Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 21 May 2013, 00:40
Customize  |  Hide

The Luquiens believed that everything had both a physical

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
Intern
Intern
Joined: 09 Oct 2012
Posts: 22
Schools: Bocconi '15
GMAT Date: 04-08-2013
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 28

The Luquiens believed that everything had both a physical [#permalink] New post 23 Feb 2013, 01:13
00:00

Question Stats:

48% (02:03) correct 51% (00:33) wrong based on 3 sessions
The Luquiens believed that everything had both a physical dimension and a spiritual dimension, and many Luquiens claimed to have communication with it directly through a psychedelic awakening.
(A) communication with it directly through
(B) direct communication with it by way of
(C) communication with the latter directly through
(D) direct communication with the latter by means of
(E) communication directly with the spiritual level due to


I'm confused between C and D
can't find reason to eliminate any of these :?:
Can anybody explain :|
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 01 Sep 2012
Posts: 93
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [1] , given: 18

CAT Tests
Re: The Luquiens believed that everything had both a physical [#permalink] New post 23 Feb 2013, 02:15
1
This post received
KUDOS
rajatr wrote:
The Luquiens believed that everything had both a physical dimension and a spiritual dimension, and many Luquiens claimed to have communication with it directly through a psychedelic awakening.
(A) communication with it directly through
(B) direct communication with it by way of
(C) communication with the latter directly through
(D) direct communication with the latter by means of
(E) communication directly with the spiritual level due to


I'm confused between C and D
can't find reason to eliminate any of these :?:
Can anybody explain :|


Here is what i did.
You can eliminate A and B cause you cant tell what IT refers to.
You are left with C, D, E.
Now here you must understand the meaning of the sentence.
You need to ask yourself whats the different between Direct Communication and communication directly with/through etc...
I eliminated E because i felt that Due To (which is the same as because and its better to say because of something) is idiomatically wrong.
Between C and D, which was hard to choose i just thought about the meaning of the sentence.
They wanted to emphasize that they had a Direct Communication and not a Communication Directly through...

indeed confusing. when it comes to Idioms there's not much to do...
_________________

If my answer helped, dont forget KUDOS! :)


IMPOSSIBLE IS NOTHING

GMAT Club Verbal Expert
User avatar
Status: Making every effort to create original content for you!!
Joined: 23 Dec 2010
Posts: 442
Location: United States
Concentration: Healthcare, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V34
GMAT 2: 750 Q49 V42
Followers: 86

Kudos [?]: 352 [0], given: 74

Re: The Luquiens believed that everything had both a physical [#permalink] New post 23 Feb 2013, 02:24
rajatr wrote:
The Luquiens believed that everything had both a physical dimension and a spiritual dimension, and many Luquiens claimed to have communication with it directly through a psychedelic awakening.
(A) communication with it directly through
(B) direct communication with it by way of
(C) communication with the latter directly through
(D) direct communication with the latter by means of
(E) communication directly with the spiritual level due to


I'm confused between C and D
can't find reason to eliminate any of these :?:
Can anybody explain :|


Hi rajatr,

Your doubt is totally justified. There is a subtle difference between (C) and (D),

(C) Retains the meaning of original sentence which says "directly through"

(D) "direct communication" with "spiritual dimension" makes more sense


In such a case the test taker will be in an indecisive state of mind; whether to choose something that makes more sense or to choose something that maintains the original meaning. Based on the given sentence alone we can not prove that "communication" cannot take place "directly through a psychedelic awakening". So, the choice becomes more subjective in nature than objective.

Actual GMAT questions do not have such issues. So, as I always say, best questions for practice/ analysis etc are the official questions. If you have exhausted all of your official stuff, then go for other stuff.

But, if at all I have to choose an answer, I will chose (D) just because "direct communication" sounds better than "communication directly"

Hope it helps,

Vercules
_________________

Press Kudos if you want to say thanks

Ultimate Reading Comprehension Encyclopedia | Ultimate Sentence Correction Encyclopedia | GMAT Prep Software Analysis and What If Scenarios -- VERBAL | GMAT Prep Software Analysis and What If Scenarios -- IR

Please Read and Follow the 9 Rules of Posting in Verbal Forum

Intern
Intern
Joined: 09 Oct 2012
Posts: 22
Schools: Bocconi '15
GMAT Date: 04-08-2013
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 28

Re: The Luquiens believed that everything had both a physical [#permalink] New post 24 Feb 2013, 05:13
Thanks guys ...got your point :o
Re: The Luquiens believed that everything had both a physical   [#permalink] 24 Feb 2013, 05:13
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts The Quechuans believed that all things participated in both TIANMU 5 19 Aug 2004, 07:32
New posts The Quechuans believed that all things participated in both sgrover 5 21 Sep 2005, 23:43
Popular new posts 2 EXPERTS_POSTS_IN_THIS_TOPIC The Quechuans believed that all things participated in both gmacvik 31 31 Dec 2005, 08:07
New posts Thought i had done everything right - still got a 600! mbaaspirant 5 13 Nov 2006, 23:56
New posts If 123 students are enrolled in both math and physics class, bmwhype2 3 12 Nov 2007, 09:28
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The Luquiens believed that everything had both a physical

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.