Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 10 Jul 2014, 08:40

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The growth of the railroads led to the abolition of local

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2005
Posts: 406
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
The growth of the railroads led to the abolition of local [#permalink] New post 12 Sep 2005, 05:47
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
11. The growth of the railroads led to the abolition of local times, which was determined by when
the sun reached the observer’s meridian and differing
from city to city, and to the establishment
of regional times.

(A) which was determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian and differing
(B) which was determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian and which differed
(C) which were determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian and differing
(D) determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian and differed
(E) determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian and differing


Your views please. I will post OA later.
Thanks.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Jul 2005
Posts: 119
Location: Bangalore, India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 12 Sep 2005, 06:10
confused between B and D. Local times should be plural so we need which were .
But B uses which was...hence will go for D
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Jan 2004
Posts: 87
Location: Valsad
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 12 Sep 2005, 06:19
I chose D but the OA was not that. I doubt the given OA.
_________________

Mayur

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 804
Location: Singapore
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 12 Sep 2005, 06:20
It truly is between B and D!
Im tempted to go for B! Cant we treat local times as a singular collective noun? (sounds naive eh?)

Will go for D! :?
_________________

Cheers, Rahul.

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Jun 2005
Posts: 364
Location: London
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 12 Sep 2005, 06:27
(E)

This is a tricky one.
The best way to understand this is to split the subclause.

local times determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian

local times differing from city to city
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Jan 2004
Posts: 87
Location: Valsad
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 12 Sep 2005, 06:38
macca wrote:
(E)

This is a tricky one.
The best way to understand this is to split the subclause.

local times determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian

local times differing from city to city


I got it. It is like this: -
1. The growth of the railroads led to the abolition of local times,determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian &
2. The growth of the railroads led to the abolition of local times, differing from city to city.
Macca, Thanks for the explanation.
_________________

Mayur

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Jun 2005
Posts: 364
Location: London
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 12 Sep 2005, 06:44
Sorry for my brief explanation. yes as Mayer pinpoints it out, break up the sentences into two parts.

1) The growth of railroads led to the abolition of local times, determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian, and to the establishment of regional times.

2) The growth of the railroads led to the abolition of local times, differing from city to city, and to the establishment of regional times.


Now, here you can see that differing is prefered to differed.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2005
Posts: 406
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 12 Sep 2005, 07:56
The OA is indeed "E". But here are the few points which I had in mind:

- "differ" should be parallel with "reached" in the phase "which was determined by when
the sun reached the observer’s meridian and differing from city to city"

And this entire sentence is defining "Local Time". The sentence makes perfect sense with the word "differed" and it also parallen in the sentence.
ie,
which was determined by when
the sun reached the observer’s meridian and differed from city to city

I am sorry but I am not too clear. It would help if you could explain why "differed" is wrong.

Thanks.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5097
Location: Singapore
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 12 Sep 2005, 08:31
sgrover wrote:
The OA is indeed "E". But here are the few points which I had in mind:

- "differ" should be parallel with "reached" in the phase "which was determined by when
the sun reached the observer’s meridian and differing from city to city"

And this entire sentence is defining "Local Time". The sentence makes perfect sense with the word "differed" and it also parallen in the sentence.
ie,
which was determined by when
the sun reached the observer’s meridian and differed from city to city

I am sorry but I am not too clear. It would help if you could explain why "differed" is wrong.

Thanks.


If you use differed, this is how your sentence would look like when it is broken up:
The growth of the railroads led to the abolition of local times, differed from city to city, and to the establishment of regional times.
Does that sound right to you?

Surly, this version is correct:
The growth of the railroads led to the abolition of local times, differing from city to city, and to the establishment of regional times.
  [#permalink] 12 Sep 2005, 08:31
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
The growth of the railroads led to the abolition of local nzgmat 1 01 Dec 2004, 14:53
The growth of the railroads led to the abolition of local brahaman 5 14 Oct 2004, 10:13
The growth of the railroads led to the abolition of local Antmavel 1 17 Sep 2004, 20:40
The growth of the railroads led to the abolition of local gmataquaguy 3 23 Jul 2004, 10:53
The growth of the railroads led to the abolition of local shygo 3 12 Jul 2004, 22:52
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The growth of the railroads led to the abolition of local

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.