Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 Oct 2014, 11:20

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The high cost of productions is severely limiting which

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 1102
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 135 [0], given: 0

The high cost of productions is severely limiting which [#permalink] New post 17 Mar 2008, 10:56
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
The high cost of productions is severely limiting which operas are available to the public. These costs necessitate reliance on large corporate sponsors, who in return demand that only the most famous operas be produced. Determining which operas will be produced should rest only with ticket purchasers at the box office, not with large corporate sponsors. If we reduce production budgets so that operas can be supported exclusively by box-office receipts and donations from individuals, then the public will be able to see less famous operas.

Which one of the following, if true, would weaken the argument?

(A) A few ticket purchasers go to the opera for the sake of going to the opera, not to see specific operatic productions.
(B) The reduction of opera production budgets would not reduce the desire of large corporate sponsors to support operas.
(C) Without the support of large corporate sponsors, opera companies could not afford to produce any but the most famous of operas.
(D) Large corporate sponsors will stop supporting opera productions if they are denied control over which operas will be produced.
(E) The combination of individual donations and box-office receipts cannot match the amounts of money obtained through sponsorship by large corporations.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 709
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 109 [0], given: 0

Re: cr lsat 5 sect 4 - 5 [#permalink] New post 17 Mar 2008, 11:13
I go for C
_________________

Persistence+Patience+Persistence+Patience=G...O...A...L

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Sep 2007
Posts: 214
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

Reviews Badge
Re: cr lsat 5 sect 4 - 5 [#permalink] New post 17 Mar 2008, 11:28
I think it must be B. Even if they reduce the budget, the sponsors will still sponsor and there will be large productions.

Hmm.. C seems right to.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Jan 2007
Posts: 73
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Re: cr lsat 5 sect 4 - 5 [#permalink] New post 17 Mar 2008, 22:36
marcodonzelli wrote:
The high cost of productions is severely limiting which operas are available to the public. These costs necessitate reliance on large corporate sponsors, who in return demand that only the most famous operas be produced. Determining which operas will be produced should rest only with ticket purchasers at the box office, not with large corporate sponsors. If we reduce production budgets so that operas can be supported exclusively by box-office receipts and donations from individuals, then the public will be able to see less famous operas.

Which one of the following, if true, would weaken the argument?

(A) A few ticket purchasers go to the opera for the sake of going to the opera, not to see specific operatic productions.
(B) The reduction of opera production budgets would not reduce the desire of large corporate sponsors to support operas.
(C) Without the support of large corporate sponsors, opera companies could not afford to produce any but the most famous of operas.
(D) Large corporate sponsors will stop supporting opera productions if they are denied control over which operas will be produced.
(E) The combination of individual donations and box-office receipts cannot match the amounts of money obtained through sponsorship by large corporations.



A close tie between C and E.
Here E refers the argument which is already stated in the premise .
In that case C makes good sense.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Jun 2007
Posts: 171
Location: Vienna, Austria
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Re: cr lsat 5 sect 4 - 5 [#permalink] New post 27 Jun 2008, 06:31
guys - the OA is C, however can someone please tell me why B is SO WRONG?

cheers
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 24 Apr 2008
Posts: 162
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 0

Re: cr lsat 5 sect 4 - 5 [#permalink] New post 27 Jun 2008, 23:16
The high cost of productions is severely limiting which operas are available to the public. These costs necessitate reliance on large corporate sponsors, who in return demand that only the most famous operas be produced. Determining which operas will be produced should rest only with ticket purchasers at the box office, not with large corporate sponsors. If we reduce production budgets so that operas can be supported exclusively by box-office receipts and donations from individuals, then the public will be able to see less famous operas.

Which one of the following, if true, would weaken the argument?

(A) A few ticket purchasers go to the opera for the sake of going to the opera, not to see specific operatic productions.
(B) The reduction of opera production budgets would not reduce the desire of large corporate sponsors to support operas.
(C) Without the support of large corporate sponsors, opera companies could not afford to produce any but the most famous of operas.
(D) Large corporate sponsors will stop supporting opera productions if they are denied control over which operas will be produced.
(E) The combination of individual donations and box-office receipts cannot match the amounts of money obtained through sponsorship by large corporations.


The conclusion is: With reduced Production costs, Opera companies can sustain the production of not so famous operas.

C - Option says that Production houses will not be able to produce less famous operas in any circumstances (Reduced Production cost might help is what is to be assumed). Though this is not a very direct and relevant ans choice I think I would chose this based on POE.

Coming to B - Desire of corporate houses is not going to affect the conclusion by any means neither does it attack any of the assumptions made. As even if the corporates desire - they would sponsor only famous operas which does not by anymeans attack the conclusion about Production costs and not so famous operas.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 01 Jan 2008
Posts: 513
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 0

Reviews Badge
Re: cr lsat 5 sect 4 - 5 [#permalink] New post 28 Jun 2008, 01:37
Why is E wrong ??
Re: cr lsat 5 sect 4 - 5   [#permalink] 28 Jun 2008, 01:37
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
The high cost of productions is severely limiting which talk2pk 12 13 Sep 2009, 20:01
The high cost of productions is severely limiting which vineetgupta 9 17 Jan 2007, 09:10
To maintain a high demand for their product, the ecotopia 6 22 May 2006, 04:55
The high cost of productions is severely limiting which shahnandan 3 31 Jan 2006, 01:19
To maintain a high demand for their product, the banerjeea_98 9 28 Apr 2005, 11:00
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The high cost of productions is severely limiting which

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.