Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 28 Aug 2014, 15:19

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The level of lead contamination in United States rivers

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Posts: 1902
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 100 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
The level of lead contamination in United States rivers [#permalink] New post 31 May 2006, 07:43
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
The level of lead contamination in United States rivers declined between 1975 and 1985. Federal regulations requiring a drop in industrial discharges of lead went into effect in 1975, but the major cause of the decline was a 75 percent drop in the use of leaded gasoline between 1975 and 1985.
Which of the following, if true, best supports the claim that the major cause of the decline in the level of lead contamination in United States rives was the decline in the use of leaded gasoline?
(A) The level of lead contamination in United States rivers fell sharply in both 1975 and 1983.
(B) Most of the decline in industrial discharges of lead occurred before 1976, but the largest decline in the level of river contamination occurred between 1980 and 1985.
(C) Levels of lead contamination in rivers fell sharply in 1975-1976 and rose very slightly over the next nine years.
(D) Levels of lead contamination rose in those rivers where there was reduced river flow due to drought.
(E) Although the use of leaded gasoline declined 75 percent between 1975 and 1985, 80 percent of the decline took place in 1985.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 May 2006
Posts: 263
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 31 May 2006, 08:10
I choose B.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 25 May 2006
Posts: 227
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 31 May 2006, 09:02
I'm going with B
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2922
Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR lead contamination [#permalink] New post 31 May 2006, 09:34
laxieqv wrote:
The level of lead contamination in United States rivers declined between 1975 and 1985. Federal regulations requiring a drop in industrial discharges of lead went into effect in 1975, but the major cause of the decline was a 75 percent drop in the use of leaded gasoline between 1975 and 1985.
Which of the following, if true, best supports the claim that the major cause of the decline in the level of lead contamination in United States rives was the decline in the use of leaded gasoline?
(A) The level of lead contamination in United States rivers fell sharply in both 1975 and 1983. Supports NONE of the claims.
(B) Most of the decline in industrial discharges of lead occurred before 1976, but the largest decline in the level of river contamination occurred between 1980 and 1985. It means that the law did not have much effect. It was the gasoline.
(C) Levels of lead contamination in rivers fell sharply in 1975-1976 and rose very slightly over the next nine years. This weakens the claim.
(D) Levels of lead contamination rose in those rivers where there was reduced river flow due to drought. Out of scope
(E) Although the use of leaded gasoline declined 75 percent between 1975 and 1985, 80 percent of the decline took place in 1985. This also weakens the claim.

_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Mar 2005
Posts: 425
Location: Phoenix
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR lead contamination [#permalink] New post 31 May 2006, 16:58
ps_dahiya wrote:
laxieqv wrote:
The level of lead contamination in United States rivers declined between 1975 and 1985. Federal regulations requiring a drop in industrial discharges of lead went into effect in 1975, but the major cause of the decline was a 75 percent drop in the use of leaded gasoline between 1975 and 1985.
Which of the following, if true, best supports the claim that the major cause of the decline in the level of lead contamination in United States rives was the decline in the use of leaded gasoline?
(A) The level of lead contamination in United States rivers fell sharply in both 1975 and 1983. Supports NONE of the claims.
(B) Most of the decline in industrial discharges of lead occurred before 1976, but the largest decline in the level of river contamination occurred between 1980 and 1985. It means that the law did not have much effect. It was the gasoline.
(C) Levels of lead contamination in rivers fell sharply in 1975-1976 and rose very slightly over the next nine years. This weakens the claim.
(D) Levels of lead contamination rose in those rivers where there was reduced river flow due to drought. Out of scope
(E) Although the use of leaded gasoline declined 75 percent between 1975 and 1985, 80 percent of the decline took place in 1985. This also weakens the claim.


Questions:

In selecting B, you're making an assumption that the drop in industrial lead discharge results in an immediate drop in lead contamination level.

Secondly, you're making an assumption, that the drop in use of leaded gasoline happened primarily after 1976. This isn't mentioned - all they mention is that the use of leaded gasoline dropped 75% between 75 and 85.
_________________

Who says elephants can't dance?

