Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 21 Oct 2014, 06:15

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Jun 2008
Posts: 90
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by [#permalink] New post 09 Jun 2008, 19:37
The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by counting the number of internal rings in its trunk is generally true. However, to help regulate the internal temperature of the tree, the outermost layers of wood of the Brazilian ash often peel away when the temperature exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit, leaving the tree with fewer rings than it would otherwise have. So only if the temperature in the Brazilian ash's environment never exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit will its rings be a reliable measure of the tree's age.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends?

A)The growth of new rings in a tree is not a function of levels of precipitation.

B)Only the Brazilian ash loses rings because of excessive heat.

C)Only one day of temperatures above 95 degrees Fahrenheit is needed to cause the Brazilian ash to lose a ring.

D)The internal rings of all trees are of uniform thickness.

E)The number of rings that will be lost when the temperature exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit is not predictable.

I dont know how the answer couldn't be C. From C we get that even when the temperature goes above 95 for one day, a ring is lost. From the original sentence we dont know how long of a period is needed for a ring to decrease nor how many rings decrease per day when the temp is above 95.
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1941
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Followers: 18

Kudos [?]: 321 [0], given: 1

Premium Member
Re: MGMAT RC spoiler [#permalink] New post 09 Jun 2008, 19:50
lionheart187 wrote:
The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by counting the number of internal rings in its trunk is generally true. However, to help regulate the internal temperature of the tree, the outermost layers of wood of the Brazilian ash often peel away when the temperature exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit, leaving the tree with fewer rings than it would otherwise have. So only if the temperature in the Brazilian ash's environment never exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit will its rings be a reliable measure of the tree's age.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends?

A)The growth of new rings in a tree is not a function of levels of precipitation.

B)Only the Brazilian ash loses rings because of excessive heat.

C)Only one day of temperatures above 95 degrees Fahrenheit is needed to cause the Brazilian ash to lose a ring.

D)The internal rings of all trees are of uniform thickness.

E)The number of rings that will be lost when the temperature exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit is not predictable.

I dont know how the answer couldn't be C. From C we get that even when the temperature goes above 95 for one day, a ring is lost. From the original sentence we dont know how long of a period is needed for a ring to decrease nor how many rings decrease per day when the temp is above 95.


I think you have fallen in the trap C. C does say that temperature >95 degree causes rings lost. But the argument do not say about the causality, but about the sign that WHEN above 95 degree, the rings lost. You have lured to the disdirection.! The trap made successfully! And count me in sometime! :lol:
_________________

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 14 Aug 2007
Posts: 735
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 104 [0], given: 0

Re: MGMAT RC spoiler [#permalink] New post 09 Jun 2008, 20:47
is the answer A.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 283
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

Re: MGMAT RC spoiler [#permalink] New post 09 Jun 2008, 21:32
lionheart187 wrote:
The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by counting the number of internal rings in its trunk is generally true. However, to help regulate the internal temperature of the tree, the outermost layers of wood of the Brazilian ash often peel away when the temperature exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit, leaving the tree with fewer rings than it would otherwise have. So only if the temperature in the Brazilian ash's environment never exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit will its rings be a reliable measure of the tree's age.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends?

A)The growth of new rings in a tree is not a function of levels of precipitation.

B)Only the Brazilian ash loses rings because of excessive heat.

C)Only one day of temperatures above 95 degrees Fahrenheit is needed to cause the Brazilian ash to lose a ring.

D)The internal rings of all trees are of uniform thickness.

E)The number of rings that will be lost when the temperature exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit is not predictable.

I dont know how the answer couldn't be C. From C we get that even when the temperature goes above 95 for one day, a ring is lost. From the original sentence we dont know how long of a period is needed for a ring to decrease nor how many rings decrease per day when the temp is above 95.



My pick for this question would be E. i m just using the denial test on this one. what is the OA for this one .
_________________

The world is continuous, but the mind is discrete

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Jun 2008
Posts: 90
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

Re: MGMAT RC spoiler [#permalink] New post 10 Jun 2008, 05:08
OA is E
Re: MGMAT RC spoiler   [#permalink] 10 Jun 2008, 05:08
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 Popular notions about migration to the United States from Rock750 3 22 Apr 2013, 01:51
1 Experts publish their posts in the topic The popular belief that a snake's age can be determined by Vercules 2 19 Feb 2013, 12:21
8 The popular notion that a tree s age can be determined by ksp 15 24 Nov 2011, 00:53
3 The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by hogann 35 13 Oct 2009, 05:54
The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by Swagatalakshmi 26 07 Dec 2006, 19:27
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.