Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 20 Oct 2014, 20:19

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The lobbyists argued that because there is no statistical

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2004
Posts: 329
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

The lobbyists argued that because there is no statistical [#permalink] New post 23 Aug 2006, 00:05
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
The lobbyists argued that because there is no statistical evidence that breathing other people’s tobacco smoke increases the incidence of heart disease or lung cancer in healthy nonsmokers, legislation banning smoking in workplaces cannot be justified on health grounds.

Of the following, which is the best criticism of the argument reported above?

(A) It ignores causes of lung cancer other than smoking.
(B) It neglects the damaging effects of smoke-filled air on nonsmokers who are not healthy.
(C) It fails to mention the roles played by diet, exercise, and heredity in the development of heart disease.
(D) It does not consider the possibility that nonsmokers who breathe smoke-filled air at work may become more concerned about their health.
(E) It does not acknowledge that nonsmokers, even those who breathe smoke-filled air at work, are in general healthier than smokers.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 13 Jul 2006
Posts: 327
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 23 Aug 2006, 00:58
Please tell me its (E)
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 1133
Location: India
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 1

 [#permalink] New post 23 Aug 2006, 01:00
Is it C ?
_________________

Trying hard to conquer Quant.

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 09 Oct 2005
Posts: 727
Location: Madrid
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 23 Aug 2006, 02:36
D for me on this one
_________________

IE IMBA 2010

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Posts: 57
Location: Moscow, Russia
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - Smoking [#permalink] New post 23 Aug 2006, 02:59
I'll go for B:

A - irrelevant, the argument discusses the smoking effects and ban.
B - right. The statistics the tabacco lobby cites only refers to healthy nonsmokers. Very few people are healthy.
C - irrelevant, addresses only the heart disease but not lung cancer, and if it were relevant it would provide support for the lobbyists, notr criticicize them: "yeah guys what don't you eat healthy and exercise more instead of prohibiting peiple from smoking"
D - so what if they become concerned ? anyway they may or may not- that's a weak argument
E - it doesn't matter if they are healthier in general because the ground for the ban are specific diseases and it's the evidence against those diseases that the lobbyists cite
_________________

________________________________
"Amicus Plato, sed magic amica veritas"

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 26 Jun 2006
Posts: 445
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 23 Aug 2006, 03:50
(B) looks fine.
_________________

http://mba2010dreams.blogspot.com

Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5252
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 139 [0], given: 0

Reviews Badge
 [#permalink] New post 23 Aug 2006, 04:54
Yurik79 wrote:
D for me on this one


I agree with Yurik here. These people may not take notice in their health until they suffer the consequences of second hand smoke.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 716
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 23 Aug 2006, 05:52
Caught Between B and D.

D is the better choice than B.

All other options are out of scope.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 02 Jun 2006
Posts: 1270
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 23 Aug 2006, 06:04
(B) It neglects the damaging effects of smoke-filled air on nonsmokers who are not healthy.

The lobbyists cite "affect on healthy ..." ignoring unhealthy nonsmokers who may be affected too.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 10 Oct 2005
Posts: 531
Location: US
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 23 Aug 2006, 06:13
straight one B...

argument only takes care of healthy non-smokers. that's the issue.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 06 May 2006
Posts: 782
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 23 Aug 2006, 06:22
Definitely b/w B and D.

Should be a straight B - I don't think a legislation can be raised just because people start becoming concerned; there must be some solid health ground.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 31 Jul 2006
Posts: 242
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 23 Aug 2006, 16:08
B. What's d OA?
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2922
Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 23 Aug 2006, 22:37
Between B and D, I go with D.
_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

  [#permalink] 23 Aug 2006, 22:37
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
The lobbyists argued that because there is no statistical gmatpapa 7 18 Feb 2011, 05:54
The lobbyists argued that because there is no statistical rao 6 11 Sep 2008, 12:01
The lobbyists argued that because there is no statistical balboa 4 12 Aug 2008, 06:56
The lobbyists argued that because there is no statistical crazy123 1 01 Jul 2007, 17:46
The lobbyists argued that because there is no statistical AK47 7 18 Jan 2007, 02:02
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The lobbyists argued that because there is no statistical

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.