Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 30 Jul 2016, 00:30
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The government of Country X has introduced new law banning

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Fighting hard
Joined: 04 Jul 2011
Posts: 72
GMAT Date: 10-01-2012
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 84

The government of Country X has introduced new law banning [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Sep 2012, 03:32
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  15% (low)

Question Stats:

73% (02:15) correct 27% (01:20) wrong based on 136 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The government of Country X has introduced new law banning the peoples' right to stage protest marches against anything they feel is offensive to their religious beliefs. The government has justified its ruling on the grounds that this move will bring down incidents of rioting and arson that are associated with such protest marches.
Which of the following, if true, most supports the government's rationale behind passing the new law?
A.There have been many incidents of rioting and arson in the last two years and they have primarily originated from protest movements.
B.The riots are not a result of the protestors but of a few miscreants who incite violence deliberately for their political ends.
C.The numbers of cases of rioting and arson have decreased since the new government has come to power.
D.There are many diverse monotheistic religions in Country X and all of them are strongly represented in the national legislature.
E.In the last two years four out of every five protest marches on the grounds of offense to religious beliefs have led to rioting and arson whereas in the case of protest marches on other grounds the proportion is one out of five.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

I will rather do nothing than be busy doing nothing - Zen saying

Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Fighting again to Kill the GMAT devil
Joined: 02 Jun 2009
Posts: 137
Location: New Delhi
WE 1: Oil and Gas - Engineering & Construction
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 48

Re: Support the Argument [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Sep 2012, 06:02
Pansi wrote:
The government of Country X has introduced new law banning the peoples' right to stage protest marches against anything they feel is offensive to their religious beliefs. The government has justified its ruling on the grounds that this move will bring down incidents of rioting and arson that are associated with such protest marches.
Which of the following, if true, most supports the government's rationale behind passing the new law?
A.There have been many incidents of rioting and arson in the last two years and they have primarily originated from protest movements.
B.The riots are not a result of the protestors but of a few miscreants who incite violence deliberately for their political ends.
C.The numbers of cases of rioting and arson have decreased since the new government has come to power.
D.There are many diverse monotheistic religions in Country X and all of them are strongly represented in the national legislature.
E.In the last two years four out of every five protest marches on the grounds of offense to religious beliefs have led to rioting and arson whereas in the case of protest marches on other grounds the proportion is one out of five.


Premise 1 - Govt brings new law that banned protest marches related to religious beliefs.
Premise 2 - This will bring down riots associated with such protest marches (referring to protest marches related to religious beliefs)

Before reading Answer options - just think for a second - Why would Govt bring upon such a law -
1) it could be that govt has noted a trend in such protests
2) some incident has happenned which forced the govt to bring this law....

Now after reading all the options - You can make out that (E) fits the criteria pretty well!!!
_________________

Giving Kudos, is a great Way to Help the GC Community Kudos

Expert Post
GMAT Tutor
avatar
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 1183
Followers: 383

Kudos [?]: 1330 [0], given: 4

Re: Support the Argument [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Sep 2012, 19:41
Expert's post
Pansi wrote:
The government of Country X has introduced new law banning the peoples' right to stage protest marches against anything they feel is offensive to their religious beliefs. The government has justified its ruling on the grounds that this move will bring down incidents of rioting and arson that are associated with such protest marches.
Which of the following, if true, most supports the government's rationale behind passing the new law?
A.There have been many incidents of rioting and arson in the last two years and they have primarily originated from protest movements.
B.The riots are not a result of the protestors but of a few miscreants who incite violence deliberately for their political ends.
C.The numbers of cases of rioting and arson have decreased since the new government has come to power.
D.There are many diverse monotheistic religions in Country X and all of them are strongly represented in the national legislature.
E.In the last two years four out of every five protest marches on the grounds of offense to religious beliefs have led to rioting and arson whereas in the case of protest marches on other grounds the proportion is one out of five.


The answer is E, because E establishes that rioting and arson are a common consequence of the protest marches in question.

Where is the question from? I can count about a half-dozen grammatical or stylistic errors in the writing (the misplaced apostrophe in " peoples' ", the colloquialism "bring down"; "incidents" instead of "incidence" in the stem; "numbers" instead of "number" in answer C; the imprecision in answer A which surely means to say that it's the protests themselves from which the arson originates, and not the "protest movements"; the incorrect use of the idiom "on the grounds of" in answer E, etc, etc). CR is hard enough without it being combined (unintentionally) with Sentence Correction!
_________________

GMAT Tutor in Toronto

If you are looking for online GMAT math tutoring, or if you are interested in buying my advanced Quant books and problem sets, please contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

Director
Director
User avatar
Affiliations: SAE
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Posts: 509
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE: Project Management (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 42

Kudos [?]: 201 [0], given: 269

Re: Support the Argument [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Sep 2012, 21:19
Premise - The government has justified its ruling on the grounds that this move will bring down incidents of rioting and arson that are associated with such protest marches.

