Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 29 Jun 2016, 10:14

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The medieval scholar made almost no attempt to investigate

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 01 Nov 2005
Posts: 126
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 64 [2] , given: 0

### Show Tags

26 Aug 2006, 06:41
2
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

5% (low)

Question Stats:

86% (01:30) correct 14% (00:48) wrong based on 754 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The medieval scholar made almost no attempt to investigate the anatomy of plants, their mechanisms of growth, nor the ways where each was related to the other.

(A) nor the ways where each was related to the other
(B) nor how each was related to some other
(C) or the way where one is related to the next
(D) or the ways in which they are related to one another
(E) or the ways that each related to some other
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Jun 2005
Posts: 454
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 33 [4] , given: 0

### Show Tags

26 Aug 2006, 07:09
4
KUDOS
imaru wrote:
The medieval scholar made almost no attempt to investigate the anatomy of plants, their mechanisms of growth, nor the ways where each was related to the other.

(A) nor the ways where each was related to the other
(B) nor how each was related to some other
(C) or the way where one is related to the next
(D) or the ways in which they are related to one another
(E) or the ways that each related to some other

I'll go with D here.

I think whenever we have a nor, there should be a neither before that:
Neither X nor Y. So A and B are both out.

C is out because "where" should be used to refer to location and plus the whole sentence is just awkard.

E is out because the construction of ways that related to some other is awkward. some other what??

D is a better choice because it clearly states the ways in which the plants are related to one another.
Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5239
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 293 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

26 Aug 2006, 07:50
uvs_mba wrote:
imaru wrote:
The medieval scholar made almost no attempt to investigate the anatomy of plants, their mechanisms of growth, nor the ways where each was related to the other.

(A) nor the ways where each was related to the other
(B) nor how each was related to some other
(C) or the way where one is related to the next
(D) or the ways in which they are related to one another
(E) or the ways that each related to some other

I'll go with D here.

I think whenever we have a nor, there should be a neither before that:
Neither X nor Y. So A and B are both out.

C is out because "where" should be used to refer to location and plus the whole sentence is just awkard.

E is out because the construction of ways that related to some other is awkward. some other what??

D is a better choice because it clearly states the ways in which the plants are related to one another.

I'll second that (D) and add that "one another" is grammatically correct in showing interdependance within a group (planets)

BTW: In case you haven't heard, we are back down to 8 planets. Pluto has been put on a leash.
VP
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 1131
Location: India
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

26 Aug 2006, 09:35
Straight D.
Use "one another" to show relation among two or more things.
_________________

Trying hard to conquer Quant.

Director
Joined: 10 Oct 2005
Posts: 528
Location: US
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

26 Aug 2006, 11:36
no doubt here. or fits better than nor.

and C and E are awkward.
VP
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 1025
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

26 Aug 2006, 11:57
Yes GMATT73. Read that. Eight plantets..and eight bits..
_________________

The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

Manager
Joined: 01 Nov 2005
Posts: 126
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

27 Aug 2006, 09:34
yup. OA is D
Manager
Joined: 22 May 2005
Posts: 141
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

27 Aug 2006, 09:48
Late but D ..
Hey just to add something to the discussion ..
is it true that we can NEVER use nor without neither preceding it ????
I think I've sen sentences where nor is used alone...
e.g.
_________________

--I never think of future, it comes soon enough!!

Intern
Joined: 23 Jul 2009
Posts: 23
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 5

### Show Tags

25 Aug 2009, 00:43
uvs_mba wrote:
imaru wrote:
The medieval scholar made almost no attempt to investigate the anatomy of plants, their mechanisms of growth, nor the ways where each was related to the other.

(A) nor the ways where each was related to the other
(B) nor how each was related to some other
(C) or the way where one is related to the next
(D) or the ways in which they are related to one another
(E) or the ways that each related to some other

I'll go with D here.

I think whenever we have a nor, there should be a neither before that:
Neither X nor Y. So A and B are both out.

C is out because "where" should be used to refer to location and plus the whole sentence is just awkard.

E is out because the construction of ways that related to some other is awkward. some other what??

D is a better choice because it clearly states the ways in which the plants are related to one another.

"Nor" can be used without a "neither" before it.
Oxford dictionary:
Nor: used before the second or further of two or more alternatives (the first being introduced by a negative such as ‘neither’ or ‘not’) to indicate that they are each untrue or each do not happen.

In the sentence, the verb before "nor" is "made", and "made" itself has no negative meaning. that is why we can not use "nor" here.
Manager
Joined: 16 Feb 2010
Posts: 224
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 218 [0], given: 16

### Show Tags

06 Aug 2010, 12:56
imaru wrote:
The medieval scholar made almost no attempt to investigate the anatomy of plants, their mechanisms of growth, nor the ways where each was related to the other.

