Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 17 Sep 2014, 07:57

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The government should stop permitting tobacco companies to

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1300
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
The government should stop permitting tobacco companies to [#permalink] New post 26 Mar 2009, 00:55
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (02:19) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 11 sessions
The government should stop permitting tobacco companies to subtract advertising expenses from their revenues in calculating taxable income. Tobacco companies would then have to pay more taxes. As a consequence, they would raise the prices of their products and this price increase would raise the prices of their products and this price increase would discourage tobacco use.

Which of the following is an additional premise required by the argument above?
(A) Tobacco companies would not offset the payment of extra taxes by reducing costs in other areas.
(B) Tobacco companies would not continue to advertise if they were forced to pay higher taxes.
(C) People would not continue to buy tobacco products if these products were no longer advertised.
(D) The money the government would gain as a result of the increase in tobacco companies’ taxable income would be used to educate the
public about the dangers of tobacco use.
(E) The increase in taxes paid by tobacco companies would be equal to the additional income generated by raising prices.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Posts: 919
Followers: 45

Kudos [?]: 165 [0], given: 17

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR : tobacco companies [#permalink] New post 26 Mar 2009, 03:19
Good Q
I feel its A

Say , you are the CEO of Tobacco company
yr corporate Income Tax go up

Conclusion saying "Co. would raise the prices of their products and this price increase would discourage tobacco use."
assuming that "(A) Tobacco companies would not offset the payment of extra taxes by reducing costs in other areas."

dont know abt E though
_________________

math-polygons-87336.html
competition-for-the-best-gmat-error-log-template-86232.html

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2007
Posts: 139
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Re: CR : tobacco companies [#permalink] New post 26 Mar 2009, 05:07
I would feel A too.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 25 Oct 2006
Posts: 652
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 190 [0], given: 6

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR : tobacco companies [#permalink] New post 26 Mar 2009, 10:16
ritula wrote:
The government should stop permitting tobacco companies to subtract advertising expenses from their revenues in calculating taxable income. Tobacco companies would then have to pay more taxes. As a consequence, they would raise the prices of their products and this price increase would raise the prices of their products and this price increase would discourage tobacco use.

Which of the following is an additional premise required by the argument above?
(A) Tobacco companies would not offset the payment of extra taxes by reducing costs in other areas.
- Yes, if they offset the extra cost, price wont increase.
(B) Tobacco companies would not continue to advertise if they were forced to pay higher taxes.
- But they can still rise the price and stop advertising. hence no help
(C) People would not continue to buy tobacco products if these products were no longer advertised.
- OOS
(D) The money the government would gain as a result of the increase in tobacco companies’ taxable income would be used to educate the public about the dangers of tobacco use.
- OOS
(E) The increase in taxes paid by tobacco companies would be equal to the additional income generated by raising prices.
- "additional income" - whose??

_________________

If You're Not Living On The Edge, You're Taking Up Too Much Space

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1300
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR : tobacco companies [#permalink] New post 26 Mar 2009, 20:15
YEs OA is A. Thanks 2 all.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 881
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 152 [0], given: 7

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR : tobacco companies [#permalink] New post 26 Mar 2009, 23:15
Good question. Agree with A.
This is an assumption or strengthen question.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 25 Oct 2006
Posts: 652
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 190 [0], given: 6

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR : tobacco companies [#permalink] New post 27 Mar 2009, 05:00
I guess it's an assumption question though the "additional premises" in question stem generally refers to Strengthen type. Logically assumption, justify and strengthen questions are similar in their types. In all three types we find the justification to hold the conclusion firmly.
_________________

If You're Not Living On The Edge, You're Taking Up Too Much Space

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Aug 2008
Posts: 162
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 8

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR : tobacco companies [#permalink] New post 27 Oct 2009, 23:05
priyankur_saha@ml.com wrote:
I guess it's an assumption question though the "additional premises" in question stem generally refers to Strengthen type. Logically assumption, justify and strengthen questions are similar in their types. In all three types we find the justification to hold the conclusion firmly.

