Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 23:31 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 23:31

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Oct 2013
Posts: 392
Own Kudos [?]: 5095 [26]
Given Kudos: 289
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Board of Directors
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Status:QA & VA Forum Moderator
Posts: 6072
Own Kudos [?]: 4689 [6]
Given Kudos: 463
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE:Business Development (Commercial Banking)
Send PM
General Discussion
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Status: enjoying
Posts: 5265
Own Kudos [?]: 42103 [2]
Given Kudos: 422
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Send PM
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 22 Jul 2011
Posts: 17
Own Kudos [?]: 50 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
R: K
Send PM
Re: The mathematical concept of "zero" was born not [#permalink]
1
Kudos
goodyear2013 wrote:
The mathematical concept of "zero" was born not in a single moment of revelation but evolved independently in several ancient cultures, including India, Babylonia, and the Maya Empire.

born not in a single moment of revelation but
born not in a single moment of revelation but was
not born in a single moment of revelation but
not born in a single moment of revelation but it
not born in a single moment of revelation but had

OE
A quick scan of the answer choices reveals two basic alternatives—"was born not" and "was not born." We eliminate (A) and (B) because "was born not" is not parallel to but evolved. The two verbs are being balanced by not and but. (B) also uses the passive "was evolved" which is an incorrect use of the word "evolve".

(D) unnecessarily adds the word "it." This could only be correct if the form of the sentence were ". . . was not born in a sudden moment of revelation; rather, it evolved slowly . . ." Since that is not the form used here, the word "it" is not needed.

(E) incorrectly uses the past perfect tense "had evolved" because the past perfect is only necessary to compare a sequence of events in which one event precedes another event in the past. Here, there is no sequence of time—the whole sentence is in the same past time.

(C) uses the proper "was not born" parallel to "but evolved" and the proper simple past, active form "evolved".


Hi, I thought parallel structure means if one of the verb is passive, another one must be passive.
Can anyone explain this for me, please.



Hi

An active voice entity CAN very well be parallel to a passive voice as long as the subject of the verbs is same....

Also some structures of possible imperfect lists:

1. Noun forms and “ing” noun forms (gerund).
2. Active and passive voice entities
3. Verb-ed and Verb-ing modifiers

For details please refer article by E-Gmat Experts at parallelism-imperfect-list-142791.html
Intern
Intern
Joined: 10 Aug 2017
Posts: 16
Own Kudos [?]: 6 [0]
Given Kudos: 122
GMAT 1: 720 Q48 V41
Send PM
Re: The mathematical concept of "zero" was born not [#permalink]
I was debating between option C and E.. and went with E, thinking that 'had' was properly placed.

Looks like I was wrong in thinking that it was a proper use of past perfect 'had.' Why is it incorrect? Is it because of parallelism?

'was not born..' is a simple past, so it should be 'but evolved', which is also a simple past?

thx in advance!
Manager
Manager
Joined: 09 May 2017
Posts: 82
Own Kudos [?]: 83 [1]
Given Kudos: 69
Location: India
GMAT 1: 610 Q42 V33
GMAT 2: 620 Q45 V31
GPA: 4
WE:Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
Re: The mathematical concept of "zero" was born not [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Hi HappyQuakka

Past perfect is used when 2 things are happened in past & one of them happened earlier in the past.
Here we are talking about total journey of single invention i.e. invention of concept of zero.

Hence using Had in E will not make sense.
Also of we take meaning approach the sentence would literally mean that concept was born before its actual invention.
'Concept of zero was not born in instant but had evolved independently in.......'


HappyQuakka wrote:
I was debating between option C and E.. and went with E, thinking that 'had' was properly placed.

Looks like I was wrong in thinking that it was a proper use of past perfect 'had.' Why is it incorrect? Is it because of parallelism?

'was not born..' is a simple past, so it should be 'but evolved', which is also a simple past?

thx in advance!
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17214
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: The mathematical concept of "zero" was born not [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: The mathematical concept of "zero" was born not [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6920 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne