Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 21 Oct 2014, 12:39

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The odds are about 4 to 1 against surviving a takeover

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Mar 2008
Posts: 102
Schools: Tuck, Duke
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

The odds are about 4 to 1 against surviving a takeover [#permalink] New post 27 Sep 2008, 07:30
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
The odds are about 4 to 1 against surviving a takeover offer, and many business consultants therefore advise that a company’s first line of defense in eluding offers like these be to even refuse to take calls from likely corporate raiders.

(A) that a company’s first line of defense in eluding offers like these be to even refuse

(B) that a company’s first line of defense in eluding such offers be to refuse even

(C) a company defending itself against offers of this kind that, as a first line of defense, they should even refuse

(D) companies which are defending themselves against such an offer that, as a first line of defense, they should even refuse

(E) that the first line of defense for a company who is eluding offers like these is the refusal even
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 Apr 2008
Posts: 90
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Re: SC: takeover [#permalink] New post 29 Sep 2008, 02:08
arorag wrote:
The odds are about 4 to 1 against surviving a takeover offer, and many business consultants therefore advise that a company’s first line of defense in eluding offers like these be to even refuse to take calls from likely corporate raiders.

(A) that a company’s first line of defense in eluding offers like these be to even refuse

(B) that a company’s first line of defense in eluding such offers be to refuse even

(C) a company defending itself against offers of this kind that, as a first line of defense, they should even refuse -AWKWARD

(D) companies which are defending themselves against such an offer that, as a first line of defense, they should even refuse -AWKWARD

(E) that the first line of defense for a company who is eluding offers like these is the refusal even


IMO A
THE TERM "EVEN TO.." DOESNT MAKE SENSE TO ME, 'REFUSE' SHUD BE FOLLOWED BY "TO"

GUYS ,PLS HELP ME REGARDING THE USE OF "EVEN" & "BOTH". I GET REALLY CONFUSED WHEN THEY ARE USED
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1578
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 186 [0], given: 0

Re: SC: takeover [#permalink] New post 29 Sep 2008, 02:23
"that" is required. Hence, C and D are out. E does not look right. Between A and B, "such" is better than "like" and hence I will go with B.
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Aug 2008
Posts: 150
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 30 [1] , given: 0

Re: SC: takeover [#permalink] New post 29 Sep 2008, 05:18
1
This post received
KUDOS
arorag wrote:
The odds are about 4 to 1 against surviving a takeover offer, and many business consultants therefore advise that a company’s first line of defense in eluding offers like these be to even refuse to take calls from likely corporate raiders.

(A) that a company’s first line of defense in eluding offers like these be to even refuse

(B) that a company’s first line of defense in eluding such offers be to refuse even

(C) a company defending itself against offers of this kind that, as a first line of defense, they should even refuse

(D) companies which are defending themselves against such an offer that, as a first line of defense, they should even refuse

(E) that the first line of defense for a company who is eluding offers like these is the refusal even

IMO A

Both A & B give correct subjunctive mood.

Correct idiom is such as & not such.
Further such as should be interchangably used for 'for example'. substituting for example in B doesnt make any sense.

B would heve been correct if : ...in eluding such offers as these...
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Jul 2008
Posts: 154
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Re: SC: takeover [#permalink] New post 29 Sep 2008, 05:33
I would go with B.
Both, A and E appear correct but in E, the language of the sentence is such that it seems to state a "fact" rather than give an advice.
The use of "is" is more of a statement in E whereas, the use of "be" in B is more of an advice.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2007
Posts: 1829
Location: New York
Followers: 27

Kudos [?]: 472 [0], given: 5

Re: SC: takeover [#permalink] New post 29 Sep 2008, 05:50
arorag wrote:
The odds are about 4 to 1 against surviving a takeover offer, and many business consultants therefore advise that a company’s first line of defense in eluding offers like these be to even refuse to take calls from likely corporate raiders.

(A) that a company’s first line of defense in eluding offers like these be to even refuse

(B) that a company’s first line of defense in eluding such offers be to refuse even

(C) a company defending itself against offers of this kind that, as a first line of defense, they should even refuse

(D) companies which are defending themselves against such an offer that, as a first line of defense, they should even refuse

(E) that the first line of defense for a company who is eluding offers like these is the refusal even


C,D out
they -- no clear referrant

like is not appropriate in A and E.

like these offers ---> offers similar to surviving take over offers
such offers ---> surviving take over offers.

logically "such offers" make sesne here.

IMO
B should be the answer.
_________________

Your attitude determines your altitude
Smiling wins more friends than frowning

Retired Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 18 Jul 2008
Posts: 997
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 76 [0], given: 5

Re: SC: takeover [#permalink] New post 29 Sep 2008, 10:37
I don't think "like" in Answer A is appropriate, therefore, I agree with B.

But as jatinrai eluded to, we need "such as" to be the correct idiom - so that would eliminate B.

SO now, I'm officially confused.

x2suresh wrote:
arorag wrote:
The odds are about 4 to 1 against surviving a takeover offer, and many business consultants therefore advise that a company’s first line of defense in eluding offers like these be to even refuse to take calls from likely corporate raiders.

(A) that a company’s first line of defense in eluding offers like these be to even refuse

(B) that a company’s first line of defense in eluding such offers be to refuse even

(C) a company defending itself against offers of this kind that, as a first line of defense, they should even refuse

(D) companies which are defending themselves against such an offer that, as a first line of defense, they should even refuse

(E) that the first line of defense for a company who is eluding offers like these is the refusal even


C,D out
they -- no clear referrant

like is not appropriate in A and E.

like these offers ---> offers similar to surviving take over offers
such offers ---> surviving take over offers.

logically "such offers" make sesne here.

