Last visit was: 23 Apr 2024, 20:16 It is currently 23 Apr 2024, 20:16

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 96
Own Kudos [?]: 1061 [27]
Given Kudos: 7
GMAT 2: 500  Q43  V16
WE 1: 4 years in IT
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 31 Jan 2010
Posts: 312
Own Kudos [?]: 341 [6]
Given Kudos: 149
 Q49  V42
WE 1: 4 years Tech
Send PM
General Discussion
RC & DI Moderator
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Status:Math and DI Expert
Posts: 11161
Own Kudos [?]: 31870 [1]
Given Kudos: 290
Send PM
CEO
CEO
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Posts: 2552
Own Kudos [?]: 1813 [1]
Given Kudos: 763
Location: India
WE:Sales (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
Re: The fishing industry cannot currently be relied upon to help the gover [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
Keywords highlighted

The fishing industry cannot currently be relied upon to help the government count the seabirds killed by net fishing,
A fact

since an accurate count might result in restriction of net fishing.
reason for the fact to be ture

The government should therefore institute a program under which tissue samples from the dead birds are examined to determine the amount of toxins in the fish eaten by the birds.
A program promoted, the process of which is given.

The industry would then have a reason to turn in the bird carcasses, since the industry needs to know whether the fish it catches are contaminated with toxins.
If I'm right this statement says that the examination of bird tissue would help fishing industry whether the fish is contaminated or not. However, not exactly sure how it would be so.

Which one of the following, if true, most strongly indicates that the government program would not by itself provide an accurate count of the seabirds killed by net fishing?

Repharsed version - Which one of the options would weaken the thought that govt's plan to count seabirds killed would be successful(in giving an accurate figure).?

(A) The seabirds killed by net fishing might be contaminated with several different toxins even if the birds eat only one kind of fish - INCORRECT. Knowing about several different toxin does not help to counter the thought that govt's plan would not be successful.

(B) The fishing industry could learn whether the fish it catches are contaminated with toxins if only a few of the seabirds killed by the nets were examined - CORRECT. If a small number(10 or 100) of seabirds are examined to establish that fish caught is contaminated, then number of seabirds killed by net can be 1000 or 100,000 or more. There is no higher limit of those number of seabirds killed. Also, they may have been killed because of some other reason.

(C) The government could gain valuable information about the source of toxins by examining tissue samples of the seabirds caught in the nets. - INCORRECT. Again source of toxins is not the core of the argument.

(D) The fish caught in a particular net might be contaminated with the same toxins as those in the seabirds caught in that net. - INCORRECT. Yes, possibly but how how does it helps in keeping an accurate count.

(E) The government would be willing to certify that the fish caught by the industry are not contaminated with toxins if tests done on the seabirds showed no contamination. - INCORRECT. Govt's willingness doesn't play any role at all in providing accurate count of seabirds killed.

It was B and D that made me think a lot. However, for D assumptions have to be made for it be right.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Nov 2020
Posts: 119
Own Kudos [?]: 25 [0]
Given Kudos: 96
Send PM
Re: The fishing industry cannot currently be relied upon to help the gover [#permalink]
This was a highly tricky question i was literally not eleminate many noptions however i sticked on to some options that made a bit of sense that was b because since if the fishing industery figured out the toxins they wouldn't report the same to the government and then conversely the government will not be able to figure out and utimately their plans will faill hance IMO B
Intern
Intern
Joined: 28 May 2021
Posts: 18
Own Kudos [?]: 6 [0]
Given Kudos: 8
Location: India
Send PM
Re: The fishing industry cannot currently be relied upon to help the gover [#permalink]
IMO [b], because if the industry can find out if their fish is intoxicated, then they can easily get rid of the program and stop co-operating because their motive is fulfilled, and the government's still isn't.
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17205
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: The fishing industry cannot currently be relied upon to help the gover [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: The fishing industry cannot currently be relied upon to help the gover [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6917 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne