Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 20 Jun 2013, 04:39
Customize  |  Hide

The following proposal to amend the bylaws of an

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Oct 2006
Posts: 440
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
The following proposal to amend the bylaws of an [#permalink] New post 30 Oct 2006, 13:35
00:00

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
The following proposal to amend the bylaws of an organization was circulated to its members for comment.

When more than one nominee is to be named for an office, prospective nominees must consent to nomination and before giving such consent must be told who the other nominees will be.

Which of the following comments concerning the logic of the proposal is accurate if it cannot be known who the actual nominees are until prospective nominees have given their consent to be nominated?

(A) The proposal would make it possible for each of several nominees for an office to be aware of who all of the other nominees are.
(B) The proposal would widen the choice available to those choosing among the nominees.
(C) If there are several prospective nominees, the proposal would deny the last nominee equal treatment with the first.
(D) The proposal would enable a prospective nominee to withdraw from competition with a specific person without making that withdrawal known.
(E) If there is more than one prospective nominee, the proposal would make it impossible for anyone to become a nominee.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 06 Sep 2006
Posts: 80
Location: New York City
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - Bylaws [#permalink] New post 30 Oct 2006, 13:46
Answer is E:

It would be impossible for any to become a nominee...It is a deadlock situation.
_________________

'Hakuna matata'

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 1026
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR - Bylaws [#permalink] New post 30 Oct 2006, 20:04
punnu_mba wrote:
Answer is E:

It would be impossible for any to become a nominee...It is a deadlock situation.


For the same reason E.
_________________

The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Posts: 1185
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 01 Nov 2006, 06:12
E 2. posted before.
VP
VP
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1482
Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 61 [0], given: 13

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 01 Nov 2006, 07:14
Go with E.
  [#permalink] 01 Nov 2006, 07:14
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Popular new posts The following proposal to amend the bylaws of an dj 10 11 Oct 2004, 17:31
New posts The following proposal to amend the bylaws of an mohitguptask 1 30 Oct 2004, 16:40
New posts The following proposal to amend the bylaws of an ruhi 5 21 Nov 2004, 11:22
New posts The following proposal to amend the bylaws of an okdongdong 8 11 Jul 2005, 06:42
New posts The following proposal to amend the bylaws of an rahulraao 3 14 Sep 2005, 17:47
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The following proposal to amend the bylaws of an

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.