The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR) - Page 2
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 23 Jan 2017, 03:54

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 18 Aug 2014
Posts: 169
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 740 Q47 V45
GMAT 2: 730 Q48 V42
GPA: 3.13
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 77

Re: The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Mar 2016, 15:00
Can someone explain to me how C is also wrong?

Last line of statement "So if the temperature in the Brazilian ash's environment never exceeded 95 degrees Fahrenheit, its rings would be a reliable measure of the tree's age."

C directly combats the usage of the word "never" in this statement. So the argument assumes that if the environment ever exceeds 95 degrees then it will lose a ring. Answer choice C is essentially this assumption.

The statement also says before this point ""often peel away" not "always", so by it's own admission the final sentence is harsher than the evidence given.
_________________

Jamboree GMAT Instructor
Status: GMAT Expert
Affiliations: Jamboree Education Pvt Ltd
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 294
Location: India
Followers: 67

Kudos [?]: 246 [0], given: 1

Re: The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Mar 2016, 22:11
"C" gives an additional information. It states another fact. It is not a necessary assumption."Only one day of temperature" also is rather extreme in its tone.
_________________

Aryama Dutta Saikia
Jamboree Education Pvt. Ltd.

VP
Joined: 18 Sep 2014
Posts: 1120
Location: India
Followers: 35

Kudos [?]: 568 [1] , given: 72

Re: The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Apr 2016, 06:02
1
KUDOS
The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by counting the number of internal rings in its trunk is generally true.
However, to help regulate the internal temperature of the tree, the outermost layers of wood of the Brazilian ash often peel away when the temperature exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit, leaving the tree with fewer rings than it would otherwise have. So if the temperature in the Brazilian ash's environment never exceeded 95 degrees Fahrenheit, its rings would be a reliable measure of the tree's age.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends?
(B) Only the Brazilian ash loses rings because of excessive heat...................we are bothered about this particular tree. It does not matter if others lose rings due to some reason.
(C) Only one day of temperatures above 95 degrees Fahrenheit is needed to cause the Brazilian ash to lose a ring........duration of heat exposure need not be assumed.
(D) The internal rings of all trees are of uniform thickness.....................thickness is additional information and need not be assumed.

While we can easily eliminate options B, C and D since they are out of scope.
Most of the candidates above(including me) got stuck between A and E.

(A) The growth of new rings in a tree is not a function of levels of precipitation..............TRAP choice. This seems to indicate that during the scenario of more than 95 degrees Fahrenheit temperature tree only loses rings and does not grow them. This seems to divert us towards reverse causality assumption but there is no reason to assume anything like that regarding growth of new rings.

(E) The number of rings that will be lost when the temperature exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit is not predictable
This may not look as attractive as option A but is the correct answer and can be veified through negation test.
If the number of rings is predictable then we can easily decide the tree age even if in high temperatures and this collapses the argument.

_________________

The only time you can lose is when you give up. Try hard and you will suceed.
Thanks = Kudos. Kudos are appreciated

http://gmatclub.com/forum/rules-for-posting-in-verbal-gmat-forum-134642.html
When you post a question Pls. Provide its source & TAG your questions
Avoid posting from unreliable sources.

My posts
http://gmatclub.com/forum/beauty-of-coordinate-geometry-213760.html#p1649924
http://gmatclub.com/forum/calling-all-march-april-gmat-takers-who-want-to-cross-213154.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/possessive-pronouns-200496.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/double-negatives-206717.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/the-greatest-integer-function-223595.html#p1721773

Current Student
Joined: 02 May 2015
Posts: 273
Location: South Africa
GPA: 3.49
WE: Web Development (Insurance)
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 23

Re: The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 May 2016, 03:56
It's easily E

Premise : Tree loses rings if temp > 95 F
Conclusion : Rings a reliable source only if temp < 95 F

Gap : There is no alternate method of determining the age other than the ring itself.

E perfectly fills that. That loss of rings can't be predicted.

A and C are traps.
_________________

Kudos if I helped

Current Student
Joined: 02 May 2015
Posts: 273
Location: South Africa
GPA: 3.49
WE: Web Development (Insurance)
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 23

Re: The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 May 2016, 04:01
redfield wrote:
Can someone explain to me how C is also wrong?

Last line of statement "So if the temperature in the Brazilian ash's environment never exceeded 95 degrees Fahrenheit, its rings would be a reliable measure of the tree's age."

C directly combats the usage of the word "never" in this statement. So the argument assumes that if the environment ever exceeds 95 degrees then it will lose a ring. Answer choice C is essentially this assumption.

The statement also says before this point ""often peel away" not "always", so by it's own admission the final sentence is harsher than the evidence given.

Hi redfield,

C states that "Only one day of temperatures above 95 degrees Fahrenheit is needed to cause the Brazilian ash to lose a ring."

