Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 21 Oct 2014, 04:05

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The great migration of European intellectuals to the United

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
2 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2009
Posts: 9
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [2] , given: 2

The great migration of European intellectuals to the United [#permalink] New post 26 Dec 2010, 16:07
2
This post received
KUDOS
5
This post was
BOOKMARKED
The great migration of European intellectuals to the United States in the second quarter of the twentieth century prompted a transformation in the character of Western social thought. The influx of Continental thinkers fleeing fascist regimes had a great impact on American academic circles, leading to new developments in such diverse fields as linguistics and theology. But the greatest impact was on the emigrés themselves. This “migration experience” led expatriates to reexamine the supposedly self-evident premises inherited from the Continental intellectual tradition. The result, according to H. Stuart Hughes in The Sea-Change, was an increased sophistication and deprovincialization in social theory.

One problem facing newly arrived emigrés in the U.S. was the spirit of anti-intellectualism in much of the country. The empirical orientation of American academic circles, moreover, led to the conscious tempering by many European thinkers of their own tendencies toward speculative idealism. In addition, reports of oppression in Europe shook many Old World intellectuals from a stance of moral isolation. Many great European social theorists had regarded their work as separate from all moral considerations. The migration experience proved to many intellectuals of the following generations that such notions of moral seclusion were unrealistic, even irresponsible.

This transformation of social thought is perhaps best exemplified in the career of the German theologian Paul Tillich. Migration confronted Tillich with an ideological as well as a cultural dichotomy. Hughes points out that Tillich’s thought was “suspended between philosophy and theology, Marxism and political conformity, theism and disbelief.” Comparable to the fusion by other expatriate intellectuals of their own idealist traditions with the Anglo-American empiricist tradition was Tillich’s synthesis of German Romantic religiosity with the existentialism born of the twentieth-century war experience. Tillich’s basic goal, according to Hughes, was to move secular individuals by making religious symbols more accessible to them. Forced to make his ethical orientation explicit in the context of American attitudes, Tillich avoided the esoteric academic posture of many Old World scholars, and was able to find a wide and sympathetic audience for his sometimes difficult theology. In this way, his experience in America, in his own words, “deprovincialized” his thought.
13. The author’s main concern in the passage is to
(A) characterize the effects of migration on U.S. history
(B) show how Paul Tillich’s career was representative of the migration experience
(C) discuss the effects of the great migration on modern social thought
(D) reveal the increased sophistication of post-migration thought
(E) contrast European social thought with that of the United States
[Reveal] Spoiler:
C


14. The author probably mentions H. Stuart Hughes (Highlighted) in order to
(A) give an example of a European intellectual who migrated to America
(B) cite an important source of information about the migration experience
(C) demonstrate how one American academic was influenced by European scholars
(D) pay tribute to Americans who provided European thinkers with a refuge from fascism
(E) name a leading disciple of Paul Tissich
[Reveal] Spoiler:
B


16. According to the passage, reports of “oppression in Europe” (Highlighted) affected social thinkers by forcing them to
(A) rethink their moral responsibilities
(B) reexamine the morality of European leaders
(C) analyze the effects of migration on morality
(D) reconsider their anti-social behavior
(E) justify the moral value of social thought
[Reveal] Spoiler:
A


17. It can be inferred that postmigration social thought is distinguished from premigration thought by its
(A) less secular nature
(B) greater social consciousness
(C) more difficult theology
(D) diminished accessibility
(E) more theoretical nature
[Reveal] Spoiler:
B



How to break down this passage? how much note taken? How much time taken in breaking passage and each question? How to approach each of above question?
Expert Post
6 KUDOS received
Manhattan GMAT Instructor
avatar
Joined: 29 Apr 2010
Posts: 126
Followers: 47

Kudos [?]: 182 [6] , given: 1

Re: Kaplan RC Passage : Migration [#permalink] New post 02 Jan 2011, 22:32
6
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Don't get bogged down in details! Here is a recreation of my thought process, as well as a cleaned-up version of my notes--I can't make symbols here, so I've rewritten those symbols as words; that makes the text look a bit longer.