I think it should be the assumption question too because it asks to fill the gap in the reasoning (additional premise). A is correct ans because "subtract advertising expenses from their revenues" is equal to "reducing costs in other areas" to reduce the taxable income
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Aug 2009
Posts: 129
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 3

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR : tobacco companies [#permalink] New post 28 Oct 2009, 06:10
agree with A.
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Status: Durham
Affiliations: AIChE, AAEES, EIT
Joined: 09 Jun 2011
Posts: 13
Location: United States (NC)
GPA: 3.8
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 19

Re: The government should stop permitting tobacco companies to [#permalink] New post 13 Dec 2011, 17:37
Good explanation priyankur. Thx.
_________________

Live as if you were to die tomorrow. Learn as if you were to live forever. (Gandhi)

Director
Director
User avatar
Status: Enjoying the GMAT journey....
Joined: 26 Aug 2011
Posts: 735
Location: India
GMAT 1: 620 Q49 V24
Followers: 60

Kudos [?]: 286 [0], given: 264

GMAT ToolKit User GMAT Tests User Premium Member
Re: The government should stop permitting tobacco companies to [#permalink] New post 13 Dec 2011, 22:53
+1 A
_________________

Fire the final bullet only when you are constantly hitting the Bull's eye, till then KEEP PRACTICING.

A WAY TO INCREASE FROM QUANT 35-40 TO 47 : a-way-to-increase-from-q35-40-to-q-138750.html

Q 47/48 To Q 50 + the-final-climb-quest-for-q-50-from-q47-129441.html#p1064367

Three good RC strategies three-different-strategies-for-attacking-rc-127287.html

Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 818
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
Schools: Ross '17, Duke '16
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
Followers: 40

Kudos [?]: 218 [0], given: 43

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: The government should stop permitting tobacco companies to [#permalink] New post 14 Dec 2011, 00:53
The government should stop permitting tobacco companies to subtract advertising expenses from their revenues in calculating taxable income. Tobacco companies would then have to pay more taxes. As a consequence, they would raise the prices of their products and this price increase would raise the prices of their products and this price increase would discourage tobacco use.

Which of the following is an additional premise required by the argument above?
(A) Tobacco companies would not offset the payment of extra taxes by reducing costs in other areas. => this is the answer. If tobacco companies offset the payment of extra taxes by reducing costs in other area. They will no longer increase price that offer to regular customer
_________________

Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you :)

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 Aug 2011
Posts: 186
Location: United States
Concentration: Technology, International Business
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V37
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 6

GMAT Tests User
Re: The government should stop permitting tobacco companies to [#permalink] New post 26 Dec 2011, 11:08
A
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Oct 2011
Posts: 276
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 110

Re: The government should stop permitting tobacco companies to [#permalink] New post 03 Jan 2012, 01:08
A is the clear answer here. If tobacco companies reduce costs in other areas, then the companies will still have some money to advertise and thus, the use of tobacco will not be discouraged.
_________________

Consider KUDOS if you feel the effort's worth it

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 28 Jul 2011
Posts: 583
Location: United States
Concentration: International Business, General Management
GPA: 3.86
WE: Accounting (Commercial Banking)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 16

GMAT Tests User
Re: The government should stop permitting tobacco companies to [#permalink] New post 03 Jan 2012, 05:16
with A
_________________

+1 Kudos If found helpful..

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 13 Aug 2010
Posts: 316
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
Re: The government should stop permitting tobacco companies to [#permalink] New post 05 Jan 2012, 00:12
+1 for A
Re: The government should stop permitting tobacco companies to   [#permalink] 05 Jan 2012, 00:12
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Experts publish their posts in the topic The government should stop permitting tobacco companies to shikhar 7 09 May 2012, 09:39
The government should stop permitting tobacco companies to mojorising800 4 31 Jan 2010, 05:53
The government should stop permitting tobacco companies to chaiku 3 04 Mar 2007, 17:45
The government should stop permitting tobacco companies to AK47 3 21 Jan 2007, 00:26
16 In Gandania, where the government has a monopoly on tobacco winskc 20 16 Oct 2006, 19:49
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The government should stop permitting tobacco companies to

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.