Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 02 May 2016, 16:44

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The Forbes Ranking is Out...

 Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 03 Mar 2007
Posts: 985
Location: Hong Kong
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Schools: HKUST MBA - Class of 2014
GMAT 1: 740 Q48 V44
GPA: 3.2
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 46 [0], given: 8

[#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Aug 2007, 20:06
Aye aye cap'n. Will do.
CEO
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 3461
Followers: 66

Kudos [?]: 781 [0], given: 781

[#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Aug 2007, 20:13
Don't sweat it guys. Carry on the good work. I have found that the best way to deal with such posts is to ignore them. I usually give such members a few chances to understand how GMAT Club works, but this was a little too serious. Thought I really hate doing this to grown ups, I had to ban beny.

I am sure all of us are capable of saying hateful things about others. Its too easy. It is up to us to decide whether we can learn to disagree in a mature way and understand the power of working in a team.

Focus on your goals and let me take care of the bad guys.

Cheers
Manager
Joined: 29 Dec 2006
Posts: 214
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

[#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Aug 2007, 20:57
Is it just me or is Ross completely missing from these rankings?
Senior Manager
Joined: 28 Jun 2007
Posts: 462
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

[#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Aug 2007, 21:06
Praetorian wrote:
Don't sweat it guys. Carry on the good work. I have found that the best way to deal with such posts is to ignore them. I usually give such members a few chances to understand how GMAT Club works, but this was a little too serious. Thought I really hate doing this to grown ups, I had to ban beny.

I am sure all of us are capable of saying hateful things about others. Its too easy. It is up to us to decide whether we can learn to disagree in a mature way and understand the power of working in a team.

Focus on your goals and let me take care of the bad guys.

Cheers

Hahahahaa... That is exactly what I thought. I dont think we need any MORE comments to ban this dude. Only promotions need "MORE" work, bans dont
GMAT Club Legend
Status: Um... what do you want to know?
Joined: 04 Jun 2007
Posts: 5464
Location: SF, CA, USA
Schools: UC Berkeley Haas School of Business MBA 2010
WE 1: Social Gaming
Followers: 71

Kudos [?]: 390 [0], given: 14

[#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Aug 2007, 21:08
Thank you Praet for taking care of this. It was definitely a bit jarring to see such posts on GMATClub, as everyone has been so supportive over the past few months.

Anyway, forcefeed, the Forbes ranking methods are kinda strange (UCLA is #21), even though it's based on ROI. You never really know if they're using averages, medians, 80% ranges, yadda yadda yadda...
Senior Manager
Joined: 28 Jun 2007
Posts: 462
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

[#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Aug 2007, 21:18
kryzak wrote:
Thank you Praet for taking care of this. It was definitely a bit jarring to see such posts on GMATClub, as everyone has been so supportive over the past few months.

Anyway, forcefeed, the Forbes ranking methods are kinda strange (UCLA is #21), even though it's based on ROI. You never really know if they're using averages, medians, 80% ranges, yadda yadda yadda...

You mean "Straight E"
CEO
Joined: 17 May 2007
Posts: 2989
Followers: 60

Kudos [?]: 523 [0], given: 210

[#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Aug 2007, 23:02
The Wharton dean of admissions mentioned that Wharton do NOT participate in rankings for this particular reason - the various ranking criteria out there simply do not cater for everyone's tastes. He referred to this particular criteria as an example. I suspect that he had an inkling that Forbes are about to publish a ranking set that did not rate Wharton as number 1.