Yours may look quite different-- the important things are to pay close attention to the beginning of the passage (to get the main premise clearly) then read the rest of the passage for big ideas and structure (since you'll have to come back to these parts later for specific detail questions anyway). Remember to perk up any time you come across those structure/red-flag words-- they are you lifelines in a passage this dense.

Also, I don't have an answer key for this passage, and you only listed one answer in your spoiler (without a q number), so let me know if I've missed any. My answers are the answers I would have chosen, not the official answers.

Passage:

The great migration of European intellectuals to the United States in the second quarter of the twentieth century prompted a transformation in the character of Western social thought. (This sounds like a main-idea type sentence, right off the bat. Will the passage fulfill that expectation?) The influx of Continental thinkers fleeing fascist regimes had a great impact on American academic circles (Yup...European thinkers fleeing-> big impact on US), leading to new developments in such diverse fields as linguistics and theology (and this fleeing->new dev). But (Ah, a switch, pay attention!) the greatest impact (yup, a superlative, pay even more attention) was on the emigrés themselves. (GREATEST impact is on emigres, not on fields.) This “migration experience” led expatriates to reexamine the supposedly self-evident premises inherited from the Continental intellectual tradition. (taking another look at previous self-evident) The result, according to H. Stuart Hughes in The Sea-Change, was an increased sophistication and deprovincialization in social theory. (Ahh, or is THIS actually the main idea? it's a more specific version of the first sentence...let's see where the passage goes)

My notes from P1:
mig of euro to US (later 20th cent) transformed west. so-thought.
fleeing facism-> impact US academia->new dev (ex ling & theo)
BUT GREATEST was "mig. exp."->emigres relook at what used to be self-evid.--> inc. soph. & deprovince in soc-theory (HUGHES)

One problem (OK this may be a paragraph listing problems...don't get bogged down in details) facing newly arrived emigrés in the U.S. was the spirit of anti-intellectualism in much of the country. (One prob=anti-intell) The empirical orientation of American academic circles, moreover, (ANOTHER problem!) led to the conscious tempering by many European thinkers of their own tendencies toward speculative idealism. In addition, (Another problem!) reports of oppression in Europe shook many Old World intellectuals from a stance of moral isolation. Many great European social theorists had regarded their work as separate from all moral considerations. The migration experience proved to many intellectuals of the following generations that such notions of moral seclusion were unrealistic, even irresponsible. (a CLAIM about result of a problem--star this)

Notes for P2
One problem=anti-intell in US
Another= US empir->tempering of Euro's idealism
Another=reports of Euro opp->shake from moral iso.
MANY had thought work SEP from moral, but now proved moral secl unreal/irresponsible*


This transformation of social thought is perhaps best (RED FLAG word!) exemplified in the career of the German theologian Paul Tillich. (Tillich=BEST example) Migration confronted Tillich with an ideological as well as a cultural dichotomy. (T was split) Hughes points out that Tillich’s thought was “suspended between philosophy and theology, Marxism and political conformity, theism and disbelief.” (Tillich suspended between poles...don't get bogged down in details!) Comparable to the fusion by other expatriate intellectuals of their own idealist traditions with the Anglo-American empiricist tradition (author is explaining how T is exemplary) was Tillich’s synthesis of German Romantic religiosity with the existentialism born of the twentieth-century war experience. (religious vs existentialism poles) Tillich’s basic goal, according to Hughes, was to move secular individuals by making religious symbols more accessible to them. Forced to make his ethical orientation explicit in the context of American attitudes, Tillich avoided the esoteric academic posture of many Old World scholars, and was able to find a wide and sympathetic audience for his sometimes difficult theology.(compares T to Old World, so this may be important) In this way, his experience in America, in his own words, “deprovincialized” his thought. (Back to the beginning of the passage-- reinforces that last sentence of first paragraph as main idea)

P3 notes
BEST EXEMPLIFIED by theo. Tillich (dichotomies from migrating)
Hughes: sus between poles...EXs
Comp to other expats, T synth'd relig w/existen.
Hughes: T's wanted to move sec peeps by making relgious accessible
T therefore had WIDE& SYMP aud.
Migration DEPROVINCIALIZED T's thought


After taking all those notes, it's good to check in again about what the main idea was-- it seems to be a combo of the first and last sentences of the first paragraph: The late 20th century migration of european intellectuals to the US transformed social thought, making it more sophisticated and less provincial. I didn't rewrite this; I just made sure that those parts were underlined in that first paragraph.

