Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 25 Jul 2014, 06:11

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The herbicide Oryzalin was still being produced in 1979,

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Nov 2007
Posts: 228
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 73 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
A Oryzal [#permalink] New post 17 Nov 2009, 01:40
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

60% (02:52) correct 40% (01:45) wrong based on 5 sessions
The herbicide Oryzalin was still being produced in 1979, three years after the wives of workers producing the chemical in Rensselaer, New York, were found to have borne children with heart defects or miscarriages, and none of their pregnancies was normal.

(A) to have borne children with heart defects or miscarriages, and none of their pregnancies was
(B) to have had children born with heart defects or miscarriages, and none of the pregnancies was
(C) either to have had children with heart defects or miscarriages, without any of their pregnancies being
(D) either to have had miscarriages or to have borne children with heart defects; none of the pregnancies was
(E) either to have had miscarriages or children born with heart defects, without any of their pregnancies being
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 28 Jul 2009
Posts: 156
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 4

Re: A Oryzal [#permalink] New post 17 Nov 2009, 02:21
jade3 wrote:
The herbicide Oryzalin was still being produced in 1979, three years after the wives of workers producing the chemical in Rensselaer, New York, were found to have borne children with heart defects or miscarriages, and none of their pregnancies was normal.

(A) to have borne children with heart defects or miscarriages, and none of their pregnancies was
(B) to have had children born with heart defects or miscarriages, and none of the pregnancies was
(C) either to have had children with heart defects or miscarriages, without any of their pregnancies being
(D) either to have had miscarriages or to have borne children with heart defects; none of the pregnancies was
(E) either to have had miscarriages or children born with heart defects, without any of their pregnancies being


C, D out either..or.. should be paralleled

I don't like Have had in B, C, D, E

So, i pick A
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2007
Posts: 1829
Location: New York
Followers: 25

Kudos [?]: 427 [0], given: 5

GMAT Tests User
Re: A Oryzal [#permalink] New post 17 Nov 2009, 10:11
bsv180985 wrote:
jade3 wrote:
The herbicide Oryzalin was still being produced in 1979, three years after the wives of workers producing the chemical in Rensselaer, New York, were found to have borne children with heart defects or miscarriages, and none of their pregnancies was normal.

(A) to have borne children with heart defects or miscarriages, and none of their pregnancies was
(B) to have had children born with heart defects or miscarriages, and none of the pregnancies was
(C) either to have had children with heart defects or miscarriages, without any of their pregnancies being
(D) either to have had miscarriages or to have borne children with heart defects; none of the pregnancies was
(E) either to have had miscarriages or children born with heart defects, without any of their pregnancies being


C, D out either..or.. should be paralleled

I don't like Have had in B, C, D, E

So, i pick A



Carefull A is wrong.

In A,B, C
to have children with heart defects or [to have Children with] miscarriages
--> Red part is illogical.. So first three are out.

between D and E

D is parallel. E is out.
_________________

Your attitude determines your altitude
Smiling wins more friends than frowning

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 23 Jun 2009
Posts: 155
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 9

GMAT Tests User
Re: A Oryzal [#permalink] New post 17 Nov 2009, 18:53
IMO "A". present perfect "have had" doesn't make sense.What is the "OA"
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 24 Oct 2009
Posts: 24
Location: Russia
Schools: IESE, SDA Bocconi
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 4

Re: A Oryzal [#permalink] New post 18 Nov 2009, 00:37
jade3 wrote:
The herbicide Oryzalin was still being produced in 1979, three years after the wives of workers producing the chemical in Rensselaer, New York, were found to have borne children with heart defects or miscarriages, and none of their pregnancies was normal.

(A) to have borne children with heart defects or miscarriages, and none of their pregnancies was
(B) to have had children born with heart defects or miscarriages, and none of the pregnancies was
(C) either to have had children with heart defects or miscarriages, without any of their pregnancies being
(D) either to have had miscarriages or to have borne children with heart defects; none of the pregnancies was
(E) either to have had miscarriages or children born with heart defects, without any of their pregnancies being



IMO, D is the answer, other variants seems absolutely wrong.
But I'm a little confused with present perfect "have had miscarriages...", because non-underlined part of the sentence refers to 1976 (...1979, three years after...)

A is wrong, as it was already said be careful with illogical part: "children with heart defects or miscarriages" - how could children have miscarriages?
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Nov 2007
Posts: 228
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 73 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
Re: A Oryzal [#permalink] New post 18 Nov 2009, 21:38
the OA is D
Expert Post
SVP
SVP
avatar
Status: Graduated
Affiliations: HEC
Joined: 28 Sep 2009
Posts: 1636
Concentration: Economics, Finance
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V44
Followers: 84

Kudos [?]: 470 [0], given: 431

GMAT Tests User Premium Member
Re: A Oryzal [#permalink] New post 07 Dec 2009, 07:36
Expert's post
Options A, B, and C imply that the women gave birth to children with miscarriages. In other words, the children possessed the miscarriages. This is nonsensical.

For E, "have had" is not parallel with "born." Also, E contains the dreaded verb "being." GMAT usually doesn't approve of this word.

