Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 18 Apr 2014, 12:47

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The Immigration Service now has the discretionary power to

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
CEO
CEO
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 3470
Followers: 57

Kudos [?]: 649 [0], given: 781

The Immigration Service now has the discretionary power to [#permalink] New post 21 Aug 2003, 22:22
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 100% (01:24) wrong based on 1 sessions
The Immigration Service now has the discretionary power to keep families united even though all their members do not meet the five-year residency requirement.

(A) all their members do not meet the five-year residency requirement
(B) not all their members meet the five-year residency requirement
(C) all their members have not met the requirement for a five-year residency
(D) not all their members have resided for five years, a requirement
(E) all their members have not resided for five years, as required
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 18 Jun 2003
Posts: 142
Location: Hockeytown
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 21 Aug 2003, 23:05
Are you sure the question doesn't read "...even if" or "...even when? "Though" makes it sound like one isolated case.

At any rate, (A) is a smoother transition between clauses than (B), IMO. (C) - (E) make no sense.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 22 May 2003
Posts: 334
Location: Uruguay
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 22 Aug 2003, 04:23
IMO it is implied with "keep families together" that only some of the members do not meet the requirements.

Only answers B and D make that distinction. The others suggest that the whole family members do not meet the requirements (in that case they could all be deported together and the family would still be united right?).

Anyway, from B and D I would choose B.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 18 Jun 2003
Posts: 142
Location: Hockeytown
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 22 Aug 2003, 12:57
MartinMag wrote:
IMO it is implied with "keep families together" that only some of the members do not meet the requirements.

Only answers B and D make that distinction. The others suggest that the whole family members do not meet the requirements (in that case they could all be deported together and the family would still be united right?).

Anyway, from B and D I would choose B.


Hmm...not totally sure I agree with that.

"All members do not meet" is not the same as "No members meet." The constuction at the beginning of (A) is not inconsistent in this regard; it could be argued that the sound is better, because the placement of "not" after "even though" in (B) is awkward, but this wasn't enough to make me choose (B). Call me crazy.
CEO
CEO
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 3470
Followers: 57

Kudos [?]: 649 [0], given: 781

 [#permalink] New post 22 Aug 2003, 13:33
MartinMag wrote:
IMO it is implied with "keep families together" that only some of the members do not meet the requirements.

Only answers B and D make that distinction. The others suggest that the whole family members do not meet the requirements (in that case they could all be deported together and the family would still be united right?).

Anyway, from B and D I would choose B.



Your explanation is right.
For this one , the official answer is B.
GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2003
Posts: 771
Location: New York NY 10024
Schools: Haas, MFE; Anderson, MBA; USC, MSEE
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 22 Aug 2003, 14:51
JP wrote:
MartinMag wrote:
IMO it is implied with "keep families together" that only some of the members do not meet the requirements.

Only answers B and D make that distinction. The others suggest that the whole family members do not meet the requirements (in that case they could all be deported together and the family would still be united right?).

Anyway, from B and D I would choose B.


Hmm...not totally sure I agree with that.

"All members do not meet" is not the same as "No members meet." The constuction at the beginning of (A) is not inconsistent in this regard; it could be argued that the sound is better, because the placement of "not" after "even though" in (B) is awkward, but this wasn't enough to make me choose (B). Call me crazy.


Funny you should say that. In collequial English, you are right. HOWEVER, in ETS-speak, "all do not meet" means exactly that -- EVERYONE does not meet (i.e., NOBODY meets).. This is important to know for CR questions.

However, this is also relevant for SC questions. Also, in colloquial English, one can argue that A and B are equivalent; however, B has the stronger connotation of "some, but not all", hence, its meaning is clearer and thus the better choice of the two.
_________________

Best,

AkamaiBrah
Former Senior Instructor, Manhattan GMAT and VeritasPrep
Vice President, Midtown NYC Investment Bank, Structured Finance IT
MFE, Haas School of Business, UC Berkeley, Class of 2005
MBA, Anderson School of Management, UCLA, Class of 1993

Manager
Manager
Joined: 19 Oct 2003
Posts: 73
Location: USA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: SC 55-5 Akamai..please comment [#permalink] New post 27 Oct 2003, 09:45
Clearly A has no problem with meaning, right!
But B changes the meaning of A even though B sound more logical based on life experience BUT it changes the meaning.
Under ETS, changing meaning is unacceptable.
_________________

I have 2 month for gmat.

GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2003
Posts: 771
Location: New York NY 10024
Schools: Haas, MFE; Anderson, MBA; USC, MSEE
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 04 Nov 2003, 08:06
Changing the meaning is acceptable if it changes that meaning from an ambiguous or unreasonable interpretation, to one that makes sense. (i.e., the original sentence was bad).
_________________

Best,

AkamaiBrah
Former Senior Instructor, Manhattan GMAT and VeritasPrep
Vice President, Midtown NYC Investment Bank, Structured Finance IT
MFE, Haas School of Business, UC Berkeley, Class of 2005
MBA, Anderson School of Management, UCLA, Class of 1993

  [#permalink] 04 Nov 2003, 08:06
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts The Immigration Service now has the discretionary power to qhoc0010 8 29 Dec 2004, 04:31
New posts The Immigration Service now has the discretionary power to scorer 7 02 Apr 2005, 22:52
New posts The Immigration Service now has the discretionary power to joemama142000 6 24 Nov 2005, 18:48
Popular new posts The Immigration Service now has the discretionary power to vivek123 10 09 May 2006, 05:32
Popular new posts 4 The Immigration Service now has the discretionary power to technocrat 10 25 Nov 2008, 08:58
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The Immigration Service now has the discretionary power to

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.