Total time to read and take notes: 4 min 12 seconds


Q13
(A) psg is not about US HISTORY--Eliminate
(B) T's career was not representative of migration experience as a whole, but migration of intellectuals and the effect of that migration on social thought--Eliminate
(C) Nice and general (but maybe too general?)--hold for now
(D) At first glance seems possible, but the passage is specifically about the period of transformation--"post-migration thought" includes ALL thought from the migration to the present day--Eliminate
(E) Again, we care about a very specific period of time--this choice is too broad--Eliminate

Do a quick check again of C-- still seems good (although it's missing the higher degree of specificity we'd like, all the other choices are concretely wrong; sometimes these general questions are just that-- really general)

Answer: C
Time: 58 sec

Q 14
A specific questions--Hughes is mentioned a lot here, as I can see from my notes. I can also see from my notes that the highlighted part of the passage cites Hughes wihle pointing out a claim (migration->increased sophistication)
(A) No, we don't know anything about Hughes' migration status. He talked about Tillich, who was an emigre--they want us to confuse the two! -- Eliminate
(B) He is cited, and seems to be an authority. Is he "important?" Not sure, but let's hold it for now.
(C) No-- the influence happening with regard to Hughes is the influence on Tillich--Eliminate
(D) "Pay tribute?" And did Hughes provide anyone refuge? Nope--Eliminate
(E) Hughes certainly discusses Tillich, but is he a "leading disciple?" Studying someone and agreeing w/him or her are different things--Eliminate

B's looking pretty good. What about that "importance" question? Well the fact that the author cites him repeatedly in the passage leads us to believe that he at least respects him, and has *some* kind of weight. Since all the other choices have concrete errors let's go with this.

Answer: B
Time: 36 seconds.


Q16
Another specific question. The highlighted portion is in the second paragraph--the one that lists all the problems migrating intellectuals faced. Remember that place we starred? This is it! The notes from that part were:

Another=reports of Euro opp->shake from moral iso.
MANY had thought work SEP from moral, but now proved moral secl unreal/irresponsible*

(A) Yup, if previous moral seclusion was "irresponsible," then the oppression certainly did make them rethink their moral responsibilities--hold onto this one
(B) Everything is great about this choice except the LAST word-- we are not talking about leaders here--Eliminate
(C) On morality in general? All kinds? For all people? Too broad--Eliminate
(D) They weren't anti-social, they were just naive. This choice goes too far--Eliminate
(E) The passage doesn't talk about the JUSTIFYING the moral value of social thought, just rethinking what that value was--Eliminate

Answer: A
Time: 39 seconds


Q17
The whole passage is about the change that happened in social thought during the migration, but since this is an INFERENCE question we have to be extra careful to back up our answer with concrete evidence.

(A) Where does the author talk about secularity? In the third paragraph, when Tillich (as comparable to other expatriate intellectuals) is described as fusing religion with existentialism. But while Tillich and religion are discussed together, "other expatriate intellecturals" fused "their own idealist traditions"-- not necessarily religion. Eliminate

(B) This is tempting, especially in light of our answer to question 16. But is moral responsibility the same thing as social consciousness? Possibly. Hold onto this one

(C) Tillich's theology was "sometimes difficult" but that doesn't mean postmigration social thought's theology in general was more or less difficult than pre-migration theology--Eliminate

(D) Nope, Tillich's work had a wide audience but we don't know about the accessibility postmigration social thought in general-- Eliminate.

