Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 24 Oct 2014, 23:47

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The growth of the railroads led to the abolition of local

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 09 Mar 2004
Posts: 21
Location: USA
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

The growth of the railroads led to the abolition of local [#permalink] New post 12 Mar 2004, 11:28
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

80% (01:43) correct 20% (01:40) wrong based on 17 sessions
The growth of the railroads led to the abolition of local times, which was determined by when the sun reached the observer's meridian and differing from city to city, and to the establishment of regional times.

(A)which was determined by when the sun reached the observer's meridian and differing
(B)which was determined by when the sun reached the observer's meridian and which differed
(C)which were determined by when the sun reached the observer's meridian and differing
(D)determined by when the sun reached the observer's meridian and differed
(E)determined by when the sun reached the observer's meridian and differing

:wink: Twinkle
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 12 Mar 2004
Posts: 23
Location: Falls Church, VA
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 12 Mar 2004, 11:34
I think the Answer is C. Here "Times" are being refered.
CEO
CEO
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 3470
Followers: 60

Kudos [?]: 675 [0], given: 781

Re: SC:The sun clock [#permalink] New post 12 Mar 2004, 11:55
Twinkle wrote:
The growth of the railroads led to the abolition of local times, which was determined by when the sun reached the observer's meridian and differing from city to city, and to the establishment of regional times.

(A)which was determined by when the sun reached the observer's meridian and differing
(B)which was determined by when the sun reached the observer's meridian and which differed
(C)which were determined by when the sun reached the observer's meridian and differing
(D)determined by when the sun reached the observer's meridian and differed
(E)determined by when the sun reached the observer's meridian and differing

:wink: Twinkle


this has been discussed just days ago.


The growth of rail roads led to [1] , , and [2]

1. Clearly, If you use "which" after [1], it is incorrect under the context . why?
which, the relative pronoun, is used to refer to a thing.thus, in this case, "which" cannot refer to times.

2. Also, in A and B , we need "were" to correctly modify "times".

So A, B and C are not correct. Its between D and E.

3. Now would be a good time to read up on participial phrases. Present participle contain verbs ending with -ing. Past participles are verbs ending with -ed.

if you see the original sentence, the correct form to use here is
determined - past participle ( times were determined in the past)
differing - present participle ( times are still differing)

Thus, we have E as the answer

NOTE : Participial Phrases act as adjectives.

Hope this helps
Praetorian
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 12 Mar 2004
Posts: 23
Location: Falls Church, VA
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 12 Mar 2004, 13:54
Can you please explain why C is WRONG ?

Rajbhai . . . . :?:
CEO
CEO
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 3470
Followers: 60

Kudos [?]: 675 [0], given: 781

 [#permalink] New post 14 Mar 2004, 18:12
Rajbhai wrote:
Can you please explain why C is WRONG ?

Rajbhai . . . . :?:


For one, see the "which" in C.. which can only refer to "things" and so logically "which" cannot refer to local times.

Second and equally serious problem , no parallel structure.

which were ....and differing

ok now?

regards
praetorian
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 12 Mar 2004
Posts: 23
Location: Falls Church, VA
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 15 Mar 2004, 07:05
Thanx a lot praetorian123



Rajbhai :wink:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Nov 2003
Posts: 356
Location: Illinois
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 19 Apr 2004, 07:35
praetorian123 wrote:
Rajbhai wrote:
Can you please explain why C is WRONG ?

Rajbhai . . . . :?:


For one, see the "which" in C.. which can only refer to "things" and so logically "which" cannot refer to local times.

Second and equally serious problem , no parallel structure.

which were ....and differing

ok now?

regards

praetorian


Praet,

I choose to differ on this explanation. Your exaplanation for the lack of parallelism is good and I agree with that. But the explanation regarding the use of "which" does not sound correct to me. I believe that "which" can be used for any noun as long as the noun does not refer to a human. For example,

"Operational effeciency, which reduces overhead for an organization, is hard to achieve."

In this sentence "Operational effeciency" is not a thing. but the use of "which" is correct.
CEO
CEO
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 3470
Followers: 60

Kudos [?]: 675 [0], given: 781

 [#permalink] New post 19 Apr 2004, 09:00
yes, you are right. which refers to a noun or a noun phrase.

Incorrect parallelism is what makes C incorrect.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 2352
Followers: 279

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: The growth of the railroads led to the abolition of local [#permalink] New post 11 Oct 2014, 12:52
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: The growth of the railroads led to the abolition of local   [#permalink] 11 Oct 2014, 12:52
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
The growth of the railroads led to the abolition of local reply2spg 1 12 Feb 2009, 13:26
The growth of the railroads led to the abolition of local topmbaseeker 4 07 Dec 2008, 16:08
The growth of the railroads led to the abolition of local bewakoof 10 13 Jan 2006, 15:38
The growth of the railroads led to the abolition of local hsgmat 7 02 Nov 2005, 20:38
12 The growth of the railroads led to the abolition of local HongHu 18 30 Jan 2005, 19:26
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The growth of the railroads led to the abolition of local

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.