightly goes into the pole in the picture, but should we solve the problem with the information in the Q, not the picture. The question doesn't say that the sphere slightly goes into the pole.
Re: The figure above shows a streetlight that consists of a [#permalink]
24 Feb 2012, 02:46
Expert's post
eybrj2 wrote:
I was also confused the part that boomtangboy mentioned above.
Bunuel says that the sphere slightly goes into the pole in the picture, but should we solve the problem with the information in the Q, not the picture. The question doesn't say that the sphere slightly goes into the pole.
So confusing....
But the question doesn't say the opposite either: why are you assuming that the sphere and the pole have only one tangent point?
In addition if it were the case then the whole point of the drawing and the radius of the pole makes little sense, because the question just becomes about adding two quantities: length of the pole and the diameter of the sphere. _________________
Re: The figure above shows a streetlight that consists of a [#permalink]
29 Feb 2012, 01:23
Expert's post
Only with what Bunuel says we have the answer C, whereas if the two figures touch each other in one point the solution was D, but when I look at this kind of statement I think that something is behind the scenes.
Too simple a question like this to say: we have the radi x 2 + height ...........this is not wonderland, this is Mordor Land. _________________
Re: The figure above shows a streetlight that consists of a [#permalink]
02 Feb 2014, 06:04
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!
Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).
Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email. _________________
The figure above shows a streetlight that consists of a [#permalink]
18 Oct 2014, 12:38
2
This post was BOOKMARKED
See that attached picture. We need both radius of the glass sphere and the pole in order to calculate the total height of the combined structure.
ANSWER: C
eybrj2 wrote:
The figure above shows a streetlight that consists of a glass sphere, with center O, placed on top of a vertical pole that is 4 meters high. What is the height QR of the streetlight?
(1) The radius of the pole is 6 centimeters.
(2) The radius OQ of the sphere is 24 centimeters.
Attachments
Screen Shot 2014-11-03 at 8.14.08 PM.png [ 180.16 KiB | Viewed 991 times ]
The figure above shows a streetlight that consists of a [#permalink]
03 Nov 2014, 20:22
1
This post received KUDOS
i updated the picture...please take a look.
basically, we know that radius of pole is 6 and radius of the sphere is 24. so we can calculate the partial portion part of the radius of sphere. We can then find the needed information.
hope this helps.
annie2014 wrote:
I am still confused how the information is sufficient.
How do we calculate the c shown above? We only know that a is 6. What is the value of b?
The “3 golden nuggets” of MBA admission process With ten years of experience helping prospective students with MBA admissions and career progression, I will be writing this blog through...
You know what’s worse than getting a ding at one of your dreams schools . Yes its getting that horrid wait-listed email . This limbo is frustrating as hell . Somewhere...