(E) What would "more theoretical" mean? The opposite of that would be practical, and the passage suggests that post-migration social theory was more morally complicated due to the real consequences of previous thought (P2), and Tillich "avoided esoteric academic posture of many Old World scholars"--Eliminate

(B) is a little bit of a leap in vocabulary, but the smallest one. (I actually did this question very quickly, noticing how many answer choices focused on Tillich rather than the larger category of postmigration social thought, so would be interested to know from the original poster if I'm correct)

Answer: B
Time: 13 sec

Total time for Q: 2min 26 sec
Total time for passage and Q: 6 min 38 seconds

Obviously the level of detail I went into in my explanation is more than I did when initially doing the questions-- but once the basic flaw is spotted, I was able to eliminate choices; I went back and filled in the long-form version that is communicable to others later :)

Hope this helps-- let me know if I missed any.
_________________


JP Park | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | Los Angeles

Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Reviews

Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2009
Posts: 9
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 2

Re: Kaplan RC Passage : Migration [#permalink] New post 03 Jan 2011, 09:45
Hi Parker,

You are 100% correct. OA is "CBAB"
I got 3 out of 4 correct but I tool almost 9 min to crack it. :(

Regrads
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Affiliations: CFA Level 2
Joined: 05 May 2004
Posts: 267
Location: Hanoi
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Re: Kaplan RC Passage : Migration [#permalink] New post 04 Jan 2011, 00:33
I got 3 out of 4 right in 10 mins :(. Tough one though
_________________

"Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you'r gonna get"

1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 21 Dec 2010
Posts: 658
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 83 [1] , given: 51

Re: Kaplan RC Passage : Migration [#permalink] New post 21 Apr 2011, 20:33
1
This post received
KUDOS
CBAB, and it took me 6 minutes . passage + questions. fairly easy this. it is a sub 500 level passage ,i don't think it is 700 level.
_________________

What is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy.

Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2009
Posts: 9
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 2

Re: Kaplan RC Passage : Migration [#permalink] New post 21 Apr 2011, 20:39
garimavyas wrote:
CBAB, and it took me 6 minutes . passage + questions. fairly easy this. it is a sub 500 level passage ,i don't think it is 700 level.

Garima.... It was difficult for me & others. At this rate I think you can aim for 750+.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 20 Apr 2011
Posts: 4
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Kaplan RC Passage : Migration [#permalink] New post 22 Apr 2011, 08:26
I got 3 out of 4..missed the third one..done in 6 mins..Seemed a 600+ question
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Oct 2011
Posts: 276
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 110

Re: The great migration of European intellectuals to the United [#permalink] New post 15 Dec 2011, 09:17
I do not know if this is a 700-level passage (questions included) but IMO, this passage should be around the 650-700 level at least. It was difficult for me too.
Got 3 out of 4 correct. Got the 3rd one wrong. Careless mistake. Nice passage though.
_________________

Consider KUDOS if you feel the effort's worth it

1 KUDOS received
Current Student
avatar
Joined: 29 Jun 2013
Posts: 43
Concentration: Marketing, Technology
GMAT 1: 640 Q46 V31
GMAT 2: 680 Q48 V35
GPA: 3.2
WE: Sales (Other)
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 19 [1] , given: 15

Re: The great migration of European intellectuals to the United [#permalink] New post 30 Aug 2013, 07:21
1
This post received
KUDOS
I came across this passage in Kaplan's Verbal Workbook but there are two more questions in that.

(5) Which of the following statements describe Tillich's achievement?
I - He elucidated religious symbols in a secular context without sacrificing their impact.
II - He shunned the esotericism of much theological scholarship.
III - He adapted a traditional religiosity to the temper of the modern world.
(A) I only
(B) II only
(C) I and II only
(D) II and III only
(E) I, II, and III

[Reveal] Spoiler:
E



(6) The passage suggests that the migration experience
(A) had little major effect on American academic circles
(B) led to the abandonment of the idealist philosophical tradition
(C) made American intellectuals sensitive to oppression in Europe
(D) caused émigré social thinkers to question certain aspects of their beliefs
(E) negated Tillich's influence on modern social thought

[Reveal] Spoiler:
D



[Reveal] Spoiler:
Also please do explain how option III in the Question 5 (first question in my post) is true?
Current Student
avatar
Status: Time to wait :)
Joined: 18 Jun 2013
Posts: 81
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Strategy
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V40
WE: Consulting (Telecommunications)
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 46 [0], given: 1181

Re: Kaplan RC Passage : Migration [#permalink] New post 11 Sep 2013, 06:23
parker wrote:
Don't get bogged down in details! Here is a recreation of my thought process, as well as a cleaned-up version of my notes--I can't make symbols here, so I've rewritten those symbols as words; that makes the text look a bit longer.

