The full-time unemployment rate cannot be determined with : GMAT Reading Comprehension (RC)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 17 Jan 2017, 03:56

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The full-time unemployment rate cannot be determined with

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 18 Oct 2009
Posts: 52
Schools: Queen's E-MBA
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 45 [1] , given: 7

The full-time unemployment rate cannot be determined with [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Feb 2010, 15:15
1
KUDOS
The full-time unemployment rate cannot be determined with great precision. One thing is certain: it cannot be zero or even close to zero. A zero unemployment rate would mean that no one ever entered or re-entered the labor force, that no one ever quit a job or was laid off, and that for new entrants or re-entrants, the process of searching for a job consumed no time. Moreover, full-time employment cannot be defined as an equality between the number of unemployed persons and the number of unfilled jobs. By this definition, almost any unemployment rate could be consistent with the full-time employment rate.
The customary definition of the full-time U.S. unemployment rate is the lowest rate of unemployment that can be attained without resulting in an accelerated rate of inflation, given the existing economic conditions. However, no one can be sure exactly what the unemployment rate is, based on this definition, since it is not possible to predict exactly how great a change in the rate of inflation will be associated with any given change in the unemployment rate. In the early 1960s, President Kennedy's Council of Economic Advisors (CEA) determined that 4 percent was the best estimate of the full-time U.S. unemployment rate. That rate was based on data collected during the period from mid-1955 to mid-1957, when the U.S. unemployment rate fluctuated around an average of 4.1 percent and the consumer price index advanced at an average rate of 2.5 percent per year. Although a 4-percent U.S. unemployment rate may have been consistent with an acceptably low rate of inflation in the mid-1950s, by the 1960s this proposition had become increasingly doubtful. Our experience since then has been such that those who accept the customary definition of the full-time U.S. unemployment rate now consider 4.5 percent to be the optimal rate under the existing circumstances.
The principal reason for this upward adjustment in the full-time U.S. unemployment rate is the changed composition of the labor force. As the labor force becomes increasingly composed of elderly people and women, the number of workers has increased. Similarly, the number of workers who are now eligible to collect benefits has increased. To the extent that these changes have increased voluntary and involuntary layoff rates and the average length of time unemployed persons spend looking for work, the full-time unemployment rate has risen.

The author’s attitude toward the existence of a zero unemployment rate is one of
A. perplexity B. uncertainty C. suspicion D. indignation E. disdain

--------------------------
_________________

Please give KUDOS if you like the post

If you have any questions
New!
Manager
Joined: 04 Feb 2007
Posts: 85
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 80 [1] , given: 16

Re: This RC passage was discussed earlier but w/out this Q [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Mar 2010, 17:27
1
KUDOS
ExecMBA2010 wrote:
The full-time unemployment rate cannot be determined with great precision. One thing is certain: it cannot be zero or even close to zero. A zero unemployment rate would mean that no one ever entered or re-entered the labor force, that no one ever quit a job or was laid off, and that for new entrants or re-entrants, the process of searching for a job consumed no time. Moreover, full-time employment cannot be defined as an equality between the number of unemployed persons and the number of unfilled jobs. By this definition, almost any unemployment rate could be consistent with the full-time employment rate.
The customary definition of the full-time U.S. unemployment rate is the lowest rate of unemployment that can be attained without resulting in an accelerated rate of inflation, given the existing economic conditions. However, no one can be sure exactly what the unemployment rate is, based on this definition, since it is not possible to predict exactly how great a change in the rate of inflation will be associated with any given change in the unemployment rate. In the early 1960s, President Kennedy's Council of Economic Advisors (CEA) determined that 4 percent was the best estimate of the full-time U.S. unemployment rate. That rate was based on data collected during the period from mid-1955 to mid-1957, when the U.S. unemployment rate fluctuated around an average of 4.1 percent and the consumer price index advanced at an average rate of 2.5 percent per year. Although a 4-percent U.S. unemployment rate may have been consistent with an acceptably low rate of inflation in the mid-1950s, by the 1960s this proposition had become increasingly doubtful. Our experience since then has been such that those who accept the customary definition of the full-time U.S. unemployment rate now consider 4.5 percent to be the optimal rate under the existing circumstances.
The principal reason for this upward adjustment in the full-time U.S. unemployment rate is the changed composition of the labor force. As the labor force becomes increasingly composed of elderly people and women, the number of workers has increased. Similarly, the number of workers who are now eligible to collect benefits has increased. To the extent that these changes have increased voluntary and involuntary layoff rates and the average length of time unemployed persons spend looking for work, the full-time unemployment rate has risen.

The author’s attitude toward the existence of a zero unemployment rate is one of
A. perplexity B. uncertainty C. suspicion D. indignation E. disdain

--------------------------

I say (C) Suspicion.

reason:
The author is certain that the existence of a 0% unemployment is practically impossible. He is not perplexed by it as in (A) nor is he uncertain (B) about it since he is certain it is wrong. (D) Indignation and (E) disdain both practically mean the same thing and they are both too strong. The author doesn't have anger or contempt toward the 0% rate. This leaves (C) suspicion and it fits as he doubts the validity of the rate i.e. he is suspicious of it.
_________________

If you like my post, a kudos is always appreciated

Senior Manager
Status: Can't give up
Joined: 20 Dec 2009
Posts: 320
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 35

Re: This RC passage was discussed earlier but w/out this Q [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Mar 2010, 20:25
nice explanation firasath..like that..
Re: This RC passage was discussed earlier but w/out this Q   [#permalink] 08 Mar 2010, 20:25
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
4 Companies that must determine well in advance of the 7 16 Jan 2013, 05:05
2 Changes in the volume of unemployment are governed by three 7 03 Jan 2011, 05:35
The sensation of pain cannot accurately be described as 9 09 Nov 2010, 21:38
The full-time unemployment rate cannot be determined with 13 24 Jun 2008, 01:56
1 In choosing a method for determining climatic conditions 6 14 Jan 2008, 21:15
Display posts from previous: Sort by