Where does one day come from? You can easily eliminate such options because assumptions can't have facts that are not in the premise or conclusion. If you think about it, maybe even 1 second of temp > 95 F can cause the tree to shed some rings ( Just discussing the options). I have a hard and first rule to ignore any options which carry numerical facts and figures not given in the conc and premise.
_________________

Kudos if I helped

Manager
Joined: 18 Sep 2015
Posts: 100
GMAT 1: 610 Q43 V31
GMAT 2: 610 Q47 V27
GMAT 3: 650 Q48 V31
GMAT 4: 700 Q49 V35
WE: Project Management (Health Care)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 611

Re: The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 May 2016, 07:57
Swagatalakshmi wrote:
The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by counting the number of internal rings in its trunk is generally true. However, to help regulate the internal temperature of the tree, the outermost layers of wood of the Brazilian ash often peel away when the temperature exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit, leaving the tree with fewer rings than it would otherwise have. So if the temperature in the Brazilian ash's environment never exceeded 95 degrees Fahrenheit, its rings would be a reliable measure of the tree's age.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends?
(A) The growth of new rings in a tree is not a function of levels of precipitation.
(B) Only the Brazilian ash loses rings because of excessive heat.
(C) Only one day of temperatures above 95 degrees Fahrenheit is needed to cause the Brazilian ash to lose a ring.
(D) The internal rings of all trees are of uniform thickness.
(E) The number of rings that will be lost when the temperature exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit is not predictable

We have several assumptions here:
1. The reliability of the method described depends on the number of internal rings. Hence the assumption implied is that the number of rings does not changes.
2. There isn't another factor that can influence the mentioned system reliability.

[X] - A - precipitation is not relevant to the discuss, and hence out of scope.
[X] - B - this does not influence the conclusion.
[X] - C - not relevant.
[X] - D - this is not relevant.
[V] - E - If the number of rings is predictable, then the number of rings can changes, and hence this negates the assumption. so this statement must be true for the conclusion to hold.
Manager
Joined: 22 Sep 2015
Posts: 118
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 136

Re: The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 May 2016, 14:46
I got this wrong initially, but the more I think about it, I understand why E works.

When doing the negation the proper negation of choice E is: The number of rings that will be lost when the temperature DOES NOT exceed 95 degrees Fahrenheit is not predictable

The conclusion clearly says that when temp is <95 degrees its predictable. Thus, negating E makes the conclusion fall apart, so E is the answer.
Manager
Joined: 27 Feb 2015
Posts: 58
Concentration: General Management, Economics
GMAT 1: 630 Q42 V34
WE: Engineering (Transportation)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 56

Re: The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Oct 2016, 11:48
The argument concludes that " rings are not a reliable measure for the age if temp exceeds 95 " . The basis of the conclusion is when temp goes beyond 95 rings are lost

(A) The growth of new rings in a tree is not a function of levels of precipitation.- even if growth of new ring is the function of levels of precipitation, it can still be counted and it can still be reliable indicator provided temp is <95. doesn't shatter my conclusion

(B) Only the Brazilian ash loses rings because of excessive heat. - so what?

(C) Only one day of temperatures above 95 degrees Fahrenheit is needed to cause the Brazilian ash to lose a ring. - doesn't matter how many days it takes to lose the ring, the ring can still be a reliable measure of the age.

(D) The internal rings of all trees are of uniform thickness. - irrelevant

(E) The number of rings that will be lost when the temperature exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit is not predictable - ok! lets negate - if they can be counted when temp >95, then why the whole fuss, just add them up and itll be a reliable indicator even when temp is >95, shatters the conclusion - CORRECT
Intern
Joined: 03 Sep 2016
Posts: 21
Location: India
GPA: 3.7
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 7

Re: The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Dec 2016, 09:10
No way E is correct.
Conclusion-If the temperature in the Brazilian ash's environment never exceeded 95 degrees Fahrenheit, its rings would be a reliable measure of the tree's age.
Negate E:The number of rings that will be lost when the temperature exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit is predictable.
This choice doesn't break the conclusion in any way.So E is not correct.

I think there is a typo in the question.I checked on other sites, and the correct version seems to be this,
The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by counting the number of internal rings in its trunk is generally true. However, to help regulate the internal temperature of the tree, the outermost layers of wood of the Brazilian ash often peel away when the temperature exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit, leaving the tree with fewer rings than it would otherwise have. So ONLY if the temperature in the Brazilian ash's environment never exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit will its rings be a reliable measure of the tree's age.

The version of the question in the OP omits the word 'only', which is quite important to get the correct answer.
Re: The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by   [#permalink] 30 Dec 2016, 09:10

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 29 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
3 CR Revision: The popular notion that a tree’s age can be determined by 3 31 Jan 2016, 23:03
13 A tree's age can be determined by counting the 8 05 Apr 2015, 07:15
Assumption Revision: The popular notion that a tree’s age 3 22 Feb 2015, 20:25
14 The popular notion that a tree s age can be determined by 17 24 Nov 2011, 00:53
11 The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by 39 13 Oct 2009, 05:54
Display posts from previous: Sort by