Conclusion - The government of Country X has introduced new law banning the peoples' right to stage protest marches against anything they feel is offensive to their religious beliefs

Anything which supports the conclusion i.e. the government was right in introducing a law, is our answer

A.There have been many incidents of rioting and arson in the last two years and they have primarily originated from protest movements. (Not related to religious movements, It does not tell us why protest on relgious ground should be banned, eliminate)
B.The riots are not a result of the protestors but of a few miscreants who incite violence deliberately for their political ends. (For the same reason as above eliminate)
C.The numbers of cases of rioting and arson have decreased since the new government has come to power. (Irrelevant)
D.There are many diverse monotheistic religions in Country X and all of them are strongly represented in the national legislature. (Irrelevant – wordy and has been given only to confuse)
E.In the last two years four out of every five protest marches on the grounds of offense to religious beliefs have led to rioting and arson whereas in the case of protest marches on other grounds the proportion is one out of five. (This is our answer – It clearly shows that protest marches on the grounds of offense to religious beliefs have led to rioting more than any other gorunds, so government is justified in banning the peoples' right to stage protest marches against anything they feel is offensive to their religious beliefs)

Hope it helps !
:-D
_________________

First Attempt 710 - http://gmatclub.com/forum/first-attempt-141273.html

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 31 Mar 2016
Posts: 264
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Finance
GMAT 1: 560 Q39 V29
GMAT 2: 670 Q46 V35
GMAT 3: 700 Q49 V36
GPA: 3.8
WE: Operations (Commercial Banking)
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 166

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: The government of Country X has introduced new law banning [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Jun 2016, 03:11
Conclusion: The government of Country X has introduced new law banning the peoples' right to stage protest marches against anything they feel is offensive to their religious beliefs.
Premise: - The government has justified its ruling on the grounds that this move will bring down incidents of rioting and arson that are associated with such protest marches.
.
The government has banned protests on religious grounds - in simple terms. We are asked to choose an answer that would support / strengthen the government's stance. Ideally it would be easy in this scenario to assume that the correct answer would seek to establish that protests on religious grounds in the past have led to riots.
.
Which of the following, if true, most supports the government's rationale behind passing the new law?
A.There have been many incidents of rioting and arson in the last two years and they have primarily originated from protest movements. - This is a broad scope answer that does not specifically address protests on religious grounds. Hence eliminate.
B.The riots are not a result of the protestors but of a few miscreants who incite violence deliberately for their political ends. - Shell game answer eliminate.
C.The numbers of cases of rioting and arson have decreased since the new government has come to power. - Opposite answer eliminate
D.There are many diverse monotheistic religions in Country X and all of them are strongly represented in the national legislature. - Trap but it specifies nothing about the protests or riots hence false answer.
E.In the last two years four out of every five protest marches on the grounds of offense to religious beliefs have led to rioting and arson whereas in the case of protest marches on other grounds the proportion is one out of five. - Perfect and correct answer that would strengthen the argument as it mentions of all the protests religious protests have more often led to riots.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Dec 2014
Posts: 343
Location: Russian Federation
Concentration: General Management, Economics
WE: Sales (Telecommunications)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 340

Re: The government of Country X has introduced new law banning [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jul 2016, 06:09
May be this is strange but for me both A and E look like contenders. I think this is poor question. Would like to know its source)
_________________

"Are you gangsters?" - "No we are Russians!"

Top Contributor
Math Forum Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Posts: 1265
Location: Ukraine
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Technology
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33
GMAT 2: 740 Q50 V40
Followers: 116

Kudos [?]: 1457 [0], given: 178

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: The government of Country X has introduced new law banning [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jul 2016, 08:19
Top Contributor
Konstantin1983 wrote:
May be this is strange but for me both A and E look like contenders. I think this is poor question. Would like to know its source)



Variant A talks about all "protest movements"
while variant E talks clearly about "protest marches on the grounds of offense to religious beliefs" and that make it the better answer.
_________________

Simple way to always control time during the quant part.
How to solve main idea questions without full understanding of RC.
660 (Q48, V33) - unpleasant surprise
740 (Q50, V40, IR3) - anti-debrief ;)

Re: The government of Country X has introduced new law banning   [#permalink] 17 Jul 2016, 08:19
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
4 Country W has banned importation of oranges from Country V goodyear2013 3 25 Mar 2014, 14:50
9 Vorland s government is planning a nationwide ban on smoking ankit0411 5 15 Sep 2012, 09:22
Vorland s government is planning a nationwide ban on smoking ankur55 5 20 Jul 2009, 00:25
Vorland s government is planning a nationwide ban on smoking tenaman10 10 30 Mar 2009, 10:03
Vorland s government is planning a nationwide ban on smoking KC 7 01 Nov 2006, 18:24
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The government of Country X has introduced new law banning

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.