I wonder where AGSM sits in this ranking. The actual cost of an MBA at AGSM is $52 K AUD and then length is 16 months. The ROI figure will be pretty high considering the job markets in Asia have been booming in the last few years. Director Joined: 18 Sep 2006 Posts: 962 Location: Chicago, IL Schools: Chicago Booth 2010 Followers: 6 Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0 [#permalink] ### Show Tags 19 Aug 2007, 23:28 wow, some heated debate on gmat club beny, it seems a bit hypocritical that you are chastising indians that only apply to h/s/w, while you are personally aiming solely for HBS also...iirc pelihu didnt get into columbia, he was waitlisted but declined after getting his scholarship from darden CEO Joined: 17 Jul 2004 Posts: 3281 Followers: 24 Kudos [?]: 462 [0], given: 0 [#permalink] ### Show Tags 20 Aug 2007, 00:35 I have studied the Forbes ranking over the past few years. While reasonable minds can certainly differ over the use of an ROI metric, it seems to have at least some utility as an evaluation criterion when used in combination with other criteria. The greater problem with the Forbes metric is that it just isn't executed very well. The calculation is profoundly sensitive to specification so that even even small changes can cause major changes in the ranking of programs (in other words, it exhibits high levels of ordinal fragility). When I recreated their rankings, I found that schools were often separated by less than 1% net benefit, a difference that was so small that it was swamped by small changes in specification. The are two major omissions- 1) A rigorous model would incorporate taxation at the state and local level. While this might sound trivial at first, consider that some states have no state income tax while others have tax rates greater than 5%. Over the course of five years, the net benefit (after tax) of students in low tax regimes would be several thousand dollars higher than that of students in high tax regimes. 2) A rigorous model would take into account cost of living for different regions of the US. Depending on how one measures COL, one dollar in a less expensive region like St. Louis could easily be the equivalent of$1.50 or more in other parts of the country. Adjusting for COL can cause programs to shift several places.

Another significant problem is that the calculation is biased against public universities that offer significant savings for in-state residents (recall that the calculation is based on out of state tuition). When I adjusted the figure for UCLA in 2003, the school jumped from a rather mediocre #18 (including intl. schools) to a far more impressive #5. The same basic pattern can be observed with Texas and UCB. As an aside, it is a bit odd that they use the current tuition to compare schools when it would be more logical to use the tuition of schools at the time that the cohort was attending school.
Manager
Joined: 27 Jun 2007
Posts: 241
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

[#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Aug 2007, 04:40
One of zee best posts on gmatclub I have ever seen.........why do all the fun posts happen when I am away from the net.

Hopefully we'll have beny part 2 in our midst soon
GMAT Club Legend
Status: Um... what do you want to know?
Joined: 04 Jun 2007
Posts: 5464
Location: SF, CA, USA
Schools: UC Berkeley Haas School of Business MBA 2010
WE 1: Social Gaming
Followers: 71

Kudos [?]: 390 [0], given: 14

[#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Aug 2007, 08:28
Thank you Hjort for the clear and detailed explanation. It is very good to know the intricacies of how the Forbes ranking was developed.
Director
Joined: 26 Jul 2007
Posts: 541
Schools: Stern, McCombs, Marshall, Wharton
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 133 [0], given: 0

[#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Aug 2007, 08:57
@Hjort - I thought I read that they did a COL adjustment

The problem I have with this rankins is that it tells you absoloutly nothing about your situation. They are basically comparing before and after salaries as well as lost wages. While I think you should look at your PERSONAL ROI, a school average does no good. After all if the school takes in a bunch of people who make $40,000 and after graduation they make$85,000 their ROI will be high due to the fact that their starting salary and lost wages will be low. This will mean absolutely nothing to you if you make \$70,000 going in.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 10 Apr 2007
Posts: 4318
Location: Back in Chicago, IL
Schools: Kellogg Alum: Class of 2010
Followers: 89

Kudos [?]: 743 [0], given: 5

[#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Aug 2007, 09:04
Another weakness of the ROI is that it benefits the schools that place a lot of people in the finance field. One person in a class making 10 million a year at a hedge fund is going to pull the average way up. Much like how having a couple of 40 year olds in a class manages to balance out all of the 24 year olds in the class profile.
Director
Joined: 26 Jul 2007
Posts: 541
Schools: Stern, McCombs, Marshall, Wharton
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 133 [0], given: 0

[#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Aug 2007, 09:19
riverripper wrote:
Another weakness of the ROI is that it benefits the schools that place a lot of people in the finance field. One person in a class making 10 million a year at a hedge fund is going to pull the average way up. Much like how having a couple of 40 year olds in a class manages to balance out all of the 24 year olds in the class profile.