Yours may look quite different-- the important things are to pay close attention to the beginning of the passage (to get the main premise clearly) then read the rest of the passage for big ideas and structure (since you'll have to come back to these parts later for specific detail questions anyway). Remember to perk up any time you come across those structure/red-flag words-- they are you lifelines in a passage this dense.

Also, I don't have an answer key for this passage, and you only listed one answer in your spoiler (without a q number), so let me know if I've missed any. My answers are the answers I would have chosen, not the official answers.

Passage:

The great migration of European intellectuals to the United States in the second quarter of the twentieth century prompted a transformation in the character of Western social thought. (This sounds like a main-idea type sentence, right off the bat. Will the passage fulfill that expectation?) The influx of Continental thinkers fleeing fascist regimes had a great impact on American academic circles (Yup...European thinkers fleeing-> big impact on US), leading to new developments in such diverse fields as linguistics and theology (and this fleeing->new dev). But (Ah, a switch, pay attention!) the greatest impact (yup, a superlative, pay even more attention) was on the emigrés themselves. (GREATEST impact is on emigres, not on fields.) This “migration experience” led expatriates to reexamine the supposedly self-evident premises inherited from the Continental intellectual tradition. (taking another look at previous self-evident) The result, according to H. Stuart Hughes in The Sea-Change, was an increased sophistication and deprovincialization in social theory. (Ahh, or is THIS actually the main idea? it's a more specific version of the first sentence...let's see where the passage goes)

My notes from P1:
mig of euro to US (later 20th cent) transformed west. so-thought.
fleeing facism-> impact US academia->new dev (ex ling & theo)
BUT GREATEST was "mig. exp."->emigres relook at what used to be self-evid.--> inc. soph. & deprovince in soc-theory (HUGHES)

One problem (OK this may be a paragraph listing problems...don't get bogged down in details) facing newly arrived emigrés in the U.S. was the spirit of anti-intellectualism in much of the country. (One prob=anti-intell) The empirical orientation of American academic circles, moreover, (ANOTHER problem!) led to the conscious tempering by many European thinkers of their own tendencies toward speculative idealism. In addition, (Another problem!) reports of oppression in Europe shook many Old World intellectuals from a stance of moral isolation. Many great European social theorists had regarded their work as separate from all moral considerations. The migration experience proved to many intellectuals of the following generations that such notions of moral seclusion were unrealistic, even irresponsible. (a CLAIM about result of a problem--star this)

Notes for P2
One problem=anti-intell in US
Another= US empir->tempering of Euro's idealism
Another=reports of Euro opp->shake from moral iso.
MANY had thought work SEP from moral, but now proved moral secl unreal/irresponsible*


This transformation of social thought is perhaps best (RED FLAG word!) exemplified in the career of the German theologian Paul Tillich. (Tillich=BEST example) Migration confronted Tillich with an ideological as well as a cultural dichotomy. (T was split) Hughes points out that Tillich’s thought was “suspended between philosophy and theology, Marxism and political conformity, theism and disbelief.” (Tillich suspended between poles...don't get bogged down in details!) Comparable to the fusion by other expatriate intellectuals of their own idealist traditions with the Anglo-American empiricist tradition (author is explaining how T is exemplary) was Tillich’s synthesis of German Romantic religiosity with the existentialism born of the twentieth-century war experience. (religious vs existentialism poles) Tillich’s basic goal, according to Hughes, was to move secular individuals by making religious symbols more accessible to them. Forced to make his ethical orientation explicit in the context of American attitudes, Tillich avoided the esoteric academic posture of many Old World scholars, and was able to find a wide and sympathetic audience for his sometimes difficult theology.(compares T to Old World, so this may be important) In this way, his experience in America, in his own words, “deprovincialized” his thought. (Back to the beginning of the passage-- reinforces that last sentence of first paragraph as main idea)

