Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 22 Jul 2014, 19:59

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past'

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 08 May 2012
Posts: 14
Location: India
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 9

The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past' [#permalink] New post 24 Sep 2012, 06:19
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  65% (medium)

Question Stats:

23% (02:22) correct 77% (01:28) wrong based on 231 sessions
The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past' history- where brothers slit each other's throats in a gory race to kinghood - can and does not seem appalling; but still does.

A. can and does not seem appalling; but still does.
B. can and does seem appalling; but still does not.
C. should and does seem appalling; and still does.
D. can and do not seem appalling; but still do.
E. may and does seem appalling; but still doesn't do so.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by sajini on 24 Sep 2012, 20:07, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: faciendo quod indiget fieri
Joined: 13 Mar 2012
Posts: 88
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 4

Re: The misnomer that sibling rivalry [#permalink] New post 24 Sep 2012, 06:40
In my opinion answer should be C, and as the sentence should use 'should' instead of'can'.. As can has that element of doubt whereas should has the tone of force and of. Sentence correctly joins two independent clauses by a semicolon

Posted from my mobile device Image
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 27 Aug 2012
Posts: 20
Location: India
Concentration: International Business, Strategy
WE: Project Management (Manufacturing)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 1

Re: The misnomer that sibling rivalry [#permalink] New post 24 Sep 2012, 11:08
I feel its A. What's the overall.
This is a good meaning type SC. What's the level of question.

Posted from my mobile device Image
VP
VP
avatar
Status: Final Lap Up!!!
Affiliations: NYK Line
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Posts: 1095
Location: India
GMAT 1: 410 Q35 V11
GMAT 2: 530 Q44 V20
GMAT 3: 630 Q45 V31
GPA: 3.84
WE: Engineering (Transportation)
Followers: 31

Kudos [?]: 242 [0], given: 67

Re: The misnomer that sibling rivalry [#permalink] New post 24 Sep 2012, 12:09
I ll go with Option D

Reason
Sentence requires a contrast X is thought to exist,can or cannot exist,but it exists..... Do should be used after but so as to repeat Slit each other's throat
Option has got and after condition which makes the intent incomplete.
May and does seem is redundancy
Can and does seem is redundancy
Use of does is incorrect

Its a good question
Pls post OA
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 08 May 2012
Posts: 14
Location: India
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 9

Re: The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past' [#permalink] New post 24 Sep 2012, 20:00
OA is C :roll:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Status: Prevent and prepare. Not repent and repair!!
Joined: 13 Feb 2010
Posts: 278
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GPA: 3.75
WE: Sales (Telecommunications)
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 279

CAT Tests
Re: The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past' [#permalink] New post 24 Sep 2012, 23:46
This depends on the meaning of the sentence. How can we affirmatively say 'should'

_________________

I've failed over and over and over again in my life and that is why I succeed--Michael Jordan
Kudos drives a person to better himself every single time. So Pls give it generously
Wont give up till i hit a 700+

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 27 Aug 2012
Posts: 20
Location: India
Concentration: International Business, Strategy
WE: Project Management (Manufacturing)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 1

Re: The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past' [#permalink] New post 25 Sep 2012, 03:13
sajini wrote:
OA is C :roll:


Experts please tell the intended meaning of the sentence as I am really confused.
I feel B is the anwer now after searched the meaning of appalling!
Expert advice is required why C is correct.
VP
VP
avatar
Status: Final Lap Up!!!
Affiliations: NYK Line
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Posts: 1095
Location: India
GMAT 1: 410 Q35 V11
GMAT 2: 530 Q44 V20
GMAT 3: 630 Q45 V31
GPA: 3.84
WE: Engineering (Transportation)
Followers: 31

Kudos [?]: 242 [0], given: 67

Re: The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past' [#permalink] New post 25 Sep 2012, 06:39
One reason i feel C is the correct answer since it has "and" in between use of but after semi colon makes the clause as dependent clause.
Hence i feel all except C is wrong
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 20 Jul 2012
Posts: 133
Location: India
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 222

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past' [#permalink] New post 27 Aug 2013, 20:49
Can someone please give a detailed explanation...I could'nt understand the question

_________________

Kudos please if you find my post useful..

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Mar 2010
Posts: 381
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 86

CAT Tests
Re: The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past' [#permalink] New post 27 Aug 2013, 20:58
The sentence after the semicolon has to be an independent clause so that the sentence can stand on its own.

I don't see that in any of the sentences. Can somebody explain this in detail??

What is the source of this question?
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Jun 2011
Posts: 165
WE 1: Information Technology(Retail)
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 29

Re: The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past' [#permalink] New post 29 Aug 2013, 01:03
Weird question. Just could not comprehend it and the ans choices :?
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 26 May 2012
Posts: 43
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 11

Re: The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past' [#permalink] New post 02 Jan 2014, 20:52
I have no idea what the sentence is saying...
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jan 2013
Posts: 180
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 69 [1] , given: 54

Re: The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past' [#permalink] New post 02 Jan 2014, 21:51
1
This post received
KUDOS
catalysis wrote:
I have no idea what the sentence is saying...

The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past' history- where brothers slit each other's throats in a gory race to kinghood - can and does not seem appalling; but still does.

While reading the question stem, we see that a portion of the sentence is dashed. This is called an "em dash" or a "dash" and it replaces commas, semicolons, colons, and parentheses to indicate added emphasis, an interruption, or an abrupt change of thought. The info provided between the dashes gives additional information about sibling rivalry. For convenience, you can ignore the same. The construction is now as follows.

The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past' history can and does not seem appalling; but still does.

Further breaking it down (or rather expanding it - by placing the omitted verb + object)

The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past' history can seem appalling, and does not seem appalling; but still does.

A. can and does not seem appalling; but still does.
can seem appalling and does not seem appalling - doesn't make sense.
B. can and does seem appalling; but still does not.
can seem appalling and does seem appalling; but still does not - doesn't make sense again
C. should and does seem appalling; and still does.
should seem appalling and does seem appalling; and still does - Good enough.
D. can and do not seem appalling; but still do.
can seem appalling and do not seem appalling - doesn't make sense again
E. may and does seem appalling; but still doesn't do so.
may seem appalling and does seem appalling; but still doesn't do so - wordy (after semicolon) and doesn't make any sense.

_________________

Read my posts...
What are modifiers ??

Re: The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past'   [#permalink] 02 Jan 2014, 21:51
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Experts publish their posts in the topic Business School with Sibling doggdetroit 1 12 Mar 2012, 18:50
PS MGMAT - Siblings (probability) siddhans 1 21 Jun 2011, 21:25
Experts publish their posts in the topic The plot of The Bostonians centers on the rivalry between pzazz12 4 22 Oct 2010, 05:03
9 Experts publish their posts in the topic There are four distinct pairs of brothers and sisters. In bmwhype2 19 02 Dec 2007, 13:57
Within the boundaries of artistic rivalry lies a sense of HIMALAYA 14 15 Jun 2005, 20:41
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The misnomer that sibling rivalry is a thing of the 'past'

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.