(A) nor the ways where each was related to the other
(B) nor how each was related to some other awkard
(C) or the way where one is related to the next
(D) or the ways in which they are related to one another
(E) or the ways that each related to some other

modifier question:
where is used to modify a place
the correct modifier for metaphorical uses (eg "the way") should be "in which"
Senior Manager
Status: Fighting on
Joined: 14 Mar 2010
Posts: 318
Schools: UCLA (R1 interview-WL), UNC(R2--interview-ding) Oxford(R2-Admit), Kelley (R2- Admit ), McCombs(R2)
WE 1: SE - 1
WE 2: Engineer - 3
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 28 [1] , given: 3

### Show Tags

06 Aug 2010, 20:29
1
KUDOS
-first split nor and or, throw the options with nor as the sentence already has the negative in "no"
-throw out C as where is used for locations.
- throw out E for odd usage of "some other"

Hence D
Intern
Joined: 29 Jun 2010
Posts: 7
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

06 Aug 2010, 21:56
imaru wrote:
The medieval scholar made almost no attempt to investigate the anatomy of plants, their mechanisms of growth, nor the ways where each was related to the other.

(A) nor the ways where each was related to the other
(B) nor how each was related to some other awkard
(C) or the way where one is related to the next
(D) or the ways in which they are related to one another
(E) or the ways that each related to some other

1. nor is always used with neither, A & B are gone.
2. where is a relative pronoun used to compare places, hence C is gone
E is gramatically wrong
So option D is left which contains or and is logically correct too.
Intern
Joined: 11 Oct 2009
Posts: 3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

07 Aug 2010, 02:04
hi i had a doubt here...

does not d have a problem with they.. they does not have a proper precendent..

and also i think we can use nor alone without using neither.
Intern
Joined: 29 Jun 2010
Posts: 7
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Aug 2010, 10:40
Hey thanks for correcting me ..
It is true that nor can be used alone as well, for negation of a sentence .

However here the sentence formation is of the form 'subject - parallelism'.

The solution to this problem lies in this alone. Now the sentence begins with a negative verb 'made almost no attempt' followed by parallel phrases.Hence the use of nor or subject unnecessary and repetition of negativism.
Intern
Joined: 11 Oct 2009
Posts: 3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

08 Aug 2010, 03:27
Ibnbatuta wrote:
Hey thanks for correcting me ..
It is true that nor can be used alone as well, for negation of a sentence .

However here the sentence formation is of the form 'subject - parallelism'.

The solution to this problem lies in this alone. Now the sentence begins with a negative verb 'made almost no attempt' followed by parallel phrases.Hence the use of nor or subject unnecessary and repetition of negativism.

Thanks for the clarification..

Can you help with the second doubt as well.

Usage of "They" does is it not ambiguous in option D.
Intern
Joined: 29 Jun 2010
Posts: 7
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Aug 2010, 11:00
Same parallelism ..the subject of they has already been mentioned once at the begining of sentence and does not need to be repeated due to parallelism ...
Intern
Joined: 11 Oct 2009
Posts: 3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

08 Aug 2010, 20:08
Ibnbatuta wrote:
Same parallelism ..the subject of they has already been mentioned once at the begining of sentence and does not need to be repeated due to parallelism ...

Ok !! got it thanks
Intern
Joined: 15 Aug 2010
Posts: 14
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [1] , given: 0

### Show Tags

01 Sep 2010, 00:43
1
KUDOS
nor can be used with "not" also.
1)not/neither X nor Y.
2)not/neither X or Y or ......nor Z.

Manager
Joined: 01 Jan 2011
Posts: 78
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

14 Aug 2011, 16:45
Simply D

Posted from my mobile device
_________________

_________________________
Try and you will succeed !

Manager
Joined: 14 Mar 2011
Posts: 87
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 34 [1] , given: 21

### Show Tags

04 Sep 2011, 01:40
1
KUDOS
+1 D, First it logical parallelism between the nouns, & they clearly refer to plants
Re: SC: medieval scholar   [#permalink] 04 Sep 2011, 01:40

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 28 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
It is believed that military strategists in the medieval 4 10 Apr 2013, 14:22
18 Medieval monks, through their manuscript illuminations, 14 12 Dec 2012, 18:20
12 The combat code of medieval knights resembled that of 11 24 Jul 2012, 05:19
6 It is believed that military strategists in the medieval 5 27 Apr 2012, 03:06
The medieval scholar made almost no attempt to investigate 3 20 Jun 2007, 17:15
Display posts from previous: Sort by