Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 22 May 2013, 12:25
Customize  |  Hide

The idea of building New Towns to absorb growth is

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
Joined: 02 Nov 2009
Posts: 144
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 97

GMAT Tests User
The idea of building New Towns to absorb growth is [#permalink] New post 20 Aug 2012, 08:48
The idea of building “New Towns” to absorb growth is frequently considered a cure-all for urban problems. It is erroneously assumed that if new residents can be diverted from existing centers, the present urban situation at least will get no worse. It is further and equally erroneously assumed that since European New Towns have been financially and socially successful, we can expect the same sorts of results in the United States.
Present planning, thinking, and legislation will not produce the kinds of New Town that have been successful abroad. It will multiply suburbs or encourage developments in areas where land is cheap and construction profitable rather than where New Towns are genuinely needed.
Such ill-considered projects not only will fail to relieve pressures on existing cities but will, in fact, tend to weaken those cities further by drawing away high-income citizens and increasing the concentration of low-income groups that are unable to provide tax income. The remaining taxpayers, accordingly, will face increasing burdens, and industry and commerce will seek escape. Unfortunately, this mechanism is already at work in some metropolitan areas.
The promoters of New Towns so far in the United States have been developers, builders, and financial institutions. The main interest of these promoters is economic gain. Furthermore, federal regulations designed to promote the New Town idea do not consider social needs as the European New Town plans do. In fact, our regulations specify virtually all the ingredients of the typical suburban community, with a bit of political rhetoric thrown in.
A workable American New Town formula should be established as firmly here as the national formula was in Britain. All possible social and governmental innovations as well as financial factors should be thoroughly considered and accommodated in this policy. Its objectives should be clearly stated, and both incentives and penalties should be provided to ensure that the objectives are pursued. If such a policy is developed, then the New Town approach can play an important role in alleviating America’s urban problems.



It can be inferred from the passage that the author considers the present American New Town formula to be
(A) thoroughly considered
(B) insufficiently innovative
(C) potentially workable
(D) overly restrictive
(E) financially sound


Why can the answer to this not be C see highlighted text ..it clearly says that "A workable American New Town formula should be established as firmly here as the national formula was in Britain" so he belives that it is a posisbility and is a workable solution since if you work on it in terms of certain guidelines it is apotentillay workable solution .. B is innovative .. the passage does not cite anything that is innovative or insufficicent.. this is tricky .. please explain

Thankyou ...................
1 KUDOS received
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 1745
Followers: 56

Kudos [?]: 575 [1] , given: 467

Re: The idea of building “New Towns” to absorb growth [#permalink] New post 20 Aug 2012, 10:32
1
This post received
KUDOS
venmic wrote:
The idea of building “New Towns” to absorb growth is frequently considered a cure-all for urban problems. It is erroneously assumed that if new residents can be diverted from existing centers, the present urban situation at least will get no worse. It is further and equally erroneously assumed that since European New Towns have been financially and socially successful, we can expect the same sorts of results in the United States.
Present planning, thinking, and legislation will not produce the kinds of New Town that have been successful abroad. It will multiply suburbs or encourage developments in areas where land is cheap and construction profitable rather than where New Towns are genuinely needed.
Such ill-considered projects not only will fail to relieve pressures on existing cities but will, in fact, tend to weaken those cities further by drawing away high-income citizens and increasing the concentration of low-income groups that are unable to provide tax income. The remaining taxpayers, accordingly, will face increasing burdens, and industry and commerce will seek escape. Unfortunately, this mechanism is already at work in some metropolitan areas.
The promoters of New Towns so far in the United States have been developers, builders, and financial institutions. The main interest of these promoters is economic gain. Furthermore, federal regulations designed to promote the New Town idea do not consider social needs as the European New Town plans do. In fact, our regulations specify virtually all the ingredients of the typical suburban community, with a bit of political rhetoric thrown in.
A workable American New Town formula should be established as firmly here as the national formula was in Britain. All possible social and governmental innovations as well as financial factors should be thoroughly considered and accommodated in this policy. Its objectives should be clearly stated, and both incentives and penalties should be provided to ensure that the objectives are pursued. If such a policy is developed, then the New Town approach can play an important role in alleviating America’s urban problems.



It can be inferred from the passage that the author considers the present American New Town formula to be
(A) thoroughly considered
(B) insufficiently innovative
(C) potentially workable
(D) overly restrictive
(E) financially sound


Why can the answer to this not be C see highlighted text ..it clearly says that "A workable American New Town formula should be established as firmly here as the national formula was in Britain" so he belives that it is a posisbility and is a workable solution since if you work on it in terms of certain guidelines it is apotentillay workable solution .. B is innovative .. the passage does not cite anything that is innovative or insufficicent.. this is tricky .. please explain

Thankyou ...................



From red statement what do you infer (aka is not explicitly stated) ???

That in US are not so innovative as in europe.

Straight ;)
_________________

KUDOS is the good manner to help the entire community.

Re: The idea of building “New Towns” to absorb growth   [#permalink] 20 Aug 2012, 10:32
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts I'm the new kid in town (GMAT Club) rafiul_akbar 4 23 Jul 2004, 11:11
New posts SC - New Town Hall cracker_jack 6 01 Jun 2005, 20:04
Popular new posts The idea of building "New Towns" to absorb growth is eyunni 10 03 Dec 2007, 20:42
Moved topic Building large new hospitals in the bistate area would ajaygmat016 7 10 Feb 2009, 11:15
New posts 1 In Many coastal New England towns, the fisherman still shrive555 2 23 Sep 2011, 10:02
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The idea of building New Towns to absorb growth is

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.