|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Feb 2004
Posts: 358
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
2
[0], given: 0
|
The geese that gather at the pond of a large corpora- tion [#permalink]
16 Jul 2004, 23:27
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
100% (00:51) wrong based on 0 sessions
The geese that gather at the pond of a large corpora-
tion create a hazard for executives who use the
corporate helicopter, whose landing site is 40 feet
away from the pond. To solve the problem, the
corporation plans to import a large number of herd-
ing dogs to keep the geese away from the helicopter.
Which of the following, if a realistic possibility,
would cast the most serious doubt on the prospects
for success of the corporation's plan?
(A) The dogs will form an uncontrollable pack.
(B) The dogs will require training to learn to herd
the geese.
(C) The dogs will frighten away foxes that prey on
old and sick geese.
(D) It will be necessary to keep the dogs in quaran-
tine for 30 days after importing them.
(E) Some of the geese will move to the pond of
another corporation in order to avoid being
herded by the dogs
I got this right , but i want to see if my line of reasoning is correct or i just got it by fluke.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 897
Location: Hyderabad
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
9
[0], given: 0
|
E should be it!
Dogs are going to be imported inorder to prevent geese from flocking around the corporation pond, this main purpose is going to be defeated if the dogs drive the geese towards the pond - and there by increase the risk of geese getting in the way of the corporate heli.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 897
Location: Hyderabad
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
9
[0], given: 0
|
missed to mention:
time taken is 45s
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Feb 2004
Posts: 358
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
2
[0], given: 0
|
Vithal, E is wrong. Other corporations are irrelevant to our question. We are concerned with the well being of the corporation in case..not with other corporations. Remember , ETS does not award or consider charity.  You know what i mean
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Dec 2003
Posts: 363
Location: India
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
5
[0], given: 0
|
I go with A.
The reason they want to have dogs to 'Shoo'away the geese as they are obstacles in landing the heli ... and if dogs became uncontrolled, they will also become a obstacles.
OA?
_________________
Giving another SHOT
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 02 Jun 2004
Posts: 162
Location: san jose,ca
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
11
[0], given: 0
|
(A) The dogs will form an uncontrollable pack.
Strong staement, if they cant be controlled why bring them?
E is tempting but the second pond may be far off,we donot know,so this can not weaken the plan.
_________________
GS
No excuses - Need 750!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Dec 2003
Posts: 363
Location: India
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
5
[0], given: 0
|
Pardon me for the joke, but
WHY bring the dogs if they know the geese will fly to another pond ...lol...
The authorities have decided to bring, but they realise the acuse, only after they bring the dogs. Hence, we have to look at the statement, which shows the action after the dogs are brought.
_________________
Giving another SHOT
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 20 Jun 2004
Posts: 172
Location: Noida, UP
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
20
[0], given: 0
|
A is my choice.
By POE, I find that none of the other qptions is any big challenge to the success of the plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Jun 2004
Posts: 399
Location: Bangalore, India
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
Re: Another GOOD CR [#permalink]
17 Jul 2004, 08:17
I think it is A. The corporation is creating another nonsense with unmanageable pack of dogs while trying to import a large number of herding dogs to solve the current issue.
Awaiting OA
Others are clearly out of scope.
crackgmat750 wrote: The geese that gather at the pond of a large corpora- tion create a hazard for executives who use the corporate helicopter, whose landing site is 40 feet away from the pond. To solve the problem, the corporation plans to import a large number of herd- ing dogs to keep the geese away from the helicopter. Which of the following, if a realistic possibility, would cast the most serious doubt on the prospects for success of the corporation's plan? (A) The dogs will form an uncontrollable pack. (B) The dogs will require training to learn to herd the geese. (C) The dogs will frighten away foxes that prey on old and sick geese. (D) It will be necessary to keep the dogs in quaran- tine for 30 days after importing them. (E) Some of the geese will move to the pond of another corporation in order to avoid being herded by the dogs I got this right , but i want to see if my line of reasoning is correct or i just got it by fluke. 
_________________
Awaiting response,
Thnx & Rgds,
Chandra
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 20 Jun 2004
Posts: 172
Location: Noida, UP
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
20
[0], given: 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 1031
Location: Florida
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
5
[0], given: 0
|
Re: Another GOOD CR [#permalink]
17 Jul 2004, 11:03
A, my answer. solved one problem, another cropped up.
E seems good, but why should this particular corporation care
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 897
Location: Hyderabad
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
9
[0], given: 0
|
I misread the option E - that's really silly I would say!
Well, guess humor upon my answer is a lesson I shall remember
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Feb 2004
Posts: 358
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
2
[0], given: 0
|
OA is A.
I , for a while, considered C also. If some foxes are already preying on geeses..then bringing dogs which will drive away foxes could be counter productive. But on a close look.. I observed that foxes are preying on old and sick geeses who in any case wont be a threat to corporations plus foxes themselves might be a problem. Iam surprised that none of you guys discussed about this option.. or is it that I have started thinking too much whne it comes to CR questions..
God save me from overthinking..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 02 Jun 2004
Posts: 162
Location: san jose,ca
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
11
[0], given: 0
|
LOL... You are speaking my words. However I guess, most of the time CR's try to make us fall into some small traps.Unless we seriously look for the potential traps, we choose a wrong choice.
_________________
GS
No excuses - Need 750!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1957
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
14
[0], given: 0
|
Sorry again a late comer, but A it is for me as well
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Marcab, Narenn
|