D is best here. "Have had" is parallel with "have borne." The phrase following the semicolon is an independent clause. "None" matches "was."
_________________

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 23 Aug 2009
Posts: 47
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Re: A Oryzal [#permalink] New post 09 Dec 2009, 12:51
D can't be answer
none of the pregnancies was...
must be were

none belongs to SANAM pronouns which may be singular or plural depending on noun it modifies (here plural pregnancies)
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 May 2009
Posts: 204
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 71 [0], given: 13

GMAT Tests User
Re: A Oryzal [#permalink] New post 09 Dec 2009, 20:24
zura wrote:
D can't be answer
none of the pregnancies was...
must be were

none belongs to SANAM pronouns which may be singular or plural depending on noun it modifies (here plural pregnancies)


none in GMAT whenever tested is always singular .
this is an exception for sanam rule
D is correct
_________________

GMAT is not a game for losers , and the moment u decide to appear for it u are no more a loser........ITS A BRAIN GAME

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 23 Aug 2009
Posts: 47
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Re: A Oryzal [#permalink] New post 10 Dec 2009, 02:30
xcusemeplz2009 wrote:
zura wrote:
D can't be answer
none of the pregnancies was...
must be were

none belongs to SANAM pronouns which may be singular or plural depending on noun it modifies (here plural pregnancies)


none in GMAT whenever tested is always singular .
this is an exception for sanam rule
D is correct


none, all, any, some,
(depends on centext) they are not always singular!
check manhatan sc guids

none of the sentences are right ... not is
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 May 2009
Posts: 204
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 71 [0], given: 13

GMAT Tests User
Re: A Oryzal [#permalink] New post 10 Dec 2009, 03:27
zura wrote:
xcusemeplz2009 wrote:
zura wrote:
D can't be answer
none of the pregnancies was...
must be were

none belongs to SANAM pronouns which may be singular or plural depending on noun it modifies (here plural pregnancies)


none in GMAT whenever tested is always singular .
this is an exception for sanam rule
D is correct


none, all, any, some,
(depends on centext) they are not always singular!
check manhatan sc guids

none of the sentences are right ... not is


agreed zura , i am aware of sanam rule ,check this link for more clarification from one of the known manhattan staff.....
http://www.beatthegmat.com/manhattan-an ... 46667.html
_________________

GMAT is not a game for losers , and the moment u decide to appear for it u are no more a loser........ITS A BRAIN GAME

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 23 Aug 2009
Posts: 47
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Re: A Oryzal [#permalink] New post 10 Dec 2009, 13:05
http://www.urch.com/forums/gmat-sentenc ... zalin.html

anyways, thats leave this issue for discussion to kaplan and manhattan stuff... :)
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Oct 2008
Posts: 58
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 3

Re: A Oryzal [#permalink] New post 10 Dec 2009, 21:27
2 questions ?

1. in X or Y, like in B, how to know where X starts ?
I interpreted B as "to have had ... miscarriages"

2. if all things similar, when to choose "and" vs ";". For ex in B and D sentence, if first part is same, which is preferred ?

Thanks.
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Sep 2009
Posts: 62
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [1] , given: 2

Re: A Oryzal [#permalink] New post 15 Dec 2009, 12:11
1
This post received
KUDOS
tashu wrote:
2 questions ?

1. in X or Y, like in B, how to know where X starts ?
I interpreted B as "to have had ... miscarriages"
Gotcha! I think it is the reason why B is eliminate.
It could be to have had children born with heart defects or (to have had children born with) miscarriages.--> not the intended meaning. If this was the case, the sentence would mean the children born with miscarriages. BUT in D, it means the wives who have miscarriages.

2. if all things similar, when to choose "and" vs ";". For ex in B and D sentence, if first part is same, which is preferred ?
I never see question that GMAT forces you to choose between "And" and ";" per se. I have seen the grammar testing on the ; is that what follows ; must be independent clause (not phrase). However, IMHO "and" implies equal weight for both sentences(before-and and after-and sentences) but ";" implies the additional explanation on the main sentence.


My ans D.
I made my reply in blue
Hope that helps,Tashu
_________________

I am not born to be a GENIUS nor a GMATTER. If you are struggling, we are in the same boat. Fight to the last!!

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Oct 2008
Posts: 58
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 3

Re: A Oryzal [#permalink] New post 15 Dec 2009, 20:05
Thanks BMindFul. Kudos :)
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1634
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 30

Kudos [?]: 207 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
Re: A Oryzal [#permalink] New post 10 May 2010, 00:15
But in D, pregnancies is plural, so were instead of was is needed, isnt it?
Thanks.
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit


Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 04 Feb 2009
Posts: 245
Location: Ukraine
Schools: Ross 2013
WE 1: Pharmaceutical industry 5 years, C level
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 20

GMAT ToolKit User GMAT Tests User
Re: A Oryzal [#permalink] New post 11 May 2010, 06:03
The herbicide Oryzalin was still being produced in 1979, three years after the wives of workers producing the chemical in Rensselaer, New York, were found to have borne children with heart defects or miscarriages, and none of their pregnancies was normal.

(A) to have borne children with heart defects or miscarriages, and none of their pregnancies was
no clear reference
(B) to have had children born with heart defects or miscarriages, and none of the pregnancies was
miscarriages cannot be applied to children born
(C) either to have had children with heart defects or miscarriages, without any of their pregnancies being
no parallelism after idiom construction
(D) either to have had miscarriages or to have borne children with heart defects; none of the pregnancies was
parallelism + correct conjunction
(E) either to have had miscarriages or children born with heart defects, without any of their pregnancies being[/quote]
no parallell
Re: A Oryzal   [#permalink] 11 May 2010, 06:03
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
The herbicide Oryzalin was still being produced in 1979, willget800 1 25 Jan 2006, 13:38
The herbicide Oryzalin was still being produced in 1979, macca 1 13 Sep 2005, 13:36
The herbicide Oryzalin was still being produced in 1979, wild_desperado 3 28 Jun 2005, 01:40
The herbicide Oryzalin was still being produced in 1979, aryan 3 26 Jan 2005, 19:45
The herbicide Oryzalin was still being produced in 1979, krish 5 21 Sep 2004, 19:31
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The herbicide Oryzalin was still being produced in 1979,

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.