|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 877
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
10
[0], given: 0
|
The high cost of productions is severely limiting which [#permalink]
17 Jan 2007, 10:10
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
The high cost of productions is severely limiting which operas are available to the public. These costs necessitate reliance on large corporate sponsors, who in return demand that only the most famous operas be produced. Determining which operas will be produced should rest only with ticket purchasers at the box office, not with large corporate sponsors. If we reduce production budgets so that operas can be supported exclusively by box-office receipts and donations from individuals, then the public will be able to see less famous operas.
Which one of the following, if true, would weaken the argument?
(A) A few ticket purchasers go to the opera for the sake of going to the opera, not to see specific operatic productions.
(B) The reduction of opera production budgets would not reduce the desire of large corporate sponsors to support operas.
(C) Without the support of large corporate sponsors, opera companies could not afford to produce any but the most famous of operas.
(D) Large corporate sponsors will stop supporting opera productions if they are denied control over which operas will be produced.
(E) The combination of individual donations and box-office receipts cannot match the amounts of money obtained through sponsorship by large corporations.
Please support your answers with reasons...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Posts: 758
Location: Dallas, Texas
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
9
[0], given: 0
|
B !
_________________
"Education is what remains when one has forgotten everything he learned in school."
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 06 Sep 2006
Posts: 749
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
8
[0], given: 0
|
C.
If this is the answer then i will share my .02 dollars worth
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 08 Nov 2006
Posts: 1560
Location: Ann Arbor
Schools: Ross '10
Followers: 12
Kudos [?]:
155
[0], given: 1
|
I agree with C.
If there is no corporate sponsorship, producers will play safe by producing only famous operas so that they dont incur a loss.
_________________
My Profile/GMAT/MBA Story http://www.gmatclub.com/forum/111-t59345
Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 22 Sep 2006
Posts: 37
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
C
A) A few ticket purchasers go to the opera for the sake of going to the opera, not to see specific operatic productions.
- this one strengthens the argument -> a few go to any opera
(B) The reduction of opera production budgets would not reduce the desire of large corporate sponsors to support operas.
- not related to the question
(C) Without the support of large corporate sponsors, opera companies could not afford to produce any but the most famous of operas.
- opera companies will produce only famous operas, therefore there will be more not less famous operas -> weakens the argument
(D) Large corporate sponsors will stop supporting opera productions if they are denied control over which operas will be produced.
- this is part of the assumption
(E) The combination of individual donations and box-office receipts cannot match the amounts of money obtained through sponsorship by large corporations.
- not related
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 15 Sep 2006
Posts: 95
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
I agree. C is the answer.
Most people will massively attend popular operas, thus producers will only be able to produce those.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Aug 2005
Posts: 395
Location: Boston, MA
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
Re: CR-Productions [#permalink]
17 Jan 2007, 15:48
vineetgupta wrote: The high cost of productions is severely limiting which operas are available to the public. These costs necessitate reliance on large corporate sponsors, who in return demand that only the most famous operas be produced. Determining which operas will be produced should rest only with ticket purchasers at the box office, not with large corporate sponsors. If we reduce production budgets so that operas can be supported exclusively by box-office receipts and donations from individuals, then the public will be able to see less famous operas.
Which one of the following, if true, would weaken the argument?
(A) A few ticket purchasers go to the opera for the sake of going to the opera, not to see specific operatic productions. (B) The reduction of opera production budgets would not reduce the desire of large corporate sponsors to support operas. (C) Without the support of large corporate sponsors, opera companies could not afford to produce any but the most famous of operas. (D) Large corporate sponsors will stop supporting opera productions if they are denied control over which operas will be produced. (E) The combination of individual donations and box-office receipts cannot match the amounts of money obtained through sponsorship by large corporations.
Please support your answers with reasons...
errrr... C? And only by POE.
The information that:
"Without the support of large corporate sponsors, opera companies could not afford to produce any but the most famous of operas."
indicates that box office sales and donations would not be enough to cover productions even after reducing the budget.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 02 Jan 2007
Posts: 42
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
C for me, too. The argument says fewer corp. sponsors would mean more availibility of less famous operas. One possibility of that not happening is if no operas will be held at all and C provides that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Affiliations: FRM Charter holder
Joined: 02 Dec 2006
Posts: 737
Schools: Stanford, Chicago Booth, Babson College
Followers: 5
Kudos [?]:
8
[0], given: 4
|
Re: CR-Productions [#permalink]
18 Jan 2007, 06:02
vineetgupta wrote: The high cost of productions is severely limiting which operas are available to the public. These costs necessitate reliance on large corporate sponsors, who in return demand that only the most famous operas be produced. Determining which operas will be produced should rest only with ticket purchasers at the box office, not with large corporate sponsors. If we reduce production budgets so that operas can be supported exclusively by box-office receipts and donations from individuals, then the public will be able to see less famous operas.
Which one of the following, if true, would weaken the argument?
(A) A few ticket purchasers go to the opera for the sake of going to the opera, not to see specific operatic productions. (B) The reduction of opera production budgets would not reduce the desire of large corporate sponsors to support operas. (C) Without the support of large corporate sponsors, opera companies could not afford to produce any but the most famous of operas.
My answer. Without the support, opera companies do the same that they wanted to avoid doing.
(D) Large corporate sponsors will stop supporting opera productions if they are denied control over which operas will be produced. (E) The combination of individual donations and box-office receipts cannot match the amounts of money obtained through sponsorship by large corporations.
Please support your answers with reasons...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 877
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
10
[0], given: 0
|
Thanks guys, the OA is C.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Marcab, Narenn
|