but can you explain how E is correct? you could get to an answer by POE, but what is E really saying? i still couldn't understand it.
I think I managed to crack it during my second attempt. Also the fact that we know the OA ('E') could have favoured it.
Let us address the premise :
P1 - when nominee: 2 or more--> introduce a new process
P2 - new process: Prospective nominees must sign a consent form
P3 - Before they sign, they should know the other nominees.
EC - no changes to the above logic of the proposal (no changes to above). And for some unforeseen reasons other nominees are not figured out
----> As we cannot break the proposal's logical approach on dealing with the nominees thus we cannot skip any premise. The proposal demands an recognition of other nominees before a sign, by which one cannot proceed ahead with nomination.
(E) If there is more than one prospective nominee
, the proposal would make it impossible for anyone to become a nominee (by signing the form)