P3 notes
BEST EXEMPLIFIED by theo. Tillich (dichotomies from migrating)
Hughes: sus between poles...EXs
Comp to other expats, T synth'd relig w/existen.
Hughes: T's wanted to move sec peeps by making relgious accessible
T therefore had WIDE& SYMP aud.
Migration DEPROVINCIALIZED T's thought


After taking all those notes, it's good to check in again about what the main idea was-- it seems to be a combo of the first and last sentences of the first paragraph: The late 20th century migration of european intellectuals to the US transformed social thought, making it more sophisticated and less provincial. I didn't rewrite this; I just made sure that those parts were underlined in that first paragraph.

Total time to read and take notes: 4 min 12 seconds


Q13
(A) psg is not about US HISTORY--Eliminate
(B) T's career was not representative of migration experience as a whole, but migration of intellectuals and the effect of that migration on social thought--Eliminate
(C) Nice and general (but maybe too general?)--hold for now
(D) At first glance seems possible, but the passage is specifically about the period of transformation--"post-migration thought" includes ALL thought from the migration to the present day--Eliminate
(E) Again, we care about a very specific period of time--this choice is too broad--Eliminate

Do a quick check again of C-- still seems good (although it's missing the higher degree of specificity we'd like, all the other choices are concretely wrong; sometimes these general questions are just that-- really general)

Answer: C
Time: 58 sec

Q 14
A specific questions--Hughes is mentioned a lot here, as I can see from my notes. I can also see from my notes that the highlighted part of the passage cites Hughes wihle pointing out a claim (migration->increased sophistication)
(A) No, we don't know anything about Hughes' migration status. He talked about Tillich, who was an emigre--they want us to confuse the two! -- Eliminate
(B) He is cited, and seems to be an authority. Is he "important?" Not sure, but let's hold it for now.
(C) No-- the influence happening with regard to Hughes is the influence on Tillich--Eliminate
(D) "Pay tribute?" And did Hughes provide anyone refuge? Nope--Eliminate
(E) Hughes certainly discusses Tillich, but is he a "leading disciple?" Studying someone and agreeing w/him or her are different things--Eliminate

B's looking pretty good. What about that "importance" question? Well the fact that the author cites him repeatedly in the passage leads us to believe that he at least respects him, and has *some* kind of weight. Since all the other choices have concrete errors let's go with this.

Answer: B
Time: 36 seconds.


Q16
Another specific question. The highlighted portion is in the second paragraph--the one that lists all the problems migrating intellectuals faced. Remember that place we starred? This is it! The notes from that part were:

Another=reports of Euro opp->shake from moral iso.
MANY had thought work SEP from moral, but now proved moral secl unreal/irresponsible*

(A) Yup, if previous moral seclusion was "irresponsible," then the oppression certainly did make them rethink their moral responsibilities--hold onto this one
(B) Everything is great about this choice except the LAST word-- we are not talking about leaders here--Eliminate
(C) On morality in general? All kinds? For all people? Too broad--Eliminate
(D) They weren't anti-social, they were just naive. This choice goes too far--Eliminate
(E) The passage doesn't talk about the JUSTIFYING the moral value of social thought, just rethinking what that value was--Eliminate

Answer: A
Time: 39 seconds


Q17
The whole passage is about the change that happened in social thought during the migration, but since this is an INFERENCE question we have to be extra careful to back up our answer with concrete evidence.

(A) Where does the author talk about secularity? In the third paragraph, when Tillich (as comparable to other expatriate intellectuals) is described as fusing religion with existentialism. But while Tillich and religion are discussed together, "other expatriate intellecturals" fused "their own idealist traditions"-- not necessarily religion. Eliminate

(B) This is tempting, especially in light of our answer to question 16. But is moral responsibility the same thing as social consciousness? Possibly. Hold onto this one

(C) Tillich's theology was "sometimes difficult" but that doesn't mean postmigration social thought's theology in general was more or less difficult than pre-migration theology--Eliminate

(D) Nope, Tillich's work had a wide audience but we don't know about the accessibility postmigration social thought in general-- Eliminate.