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 1133
Location: India
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 31 May 2006, 18:18
Without a doubt B.
It is the most relevant argument supporting the claim made.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5097
Location: Singapore
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 136 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 31 May 2006, 21:15
B for me. It shows that the law enacted in 1975 did not have as much effect on the decline. The steep drop between 1980 and 1985 suggest it took a while before the drop in the use of leaded gasoline has an effect on the level of lead contamination in U.S rivers.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5097
Location: Singapore
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 136 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR lead contamination [#permalink] New post 31 May 2006, 21:22
kapslock wrote:
ps_dahiya wrote:
laxieqv wrote:
The level of lead contamination in United States rivers declined between 1975 and 1985. Federal regulations requiring a drop in industrial discharges of lead went into effect in 1975, but the major cause of the decline was a 75 percent drop in the use of leaded gasoline between 1975 and 1985.
Which of the following, if true, best supports the claim that the major cause of the decline in the level of lead contamination in United States rives was the decline in the use of leaded gasoline?
(A) The level of lead contamination in United States rivers fell sharply in both 1975 and 1983. Supports NONE of the claims.
(B) Most of the decline in industrial discharges of lead occurred before 1976, but the largest decline in the level of river contamination occurred between 1980 and 1985. It means that the law did not have much effect. It was the gasoline.
(C) Levels of lead contamination in rivers fell sharply in 1975-1976 and rose very slightly over the next nine years. This weakens the claim.
(D) Levels of lead contamination rose in those rivers where there was reduced river flow due to drought. Out of scope
(E) Although the use of leaded gasoline declined 75 percent between 1975 and 1985, 80 percent of the decline took place in 1985. This also weakens the claim.


Questions:

In selecting B, you're making an assumption that the drop in industrial lead discharge results in an immediate drop in lead contamination level.

Secondly, you're making an assumption, that the drop in use of leaded gasoline happened primarily after 1976. This isn't mentioned - all they mention is that the use of leaded gasoline dropped 75% between 75 and 85.


In selecting B, you're making an assumption that the drop in industrial lead discharge results in an immediate drop in lead contamination level.

--> I think selecting B does not require an assumption that the drop in industrial lead discharge results in an immediate drop in lead contamination level. We're already told in B, that the biggest decline only came later in 1980 to 1985. This suggests that the improvement is a gradual process.

Secondly, you're making an assumption, that the drop in use of leaded gasoline happened primarily after 1976. This isn't mentioned - all they mention is that the use of leaded gasoline dropped 75% between 75 and 85.

--> We're told in the passage the use of leaded gasoline came between 75 and 85. The drop in the use was 75%. Since pre-75' there was a law and the contamination levels didn't really improve, then the improvement should have come from the declining use of leaded gasoline. No assumption is needed.

In any case, the remaining choices are just plain bad. What do you think should be the answer if you think B is a bad choice?
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 23 Apr 2006
Posts: 16
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 01 Jun 2006, 01:56
B for me too.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Posts: 1902
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 100 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 01 Jun 2006, 02:28
you all are CR kings :)
OA is B.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 22 May 2006
Posts: 176
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 01 Jun 2006, 08:22
All the other answer choices are bad. Where did you get this CR?
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 16 Aug 2005
Posts: 950
Location: France
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 03 Jun 2006, 19:00
B is an easy choice
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 1741
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 05 Jun 2006, 04:14
Will go with B too.
If the industrial discharge declined before 1976, then the possible cause for the decline in river contamination bt 1975 and 85 would be the decline in use of leaded gasoline
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 06 Sep 2006
Posts: 746
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 24 Aug 2007, 01:21
Its amazing none of the guys even considered E. I must really suck at CR, I guess!
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 03 May 2007
Posts: 48
Schools: Olin
GMAT 1: Q V
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Re: CR lead contamination [#permalink] New post 24 Aug 2007, 07:30
The level of lead contamination in United States rivers declined between 1975 and 1985. Federal regulations requiring a drop in industrial discharges of lead went into effect in 1975, but the major cause of the decline was a 75 percent drop in the use of leaded gasoline between 1975 and 1985.
Which of the following, if true, best supports the claim that the major cause of the decline in the level of lead contamination in United States rives was the decline in the use of leaded gasoline?
(A) The level of lead contamination in United States rivers fell sharply in both 1975 and 1983.
This does not explain the intended reason

(B) Most of the decline in industrial discharges of lead occurred before 1976, but the largest decline in the level of river contamination occurred between 1980 and 1985.
This one is the correct choice, it correctly says that the majot decline was not because of drop in Industrail waste discharge

(C) Levels of lead contamination in rivers fell sharply in 1975-1976 and rose very slightly over the next nine years.
This says the opposite that the main reason was drop in Industrail waste discharge

(D) Levels of lead contamination rose in those rivers where there was reduced river flow due to drought.
Irrelevant

(E) Although the use of leaded gasoline declined 75 percent between 1975 and 1985, 80 percent of the decline took place in 1985.
DEcrease could be because of any reason, so this one is ruled out
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 16 May 2007
Posts: 145
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 24 Aug 2007, 13:19
B.
  [#permalink] 24 Aug 2007, 13:19
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
The level of lead contamination in United States rivers ricokevin 3 13 Mar 2007, 18:29
The level of lead contamination in United States rivers hellom3p 4 02 Mar 2006, 09:40
The level of lead contamination in United States rivers sushom101 6 18 Oct 2005, 14:52
The level of lead contamination in United States rivers rahulraao 12 19 Sep 2005, 18:48
The level of lead contamination in United States rivers WinWinMBA 3 29 Apr 2005, 16:35
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The level of lead contamination in United States rivers

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.