saman283 wrote:
GMATNinja mikemcgarry VeritasKarishma Hi verbal experts, please help me understand where I am going wrong with my reasoning.
Hi
saman283,
I think we should start by changing our target outcome. Verbal is (generally) not about yes/no choices. When the question says "which of the following, if true,
most strongly suggests {ABC}", it is
not asking us to guarantee that particular {ABC}, whatever it may be. Instead, we want the best
option. It doesn't even have to be particularly convincing.
It just has to be better than the other four options. In other words, try not to look for an option that guarantees that the spread of TC will not be stopped. Look for something that gets you
closer to what the question stem says than the other options do.
saman283 wrote:
According to the question, I have to identify an answer choice that will say that even if we test ALL the visitors from Y, the spread of TC will not be stopped. In other words, TC will spread even after the proposed plan of testing all the visitors.
Here's the question stem:
ldpedroso wrote:
Which of the following, if true, most strongly suggests that the proposed medical examinations will not help curb the spread of tuberculosis in Country X?
"Will not help curb"
~ "will not help reduce".
The word help is particularly important here.
saman283 wrote:
Now, if I go by option B, I can say that we won't be able to detect all the carriers of TC. This means, there might be a few people who would have TC and still enter country X. These people would add to the spreading of TC in country X.
In order for the plan to work we need to ensure that NO ONE with TC enters the country X. Because even if one person enters, we can't say that the spread has been curbed.
Let's go back to the fact that we are working with measures to help reduce (or help limit) the spread of TB. Again, focus on
help. Imagine that you're in charge of selecting measures that will help reduce the spread of COVID-19 in your country. Would you not use medical tests just because no medical test is 100% effective? The point is that even if medical technology is not perfect, it is still possible to use medical examinations as part of a strategy to help reduce the spread of a disease.
saman283 wrote:
As for option D, how does it help if TC does not get spread through human contact. it could very well be transmitted from a TC-infected person to air / food and then affect more people in country X. How does D weaken the plan's outcome.
If we had to choose measures to help limit the spread of a disease, when would we reject medical examinations of humans? Option B says that we should reject medical examinations of humans if the examinations cannot detect every single carrier of the disease. Option D says that we should reject medical examinations of humans if the disease doesn't spread through human contact.
That's the real choice here, and even though we could weaken D (the way you did), I'd say that D is better than B.
_________________
Free Comprehensive CR Course: youtube.com/@DelvAcademy/playlists