(E) What would "more theoretical" mean? The opposite of that would be practical, and the passage suggests that post-migration social theory was more morally complicated due to the real consequences of previous thought (P2), and Tillich "avoided esoteric academic posture of many Old World scholars"--Eliminate

(B) is a little bit of a leap in vocabulary, but the smallest one. (I actually did this question very quickly, noticing how many answer choices focused on Tillich rather than the larger category of postmigration social thought, so would be interested to know from the original poster if I'm correct)

Answer: B
Time: 13 sec

Total time for Q: 2min 26 sec
Total time for passage and Q: 6 min 38 seconds

Obviously the level of detail I went into in my explanation is more than I did when initially doing the questions-- but once the basic flaw is spotted, I was able to eliminate choices; I went back and filled in the long-form version that is communicable to others later :)

Hope this helps-- let me know if I missed any.


Thank you so much for the very well explained thought process to this question. I have read so much RC guidance all around, but the way you've gone about this questions kills it for me. 2 weeks to go for GMAT, was struggling with RC - this is going to help me seal it!
_________________

Dream On...

Current Student
avatar
Status: Time to wait :)
Joined: 18 Jun 2013
Posts: 81
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Strategy
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V40
WE: Consulting (Telecommunications)
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 46 [0], given: 1181

Re: The great migration of European intellectuals to the United [#permalink] New post 11 Sep 2013, 06:29
siddharthkanjilal wrote:
I came across this passage in Kaplan's Verbal Workbook but there are two more questions in that.

(5) Which of the following statements describe Tillich's achievement?
I - He elucidated religious symbols in a secular context without sacrificing their impact.
II - He shunned the esotericism of much theological scholarship.
III - He adapted a traditional religiosity to the temper of the modern world.
(A) I only
(B) II only
(C) I and II only
(D) II and III only
(E) I, II, and III

[Reveal] Spoiler:
E



(6) The passage suggests that the migration experience
(A) had little major effect on American academic circles
(B) led to the abandonment of the idealist philosophical tradition
(C) made American intellectuals sensitive to oppression in Europe
(D) caused émigré social thinkers to question certain aspects of their beliefs
(E) negated Tillich's influence on modern social thought

[Reveal] Spoiler:
D



[Reveal] Spoiler:
Also please do explain how option III in the Question 5 (first question in my post) is true?


Hi Sid,

What does the Kaplan book say for proving that option III in Question 5 is true. Thanks.
_________________

Dream On...

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Apr 2013
Posts: 295
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 27

Re: The great migration of European intellectuals to the United [#permalink] New post 13 Sep 2013, 00:59
this is a hard questions which contain long sentences and hard content.

I see prediction is a good skill for rc. after reading and understanding a long sentence, we can predict what happen next. This way we can know that we already understood what we have just read and more importantly, we are able to read and understand the next text, which is dense detail.

we can understand the next dense details, only when we, fully or partly, understand the purpose of those details, which is predicted previously.

another skill is stopping and summarize. This skill help us remember what we have just read.

I think gmat require us read slowly a hard passage. if that is true, I want to find hard passages to practicie reading slowly and comprehensively. I think we do not need to read many easy passages
_________________

If anyone in this gmat forum is in England,Britain, pls, email to me, (thanghnvn@gmail.com) . I have some questions and need your advise. Thank a lot.

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 2289
Followers: 276

Kudos [?]: 66 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: The great migration of European intellectuals to the United [#permalink] New post 19 Sep 2014, 07:49
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: The great migration of European intellectuals to the United   [#permalink] 19 Sep 2014, 07:49
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
7 Experts publish their posts in the topic Rome’s great intellectual achievements laid in organizing th mikemcgarry 1 31 Jul 2014, 16:27
2 Popular notions about migration to the United States from Rock750 3 22 Apr 2013, 01:51
1 Migrating European starlings can eat many times their weight guygmat 4 19 Jun 2011, 07:07
intellectual capacities of students Nihit 3 01 Sep 2008, 07:53
European MBA vs. United States MBA Compendium Hjort 2 17 Sep 2005, 18:08
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The great migration of European intellectuals to the United

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.