IMO
B should be the answer.
1 KUDOS received
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2007
Posts: 1829
Location: New York
Followers: 27

Kudos [?]: 472 [1] , given: 5

Re: SC: takeover [#permalink] New post 29 Sep 2008, 10:47
1
This post received
KUDOS
bigfernhead wrote:
I don't think "like" in Answer A is appropriate, therefore, I agree with B.

But as jatinrai eluded to, we need "such as" to be the correct idiom - so that would eliminate B.

SO now, I'm officially confused.

x2suresh wrote:
arorag wrote:
The odds are about 4 to 1 against surviving a takeover offer, and many business consultants therefore advise that a company’s first line of defense in eluding offers like these be to even refuse to take calls from likely corporate raiders.

(A) that a company’s first line of defense in eluding offers like these be to even refuse

(B) that a company’s first line of defense in eluding such offers be to refuse even

(C) a company defending itself against offers of this kind that, as a first line of defense, they should even refuse

(D) companies which are defending themselves against such an offer that, as a first line of defense, they should even refuse

(E) that the first line of defense for a company who is eluding offers like these is the refusal even


C,D out
they -- no clear referrant

like is not appropriate in A and E.

like these offers ---> offers similar to surviving take over offers
such offers ---> surviving take over offers.

logically "such offers" make sesne here.

IMO
B should be the answer.


i don't think "such as" required here.. you are not listing the examples after "such"

1) such as surviving a takeover
2) such offers.. clearly refers to offers that mentioned earlier (surving takeover offers) ..
(more concise)

both are correct and idiomatic..
2 is concise and clear too.. 1 is wordy.. I will choose 2 even if statement (1) exists in the answer choices.

Any takers.
_________________

Your attitude determines your altitude
Smiling wins more friends than frowning

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1300
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 126 [0], given: 0

Re: SC: takeover [#permalink] New post 29 Sep 2008, 16:45
I go with B

arorag wrote:
The odds are about 4 to 1 against surviving a takeover offer, and many business consultants therefore advise that a company’s first line of defense in eluding offers like these be to even refuse to take calls from likely corporate raiders.

(A) that a company’s first line of defense in eluding offers like these be to even refuse

(B) that a company’s first line of defense in eluding such offers be to refuse even

(C) a company defending itself against offers of this kind that, as a first line of defense, they should even refuse

(D) companies which are defending themselves against such an offer that, as a first line of defense, they should even refuse

(E) that the first line of defense for a company who is eluding offers like these is the refusal even
confusing
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Mar 2008
Posts: 102
Schools: Tuck, Duke
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

Re: SC: takeover [#permalink] New post 02 Oct 2008, 19:59
Thanks for the nice disscussion. OA is B
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1406
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 121 [0], given: 0

Re: SC: takeover [#permalink] New post 05 Oct 2008, 17:38
arorag wrote:
The odds are about 4 to 1 against surviving a takeover offer, and many business consultants therefore advise that a company’s first line of defense in eluding offers like these be to even refuse to take calls from likely corporate raiders.

(A) that a company’s first line of defense in eluding offers like these be to even refuse

(B) that a company’s first line of defense in eluding such offers be to refuse even

(C) a company defending itself against offers of this kind that, as a first line of defense, they should even refuse

(D) companies which are defending themselves against such an offer that, as a first line of defense, they should even refuse

(E) that the first line of defense for a company who is eluding offers like these is the refusal even


Long time NO subjunctive !!!
C,E eliminated since no that ,advise that is the one we are looking for

E ->company who is actually wrong OUT

between A and B B is better since in A like these is not correct
Hence IMO B
OA plss
_________________

cheers
Its Now Or Never

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1406
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 121 [0], given: 0

Re: SC: takeover [#permalink] New post 05 Oct 2008, 17:39
spriya wrote:
arorag wrote:
The odds are about 4 to 1 against surviving a takeover offer, and many business consultants therefore advise that a company’s first line of defense in eluding offers like these be to even refuse to take calls from likely corporate raiders.

(A) that a company’s first line of defense in eluding offers like these be to even refuse

(B) that a company’s first line of defense in eluding such offers be to refuse even

(C) a company defending itself against offers of this kind that, as a first line of defense, they should even refuse

(D) companies which are defending themselves against such an offer that, as a first line of defense, they should even refuse

(E) that the first line of defense for a company who is eluding offers like these is the refusal even


Long time NO subjunctive !!!
C,E eliminated since no that ,advise that is the one we are looking for

E ->company who is actually wrong OUT

between A and B B is better since in A like these is not correct
Hence IMO B
OA plss

OOps OA is there
Didnt notice the discussio while posting
Good question and discussion!!!
_________________

cheers
Its Now Or Never

Re: SC: takeover   [#permalink] 05 Oct 2008, 17:39
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
5 The odds are about 4 to 1 against surviving a takeover tejal777 13 01 Aug 2009, 01:49
The odds are about 4 to 1 against surviving a takeover acer2knight 1 29 Jun 2009, 00:32
The odds are about 4 to 1 against surviving a takeover lnaik 1 01 Oct 2007, 09:30
The odds are about 4 to 1 against surviving a takeover gmacvik 11 14 Oct 2005, 21:50
The odds are about 4 to 1 against surviving a takeover okdongdong 2 24 Jul 2005, 00:52
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The odds are about 4 to 1 against surviving a takeover

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.