They should be able to compensate for this by removing the outliers. However I dont know if they do.
VP
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 1134
Location: Bangalore
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 0

[#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Aug 2007, 10:02
kryzak wrote:
beny, you are out of line. Like Praetorian and riverripper said, you are welcome to express your opinions, but not at the expense of insulting other groups of people. Unlike what you believe, aviroop is actually *quite* knowledgeable about what he's talking about, and we do understand the ROI methods that Forbes uses (after reading their website). It was the initial "shock" of the rankings that resulted in some of the earlier comments here.

Again, your posts here show an immaturity that is not fit for these forums. Please refrain from posting if you can't "play nice". We are not the BW forums for a reason.

Please read this:
http://www.gmatclub.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=42290

Thank you

- Clap Clap - Very well said. Thank you kryzak.
Manager
Joined: 11 Jul 2006
Posts: 99
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

[#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Aug 2007, 13:18
Weird, I really didn't find anything posted by beny to be terribly offensive. I did, however, find the personal attacks and name calling against him to be much more distasteful. I mean are there loads of unqualified Indians applying to H/S/W or any other top program every year? Of course, same can be said of any other race/ethnicity. I am Chinese and I can tell you there are plenty of unqualified Chinese applying to H/S/W, big deal, it's not like I'm knocking my own race, it's simply a fact. There's a reason why H/S/W is everyone's reach school. My guess is that beny is probably Indian as well.
Current Student
Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Posts: 110
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

[#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Aug 2007, 14:42
I agree...the ban was a bit dramatic. But oh well, these rankings always cause a big buzz.
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Jul 2007
Posts: 288
Location: The 408
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

[#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Aug 2007, 14:45
I actually laughed out loud at these.
VP
Joined: 24 Sep 2006
Posts: 1359
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 196 [0], given: 0

[#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Aug 2007, 15:44
beny wrote:
Yes, there may be Indians who are knowledgable (a few on this forum come to mind), this does not compensate for the countless who apply knowing absolutely nothing about the schools.

I think that we could replace "Indians" by "people" in your comment, and it would still be true.

Just a thought.

L.
GMAT Club Legend
Status: Um... what do you want to know?
Joined: 04 Jun 2007
Posts: 5464
Location: SF, CA, USA
Schools: UC Berkeley Haas School of Business MBA 2010
WE 1: Social Gaming
Followers: 71

Kudos [?]: 390 [0], given: 14

[#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Aug 2007, 15:58
I believe beny is Korean, based on his blog.

I didn't find his posts offensive because of his name calling (again, *I* didn't ban beny) , I found his posts offensive because of the tone and attitude he used to generalize and accuse groups of people for certain things. Yes, the "response" attacks were also not ok, that's why I asked the member involved to take the "high road" and tone down. It is the initiator that I find at fault for igniting this "firestorm", and I'm glad that we calmed the others down quickly enough so that the discussion resumed in our usual, friendly, and nice way.
[#permalink] 20 Aug 2007, 15:58

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3    Next  [ 41 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Stanford GSB Tops Forbes ROI Ranking…Again 0 16 Sep 2015, 12:01
1 Forbes 2009 Ranking – Non-US Schools 3 08 Aug 2009, 10:00
2 Forbes 2009 B-School Rankings 20 06 Aug 2009, 19:46
4 New FT Rankings are out 47 28 Jan 2008, 00:15
Check out the new rankings... 5 21 Jul 2007, 23:03
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# The Forbes Ranking is Out...

 Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.